


I know this is off the original topic and no amount of information will sway your mind Xenophobe but consider this:

Ayup old hydro power is a lot cheaper then new photovoltaic panel power but as you have seen in Maine they are into taking out old hydro-dams not building new ones. The 150,000 or so plug ins they will sell this year won't make a noticeable difference but eventually you will get to the point where they want to turn off Grandmas TV so that junior can charge his car. Then you have to decide what your going to build to provide the needed new electricity. A new hydro dam of any size anywhere in the US is highly unlikely when you consider all the enviropolitics involved. New nuclear plants to even replace the old ones we have seem a long shot as the Clam shell alliance is still in full cry. State of the art coal is possible but CO2 capture and sequestration may use as much as 30 percent of the energy produced by the raw coal so cheap it will not be. At least nowhere near as cheap as what we are paying now. As you can see from the example above PV roof panels are a loser but solar to steam in the dessert might pay off. And switching to more natural gas will just use up that resource more rapidly.That leaves wind and tide each with it's limits and promises. I don't see why anyone would see the problem as solved. 













Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest