by theluckycountry » Thu 11 May 2023, 15:54:27
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')Here I am in Chile, in the Atacama Desert, seeing these mining-related harms, and then there I go in the U.S. advocating for a rapid transition. How do I align these two goals?” Riofrancos said. “And is there a way to have a less extractive energy transition?”
When she went looking for research that would help answer that question, she found none, at least not for the transportation sector, which was her area of focus.
Well isn't that interesting. The academic's field of research is the transportation sector, and yet she didn't even see this as a problem until a trip to Chilli? It sort of sums up academia doesn't it. These people live in ivory castles and really haven't a clue how the world works. They assume they will write some paper and industry will "see the light" and change for the better.
We don't need academia now, not in our modern world of corporate control. They serve no purpose, they are just a bunch of befuddled clowns writing papers full of unverifiable claims and teaching students the same rubbish that got the world into the mess it's in today. 99% of climate scientists, most from academia of course, all agree, they make their prognostications, write their papers, and nothing changes. I have been reading BS papers for 20 years and none of them made one iota of difference. They are basically Hopium with a veneer of respectability.
Solar panels and wind turbines and making woodchip in America to sell to Germany for their power plants is entirely a corporate money making enterprise. It has nothing to do with any of the goals stated by these academics. If that academic wants to make a difference then she should stop getting on commercial jets, stop driving her car and pull her air conditioners out.
At the end of the day all these people simply want to continue leading a life of luxury and abundance without having to make too many sacrifices. The solutions they seek are not solutions at all. The only solution is to power down, unplug, take the personal vehicles off the roads altogether and make all other necessary changes to bring us back to an 1800's power consumption level. Sure we can still have some LED lighting, and lots of hitech human powered trikes and 4-weelers and a few other super efficient devices that technology has brought us. But flying in roses from South Africa? Shipping oranges from California all over the planet? No. All that and much more has to go if they really want to fix the nightmare we have created.
The only reason Riofrancos stays in her job is because she wants to buy a nice home and a nice car and have lots of money to fund a modern extravagant lifestyle in her retirement. She is no different to me or any one of us aside from the fact that she is masturbating with these ideas of solutions.
Look at her. She probably spends more on her hair than I do on food.
25 years ago I bought a profession Wahl hair trimmer for $100 and it's still going strong today. I haven't been to a barber since, Now that's conservation.

"Oh but we have to do something, Lucky" Do we? Could they stop the collapse of the Roman Empire? Could they save the vast temple-city of Angkor in Cambodia from collapse? Did they prevent Easter Island from being turned from a temperate paradise into a treeless sheep station? The real solution, as always, is a personal solution. Just get the hell out of the system and make a life for yourself far from the maddened Consumers who don't see what's coming. Because that is and always has been the problem. Too Many Consumers of Resources, all herded into vast cities, oblivious to where the food and resources come from that sustains them.
We're 17 years past the peak now and the 3rd World is going hungry and dark. We'll be next, we're well on the way in fact.