by FreddyH » Tue 15 Jan 2008, 04:34:50
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', ' ')Freddy take a look up there, just north of you. One of the world's last great oil regions, the North Slope is in 8% annual decline. It's little itty bitty neighbor Anwar might have 9 months more reserves. Little or nothing else of this magnitude has been discovered since. And you are feeling happy about this? You need to find some shelter or warmth you seem addled?
The
Reserve/Production ratio has been 40 yrs forever. It is this industry's metric for supply management. All players are comfortable with that time frame. Did u not notice that Reserves have not declined ever? Even tho another 31-Gb is lost each and every year to consumption?
Despite annual consumption, BP's Reserves have risen 323-Gb in the last ten years. They should have declined by 269-Gb to account for extraction. Thus the real improvement is 592-Gb over those ten years.
That's 59-Gb/yr. In Y2k,
USGS forecast that Reserves would rise 54-Gb/yr 'til 2025 and the Doomster pundits laffed their asses off. Well, they aren't laffing anymore, eh!
Reserves have two components:
Discoveries & Reserve Growth. The pre-occupation with Discoveries is absurd in light of the awesome Reserve Growth. Why would any sane company knock themselves out with expensive explorations costs just to build up that R/P ratio? Do u feel 40 yrs is not enuf? Do u think it should be 50yrs? 60yrs?
Global URRhas doubled since 1992. The Resource/Production ratio is 83 years. Please understand that there is no shortage of oil in the ground.
The globe's problem next decade will be based on dismal flow rates from the non-conventional oil sources ... not poor Reserves.