by ralfy » Sat 06 Dec 2014, 23:11:17
Governments, like households, the military, and businesses, have as a primary purpose their continued existence. They will help the other groups only if it is in their best interest to do so.
Thus, governments will support initiatives to increase life expectancy rates, etc., because that allows for greater prosperity, and thus more income for households and more profits for businesses, which in turn means more tax revenues for governments. The same principle applies to households, the military, and others.
But when problems take place, then mutual support weakens. In this case, we have a country with large amounts of credit, which in turn was used to increase military spending needed to protect the petrodollar, and that spending may be connected to large prison systems, increased surveillance, and more spending for police and intelligence networks.
The credit was also used to foster consumer spending and the rise of a middle class, in turn leading to preferences for white collar jobs, increased debt and spending, etc.
As large amounts of credit lead to financial crisis, and in turn economic problems such as unemployment, bankruptcy, etc., and coupled with the effects of oil supply issues and global warming, then police and military organizations may become more alarmed, if not paranoid. This may lead to more "collateral damage" outside the country as well as more incidences of police brutality, fines, jailing or imprisonment, etc.