by kpeavey » Sun 04 Sep 2011, 12:50:56
Built on land the plant would be subject to environmental regulations, unannounced inspections, and would require union workers for construction.
Placed at sea, regulations are far more liberal, inspectors would have to be flown/ferried in which offers time to get the ship into shape, spills are dissipated rather than reported, and construction labor becomes the cheapest in the world. The added bonus of the plant being portable means pipelines are not needed for every single well. This can offset some of the initial construction expenses. I wonder if the thing can be moved out of the way of a storm. Building the rig in floating sections then assembling at sea would significantly reduce construction time.
I think the elimination of construction permits and planning process for a land based operation saves immeasurable hassle, time and expense. Land acquisition, zoning, local/county/state ordinances, environmental considerations for soil/water/air/species, evacuation planning, and of course, taxes, taxes, taxes.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face--for ever."
-George Orwell, 1984
_____
twenty centuries of stony sleep were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle, and what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
-George Yeats