by mark » Sun 26 Apr 2009, 16:20:10
It's possible, even probably, that all that we've talked about here for the last 5 years has been the result of careful and consistent effort by those with the most to gain.
Of course, you must do your own research to come to your own conclusion, as I have done for myself. But, I have no special knowledge, everything I've learned is written somewhere. I have not yet discerned all the details but in general it goes like this:
More than 100 years ago a new wave of thought swept the elite class of England. It was their obligation, as superior men of civilized England, to rule over the masses of people who have no idea what's good for them. It was to be a new world order where the elite were to rule and the masses were to serve, we were to be mere cogs in the wheel of advancing civilization. [see John Taylor Gatto] Call it socialism, communism, Fascism, or the new world order, it's common thread was, We, your betters, know what's best for you, so shut up and dig... simplified, of course, but that's the general idea. All the great events of the 20th century, may have had origin with this very small group of men. The Kennedy assassination, Vietnam war, Reagan, the S&L crisis, Clinton, Bush, 9-11, the newspeak "war on terror," (more aptly phrased "war on freedom") Iraq, and the culmination of the plans of the globalist elite, the presidency of Barack Obama.
This has taken on greater weight in the last 100 days as our new president is revealing his colors. The end, as presciently written more than 15 years ago by G. Edward Griffin, is total control of the masses for the benefit of the few. If I'm correct, the elite will push us to the breaking point, to provoke a violent response that will give them cover to ruthlessly smash any remaining resistance. Oh, and to "thin the herd" so that more resources will be left for the living (Them, in case you were wondering...they really think of us as little more than cattle)
Reach you own conclusions after your own research. Don't come here to agree or disagree without doing your own work.
Who is John Galt?