Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Traders' Corner

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Where will WTI close on December 31st, 2005?

Poll ended at Tue 03 Jan 2006, 04:44:43

less than $60
10
No votes
around $60
12
No votes
around $65
23
No votes
around $70
12
No votes
more than $70
15
No votes
 
Total votes : 72

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby tdrive » Wed 09 Nov 2005, 14:55:21

Cold weather coming...

Cheers,

Edited: deleted the weather chart:

http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/products/predic ... mp.new.gif
Last edited by tdrive on Thu 10 Nov 2005, 15:37:56, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
tdrive
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun 11 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 09 Nov 2005, 15:05:40

Hey, what happened to Canada? Is all that white snow? Why is it snowing in Mexico? :) Thanks. Much appreciated.

This market is so choppy, already given at $59.05 again after the test of $60.40 :!: Shake out the shorts & the longs and then rally? Maybe, still not new lows in the products. Creaping bottom is my guess?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby CARVER » Wed 09 Nov 2005, 18:42:54

Could someone give me a 101 on Technical Analysis?

My impression is that Technical Analysis is for those who do not know what the price should be, what is influencing the price. So they rely on what others are doing, they try to find patterns in what others are doing who hopefully do know what they are doing.

- Are there some figures on how much of total volume traded is based on technical analysis (an average percentage)?
- Does/can technical analysis cause self-fulfilling prophecies? If a lot of companies use the same technical analysis method they signal buy or sell signals at the same time. Does it exacerbate the price movements?
- How do they come up with support and resistance levels (especially for an index)? Is it based on recent history, or is it something they read from the current order-book, or maybe something to do with stop-loss limits?

- What happens when a big player suddenly starts unloading stocks without there being any reason (no rumour or news). Can it fool automatic trading systems. To create a bigger selloff so that the big player could buy them back at a lower price. (Or is this maybe not allowed)

- Any fun trading stories where somebody did something really smart or really stupid? :)
User avatar
CARVER
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Holland

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby ubercynicmeister » Wed 09 Nov 2005, 23:00:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'A')s for trading oil & gas it is an efficient means of price discovery and a means of transfering risk from those who don't want it to those that do. No one is forced to trade futures.


On the contrary - EVERYONE is forced to trade in Oil Futures...when that price is paid at the Pump, part of that price is from "Oil Futures". or don't you beleive that the Price at the Pump is determined by the NYMEX? If so, why does one bother to trade at all?

Thus we're all forced to prop up this rather odius way of a few people making obscene amounts of money, while everyone else gets to pay and to pay and to pay. I realise it's a throw-away line, not intended to offend, and I'm trying hard not to be offended by it.

Nonetheless, we're ALL forced to trade in oil Futures. Like It Or Not.
User avatar
ubercynicmeister
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun 25 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby tdrive » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 01:09:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hus we're all forced to prop up this rather odius way of a few people making obscene amounts of money


Errrmmm... pardon me, but the futures market is a zero sum game, so someone else is LOSING obscene amounts of money.

Wake up.

Cheers,
User avatar
tdrive
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun 11 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby Marklar » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 02:05:47

lol


anyway,

I was reading Joe Bastardi and he says the longer the wait for winter the colder it'll be.

Basically the cold arctic air will build up above the jet stream which is pretty far up north at the moment. The longer it stays up there the more cold air will build up and when the jet stream finally plunges we get a cold one.

One question I've been thinking lately regarding Oil prices.

What if the hurricanes didnt hit us? Do you think the price of oil would be cheaper than now, or more expensive? It seems there's alot of confusion in the market now. For instance today it was around $58-59 then it actually jumped up to $60 something and then it closes at $58.

I would look at the google news to see what the media says the reason the price went up to $60 and it was because distilliates are still low.... However I think the media makes up the reasons and draws their own conclusion and that doesnt help the confusion, imo.
User avatar
Marklar
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Wed 17 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby tdrive » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 03:33:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat if the hurricanes didnt hit us? Do you think the price of oil would be cheaper than now, or more expensive?


Excellent question. The price would have stayed in the high fifties.
If things do not change, I mean, demand keeps up and housing
does not go for a hard landing, a year from now many people
would have wished they bought in now.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')asically the cold arctic air will build up above the jet stream which is pretty far up north at the moment.


Naturally. It is a closed system and eventually it will give in. I find it
very short-sighted to believe that after 80+ MBBL shut in after the
hurricanes and a cold winter in Europe people to think this will go away,
just close your eyes under the blanket and mommy will sing you a song...

As much as I am sorry for all the poor cold souls in the North-East, they
brought it on themselves.

Cheers,
User avatar
tdrive
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun 11 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby tdrive » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 03:36:08

Hear hear...

House suspends Alaska drilling push

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ouse leaders late Wednesday abandoned an attempt
to push through a hotly contested plan to open an Alaskan
wildlife refuge to oil drilling, fearing it would jeopardize
approval of a sweeping budget bill Thursday.

They also dropped from the budget document plans to allow
states to authorize oil and gas drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific
coasts -- regions currently under a drilling moratorium.


Do I hear bulls' hoofs in the distance?

Cheers,
User avatar
tdrive
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun 11 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 03:50:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')old weather coming...

Cheers,


TDrive, thanks for that chart, but can I ask you to go into edit and delete it now? Unfortunately, the sizing is making it hard to read all the comments below it as it re-sizes the screen and I have to keep scrolling right & left to get to the margins? Sorry about that. Thanks.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 04:32:45

Well, I for one just wish it was ME making obscene amounts of money by trading commodity futures :!: :-D

However, the reality is that it is a very deep & liquid market and it is a constant battle of ideas between bulls & bears based on all available information. Unfortunately, not even with our BIG brains can we absorb all the given information as to world supply & demand and every economic indicator that affects them. And even if we could, the information would be stale as soon as we learnt it and therefore it would be a constant struggle to know everything all the time and then to act on that information. I am affraid it is a little too much for your average Joe Trader down there in the pits yelling & screaming, waving his arms and trying to sell or buy a few contracts during the open pit session.

Even we that have the luxury to sit at our computers and effectively trade electronically, there is only so much you can read and absorb in a typical 10-12 hour day. You certainly cannot know everything.

So the two basic schools of thought are fundamental and technical analysis and they are not mutually exclusive. Fundamental analysis looks at supply & demand factors. However, trying to trade on supply & demand factors alone is inherently difficult if you do not know exactly where you are? Also you have the interplay between exploration, development, extraction, refining, distribution, end consumer behavior, the physical market and the futures market and all other related markets such as ocean freight and infrastructure. Like a spider's web, if you tug at one end, it will move parts of the entire web. Small, insignificant events can in combination with other factors effect the overall price out of proportion to their individual importance.

It is like trying to read a roadmap which is sized 1:1. It is hard to get an overview. However, every trader should understand the factors which are driving the market. A basic understanding of supply & demand is essential. But, even fundamentalists use technical analysis to see where the support and resistance levels are to plan their entry and exit points. A train may be on the wrong track, going the wrong direction, but it is still not wise to stand in front of it. Last summer's rally was a classic example. Inventories were building and yet the price was grinding relentlessly higher. It was like subconsiously the market was expecting a big supply disruption and sure enough Katerina provided that event. How did the collective psyche of the market know? Simply, demand was strong & growing, there was very little extra capacity and no cushion should there be an interuption. As oil & gas demand are somewhat inelastic, you need a big move in price to effect demand destruction and bring supply & demand back into line. The huge run up in price this past summer was just such a rationing in action.

But, back to technical analysis. It is very important because at every price there is a buyer and a seller. So at every price one trader made money and one trader lost money. When the price returns to that level the market has memory. When the price returns to that level the trader who made money at that level, say by buying, may try to buy again. The trader who lost money at that level, by selling, may be reluctant to sell again, and may even decide to buy. So at major turning points it does become a self-fullfilling prophesy.

Also, say you wanted to sell at $60.00, but the price only went up to $59.95 and then went down quickly. Well, next time up you may put your sell order in at $59.90 to make sure your order gets done. This starts to build resistance, a number of sell orders, between $59.90 and $60.00. Similarly, if you have seen oil rally from $49 in May to $70.85 in August and you have been chasing the market, you may move your price expectations up. That is put in bids higher and higher until you are able to buy. $50 looks expensive until you get used to $60 and then $70 and then you think $50 is cheap. This would form the basis of support as buyers look for good levels to buy in the expectation that we may go higher.

Of course, as at every level there is a buyer and a seller, the overall chance of success or failure is always 50%. It is gambler's fallacy to think we went up, therefore we must go down. Anyone who was happy to sell oil at $30 because it went up in price from $15 would be nursing their wounds when the price went up and up to $60. There are no magical numbers, which is sometimes technical analysis gets a bad name from the uninitiated.

Basically, I thought the range yesterday would be $58.60-$60.40, which it was for yesterday's trading session. However, now we have broken support today at $58.60 and have moved lower to $58.40. The old support of $58.60 is no longer valid, but the resistance level at $60.40 is as it was tested yesterday and held. It proved a great place to sell.

Well, that is Technical Analysis 101. I hope it helps?

As for me, I am a great teacher and a lousy trader. Yesterday I really got whipped and had I just kept my short at $59.77 I would have been much happier this morning. I actually has a sell order at $60.35 which I cancelled before we got there! :( Instead I am short at $58.60 ($56.50 in the Brent) and looking for a move lower on the break of $58.60 and the bearish close below $59.40 on the daily chart. If I am correct, we should now see a move down to $57.60-70 in the WTI with $55-56 as the ultimate goal ($54.50-55.00 in the Brent)? However, this will also depend on the products.

With supply & demand analysis it is easy to convince yourself you are right and the market is wrong. But, with technical analysis you always have levels which invalidate your opinion. That is another reason they are useful. :)
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 04:40:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')here will WTI close on December 31st, 2005?
less than $60 14% [ 8 ]
around $60 12% [ 7 ]
around $65 29% [ 16 ]
around $70 21% [ 12 ]
more than $70 21% [ 12 ]

Total Votes : 55


So here we are. Almost mid-November with just 6-weeks to go until year-end. As you can see more people had the idea that we would be higher than $65 - 42% - and those who thought we would be under $65 - 26% - and the mode is still around $65 - 29% - a nice bell curve skewed to the right. This explains nicely how futures markets work. If we close below where we are today at $59 then just 14% will have made money while 86% would have had losses. Of course, the losses will equal the gains. But, still next time some hardcore doomer tells you commodity prices can ONLY go up. Remind yourself of this simple little poll. 86% got it wrong so far. Mind you we still have 6-weeks to go, so stay tuned. :)
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby shakespear1 » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 05:01:20

Good analysis Mr. Bill. The education is appreciated :)
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 05:11:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shakespear1', 'G')ood analysis Mr. Bill. The education is appreciated :)



Or as the ol' Vaudeville entertainers used to say, 'Don't clap, just throw money'

Thanks. :)
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby Doly » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 05:45:19

My observations so far have been that doomers are too gloomy, while optimists that say that oil prices will go down are often wrong. My impression is that taking the doomer price with a correction downwards for doomerosity of about 20% is often about right. With this calculation, I took the standard doomer prediction of 80$, corrected by 20% and arrived at 64$, or about 65$, which is what I voted. Of course, this is anything but hard science. I may have been too gloomy anyway. I'm glad I don't put my money on this.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 05:56:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', 'M')y observations so far have been that doomers are too gloomy, while optimists that say that oil prices will go down are often wrong. My impression is that taking the doomer price with a correction downwards for doomerosity of about 20% is often about right. With this calculation, I took the standard doomer prediction of 80$, corrected by 20% and arrived at 64$, or about 65$, which is what I voted. Of course, this is anything but hard science. I may have been too gloomy anyway. I'm glad I don't put my money on this.


Your system is very good Doly and it is based on statistical methods if not exactly scientific. It is called regression to the mean.

Quite often at the top and at the bottom of the market is when people become either too optomistic or too pessimistic. I had been selling into the rally all summer, but after Katerina even I was bullish. It was hard not to when all that damage is taken into account. Then when Rita was headed for Texas the correct response was to be short, but after my experience with Katerina, I could not go home on Friday night short with Rita bearing down on Houston?

However, traders have a name for this, too. Buy the rumor, sell the fact. It is another varient on regression to the mean. Once the uncertainty is by, reasess and look at the next factor on the horizon (demand destruction).

So what do you think now? Will be stay below $60 or pull-back to $65 still?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 06:23:07

Not much by way of news this morning. Here are Refco's comments.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ews:

· NYMEX will offer electronic trading of Brent crude oil as an alternative to live transactions on the floor of the London exchange. Volumes have only averaged 1% of those on the ICE.

· Louisiana reports 104,723-bpd or 51.6% of daily capacity has been restored

· MMS update reports 737,136-bpd or 49.14% of US Gulf oil output still shut-in with cumulative lost production since 8/26 of 81.999 million barrels or 14.977% of annual Gulf output. There were also 191 platforms and 5 rigs evacuated, or 23.32% of 819 manned platforms and 3.73% of 134 rigs currently operating in the Gulf.


Got this from a broker yesterday. Some of you may be interested.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Overall volumes have been high over the last couple of days with IPE Brent trading over 180.000 contracts each day, compared with the October average of 132.000. ICE must be very pleased with the trend since going 100% electronic, seeing not only the absolute volumes increase, but also a higher ratio versus NYMEX. Starting back at 50% earlier this year, IPE Brent traded at 57% of NYMEX WTI volume in October, and so far in November has reached 65%. Yesterday's (Nov. 8th) volumes were 185.045 for Brent and 236.990 for WTI giving a ratio of 78%. Meanwhile few eyes are sadly on he NYMEX Brent contract, which has just managed over 2000 lots so far this month.


I find it interesting. Obviously, electronic trading is more efficient and less open to floor broker abuse such as front running orders. I prefer it. But, also this shows the level of competitive intensity to capture the most business between exchanges. Volume gravitates to the exchange that offers the most liquidity and the lowest transaction costs. This is similar to the EUREX's assault on business at the CME/CBOT. Interestingly, CME & CBOT are also rivals, but have teamed up to keep EUREX out.

I bring this up in the context of either an Iranian oil bourse or an oil contract priced in euros. The major existing exchanges would fight hard to retain volume at their own exchanges even if this means offering their own euro denominated contracts. If they didn't than exchanges like the EUREX or CME/CBOT might step in to offer their own alternative contract. I think the Iranian oil bourse is a still-birth right now due to political and economic uncertainties in that country as well as remarks made by the President of Iran that speculators should be hung. But, if they were to open their doors they would quickly find an overwhelming competitive response from the incumbants. FWIW.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby shakespear1 » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 06:30:40

Well in my case I see us ( World ) to be on a wave of bad news.

The weather for sure is not going to make an about face change and give us "quieter" hurricans. So if this last season was bad, and if the climate studies are correct ( this is almost certain from my travels around the globe) then next year we will have more of the same. The platforms are duck and they know it.

Middle East is not looking to be quieter. Russia just told Poland that they want to renegotiate the gas contract with Gazprom ( blow back from Poland meddling in Ukraine ). George will continue to do damage. Last trip to Houston, Dallas and Boise tells me that the average American knows little of the real issues. Thus I vote for higher prices or a crack in the economies.
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 06:45:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shakespear1', 'W')ell in my case I see us ( World ) to be on a wave of bad news.

The weather for sure is not going to make an about face change and give us "quieter" hurricans. So if this last season was bad, and if the climate studies are correct ( this is almost certain from my travels around the globe) then next year we will have more of the same. The platforms are duck and they know it.

Middle East is not looking to be quieter. Russia just told Poland that they want to renegotiate the gas contract with Gazprom ( blow back from Poland meddling in Ukraine ). George will continue to do damage. Last trip to Houston, Dallas and Boise tells me that the average American knows little of the real issues. Thus I vote for higher prices or a crack in the economies.




Well, interesting points. I also thought about the hurricane season a few days ago when the EIA (or was it the IEA or was it the DOE? :) ) said that nat gas supply would be 100% up and running in June of 2006. I thought, great, just in time for the next hurricane season? :oops: Also, you may have read that many insurance companies are now refusing to renew of offer hurricane insurance in the GOM anymore? This means either that oil cos. will have to self-insure (higher fixed costs) or that the US will offer hurricane insurance (higher taxes)? Well, not good developments. Why didn't anyone think of building unloading facilities far inland? Oh yah, tornado risk :!:

The problem between Poland and Russia should not influence international markets. The problem is that Poland was getting cheap nat gas in return for transit fees on pipelines crossing Poland on their way to Germany and western Europe. Now, Gazprom wants more money for their gas. Russia, BASF and E.On have also tentatively agreed on a new pipeline route under the Oestsee to by-pass Poland and Ukraine (who also get subsidized gas in-lieu of transit fees). This will put downward pricing pressure on those transit fees as Russia will have more outlets for its nat gas and Germany more secure supply, less susceptible to disruption. Of course, the Baltic states, Poland and the Ukraine are upset about this lack of access to cheap gas, but that is the way the Evil Empire crumbles. If you are no longer in Russia's sphere of influence you should not expect to pay sub-world price for your oil & gas. Freedom does have a price. :)

I was not predicting peace to break out anytime in the Middle East, so it was not part of my baseline prediction. As for Dubbya, well, what can you say, in any democracy the people get the government they deserve :!: Hillary in 2008? :oops:
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby shakespear1 » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 07:14:22

I have worked/lived in Russia and now find my self in Poland observing things here. However you info is very intersting because this is not the SPIN that is offered for the crowd here.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')The problem is that Poland was getting cheap nat gas in return for transit fees on pipelines crossing Poland on their way to Germany and western Europe.


Thanks for the info Mr. Bill :roll:

PS SPIN is SPIN in any country. Same word is found in Quantum Physics. If we were to draw analogies from Quantum Physics to the real world it could probable get very STRANGE and interesting.
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Traders' Corner

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 10 Nov 2005, 09:08:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shakespear1', 'I') have worked/lived in Russia and now find my self in Poland observing things here. However you info is very intersting because this is not the SPIN that is offered for the crowd here.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')The problem is that Poland was getting cheap nat gas in return for transit fees on pipelines crossing Poland on their way to Germany and western Europe.


Thanks for the info Mr. Bill :roll:

PS SPIN is SPIN in any country. Same word is found in Quantum Physics. If we were to draw analogies from Quantum Physics to the real world it could probable get very STRANGE and interesting.


Where are you in Poland? A very interesting country. I like it a lot. But, going through some pretty gut wrenching changes for many. I can sympathize.

You can keep abreast of Russian news by reading The Moscow Times. Most of the articles are reprints of other articles either in Russian translated or in English that have appeared elsewhere, but unless you speak Russian it is as good as I can reccommend.

If you want real inside information on Russia I would suggest you contact Eric Kraus at Sovlink Securities and get added to his research called Truth & Beauty. He really pulls no punches. About as good as it gets.

Here is his email address is kraus@sovlink.ru or click on Sovlink Securities

I enjoy reading it. What about Polish dailies in English? Any good ones?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests