Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Why do doomers censor hope?

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby Newfie » Mon 27 Feb 2017, 16:58:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'D')oomers do not censor hope but shine a bright light on the most serious problems


I shine a bright light on the problems I see all the time. However I do not then proclaim those problems are so grand we are all gonna die, civilization is about to collapse, the economy is falling apart never to recover, oil will soon be so worthless nobody will bother pumping it out of the ground or any of the half dozen other doomer theme scenarios that get pumped around this place constantly.


I don't know if I fall into your catagory of folks who "pump" doom. Maybe.

I do consider myself a doomer.

It seems obvious to me that infinite growth is impossible and that our economy relies upon infinite growth. Therefore that the economy is unsustainable and will collapse seems inevitable.

It seems obvious to me we can not sustain our human population even if we had abundant cheap and clean power. We've done too much damage to the ecosystems to feed ourselves forever and we have numerous biological challenges. Humanity is now probably be largest source of prey upon the planet. Nature will almost surely develop an effective predator, if only a virus. Or perhaps we will turn on ourselves through genocide, who knows.

I don't have a clue when a collapse will take place. I don't know how to avoid it. I do think there are measures we could take to lessen its impact, but we don't do that.

So maybe I fit your catagory.

P.S. If Bahamian Internet access is any guide we are in deep dodo as I ty...
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby eclipse » Mon 27 Feb 2017, 17:09:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eclipse', 'I')F this seaweed scheme can be scaled up to 9% of the world’s oceans it WILL sequester ALL our CO2 emissions


You sure are a committed advocate for destroying large areas of the ocean to grow kelp.

So please explain---how does growing lots and lots of seaweed sequester "ALL our CO2 emissions"?


If that's what you think, you need to watch the following TED talk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8ViaskDSeI
Dr James Hansen recommends breeder reactors that convert nuclear 'waste' into 1000 years of clean energy for America, and can charge all our light vehicles and generate "Blue Crude" for heavy vehicles.
https://eclipsenow.wordpress.com/recharge/
User avatar
eclipse
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri 04 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Sydney

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby eclipse » Mon 27 Feb 2017, 17:36:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'I')t seems obvious to me that infinite growth is impossible and that our economy relies upon infinite growth. Therefore that the economy is unsustainable and will collapse seems inevitable.

Too simplistic. GDP is decoupling from money, and the economy can run in stagnant modes for long periods. See Japan's economy for the last 15 years.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t seems obvious to me we can not sustain our human population even if we had abundant cheap and clean power.

We do have access to abundant clean power if we would only build it. Breeder reactors would convert America's nuclear waste into 1000 years of fuel.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e've done too much damage to the ecosystems to feed ourselves forever and we have numerous biological challenges.

I do not wish to minimise the challenges we face, but there are ways through. Time for the kelp summary, again! On top of all the abundant clean energy we can get from breeder reactors, we now have the systems to create enormous kelp farms that would HEAL and RESTORE the ocean, not harm it! Win win win!

The paper below says it would give us:-

* half a kilogram of seafood per person per day, to feed a world of 10 billion people!
* all the biofuels and biogas we could need to replace fossil fuels and provide the ultimate backup to wind and solar power
* remove ocean acidity
* restore our atmosphere to 350ppm by 2085
In other words, seaweed is a silver bullet to feed the world, save the oceans, and save us from climate change, all in this free PDF. "Negative carbon via Ocean Afforestation". Just register, and download it for free.
http://www.psep.ichemejournals.com/arti ... 57-5820(12)00120-6/abstract



$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Humanity is now probably be largest source of prey upon the planet.

Yep.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Nature will almost surely develop an effective predator, if only a virus. Or perhaps we will turn on ourselves through genocide, who knows.
Conjecture.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') don't have a clue when a collapse will take place.
Glad you admit it.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') don't know how to avoid it.
I do: abundant clean energy with abundant renewable materials in an economy that provides nature with restorative hand-prints, not destructive footprints. Increased natural parks and increased wildlife corridors. Massive kelp farms that could feed the world by both increasing our oyster & shellfish & fish intake, kelp & derivatives intake, and even provide feedstock for vat grown meats that will eventually replace all animal farms! That means returning 30% of the non-ice surface of the land to nature as we replace animal husbandry with vat-grown meats from kelp (or other algal) feedstocks.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')I do think there are measures we could take to lessen its impact, but we don't do that.
I'm looking forward to peak oil, as once the price starts rising, Tesla motors and other EV car companies will take over. Then we'll replace diesel with "Blue Crude" (diesel from seawater), boron, or even kelp derived biodiesel. It may even stimulate many environmentally apathetic sheeple into taking an interest in where the heck their lifestyle comes from, and demand more sustainable longer term solutions, of which there are plenty!
Dr James Hansen recommends breeder reactors that convert nuclear 'waste' into 1000 years of clean energy for America, and can charge all our light vehicles and generate "Blue Crude" for heavy vehicles.
https://eclipsenow.wordpress.com/recharge/
User avatar
eclipse
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri 04 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Sydney
Top

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby onlooker » Mon 27 Feb 2017, 17:47:29

I like what Newfie states. I think I have never stated timelines but I have been open to the more doomerish predictions in so much as I see no way to rule them out. Specifically, I looked into the AGW doom of Cid Yama and I see no obvious flaw or omission that would rule it out. And in regards to Energy I see a model that attempts to uncover the energetic status of oil reserves utilizing tried and tested pure mathematics and physical laws as well as some regression analysis. This model being the Etp has reached conclusions that do not seem far fetched in the least. So I cannot rule out its conclusions either
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby onlooker » Mon 27 Feb 2017, 17:52:31

I think Eclipse is offering some genuinely good ideas (see not censoring). Eclipse how would you propose we control and reduce population?
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Mon 27 Feb 2017, 18:30:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eclipse', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eclipse', 'I')F this seaweed scheme can be scaled up to 9% of the world’s oceans it WILL sequester ALL our CO2 emissions

....please explain---how does growing lots and lots of seaweed sequester "ALL our CO2 emissions"?


you need to watch the following TED talk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8ViaskDSeI


OK. I watched the TED talk in your link.

There was no mention in the TED talk of sequestering "ALL our CO2 emissions" as you claim. The speaker briefly mentioned that kelp absorbs 5x the carbon from the ocean as a terrestrial plant---but then in the next sentence he said the kelp would then be converted into biofuel and burned as fuel.

Perhaps you don't understand what sequestering means? When the kelp is converted to biofuel and burned the CO2 goes right back into the atmosphere---its not sequestered if it goes back into the atmosphere.

You may be right that growing Kelp in sea farms will help feed the world---although the picture of a "Kelp cocktail" in the TED talk was revolting---but you don't help your case by making false claims about Kelp farms sequestering all the world's CO2 emissions.

Image
Would you care for a Kelp cocktail with your Kelp noodles?

Cheers!
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby eclipse » Mon 27 Feb 2017, 19:08:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('evilgenius', 'T')hat's kind of what Jonah said to God when the people of Nineveh repented. But if he hadn't gone and preached to them they wouldn't have repented. Jonah was actually being selfish in an insidious way. Facing up to narcissism is a difficult task. Babbling on about doom can be about yelling to the world how great you are because you know what is going to happen. It's uncomfortable to a narcissist to be wrong. They will usually come at you with a whole new set of ideas rather than admit they are fallible. Personally, I've had to let go of a lot of my doom, while still remaining skeptical. People have proven to me that they are more resourceful and imaginative than I thought they were. That was hard to do. I had to change.

Interesting point! There is a branch of cult psychology that analyses "Apocalyptic Outsiders", whether their 'cult' is Jonestown or Waco Texas, or has a more secular environmental basis. The difference between being generally cynical and sceptical is that the sceptic is asking lots of questions and generally pessimistic about the outcome, but still open to being surprised and happy with a good outcome. The Apocalyptic Outsider sees themselves as above and superior to society, and outside that. (Whether or not they are physically removed from it is irrelevant). They use terms like 'Sheeple" to condemn their fellow citizens, and embrace their pessimism as prophecy. Some even have a saviour complex, and see themselves as John Connor warning of the impending Skynet. OK, bad metaphor because that particular version of doom has too many energy requirements in it! It's too high tech for a peak oil doomer. :P But the fundamental psychological difference is that the Apocalyptic Outsider is personally invested in society going down. It's a psychological need for certainty that drives it. Documentaries on it describe that uncertainty is the hardest state for people to endure.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')usan Tanner
Clinical Psychologist
Now many things are not predictable. The world is a very uncertain place. People change their jobs, organisations fold, collapse, you know, There is no guarantee in anything any more…Global threats like war, climate change certainly create anxiety too because the future is no longer guaranteed…
.…that sort of unpredictability and uncertainty creates a lot of anxiety, and anxiety is often a precursor to depression.

Unresolved anxiety sets people up for depression, because you can then feel despondent that well there actually isn’t anything I can do. Because climate change is out of my hands, terrorism is out of my hands…
So that can lead to what’s called catastrophic thinking, that imagining the worst scenario of what might happen and then believing that that’s what will happen.

Narrator
Surprisingly, being certain about the end can actually bring relief to those suffering anxiety…

Susan Tanner
Apocalyptic thinking can be very useful to people who need to feel a sense of control, and that they therefore feel calm because they know what’s going to happen. Living with uncertainty, living with a question mark is the hardest thing to do for all human beings. We like to know what’s going to happen. That’s why we visit clairvoyants and you know we have our tarots read and all sorts of things….

Narrator
Cards and palm readings may not be the most scientific way to predict our futures, yet humans have looked to them for centuries.

Richard Eckersley was struck by a similar lack of science when he researched fundamentalist thinking about the end times.
http://www.abc.net.au/compass/s2428806.htm


Certainty, even of doom, is preferable to uncertainty. People will even vote maniacs like Trump in on the promise of some sort of certainty. Certainty then provides smugness and superiority and a strong sense of community, of belonging to an online elite who are gifted to know the future.

It's time for doomers to grow up and admit they don't actually have a crystal ball, and that there are high EROEI alternatives to fossil fuels, abundant food sources like ocean kelp farms that also farm shellfish and fish, and vast-grown meat that can most probably (but I'm still confirming) use kelp biofeedstock to grow all the meat we need without even taxing the land with grazing! This is just scratching the tip of the iceberg of what's happening and how we're adapting. Increasing wealth is going to stabilise the human population at around 10 billion, and by then we could be living in a largely renewable (+ mainly nuclear) energy economy with largely renewable materials.
I'm not predicting this, but it is possible with the technology we have now. On the other hand, Trump could nuke us all back to the Stone Age. Who knows? I'm being an adult and embracing uncertainty, even as I discuss a positive vision of the future.
Dr James Hansen recommends breeder reactors that convert nuclear 'waste' into 1000 years of clean energy for America, and can charge all our light vehicles and generate "Blue Crude" for heavy vehicles.
https://eclipsenow.wordpress.com/recharge/
User avatar
eclipse
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri 04 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Sydney
Top

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby onlooker » Mon 27 Feb 2017, 19:29:30

okay that is fair arguments Evil and Eclipse. And as for the psychological impetus to hold a doom scenario, I can just as easily say that one exists to NOT hold one. Like fear for instance. It is referred to as confirmation bias.
No doubt some have gone overboard in their doom prognostications. Eclipse you can list many positive trends, I can list many negative ones. I do know that as we speak our consumer tendencies and our huge numbers are degrading and depleting the Earth. The air, the water, the soil all of it. The Limits to growth pertains to what is the least abundant necessary component to sustain a given population or what stresses can break the resilience of a human ecosystem. It is foolish to sound certain on anything with regards to how exactly all this will flesh out. However, what can attempt to highlight certain elements which do offer clues as to our destination. My focus has been to shine the light on problems. Because dire problems do exist. And no single magic bullet can solve them all. If I sound pessimistic it is because we are as a species have not united as we should have to tackle these vexing problems and because we have not done nearly enough to head off the more extreme negative consequences. Our population boomed to 7 plus billion and we have not really built hardly any replacement to our fossil fuel infrastructure and the two most populous countries by far India and China decided it was okay to rev up our impact on Earth greatly by trying to adopt modern affluent lifestyles.

So, my pessimism I believe is warranted in so much as it follow the precautionary principle which colloquially speaking is plan for the worse and hope for the best.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby onlooker » Mon 27 Feb 2017, 19:47:30

I submit that the tone of "Why do doomers censor hope?" invokes an appeal to sentiment and emotion. In fact, our debates should attempt to focus on facts not on feelings
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Mon 27 Feb 2017, 19:49:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eclipse', ' ')Increasing wealth is going to stabilise the human population at around 10 billion, and by then we could be living in a largely renewable (+ mainly nuclear) energy economy with largely renewable materials.
I'm not predicting this, but it is possible with the technology we have now.


Your utopian vision of the future doesn't match well with the facts.

There is no reason to believe that humans will suddenly stop reproducing and human population will stabilize at around 10 billion. Human populations have been steadily growing for millennia ----- having babies is something that humans are very good at.

Image
Your claim that human population growth can magically stop at 10 billion seems as unlikely as your claim that in the future Kelp Farms will magically sequester all the CO2 emissions.

Sooooooo….Why exactly are you making all this utopian stuff up and posting it here? Do you really think Kelp can sequester CO2 and humans will stop having kids or are you just having a giggle with the wacky stuff you post?

Cheers!
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby eclipse » Mon 27 Feb 2017, 20:42:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'O')K. I watched the TED talk in your link.

Thank you for taking the time to do that! I'm impressed you actually watched it.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here was no mention in the TED talk of sequestering "ALL our CO2 emissions" as you claim. The speaker briefly mentioned that kelp absorbs 5x the carbon from the ocean as a terrestrial plant---but then in the next sentence he said the kelp would then be converted into biofuel and burned as fuel.

Absolutely correct! I linked you to that because it is the foundation we're going to build on now. That's the basic principle: vast kelp farms that help clean up the oceans of excess nutrients in a manner that is sensitive to biodiversity, mangroves, shipping lanes, and other concerns.

Let's scale it up. Here's a summary of that TED talk and then the scaled up paper I link to below. I've posted it elsewhere, but will repeat for convenience.

Seaweed farms could revolutionise the world. 2% of the world's oceans are nutrient rich enough for these farms. Nutrients wash down rivers and coastal erosion, and some come up from the ocean floors in 'oceanic upwelling' currents. Some rivers near farming regions dump too much fertilisers in the oceans which causes algal blooms and oceanic dead zones.Seaweed farming can soak this up and restore ocean health. A new vertical column method of 3D farming grows kelp and other seaweeds that are a rich source of vegetarian super-food in their own right! Seaweeds can form a whole variety of ice-creams, 'salads' or vegetables, sauces, and other food ingredients. But not only this, vertical farming is an ecosystem based approach. They also grow shellfish and oysters and even wild fish grow in amongst the kelp. It's nothing less than a revolution that could feed the world! Watch this 15 minute TED talk about seaweed feeding the world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8ViaskDSeI

2% of the world's oceans have abundant nutrients for growing seaweed, and according to the TED talk above, we would only need a small fraction of that to feed the world. But seaweed farming would not limit us to only seaweed and seafood! By no means! It could provide all the fertiliser our traditional land based farmers need. We would bring some biodigested seaweed onto land, get the salt out, and use it as fertiliser. Seaweed could bring our soils back to life. There is even a special seaweed that cows love and eliminates their methane burps! Methane burps are bad news, and cattle lose 15% of their growth to these energy losing burps. But a special seaweed cuts their burps by 99%, solving cattle's infamous methane climate emissions, *and* helping the cows grow faster!
https://theconversation.com/seaweed-cou ... urps-66498

Now here's where it gets bizarre, and potentially planet-saving. Peer-reviewed work has been done imagining extending kelp farming out into the nutrient-poor open ocean. They first farm the nutrient rich waters. Then a previous season's kelp is biodigested in big submersible bags to collect methane gas out the top, leaving the digested kelp nutrients behind. They then recycle those nutrients out in nutrient poor waters. They use slow drip feed hoses and 'tea-bags' that slowly fertilise the kelp, extending the kelp farms out into what was nutrient poor water, or 'ocean desert'. This means that oceanic nutrient flows are no longer a limiting factor. We can recycle nutrients and grow kelp almost anywhere.

Methane is harvested out the top, then CO2 also harvested and sequestered in huge plastic bladders that are placed on the ocean floor.

What if we really went crazy and farmed about 9% of the world's oceans this way?
The paper below says it would give us:-

* half a kilogram of seafood per person per day, to feed a world of 10 billion people!
* all the biofuels and biogas we could need to replace fossil fuels and provide the ultimate backup to wind and solar power
* remove ocean acidity
* restore our atmosphere to 350ppm by 2085
In other words, seaweed is a silver bullet to feed the world, save the oceans, and save us from climate change, all in this free PDF. "Negative carbon via Ocean Afforestation". Just register, and download it for free.
http://www.psep.ichemejournals.com/arti ... 57-5820(12)00120-6/abstract
Dr James Hansen recommends breeder reactors that convert nuclear 'waste' into 1000 years of clean energy for America, and can charge all our light vehicles and generate "Blue Crude" for heavy vehicles.
https://eclipsenow.wordpress.com/recharge/
User avatar
eclipse
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri 04 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Sydney
Top

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby eclipse » Mon 27 Feb 2017, 21:23:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'I')f I sound pessimistic it is because we are as a species have not united as we should have to tackle these vexing problems and because we have not done nearly enough to head off the more extreme negative consequences.


Nukes are the fastest and safest way to get off fossil fuels. France deployed them to run three-quarters of their grid in just 15 years. That is history. That is a FACT.

At the same time we can switch all city driving to EV's (now that even buses and council garbage trucks can run on EV). Heavier long-haul vehicles have 3 options:-
1. Recyclable powdered boron (see Dr James Hansen below).
https://eclipsenow.wordpress.com/recharge/
2. Synthetic diesel from seawater, with the nuclear power to run the factory costed into the price.
3. Biodiesel from kelp which can more than replace all liquid fuels - as we have seen in the paper above, it can replace ALL fossil fuels. Kelp. Seaweed. Whodathunkit?

Kelp can also become a feedstock for plastics, medicines, building materials, anything else the chemists can cook up. I think it could also be brewed down into a nutrient feedstock replacing meat with vat-grown meat.
Dr James Hansen recommends breeder reactors that convert nuclear 'waste' into 1000 years of clean energy for America, and can charge all our light vehicles and generate "Blue Crude" for heavy vehicles.
https://eclipsenow.wordpress.com/recharge/
User avatar
eclipse
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri 04 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Sydney
Top

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby eclipse » Mon 27 Feb 2017, 21:29:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'T')here is no reason to believe that humans will suddenly stop reproducing and human population will stabilize at around 10 billion. Human populations have been steadily growing for millennia ----- having babies is something that humans are very good at.

Incorrect, there is plenty of reason and they know the variable because it has already happened in various countries. To deny this is to deny the history of a variety of nations. You really sound ignorant of basic demographics! Read this page and get back to us on why the UN is so 'delusional' in your opinion that they think the human population will stabilise by mid century.
https://eclipsenow.wordpress.com/reduce/
Dr James Hansen recommends breeder reactors that convert nuclear 'waste' into 1000 years of clean energy for America, and can charge all our light vehicles and generate "Blue Crude" for heavy vehicles.
https://eclipsenow.wordpress.com/recharge/
User avatar
eclipse
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri 04 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Sydney
Top

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby eclipse » Tue 28 Feb 2017, 00:45:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '3'). Biodiesel from kelp which can more than replace all liquid fuels - as we have seen in the paper above, it can replace ALL fossil fuels. Kelp. Seaweed. Whodathunkit?
The ocean is already awash in unwanted sea vegetables.
Image
Seaweed chokes the Chesapeake and the Florida Bay. And nobody is going to eat kelp. We prefer steaks, thank you.

Learn the difference between algae and what causes them - over nutrient poisoning that causes oceanic dead zones. You're complaining about the cure to this very problem!

Also, try and read a thread if you're going to comment on it. I've covered how we're not just eating kelp, and one unique means of eating all the steak and chicken and turkey and pork or whatever other meat can be grown from stem cells WITHOUT grazing land! Stem-cell vat-grown meat is a thing now, and will soon be cheaper than land grown meat off an animal. With kelp as a nutrient feedstock, we could return all grazing lands to nature AND still eat meat AND still feed the world from the oceans via the kelp => bionutrient feedstock => stem cell meat pathway. Kelp fertilisers could grow the corn and wheat and other crops we want, and kelp diesel could do the hard work.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s an energy source, sea vegetables share and compound difficulties inherent in all biofuel production systems. The energy to fertilize/manage/harvest/process the kelp by boat would exceed the energy derived from the kelp.

Absolutely incorrect, and you obviously haven't read the paper. They use the most bizarre method to harvest and ferment the bulk of the kelp that's being grown for energy and carbon sequestration, and I take their hats off for creative thinking. I'll leave it to you to read the paper where the energy costs are spelled out against the energy profits.
http://www.psep.ichemejournals.com/arti ... 57-5820(12)00120-6/abstract
Dr James Hansen recommends breeder reactors that convert nuclear 'waste' into 1000 years of clean energy for America, and can charge all our light vehicles and generate "Blue Crude" for heavy vehicles.
https://eclipsenow.wordpress.com/recharge/
User avatar
eclipse
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri 04 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Sydney
Top

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 28 Feb 2017, 01:02:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eclipse', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'T')here is no reason to believe that humans will suddenly stop reproducing and human population will stabilize at around 10 billion.

Incorrect, there is plenty of reason and they know the variable because it has already happened in various countries.


Of course it is true that a few countries have low birthrates. But even in almost all of those countries population continues to grow because of immigration from other countries with HIGH birthrates. The US, for instance, has low birthrates among native born people---but the population of the USA is nonetheless growing significantly because of in-migration from Mexico and other countries.

Why not face facts?---global population continues to grow rapidly, with no obvious end in sight to the growth. You are pretending that there is some settled science or rationale for the world's population to magically stop growing at 10 billion, but in reality there are a variety of models for future population growth, with some demographers and scientists predicting world population wlll exceed 18 billion.

Image
Some demographers predict world population will reach 18 billion people---almost twice the 10 bill that you claim will be the point at which the world's population stops growing.

Cheers!
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby eclipse » Tue 28 Feb 2017, 02:31:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'O')f course it is true that a few countries have low birthrates.

Excellent, so you're aware of the Demographic Transition. Sorry to imply otherwise.
However, it's not a few. Few is the wrong word. It is most.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he theory was proposed in 1929 the American demographer Warren Thompson,[1] who observed changes, or transitions, in birth and death rates in industrialized societies over the previous 200 years. Most developed countries have completed the demographic transition and have low birth rates; most developing countries are in the process of this transition.[2][3] The major (relative) exceptions are some poor countries, mainly in sub-Saharan Africa and some Middle Eastern countries, which are poor or affected by government policy or civil strife, notably, Pakistan, Palestinian territories, Yemen, and Afghanistan.[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition

But even in almost all of those countries population continues to grow because of immigration from other countries with HIGH birthrates. The US, for instance, has low birthrates among native born people---but the population of the USA is nonetheless growing significantly because of in-migration from Mexico and other countries.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou are pretending that there is some settled science or rationale for the world's population to magically stop growing at 10 billion, but in reality there are a variety of models for future population growth, with some demographers and scientists predicting world population wlll exceed 18 billion.

If we roll out nuclear power and sustainable transport and sustainable food options for the world, and educate and empower women, we'll also be rolling out the Demographic Transition to those countries that have avoided it so far. For every 3 years of education a girl receives, it's one less child she has as an adult. Let's campaign for the education and empowerment of girls in developing countries, a good thing to do in itself, and see what happens to their population growth!
Dr James Hansen recommends breeder reactors that convert nuclear 'waste' into 1000 years of clean energy for America, and can charge all our light vehicles and generate "Blue Crude" for heavy vehicles.
https://eclipsenow.wordpress.com/recharge/
User avatar
eclipse
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri 04 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Sydney
Top

Re: Why do doomers censor hope?

Unread postby eclipse » Tue 28 Feb 2017, 03:04:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'e')clipse, so many unfounded, untested and/or poorly designed studies. You invest. I sit this one out, thank you.

Which studies are poor and why? The Greenwave business is already thriving, and he's open sourced it for more people to join in. The study is an extrapolation of kelp farming practices today.
Dr James Hansen recommends breeder reactors that convert nuclear 'waste' into 1000 years of clean energy for America, and can charge all our light vehicles and generate "Blue Crude" for heavy vehicles.
https://eclipsenow.wordpress.com/recharge/
User avatar
eclipse
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri 04 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Sydney
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron