Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Main Doomer Fallacy

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Fri 20 Aug 2010, 21:57:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'o') you admit there has been significant progress in sound, graphics, etc. But unless you encounter an AI that can out-think you, you decree that no significant progress is being made? That is a weak position to take. The human mind took millions of years to create. We may never be able to out-do the job nature has done. But even if we do, you insist it must be done in your lifetime when nature herself took millions of years?


very late to this thread...and an old fart to boot! That being said I have a perspective that many of you young folks do not. When I did my undergrad there was nothing but one huge computing centre, it took up an area the size of a small world war II bungalow and had limited power. This was the state of affairs as I did my Msc, I distinctly remember feeding big boxes of punched cards into terminals, with of course the normal card in the middle of the deck getting spit out...back to the start. When I did my doctorate thesis there were a few terminals around the university attached to the mainframe and I used what would seem bizarre command language to type my thesis into that beast. When I got out...holy smokes I could buy a PC or I could buy an Apple. Like a true geek I went for the Apple 2c (still have it stored if anyone wants to buy a bit of history) and I thought that was just amazing. I worked for numerous years at various companies but it wasn't until just after Netscape came out that I was able to convince the company I worked for...hey this is important. I'm a scientist and up until that time I was using the Internet on a regular basis, but if you couldn't speak Unix it was problematic where I was. Anyway...fast forward a few years (perhaps 1 decade) and we have handhelds that have more storage capacity and computing power than my first desktop. We have mobile phones that work pretty much everywhere when I distinctly remember having to get into a landrover and drive 2 hours to get to a landline, try 10 or more times to get an overseas line and finally get in touch with my wife and tell her I was still alive. Nowadays when I'm travelling I have continual communication with her via my mobile. Now I have pretty much continual 2G connection with by email everywhere I travel (a lot of countries) and can carry all the documents I need on my Blackberry.
To say there haven't been wild changes is crazy as far as I'm concerned. If you were to compare technology acdvancements through the first half of the 20th century versus the last half I think you would be astounded. I certainly have been.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby Newfie » Fri 20 Aug 2010, 22:06:20

Dad was a guide for duck hunting parties, the ducks would blacken the sky. The ducks are nearly gone.
Dad worked in the bay and made a living. The bay is now dead with pollution.
I used to hunt out of our back yard. There is no more hunting for miles around.
My grand father caught cod for a living, cod that was the main protein source for Western Europe. The cod fishing moratorium is 14 years old and the cod biomass is under 5% of historical records.

Chart your own destiny.

Personally we have no TV and no AC. We walk to work. We have a bug out boat. I am happier now.

I am an engineer and work in technology. After 40 years I see a marked reduction in the quality of my life style and in the meaning of life. I have come to the conclusion that, while technology has benefits, they are greatly over rated.

Read "1984."

Cheers
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby ralfy » Sat 21 Aug 2010, 13:19:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '
')
If you like this site, x, and you want to be comfortable and accepted by everyone, then you'll probably have to espouse some doomerism yourself. Personally, I never have been able to stand groupthink, which is what this really is here at PeakOil.com. The doomers are totally intolerant of any outspoken person who disagrees with their group line.

And I admit, constitutionally, I don't care to follow any group. I like to think for myself. And when I am learning about a complex subject, I like the devil's advocate role because arguing a position uncovers weaknesses as well as strengths. It's amusing for me.

So, unless you're willing to be something of a pariah, you probably shouldn't follow my lead.

To tell you the truth, no one here really gives me much of a fight. The doomers mostly sound like a bunch of middle school kids throwing food and insults around in the cafeteria. Every once in a long while, someone argues a point which gives me pause. But that doesn't happen very often with this collection of twits.

I wish there were more people who argued cogently and forcefully in a more collegiate debating mode. That would be a whole lot more fun.


Your views are those of most, i.e., science and technology will save us, etc. In which case, your views are not that of a pariah but the opposite, i.e., the same as that of most people who have not heard of or argue that peak oil, global warming, and the current economic crisis are hoaxes or are irrelevant because they can be solved easily through a combination of science and technology driven by free market capitalism.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby ralfy » Sat 21 Aug 2010, 13:25:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'B')oys and girls I'm going to lock this thread and start with the formal warnings if you don't behave and that is a big waste of my time - be civil or go somewhere else.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'O')ne more time,

At what price point will increasing energy cost limit R&D?


No one is stepping up to the plate except for me, Pops. My answer: Never.

Science is not an artifact of culture as doomers mistakenly assert.

Thanks carl.

Here's an article in Science on topic, they certainly aren't doomers as far as when peak will occur.


The bad news is that we also need petrochemicals for plastics and other necessities, minerals, water, and so on. For example,

http://www.ranken-energy.com/Products%2 ... roleum.htm

Ironically, several of these resources (including rare-earth metals) and products like plastics are also needed for renewable energy.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby dsula » Sat 21 Aug 2010, 18:54:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kublikhan', 'T')he level of education of present day humans is higher than during past eras of humans. And even uneducated humans can contribute to human technological progress.

A truckload of high school graduates is no substitute for a university degree.
Not much chance you will be getting life-changing science out of the slums of mexico city.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kublikhan', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', 't')hem cost an enormous amount of money and use an enourmous high tech ifrstructure to be built and maintained. As far as I can see any advancement in sci/tech will only lead to more consumption of resources and eventually more destruction of earth. The roman empire was also technologicaly advanced. But still they went bust.
And yet here we are, sitting at a technological level far higher than the Romans possessed. Empires rise and fall all the time, yet the march of human technological progress has continued.

Thanks to surplus energy available to feed an army of scientiest, engineers and support troops. Once the energy surplus goes, so will science..

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kublikhan', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', 'M')y gradfather travelled in an ox-cart, my father owned a car. I still own a car as opposed to a flying saucer.
My grandfather cooled beer with ice cut from some cave, my father had a refrigerator, I own a refrigerator (as opposed to a self-cooling beer).
My grandfather listened to radio, my father watched TV, I watch TV (as opposed to totally immersive vritual 3D world)
My grandfather wrote letters, my father used the phone, I use the phone.
How about:
Grandpa used ox power. Papa used dino-goo power. I use nuclear power.
Grandpa had radio. Papa had 200 pound black n white tv. I have 2" HD plasma and the internet.
Grandpa had slide ruler. Papa had adding machine. I have 4Ghz Intel computer.
Grandpa used pen. Papa used landline. I use wireless.

There;s no live changing difference between a B&W TV and a plasma.
Same is true for all your other examples.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kublikhan', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', 'I')'m playing computer games since the dawn of times. And as of yet I still have to encounter this new great game which makes significant improvement on the AI. Graphics are great, sound is great, AI is still on the level of the pacman ghosts. Where's this exponential progress?So you admit there has been significant progress in sound, graphics, etc. But unless you encounter an AI that can out-think you, you decree that no significant progress is being made? That is a weak position to take. The human mind took millions of years to create. We may never be able to out-do the job nature has done. But even if we do, you insist it must be done in your lifetime when nature herself took millions of years?
[/quote]
But I thought that is all this singularity stuff all about? Give birth to some beyond-human bio-AI-machine outsmarting us? And I'm saying the computer games AI is no smarter than it was 20 years ago. Grpahics and sound is just useless dressing.
User avatar
dsula
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 982
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby Pretorian » Sat 21 Aug 2010, 20:35:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kublikhan', 'T')he level of education of present day humans is higher than during past eras of humans. And even uneducated humans can contribute to human technological progress.

A truckload of high school graduates is no substitute for a university degree.
Not much chance you will be getting life-changing science out of the slums of mexico city.


Formal education has little to do with intelligence, if any at all. Its just shows that person in question was able to pass some tests, thats it. Like if you have a high-school graduate you can assume that (hopefully) this person is no less than borderline retarded and is able to read and write, if you have a college graduate, you can assume that he is somewhat higher than borderline retarded and surely is able to read and write, if he has an advanced degree you can assume that he is normal and not only writes and reads but also understands written material.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby dsula » Sat 21 Aug 2010, 21:08:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kublikhan', 'T')he level of education of present day humans is higher than during past eras of humans. And even uneducated humans can contribute to human technological progress.

A truckload of high school graduates is no substitute for a university degree.
Not much chance you will be getting life-changing science out of the slums of mexico city.


Formal education has little to do with intelligence, if any at all. Its just shows that person in question was able to pass some tests, thats it. Like if you have a high-school graduate you can assume that (hopefully) this person is no less than borderline retarded and is able to read and write, if you have a college graduate, you can assume that he is somewhat higher than borderline retarded and surely is able to read and write, if he has an advanced degree you can assume that he is normal and not only writes and reads but also understands written material.

Yes for the intelligence. No for the required underlying knowledge. If you're the smartest guy in the universe and never went to school chances are very slim that you're going to produce advanced scientific results.
Two guys with an IQ of 100 each is not the same as one guy of IQ 200.
User avatar
dsula
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 982
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby diemos » Sat 21 Aug 2010, 21:45:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', 'F')ormal education has little to do with intelligence, if any at all.


The people who lived 2000 years ago were just as intelligent as we are but they didn't have the technological progress that we have had. One wonders what we had that they didn't have. (hint: wealth and leisure due to fossil fuel consumption).
User avatar
diemos
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby diemos » Sat 21 Aug 2010, 23:34:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'B')ut about that lunar power?


I did a double take on that too, but tidal power does count and it does come from the moon.
User avatar
diemos
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby BigTex » Sun 22 Aug 2010, 01:54:05

This is a great discussion.

I see humans as sort of like the dinosaurs--totally in control of a world seemingly configured just for them.

When the dinosaurs ran out of cheap abundant plant life to eat they all died. I imagine that when carbon-based energy concentrations become more diluted at some point in the future, life will get harder for humans as well.

But a process like that can unfold achingly slowly for the impatient doomer and clever creatures like humans have consistently come up with all sorts of gadgets to slow the process down even more.

Life on this earth has gone through countless cycles of experimentation, standardization, evolution, extinction, re-birth, etc. We are its latest top-of-the-food-chain iteration, but it's hard to argue with a straight face that we are the final and ultimate expression of intelligent life, optimally adapted to its environment in perpetuity.

IMHO, people in general, and doomers in particular, should find more about the present and life in general in which to find meaning and enjoyment, even if we are standing on the edge of a cliff as a species, culture, nation, etc. We cannot change our nature by lamenting its shortcomings (my opinion, of course).

Imagine the pointlessness of a Cassandra dinosaur millions of years ago--"Hey guys, we're all going to be extinct in 10,000 years, let's try to delay it another 1,000 years by stocking up on plant MREs and implementing a 'one-dinosaur policy'." That would have been a silly thing to do.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby kublikhan » Sun 22 Aug 2010, 02:30:08

Thank you diemos, I was indeed referring to tidal power there when I said lunar. 1 out of 5 pstarr? I think not. Solar, fission, and fusion alone all have the potential to generate energy in excess of the amount we extract from fossil fuels. As for tidal and geothermal, I did mention mixing energy sources together did I not? Even with fossil fuels we don't extract all of our energy from a single fossil fuel. I think it is really disingenuous when doomers cry foul over a clean, renewable energy source just because it can't meet 100% of our energy needs.
The oil barrel is half-full.
User avatar
kublikhan
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 5064
Joined: Tue 06 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Illinois

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby kublikhan » Sun 22 Aug 2010, 03:23:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', 'T')here;s no live changing difference between a B&W TV and a plasma.
Same is true for all your other examples
Really? So this sounds about right to you?
Me: The development of energy sources that can provide energy at or beyond the level of fossil fuels, yet do so for thousands of years or longer(fission), is an incredibly important achievement for humanity.
You: Nah. Once the dino goo runs out I'm good playing with sticks and stones.
Me: The computer was a revolutionary advancement for humanity.
You: Nah. It is just an incremental improvement over the slide ruler.
Me: The internet was an incredible advance that provides an extraordinary wealth of information for millions of people with a few key strokes.
You: Bah. Read a book.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', 'A')nd I'm saying the computer games AI is no smarter than it was 20 years ago. AI is still on the level of the pacman ghosts.
Bullshit. We now have computer AI than is capable of defeating world class chess champions. That is quite a few levels higher than your packman ghosts.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', 'G')rpahics and sound is just useless dressin
Oh really? Still playing on our Atari then are we? Or perhaps you find some of that "useless dressing" appealing, hmmmm?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kublikhan', 'A')nd yet here we are, sitting at a technological level far higher than the Romans possessed. Empires rise and fall all the time, yet the march of human technological progress has continued.
Thanks to surplus energy available to feed an army of scientiest, engineers and support troops. Once the energy surplus goes, so will science..That is ridiculous. Technological progress continued after the fall of the roman empire despite the lack of fossil fuels. And technological progress will continue long after fossil fuels are gone. Science is not going to stop just because you can't fill up your hummer...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', 'A') truckload of high school graduates is no substitute for a university degree.
Not much chance you will be getting life-changing science out of the slums of mexico city.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nil Gupta, a professor at India's premier business school, the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, leads a pioneering tribe of technocrats working for no-frills change at the mass level, by harnessing knowledge wealth from economically weaker sections of society.

"Being economically poor does not mean being knowledge-poor," Gupta told Asia Times Online. "But the poor who are at the bottom of the economic pyramid are often considered as being at the bottom of the knowledge pyramid as well. Nothing could be further from the truth."

To prove the truth that wisdom does not depend on university degrees, Gupta's 21-year-old Honey Bee Network has compiled an unprecedented database of 140,000 innovations created by farmers, villagers and small-town inventors. Many have no formal education or technical training. Teams of Honey Bee volunteers scout across India to hunt out local innovations, inventions and traditional knowledge practices.

The inter-connected agencies help test grassroots inventions, file for patents, find investors to develop, produce and market eco-friendly, cheaper new products.

Prajapati invented low-cost refrigeration in a country where the fridge remains out of reach of lower, middle-income groups and the poor. The Mitti Cool, made out of terracotta, an unglazed clay-based ceramic, uses an age-old practice still common in India of earthen-clay pots keeping water refreshingly below room temperature. Prajapati developed the earthen pot-cooling effect to produce a fridge that keeps food, vegetables, even milk, fresh for days, requires no maintenance, needs no electricity and costs $53, with shipping charges extra. Such sustainable, ready-to-order inventions from the Honey Bee database range across 34 categories. They include agricultural tools and techniques, water conservation, health, education innovation, food and nutrition, traditional medicines and industrial and household goods. India's rural inventors drive change

This is exactly the kind of innovation and know-how we are going to need when if are moving into an energy poor future. People are out there solving problems everyday. Many without any formal education. You should not write off billions of people as simpleton morons who are not going to contribute to progress just because they don't have a college degree.
The oil barrel is half-full.
User avatar
kublikhan
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 5064
Joined: Tue 06 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Illinois
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby sparky » Sun 22 Aug 2010, 08:05:35

.
Hello big tex glad to see you around
The main doomer fallacy is to equate the modern consumer society with " the world "
it's not .......by a long shot ,
the suburban malls are the dinosaurs ,like the downtown high rise office towers
the poorest groups will hardly feel a change , just a bout of extreme misery ,
that's business as usual , the poors die in bad times but their world go on
for the few subsistence clod scratching farmers , no change at all , maybe a bit of aggro
but this will pass too .
anyone who get it's fat content from some centralized organization , this will get very sticky indeed
especially in the mega cities .
The main doomer fallacy is to think it will happen as a crash , in a matter of a few months
I see it as an uneven process lasting generations and totally unstoppable
it's probably for the best anyway .
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby dsula » Sun 22 Aug 2010, 09:32:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kublikhan', '
')This is exactly the kind of innovation and know-how we are going to need when if are moving into an energy poor future.

Exactly, practical innovations, FAR FAR away from your super-conducting bio-engineered nano AI with fission reactor. Forget your singularity. Innovation of the future means to solve small scale little every-day problems. The same as has happened for 1000 of years. After all the human brain is limited.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kublikhan', '
')People are out there solving problems everyday. Many without any formal education. You should not write off billions of people as simpleton morons who are not going to contribute to progress just because they don't have a college degree.

Yep, but there's a limit of how far you can go without underlying knowledge. After all the singularity is the idea that we all pile up on past innovation and science to achieve the new great thing. Ever played civilization? You should get the idea.

Trick question for you. Say you want to design the new next generation 5G wireless iphone/droid can-do-it-all super duper phone. Who would you hire? 1000 villigars without any education or one ph.d with formal engineering education?

So to agree with you: Technology and innovation will never stop. But it will fall back to a level understandable to individual without huge prior education. That's the level we will see, that's the level we will be limited to. Kiss the singularity good bye.

And you're also right with your chess game. It got better. But only because it's not so much an AI problem but a mathematical game. Try games that have an order of magnitude more freedom. It don't look pretty.
User avatar
dsula
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 982
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 22 Aug 2010, 09:45:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '
')And you're also right with your chess game. It got better. But only because it's not so much an AI problem but a mathematical game. Try games that have an order of magnitude more freedom. It don't look pretty.


Exactly. Chess requires the ability to evaluate permutations of a very limited number of moves. A very limited kind of intelligence perfectly suited to a computer's abilities, but not especially well suited to a human's abilities - which is why chess masters are so impressive; they are like human computers. But a chess-playing computer is only like a computer, not like a human.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby kublikhan » Sun 22 Aug 2010, 14:30:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', 'F')orget your singularity. Kiss the singularity good bye.
My singularity? I never even mentioned a singularity. I am not arguing for that. I am arguing against the position: "Once fossil fuels run out, technological progress will stop and reverse."

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', 'E')xactly, practical innovations, FAR FAR away from your super-conducting bio-engineered nano AI with fission reactor. there's a limit of how far you can go without underlying knowledge. Trick question for you. Say you want to design the new next generation 5G wireless iphone/droid can-do-it-all super duper phone. Who would you hire? 1000 villigars without any education or one ph.d with formal engineering education?
Of course there is value in higher education. And with that thought, I would like to reiterate my previous point: We are graduating more people in higher education now than at any other time in history. Half a million new engineers are graduating from the US and India alone, every year!! By 2000, there were 200 million college educated people in the world. Compare that to the Roman empire where only the wealthy and elite were able to pursue higher education, and even that was of dubious practical quality.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e should recognize important contrasts to formal education as we know it today. In the modern world, a student generally pursues higher levels of education to gain the skills and certifications necessary to work in a more prestigious field. In contrast, only the Roman elite would expect a complete formal education. A tradesman or farmer would expect to pick up most of his vocational skills on the job. Higher education in Rome was more of a status symbol than a practical concern.
Education in Ancient Rome

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', 'T')echnology and innovation will never stop. But it will fall back to a level understandable to individual without huge prior education. That's the level we will see, that's the level we will be limited to.
Disagree. We are not going to dismantle humanity's wealth of knowledge just because the gas pumps run dry. Nor are we going to turn our backs on higher education. Not even if there is a collapse in our future. Even during the dark ages, technological progress continued.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here is a major fallacy in the concept of the 'Dark Ages'. Haskins, followed by scores of other scholars, demonstrated that Europe experienced its revival in the twelfth century and not in that magic period of the so called Renaissance. Sarton, in his voluminous Introduction to the History of Science shows both the continuity in scientific progress, the crucial importance of the middle ages and also the decisive Muslim contribution.

'The traditional picture of the Middle Ages (5th to the 15th) has been one of historical decline, particularly in early Middle Ages, the so called dark Ages. Yet such a view of the Middle Ages is false when viewed from the standpoint of the history of technology. the very creative new Islamic civilisation incorporated and perpetuated the technical achievements of Greece and Rome... The idea of so called dark Ages was only applicable to the western portion of the Roman Empire. Rising with the spread of Islam was a grandiose civilisation. Unlike Europe gripped by darkness, the Muslim scientific revolution took place exactly during the apogee of Islam, from roughly the late 8th century to the thirteenth. It was, indeed, between the 8th-13th centuries that most decisive scientific inventions were made, and the foundations of modern civilisation were laid. Scientists and scientific discoveries in their thousands, artistic creativity, great architecture, huge libraries, hospitals, technology, universities, industry, mapping of the world, the discovery of the sky and its secrets and much more.

'In a time when the movement of ideas was at a relative standstill,' he holds, `the Muslims came along with a new outlook, with a sense of enquiry into the old, and finally to a point where Western Europe could take over this thoroughly examined knowledge and endow its ripeness with a completely fresh approach of its own The fallacy of the 'Dark Ages'

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', 'A')nd you're also right with your chess game. It got better. But only because it's not so much an AI problem but a mathematical game. Try games that have an order of magnitude more freedom. It don't look pretty.Again, it took millions of years for nature to engineer the human brain. Yet you want an artificial intelligence that has the capability to out think that creation? And you want it now damn it! These computer players are a push over!!! I am not sure we will EVER be able to create an artificial intelligence that can out think our own mind. Yet you posit this as evidence technological progress is stopping? This field of research is just one tiny drop in an ocean of human knowledge and technological progress.
The oil barrel is half-full.
User avatar
kublikhan
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 5064
Joined: Tue 06 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Illinois
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby davep » Sun 22 Aug 2010, 14:30:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '
')And you're also right with your chess game. It got better. But only because it's not so much an AI problem but a mathematical game. Try games that have an order of magnitude more freedom. It don't look pretty.


Exactly. Chess requires the ability to evaluate permutations of a very limited number of moves. A very limited kind of intelligence perfectly suited to a computer's abilities, but not especially well suited to a human's abilities - which is why chess masters are so impressive; they are like human computers. But a chess-playing computer is only like a computer, not like a human.


+1

It isn't the AI that has improved, just the speed and a honed algorithm for a specific problem.
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby dsula » Sun 22 Aug 2010, 15:16:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kublikhan', '[')Disagree. We are not going to dismantle humanity's wealth of knowledge just because the gas pumps run dry. Nor are we going to turn our backs on higher education. Not even if there is a collapse in our future. Even during the dark ages, technological progress continued.

Alright then. There's nothing I can say anymore as we fundamentally disagree. You believe science/innovation is free and piles up for anybody to use. I believe science/innovation costs energy, effort and money, even for maintaining it. A man who has to work for food don't have time to invent. That's my take.
Over and out.
User avatar
dsula
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 982
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Main Doomer Fallacy

Unread postby kublikhan » Sun 22 Aug 2010, 16:23:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', 'A')lright then. There's nothing I can say anymore as we fundamentally disagree. You believe science/innovation is free and piles up for anybody to use. I believe science/innovation costs energy, effort and money, even for maintaining it. A man who has to work for food don't have time to invent. That's my take.
Over and out.
That is not quiet what I believe. A few years ago, Montequest started a long thread on this very subject called "Energy and the Mother of Invention". His argument was something along the lines of: "Necessity may be the mother of invention, but energy is it's father(along with capital and resources)." The thread was 24 pages long and I am not really interested in going another 24 pages on the subject. But let me just clarify my position a bit. Technological research does indeed cost energy and manpower and does not pile up for free. In an energy poor future, there will be less energy available for everything, including technological research. Thus the available supplies of energy will have to be rationed to where they are most highly needed. I believe solving the energy crisis through new research will place very high on this list. Other areas of research may not get the same level of funding/energy they currently enjoy during an energy crisis, however I think that is along way from "Humanity will be so energy starved, that we will not only fail to invest in new technology, we won't even have the energy to maintain our current level of technology." I think the amount of energy that goes into technological research is trivial compared to the amount of energy used for transportation, industrial uses, residential uses, etc. I don't think an area that has the potential to produce such huge gains at a comparatively low energy cost is going to be scrapped. Anyway, here is Monte's thread if you were interested:

Energy and the Mother of Invention
The oil barrel is half-full.
User avatar
kublikhan
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 5064
Joined: Tue 06 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Illinois
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron