by eclipse » Mon 27 Feb 2017, 19:08:42
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('evilgenius', 'T')hat's kind of what Jonah said to God when the people of Nineveh repented. But if he hadn't gone and preached to them they wouldn't have repented. Jonah was actually being selfish in an insidious way. Facing up to narcissism is a difficult task. Babbling on about doom can be about yelling to the world how great you are because you know what is going to happen. It's uncomfortable to a narcissist to be wrong. They will usually come at you with a whole new set of ideas rather than admit they are fallible. Personally, I've had to let go of a lot of my doom, while still remaining skeptical. People have proven to me that they are more resourceful and imaginative than I thought they were. That was hard to do. I had to change.
Interesting point! There is a branch of cult psychology that analyses "Apocalyptic Outsiders", whether their 'cult' is Jonestown or Waco Texas, or has a more secular environmental basis. The difference between being generally cynical and sceptical is that the sceptic is asking lots of questions and generally pessimistic about the outcome, but still open to being surprised and happy with a good outcome. The Apocalyptic Outsider sees themselves as above and superior to society, and outside that. (Whether or not they are physically removed from it is irrelevant). They use terms like 'Sheeple" to condemn their fellow citizens, and embrace their pessimism as prophecy. Some even have a saviour complex, and see themselves as John Connor warning of the impending Skynet. OK, bad metaphor because that particular version of doom has too many energy requirements in it! It's too high tech for a peak oil doomer.

But the fundamental psychological difference is that the Apocalyptic Outsider is personally invested in society going down. It's a psychological need for certainty that drives it. Documentaries on it describe that uncertainty is the hardest state for people to endure.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')usan Tanner
Clinical Psychologist
Now many things are not predictable. The world is a very uncertain place. People change their jobs, organisations fold, collapse, you know, There is no guarantee in anything any more…Global threats like war, climate change certainly create anxiety too because the future is no longer guaranteed…
.…that sort of unpredictability and uncertainty creates a lot of anxiety, and anxiety is often a precursor to depression.
Unresolved anxiety sets people up for depression, because you can then feel despondent that well there actually isn’t anything I can do. Because climate change is out of my hands, terrorism is out of my hands…
So that can lead to what’s called catastrophic thinking, that imagining the worst scenario of what might happen and then believing that that’s what will happen.
Narrator
Surprisingly, being certain about the end can actually bring relief to those suffering anxiety…
Susan Tanner
Apocalyptic thinking can be very useful to people who need to feel a sense of control, and that they therefore feel calm because they know what’s going to happen. Living with uncertainty, living with a question mark is the hardest thing to do for all human beings. We like to know what’s going to happen. That’s why we visit clairvoyants and you know we have our tarots read and all sorts of things….
Narrator
Cards and palm readings may not be the most scientific way to predict our futures, yet humans have looked to them for centuries.
Richard Eckersley was struck by a similar lack of science when he researched fundamentalist thinking about the end times.
http://www.abc.net.au/compass/s2428806.htm Certainty, even of doom, is preferable to uncertainty. People will even vote maniacs like Trump in on the promise of some sort of certainty. Certainty then provides smugness and superiority and a strong sense of community, of belonging to an online elite who are gifted to know the future.
It's time for doomers to grow up and admit they don't actually have a crystal ball, and that there are high EROEI alternatives to fossil fuels, abundant food sources like ocean kelp farms that also farm shellfish and fish, and vast-grown meat that can most probably (but I'm still confirming) use kelp biofeedstock to grow all the meat we need without even taxing the land with grazing! This is just scratching the tip of the iceberg of what's happening and how we're adapting. Increasing wealth is going to stabilise the human population at around 10 billion, and by then we
be living in a largely renewable (+ mainly nuclear) energy economy with largely renewable materials.
with the technology we have now. On the other hand, Trump could nuke us all back to the Stone Age. Who knows? I'm being an adult and embracing uncertainty, even as I discuss a positive vision of the future.