by ralfy » Sat 21 Aug 2010, 13:19:58
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '
')
If you like this site, x, and you want to be comfortable and accepted by everyone, then you'll probably have to espouse some doomerism yourself. Personally, I never have been able to stand groupthink, which is what this really is here at PeakOil.com. The doomers are totally intolerant of any outspoken person who disagrees with their group line.
And I admit, constitutionally, I don't care to follow any group. I like to think for myself. And when I am learning about a complex subject, I like the devil's advocate role because arguing a position uncovers weaknesses as well as strengths. It's amusing for me.
So, unless you're willing to be something of a pariah, you probably shouldn't follow my lead.
To tell you the truth, no one here really gives me much of a fight. The doomers mostly sound like a bunch of middle school kids throwing food and insults around in the cafeteria. Every once in a long while, someone argues a point which gives me pause. But that doesn't happen very often with this collection of twits.
I wish there were more people who argued cogently and forcefully in a more collegiate debating mode. That would be a whole lot more fun.
Your views are those of most, i.e., science and technology will save us, etc. In which case, your views are not that of a pariah but the opposite, i.e., the same as that of most people who have not heard of or argue that peak oil, global warming, and the current economic crisis are hoaxes or are irrelevant because they can be solved easily through a combination of science and technology driven by free market capitalism.