Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby vtsnowedin » Tue 04 Jan 2011, 10:34:56

8) I rather think of my self as a REALIST!!
My math is not off. If charging a volt everyday doesn't double your bill then you are already using more then 13 KWH per day. That's the only difference. My price for last KWHs is over .17/KWH. They discount the first 200KWH to .077/kwh as a lifeline to the poor. That is how doubling my usage will more then double my bill.
Where does your electricity come from bye the way. If it's from an old coal burning plant switching from gas to your electric grid might cause more greenhouse gasses not less.
I'm not against EVs. I just want to build the nuclear power plants to charge them at the same time we build the cars, along with what wind and solar is feasible. As that seems to be politically impossible we would be better to buy the most efficient conventional car as possible and then cut our yearly mileage in half. That will save a lot more oil and money then EVs and hybrids will ever accomplish. What really Ts me off are the tax subsidies that they are charging me for to pay you to waste money on a losing proposition. If EVs really made economic and environmental sense they would need no subsidy.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby Xenophobe » Tue 04 Jan 2011, 21:16:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', '8')) I rather think of my self as a REALIST!!
My math is not off. If charging a volt everyday doesn't double your bill then you are already using more then 13 KWH per day. That's the only difference. My price for last KWHs is over .17/KWH. They discount the first 200KWH to .077/kwh as a lifeline to the poor. That is how doubling my usage will more then double my bill.


Okay, it doubles your bill. 12.9 kwh @ 17 cents per kwh means that your Volt can be charged up for 30 miles of cruising the burbs for $2.20!! While that MASSIVE $2 might double you electric bill, Vt, your electric bill, it ain't much to begin with.

Miles per $1 of fuel? 13.6 on the low side, 18.1 if you do average

So lets compare, at $3/gal, and 12 mpg in my old pickup? (12 miles / $3) is 4 miles per $1 fuel. Double it to a normal sedan. 8 miles per $1 fuel. Collect a hybrid getting 45 mpg? 15 miles per $1/fuel.

So a Volt is comparable, fuel costs, for a nice 45 mpg hybrid, like a Prius.

Except, of course, the Volt can be powered off the plentiful and common fuels we use in America to create electricity, including windmills and PVs on our rooftops (i'll include your nukes, I like those too). So...the Volt STILL allows us to save ourselves from peak oil because...the Volt won't require any of the fuel to be crude!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', '
')Where does your electricity come from bye the way. If it's from an old coal burning plant switching from gas to your electric grid might cause more greenhouse gasses not less.


This is a peak oil site, deleted But my electricity is a little windmillish, reasonable portions of coal and natural gas. No nukes though.
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby Keith_McClary » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 01:35:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', 'C')an't afford it? Don't buy one. Drive less. Stop driving. Buy a used Prius, drove past a lightly used one for $16G's just last night at the local toyota dealership.

Stop whining about it man! Solve your own peak oil problems immediately and let gasoline hit $10/gal and you won't care either!

Get a horse.
Image
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby Keith_McClary » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 01:53:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', 'G')asoline cost to the American consumer is a 1:1 effect, BUT ONLY ON THEIR GASOLINE CONSUMPTION COSTS. Americans mitigate against increased gasoline costs by doing away with some of that 50% discretionary car use they don't need, each to his own means. Fuel costs DON'T cause 1:1 increases in prices of other things, because in other industries fuel costs can be apportioned to the product being shipped.
...
The means to save our personal finances from those increased costs is as far away as the Chevy dealership. DO NOT BE AFRAID THUJA!!!! THE FORCE CHEVY VOLT IS WITH US!

Image
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby vtsnowedin » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 08:52:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Keith_McClary', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', 'G')asoline cost to the American consumer is a 1:1 effect, BUT ONLY ON THEIR GASOLINE CONSUMPTION COSTS. Americans mitigate against increased gasoline costs by doing away with some of that 50% discretionary car use they don't need, each to his own means. Fuel costs DON'T cause 1:1 increases in prices of other things, because in other industries fuel costs can be apportioned to the product being shipped.
...
The means to save our personal finances from those increased costs is as far away as the Chevy dealership. DO NOT BE AFRAID THUJA!!!! THE FORCE CHEVY VOLT IS WITH US!

Image

:-D You forgot to label the high tech. synthetic headlights. (on the spokes-model)
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby vtsnowedin » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 10:13:00

8) OK Xeno lets try this one more time.
There are 250 million registered cars in the USA. We drive them on average 15000 miles a year. If we have to and we probably will we could get by on about half that amount of driving. A lot of the world drives less then that so why can't we?
So to get off of oil for transportation we need 125 million volts or similar cars. More or less.
Each Volt uses 12.9 kwh for a charge that will take it 30 miles or doing the math 6450 kwh per year to drive it 15000 miles on electricity. Our present electrical grid is old and at capacity plus or minus safety margins so any major new load on the system will require building enough new capacity to provide it.
A 600 mw power plant typically produces 3,900 giga watt hours of power per year or enough to charge 604,000 Volts if they have no other customers. 125 million divided by 604 thousand gives you a need for 207 new 600 mw power plants or 1.242 million mw of new generating capacity. Your not going to do that with wind ,solar or dump gas.
And that is what it would take to replace half the driving we are doing now so you see your view that EVs are the easy answer just doesn't add up.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby Revi » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 11:20:09

There is an answer, but it involves ending the traditional car culture and taking the bus between towns. If we all got NEV's or low speed vehicles and only drove them around town we could cut our mileage by a lot. Maybe 5000 miles a year in a much lighter vehicle. I was in Bar Harbor last summer and a lot of the people who work in restaurants get around in little scooters. They get around 100 mpg and can be parked anywhere. There is a bus to take you to the rest of Mount Desert Island and you can take a long distance bus anywhere, so why have a car? I think we will move towards a model like that soon. Young people will get a job in a resort town, a ski town, etc. and not get a car. Us old fogeys will be stuck in full sized car world and slowly go broke. None of my nephews or nieces have a car. Our kids don't have cars. They are all working all over the world and they don't need one. Car culture is dead already.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby vtsnowedin » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 12:04:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 's')nip.....
....... Car culture is dead already.

Not just yet it isn't. it was 15F here this morning and snowing. Not a day to be ridding a scooter or bicycle to work.
I have three grown children. One drives a Toyota corolla she bought when she came home from Kuwait. I gets 38 mpg with her foot right into the firewall. She carpools with her sister who bought a new Toyota Camry this year that gets about 31 mpg. The third bought a new Honda Accord that gets 30 mpg. She lives just ten miles from her job. The boss (wife ) drives a 2010 Rav4 that gets 25 on her way down to drive the school bus and her other job and I'm driving a Ford ranger that has over 260 k on it I bought for $900 two years ago.
We have done our part to pull the auto industry out of this recession buying three new cars in a single year but as prices rise as expected I expect a house or two to be purchased much closer to work to reduce commutes.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby Maddog78 » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 16:03:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'C')ar culture is dead already.



Not by a long shot and a pretty ridiculous statement to be honest.
Maybe in your small circle (family) or Maine. I don't know much about Maine but car culture is doing very well in many if not most other areas it would seem.

In my small circle in the past couple of months. neighbour new Chevy pickup, another neighbour new Hyundai SUV, friend's wife new Chevy Cruze, sister in law, new Mini Cooper, brother new Ford SUV, neighbour's kid new Jeep SUV son's best friend used BMW 3 series.
That's just off the top of my head and I'm sure I'm missing a few.



Bigger picture.

http://www.thestar.com/wheels/article/9 ... igher?bn=1

Car and especially truck sales sales did very well where I live last month.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Auto-sale ... 9.html?x=0

Even in the U.S. they weren't bad at all. Still taking off big time in China.
User avatar
Maddog78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby Revi » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 18:27:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Maddog78', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'C')ar culture is dead already.



Not by a long shot and a pretty ridiculous statement to be honest.
Maybe in your small circle (family) or Maine. I don't know much about Maine but car culture is doing very well in many if not most other areas it would seem.

In my small circle in the past couple of months. neighbour new Chevy pickup, another neighbour new Hyundai SUV, friend's wife new Chevy Cruze, sister in law, new Mini Cooper, brother new Ford SUV, neighbour's kid new Jeep SUV son's best friend used BMW 3 series.
That's just off the top of my head and I'm sure I'm missing a few.



Bigger picture.

http://www.thestar.com/wheels/article/9 ... igher?bn=1

Car and especially truck sales sales did very well where I live last month.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Auto-sale ... 9.html?x=0

Even in the U.S. they weren't bad at all. Still taking off big time in China.


We are buying less cars than we were now. I am just saying that we can see the end of car culture. I figured out that there are only about 280,000 miles left on every vehicle on the planet. That's assuming a trillion barrels left, a third used for transportation and a billion vehicles. We are going to burn through the second half a lot faster than the first half of the oil. There are lots of people who aren't going to have a car in the US soon. It costs the average person about $8000 a year to have one, so a lot of people won't be able to afford them. I know that a lot of people are putting themselves in hock to have a car still, but that doesn't mean they will be able to afford to drive it.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine
Top

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby Xenophobe » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 18:38:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', ' ')Our present electrical grid is old and at capacity plus or minus safety margins so any major new load on the system will require building enough new capacity to provide it.


Here is the crux. I don't think I disagree with your basic calculations for how much power we need to create to fire up the Volt, but when I mentioned peak loading earlier, I had this issue in mind. What I don't know, and perhaps you can help me with, is the difference between peak load ( in a general way ) and normal loading, the difference being the power that can distributed without new infrastructure.

You can claim all you'd like about old grids and stuff, but this isn't any different than Roccmans old argument that Phoenix was going down a few years back because, well, YOU know, someone told him that because the entire infrastructure hadn't been completely replaced there was no way it could stand up another year. Admittedly, an incoherent source, but the angle is the same. Call it Simmons old "corrosion brings down the oil industry!" routine when that pipeline near Prudhoe sprang a leak a few years back. Another crackpot theory from another crackpot, ignoring the near continual maintenance on these types of systems.

Figuring out WHERE the power comes from is easy, take your pick. Coal, nukes, windmills, PV's across rooftops on America are good for 700+ gigawatts, but the real kicker is the difference a smart grid can yield, and that difference is the gap between peak load and normal loading, and how many hours that differential exists.
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08
Top

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby Xenophobe » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 18:44:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', ' ') None of my nephews or nieces have a car. Our kids don't have cars. They are all working all over the world and they don't need one. Car culture is dead already.


Nope. The onslaught of EV's and PHEV's and even the remaining Corvettes and sportscars and monster trucks are still here, still being purchased even with $3/gal gasoline in America, and aren't going anywhere soon.
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08
Top

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby Xenophobe » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 18:51:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', ' ') I figured out that there are only about 280,000 miles left on every vehicle on the planet.


Yeah but that was a really bad calculation Revi. Particularly considering you are like one of the early adoptors for how to ride around in a car which doesn't need crude to power it. And now that we've got the big 3 all getting ready to fight over how they can sell us the full scale version of EV? Fuggetaboutit.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', '
') That's assuming a trillion barrels left, a third used for transportation and a billion vehicles.


Thats why your calculation is bad. We've got MULTIPLE trillions left, and have the technology to get it, just as we reach the point where we don't even need it as much.

It should be noted that these are GOOD things.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', '
')I know that a lot of people are putting themselves in hock to have a car still, but that doesn't mean they will be able to afford to drive it.


Yeah, after the average American pays $25G's for that average new car, he/she then can't afford to cough up $100/month for the fuel to drive it 1000 miles a month....while making a $400/month car payment. The problem here isn't afford-ability, its brain power of the average American to spend $400/month while forgetting he/she really needs to spend even more for fuel, registration, insurance, maintenance, tires, etc etc. Someone that ignorant might even buy more house than they could afford and then...blame it all on peak oil! 8O
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08
Top

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby Revi » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 20:28:47

I think a lot of young people are going to think twice before they chain themselves to the car. It is going to make a lot more sense to get around in something else and when they have to go further get a Zip Car or something. Why start the payments? We don't drive as much as we used to, and a third of our driving lately has been electric. I just think that there are lots of people in the US who are perfectly fine without their own car. I know a lot of them live around here. A lot of our culture has been about getting a car and how great it is, so it's hard to see out of that lense, but this is a peak oil website and you might hear this kind of thing around here. After 2014 the car is going to really seem like a millstone. When we start to drop off the plateau they are going to figure out a way to get us out of our cars for good.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby Xenophobe » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 20:57:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'I') think a lot of young people are going to think twice before they chain themselves to the car.


I agree. Part of demand destruction is just such an idea.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', '
') It is going to make a lot more sense to get around in something else and when they have to go further get a Zip Car or something. Why start the payments?


I agree. Cars are not for everyone, and as we create more economic output per unit of crude used, one of the ways we do it is by getting around in different and better ways than we used to.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', '
')A lot of our culture has been about getting a car and how great it is, so it's hard to see out of that lense, but this is a peak oil website and you might hear this kind of thing around here.


Americans have been raised in a car culture, something I certainly don't object to. And peakers have a habit of objecting to everything, I think its a part of their natural pessimism.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', '
') After 2014 the car is going to really seem like a millstone. When we start to drop off the plateau they are going to figure out a way to get us out of our cars for good.


We're increasing production again...maybe we'll create another plateau in another generation? But even with more production, it doesn't matter. The EV revolution has begun, it's too late to turn back the clock now.
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08
Top

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby vtsnowedin » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 21:51:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', ' ')Our present electrical grid is old and at capacity plus or minus safety margins so any major new load on the system will require building enough new capacity to provide it.


Here is the crux. I don't think I disagree with your basic calculations for how much power we need to create to fire up the Volt, but when I mentioned peak loading earlier, I had this issue in mind. What I don't know, and perhaps you can help me with, is the difference between peak load ( in a general way ) and normal loading, the difference being the power that can distributed without new infrastructure.

You can claim all you'd like about old grids and stuff, but this isn't any different than Roccmans old argument that Phoenix was going down a few years back because, well, YOU know, someone told him that because the entire infrastructure hadn't been completely replaced there was no way it could stand up another year. Admittedly, an incoherent source, but the angle is the same. Call it Simmons old "corrosion brings down the oil industry!" routine when that pipeline near Prudhoe sprang a leak a few years back. Another crackpot theory from another crackpot, ignoring the near continual maintenance on these types of systems.

Figuring out WHERE the power comes from is easy, take your pick. Coal, nukes, windmills, PV's across rooftops on America are good for 700+ gigawatts, but the real kicker is the difference a smart grid can yield, and that difference is the gap between peak load and normal loading, and how many hours that differential exists.

Ah yes charge them off peak using smart grids and we won't have to build anything. Not!!
If you compare existing coal plants rated capacity to their yearly production you will see that they are in effect used about eighteen hours per day at full capacity or for some longer period at a reduced rate adding up to the same thing. You might jump to the conclusion that that gives you six hours per day to charge cars off peak but in reality it is much less then that as every plant has a considerable amount of down time for repairs and maintenance. There is some spare capacity there but you will use that up long before you build enough volts to significantly reduce oil consumption.
You take issue with my assessment of the age of our electric grid. Hem and haw all you want but every nuclear plant in America is already thirty years old and beyond its initial design life. The situation in coal plants is not as uniform but a good portion of them were built before 1960. the industry is rightly concerned about the need to rebuild the system on a schedule that meets current needs and expected growth in population. Add in a need for 1.242 Million Mega watts of new generating capacity and panic will ensue.

700+ gigawatts of roof top PV? Is that 700 gigawatts capacity or 700 gigawatt-hours of annual yield? Doesn't matter actually as the cost per KWH is a wee bit more then 11 cent coal power and they don't work at night when you need to charge your EV car.
The difference a smart car can yield can only be computed after you account for all the resources used to build, maintain, fuel/charge, repair, and dispose of the car when worn out. Leaving out the cost of the power plants and distribution line upgrades needed to actually convert to electric transportation gives you false conclusions and a rosy view of your future that just is not going to happen.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby JohnDenver » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 22:15:49

The author of this article, Mike Bendzela, posted for a long time here at peakoil.com as a hardcore doomer named "killJOY".
member/killJOY/
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby Xenophobe » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 23:16:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'T')he author of this article, Mike Bendzela, posted for a long time here at peakoil.com as a hardcore doomer named "killJOY".
member/killJOY/


John! Update your blog! We're seeing yet ANOTHER peak, do some kind of post on how many we might have, how often they show up, etc etc! Please!
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08
Top

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby Xenophobe » Wed 05 Jan 2011, 23:31:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', '
')Figuring out WHERE the power comes from is easy, take your pick. Coal, nukes, windmills, PV's across rooftops on America are good for 700+ gigawatts, but the real kicker is the difference a smart grid can yield, and that difference is the gap between peak load and normal loading, and how many hours that differential exists.

Ah yes charge them off peak using smart grids and we won't have to build anything. Not!!


I didn't say you had to like it, but do you have much in the way of the gap between peak load and base load so we can calculate it out?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', '
')If you compare existing coal plants rated capacity to their yearly production you will see that they are in effect used about eighteen hours per day at full capacity or for some longer period at a reduced rate adding up to the same thing. You might jump to the conclusion that that gives you six hours per day to charge cars off peak but in reality it is much less then that as every plant has a considerable amount of down time for repairs and maintenance. There is some spare capacity there but you will use that up long before you build enough volts to significantly reduce oil consumption.


Fine. So first, we utilize what we've got. How many years/millions of Volts can that handle, FIRST? We aren't talking about 200 million volts tomorrow, we've got a century of crude, so even if we build 1 MW wind turbines to cover the Volts (needing perhaps 140,000 of them to cover 125 million Volts, at 50% utilization) we're talking about, to be reasonable, 5 decades to build them out?

I like nukes better of course, or even coal, but windmills are pleasant.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', '
')Add in a need for 1.242 Million Mega watts of new generating capacity and panic will ensue.


So, we need 140,000 1 MW wind turbines, 50 years to build it out, you think we can't build 2800/year? Seems pretty reasonable....throw in some nukes and PV's and you won't even need that many.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', '
')700+ gigawatts of roof top PV? Is that 700 gigawatts capacity or 700 gigawatt-hours of annual yield?


Perhaps I am reading incorrectly for the available amount showing up, residential and commercial on the graph for Figure 2?

http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy09osti/44073.pdf

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', '
')Doesn't matter actually as the cost per KWH is a wee bit more then 11 cent coal power and they don't work at night when you need to charge your EV car.
The difference a smart car can yield can only be computed after you account for all the resources used to build, maintain, fuel/charge, repair, and dispose of the car when worn out. Leaving out the cost of the power plants and distribution line upgrades needed to actually convert to electric transportation gives you false conclusions and a rosy view of your future that just is not going to happen.

Says you. We built out the entire ICE powered infrastructure in a century, no reason we can't power the 125 million Volts in 50 years. We certainly aren't running short on coal, natural gas or uranium anytime soon, so mixing and matching as we go would work quite well.
User avatar
Xenophobe
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri 06 Aug 2010, 21:13:08
Top

Re: The End of The End: How the Peak Oil Movement Failed

Postby Keith_McClary » Thu 06 Jan 2011, 01:04:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Xenophobe', 'Y')eah, after the average American pays $25G's for that average new car, he/she then can't afford to cough up $100/month for the fuel to drive it 1000 miles a month

"Average Americans"?
3% of Americans buy a new vehicle each year.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron