Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby dissident » Thu 04 Dec 2014, 18:21:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', 'I') learned as a small child to be polite to police officers and Sherrif deputies and it has served me well. Yes I got a few tickets, but I have never been arrested because I never refused to do the sensible thing and avoid a confrontation of my own making.


How does a cop expect politeness from someone with Down's syndrome who is experiencing a hysterical attack? Too many excuses for poor little police officers who shoot first and ask questions later.
dissident
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6458
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby Subjectivist » Thu 04 Dec 2014, 19:46:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dissident', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', 'I') learned as a small child to be polite to police officers and Sherrif deputies and it has served me well. Yes I got a few tickets, but I have never been arrested because I never refused to do the sensible thing and avoid a confrontation of my own making.


How does a cop expect politeness from someone with Down's syndrome who is experiencing a hysterical attack? Too many excuses for poor little police officers who shoot first and ask questions later.


Law enforcement need to be trained in understanding the limitations of people with physical or mental handicap conditions. I have worked with disabled people a few times, then tend to be easy to get along with if you treat them with the right approach. That goes both ways, police don't get a free pass to be nasty. Most of them are reasonable people, and even those who are less reasonable are better dealt with if you give them no excuse to over react.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby noobtube » Thu 04 Dec 2014, 21:40:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dissident', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', 'I') learned as a small child to be polite to police officers and Sherrif deputies and it has served me well. Yes I got a few tickets, but I have never been arrested because I never refused to do the sensible thing and avoid a confrontation of my own making.


How does a cop expect politeness from someone with Down's syndrome who is experiencing a hysterical attack? Too many excuses for poor little police officers who shoot first and ask questions later.


Law enforcement need to be trained in understanding the limitations of people with physical or mental handicap conditions. I have worked with disabled people a few times, then tend to be easy to get along with if you treat them with the right approach. That goes both ways, police don't get a free pass to be nasty. Most of them are reasonable people, and even those who are less reasonable are better dealt with if you give them no excuse to over react.


Signs of a dishonest, corrupt, self-serving explanation.

How in the hell would you know? Have you met most cops?

There are 600,000 cops in the United States. I guess you are the cop spokesperson?

Americans are like little children... believing whatever the TeeVee tells them.
noobtube
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 287
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2013, 12:48:54
Top

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby wildbourgman » Thu 04 Dec 2014, 21:50:56

Wow, noobtube I sure didn't think that the subjectivist comment was very inflamitory. Really it seemed kind of milk toast to me.
wildbourgman
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Sun 07 Jul 2013, 10:05:52

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby rdberg1957 » Thu 04 Dec 2014, 23:47:28

Americans have multiple problems when it comes to police. More than 400 people per year are shot by American police. In Germany, Britain and France combined, 6 people died in interactions with police in 2012. One problem is that American police have to be more on their guard than British, French or German counterparts. There are many fewer guns in Europe.

In addition, American police are becoming less accountable. They are able to get surplus military hardware, including tanks because of a federal law that allows police departments to keep money confiscated without any legal process. All that is required is police suspicion that the money was used in criminal activity. This law is patently unconstitutional, but has gone unchallenged. (A series of articles was done on this law by the Washington Post this year). It allows police to become less accountable to elected officials because they have money which is not allocated by the legislature or city council.
User avatar
rdberg1957
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri 28 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Fri 05 Dec 2014, 00:45:02

If Eric Garner's killer can't be indicted, what cop possibly could? It's time to fix grand juries
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f you are an ordinary citizen being investigated for a crime by an American grand jury, there is a 99.993% chance you’ll be indicted. Yet if you’re a police officer, that chance falls to effectively nil.
I have read elsewhere that once you are indited you have a 99% chance of conviction. What other countries can beat that? North Korea?
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby Oneaboveall » Fri 05 Dec 2014, 02:09:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Keith_McClary', '[')url=http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/04/eric-garner-indicted-cop-grand-juries-video-evidence]If Eric Garner's killer can't be indicted, what cop possibly could? It's time to fix grand juries[/url]
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f you are an ordinary citizen being investigated for a crime by an American grand jury, there is a 99.993% chance you’ll be indicted. Yet if you’re a police officer, that chance falls to effectively nil.
I have read elsewhere that once you are indited you have a 99% chance of conviction. What other countries can beat that? North Korea?

I'm going to repost this. I noticed it's gotten more attention with all the recent publicity around grand juries:

Police officer who killed 17 year old armed with a WII REMOTE will not face charges:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/07/17/n ... ontroller/

http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/224897/ ... -anything/

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') grand jury in Euharlee, Georgia has decided not to indict Cpl. Beth Gatny in the shooting death of Christopher Roupe. Roupe was a member of his school’s ROTC and was hoping to join the military after graduation.

On February 14th, Valentine’s Day, Gatny and some other officers knocked on the door of the mobile home where Roupe lived, in order to serve his father with a warrant for violating his probation. Gatny said she heard what she “believed to be a firearm” before the door opened, drew her pistol at Christopher and shot, believing the Wii controller in his hand was a gun.


Here's the best part:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Although a previous grand jury found that Gatny’s use of force was unauthorized and that she should be subject to further prosecution, the new one decided that she should not be charged with either involuntary manslaughter or reckless conduct.


So we just summon a new grand jury when the previous one returns a recommendation we don't like?
When the banksters want something, our policymakers move with the speed of Mercury and the determination of Ares. It’s only when the rest of us need something that there is paralysis.

How free are we today with the dominance of globalist capital and militarized security apparatus?
Oneaboveall
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon 01 Nov 2010, 17:56:45
Top

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Fri 05 Dec 2014, 03:48:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Keith_McClary', '[')url=http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/04/eric-garner-indicted-cop-grand-juries-video-evidence]If Eric Garner's killer can't be indicted, what cop possibly could? It's time to fix grand juries[/url]
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f you are an ordinary citizen being investigated for a crime by an American grand jury, there is a 99.993% chance you’ll be indicted. Yet if you’re a police officer, that chance falls to effectively nil.
I have read elsewhere that once you are indited you have a 99% chance of conviction. What other countries can beat that? North Korea?

99% chance of indictment, not conviction.

You were so close except for the part about being totally ass backwards.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Fri 05 Dec 2014, 04:16:09

If anything like most places in the world, about 90% of indicted/ committed to trial cases result in guilty pleas. A 1% overall acquittal rate indicates roughly 10% success for actual defended cases. The odds then hinge on the amount of money the person charged is able to muster for the defence. Another huge factor is the level of legal awareness of the charged, in knowing exactly what not to say in an interview, rules of evidence etc.

In the case of police officers being charged, there will almost always be a vigorous defence, usually funded by police unions, which know exactly the best lawyers, legal strategies, & in most cases the defendant has been wise enough to keep their mouths shut as soon as they know they are under suspicion.

These facts indicate reform is going to be close to impossible, only total restructuring would make any difference. The required interference with the courts would almost certainly be unconstitutional & beyond even Presidential authority.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Fri 05 Dec 2014, 12:21:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Keith_McClary', '[')url=http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/04/eric-garner-indicted-cop-grand-juries-video-evidence]If Eric Garner's killer can't be indicted, what cop possibly could? It's time to fix grand juries[/url]
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f you are an ordinary citizen being investigated for a crime by an American grand jury, there is a 99.993% chance you’ll be indicted. Yet if you’re a police officer, that chance falls to effectively nil.
I have read elsewhere that once you are indited you have a 99% chance of conviction. What other countries can beat that? North Korea?

99% chance of indictment, not conviction.
No, I said once you have been indicted you have 1% chance of being acquitted at trial:
http://open.salon.com/blog/barry60x/201 ... ne_percent
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby wildbourgman » Fri 05 Dec 2014, 13:53:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wildbourgman', 'T')his man was being harrassed by cops for supposedly selling single cigarettes without paying taxes. Really? First of all that has big government and nanny state's signature all over it.

It is 'nanny state' but not necessarily 'big government.' I see the same thing in my little "green" city. The retail shop owners don't want scruffy people on the sidewalks, who don't buy stuff. However those scruffy people have the right to exist/loiter on public property--sidewalks, streets, etc. So the shop keepers get 'nuisance' laws passed to drive away the poor. And then the cops are in the unfortunate position of selecting, targeting, enforcement randomly, based on complaints by said shop keepers. It's not against the law to be poor, but it might as well be.
. . .
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wildbourgman', 'I')f selling cigarettes without paying taxes as an offense that you must be detained and arrested for according to the law then what did these officers do wrong in the eyes of the law? These folks are getting the type of governance that they voted for.

I would have thought a citation would have been enough, but really I don't think it's governments business to start with.
The cops knew his name -- Eric Garner. Cops could have written up a ticket, smiled and gone on their way. But that would have been impossible, because the cops have not been tasked with enforcing laws. Their job has become to enforce community standards--behavior, dress, and proper respect for hard work, wealth, and Christian values. Which Eric Gardner obviously did not have.

I am not defending those pigs. They should all be stripped of their badges, charged with excessive force, and tried in a court. But that is not the issue. The cops are tasked with randomly enforcing nuisance laws--and that includes drug, prostitution, and sexual orientation laws (sodomy etc.) Cigarette smoking is a victimless crime?



In a town in Southern Louisiana years ago we had an officer research old outdated laws in order to harrass a barber shop owned by young black men that were trying to have a "barber Shop" setting like in the movie with Ice Cube. Well the shop was in an old white area and the other shop owners were not happy about the influx of young black men and the noise and traffic that it caused in the area. The officer found one of the old "Blue laws" that said barber shops couldn't be open on monday. He went to the shop on monday and cited them. Now there were other babrer shops and hair stylist that didn't close on monday but none of them were ever cited.

This made the local news and our eventually local news papers online forum took up the story. I was one of the only people who were on the side of the barber shop owners. I soon found myself debating conservatives who I normally agreed with. It was kinda like "twelve angry men" in a way. I was able to turn a few opinions and we even had enough of us reach out to the District Attorney that he dismissed the charges and also said he would start a review of out of date laws. He also said he would then get with our Parish councel in order to get rid of or change them when necessary. I don't know if they ever followed up on that promise.

Government has too many laws on the books as well as too many archaic laws that should be purged. These laws make everyone a criminal at some point. I think it is big government that empowers the nanny state and I think a nanny state emboldens big government.
wildbourgman
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Sun 07 Jul 2013, 10:05:52
Top

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby dissident » Fri 05 Dec 2014, 18:25:03

Here is an example of the ridiculous police state inanity afflicting the US:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRZM9I7Psxs

That's right, arrested for walking by with hands in pocket and making "people" (I guess they must be hypothetical and not real) nervous. I bet if he resisted this ludicrous arrest he would have been shot and shot to death. Then some f*cka** "grand jury" would be really, really concerned with the poor policeman's career and life. Since in America the police can do no wrong.

Americans should stop worrying about what happens on the other side of the planet (thanks to the meddling by their own government) and worry about how to clean up the mess at home.
dissident
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6458
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 05 Dec 2014, 18:27:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dissident', 'H')ow does a cop expect politeness from someone with Down's syndrome who is experiencing a hysterical attack? Too many excuses for poor little police officers who shoot first and ask questions later.


You're right about that Diss, and have a good point.

There have been foreigners in the airport that were tased and died from tasing -- when really the problem was just that they didn't speak any english.

Police need retraining and focus on conflict resolution. How to keep things from escalating, EVEN IF the decision to arrest is made.

We've got a tv show called "cops" over here, and I thought this was how they all did it, but you watch that show and when someone is agitated the cop will talk to him to calm him and de-escalate it even as they cuff him. The goal is to get the cuffs on -- not to just jump an excited / drunk / mentally disabled / drugged person with sleeper holds and four cops on his head, in the pavement.

The reality is that this isn't just a ghetto issue -- it could be one's elderly father with alzheimers, or a mentally challenged brother, or even if someone is drunk and beligerent that doesn't mean they should die or that's how it has to go down.

Cops need better judgement, to know when to bring the hammer down and when to do de-escalating talk to get the cuffs on peacefully, and we won't have people dying in the street. In general, I think most people comply with getting cuffed if you handle it right. With this Garner case, and some others, it just looks like they're bullies and *a little too eager* to jump a perp and slam the head into the pavement.

I just noticed on CNN that NYC is ordering immediate retraining for all 22,000 officers. To focus on conflict resolution and how to arrest without unnecessarily escalating situations. Which is common sense law enforcement, I don't understand how it happened that cops got so tough lately. Seems to be a post-9/11 thing. And then the Defense dept even started handing out suprlus humvees and military gear.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 05 Dec 2014, 19:26:29

By the way, in case anyone ever thinks I'm a racist, I'm really not.

I'm actually dating a woman of mixed race lately. Half black, and her white side is some Asian and Irish and Italian.

She's petite and absolutely gorgeous. We met online five years ago -- and this is a whole other story and off topic, and twist of fate. She lived up north, and I lived in the South, and we were more like good friends and we did this online creative building mmo together.

So I actually knew her a long time and we spent a lot of time together, was always text, not even a voice.

We drifted apart, and then she ran into me out of nowhere one time -- completely by chance, we were in the same spot and she had a different online name. So we started talking again, and she was an online friend for the last year.

I just recently found out she had moved -- not just to the South, not just to my same state, not just to my same town, but down the street from me. The quirk of chance and fate is just astounding, to me.

So of course we had to meet, and we had a date the other day.

I had a wonderful time. Best first date of my life. I should have made another thread for this, it touches on multiple topics, one being the strangeness of the modern world and knowing people in other states and knowing them "online" and spending so much time with them. And then what is it like, if you meet for real, after so much time?

Well, I found out it was an instant companion. It was just like all that time we spent online together. She's far better for real, she's smart and funny, so sweet, younger than me and a massive nerd. She's an introvert, homebody, on the computer all the time. Plays the same dork computer games that I do -- the exact same games.

She is SO funny. We spent a good 12 hours together, talked nonstop the whole time.

There are some differences -- but race is an irrelevant one. She "sounds white." She's an artist (I'm not, but I like artists). She can draw, paint, CAD, all of that.

She's a bit of a doomer and talked about ebola. She's even a russophobe! Or Putin phobe, at least, and she brought that topic up (we had never discussed that before). Now I've come to learn a lot about Russia, so I'm really not a russophobe, and I corrected her on some facts and how things are in Russia. But just meeting someone that knows anything about geopolitics, and all the issues, and is aware of events, that's nice.

So anyhow, Sixtrings is a happy man lately.

Bringing this back around on topic -- it's my first experience at interracial dating, and the race factor is utterly irrelevant. We have so much in common, it's uncanny, and what we don't have in common, complements the other.

If anyone really IS a racist -- as in, you wouldn't even give a job interview to a woman just because she is black or part black, then that's wrong.

I've dated a lot of women in my life, and this is the one of the smartest funniest women I've ever met. She's got a good work ethic too, and I like that.

P.S. I very rarely say anything about my personal life, but I thought I'd share this with the forum since we've been talking about race lately.

And also so you know I'm not a total shut-in. :lol: I sure had fun the other day, wish me luck guys. :)
Last edited by Sixstrings on Fri 05 Dec 2014, 19:34:45, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby wildbourgman » Fri 05 Dec 2014, 19:36:56

Sixstrings, do you know how I know your a racist? Read your last post you racist shut-in. :)
wildbourgman
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Sun 07 Jul 2013, 10:05:52

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby wildbourgman » Fri 05 Dec 2014, 19:40:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'S')ix, that is great. Now you won't be such a hard#ass :razz:

But back to the thread; retraining is not enough. Government needs to be funded, as per the liberal agenda. :razz:

If we a nation refuse to tax ourselves adequately then we get the overworked, underpaid, stressed-out police department we see behind these events. It cost money to put a cop on the ground, in the hood, on an old-fashioned beat. As long as the cops patrol inside impersonal, impressive, high-powered, (now armored?) vehicles, regular folks feel disgust and threatened. And react accordingly. Neighborhoods should be patrolled by peer-police. People from the neighborhood. Not an imported occupying force.


First get rid of the welfare state and then explain to people that like to eat what a job is. Once the punks that run the streets have to work all day, then the crime rate will go down. Policing problem solved.
wildbourgman
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Sun 07 Jul 2013, 10:05:52
Top

Re: Eric Garner root cause analysis, why did he die?

Unread postby wildbourgman » Fri 05 Dec 2014, 20:23:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'Y')our conservative roots are showing bourg. "Get 'em off the streets and put 'em into work houses I say!" :razz:

Would you suggest we lower the minimum wage to $1/day, like in Pakistan, so those punks have something to do with their time? Or maybe the ghetto needs more burger flippers?


The economist that I agree with say that the minimum wage is always zero in the free market. What I'll say is what difference does it make when the value of most currencies are debased by their loving governments and central banks? If not for inflation the buying power of the minimum wage would be the same as it was in the late 1960's, hence no need to raise it. I'm for not screwing with peoples buying power to start through via inflation and allowing people to accept whatever wage that they will accept. I'm more of a "right of contract" fellow in that regard.

There was a time that people had to work to eat, I don't see anything wrong with that.

Oh and the ghetto would be empty because the real jobs aren't in the ghetto.
wildbourgman
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Sun 07 Jul 2013, 10:05:52
Top

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

cron