Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby JohnDenver » Tue 18 Dec 2007, 21:47:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', 'O')fcourse a lot will depend on the steepness of the decline, but that doesn't look promising thinking about the large scale application of horizontal drilling employed these days; IOW the steepness of the decline will probably be bigger than in the classic hubbert curve because the "superstraw technology" making it possible to have higher well flow rates for longer but which have proven to result in sudden in very steep drops once pressure in fields cannot be maintained anymore by artificial means. This technology in fact has skewed the hubbert curve to the right into the future but with a much sharper dropoff than in the classic curve. In fact without the modern technology we would probably be on a "relative" gentle downward slope in oil production already.


Can you name a country which has declined faster than its Hubbert Curve would predict? i.e. a country where the production curve is assymetical and superstraw technology has turned the right side of Hubbert's Curve into cliff?
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby Bas » Tue 18 Dec 2007, 21:53:02

England, Norway, Mexico, Oman
Bas
 

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby JohnDenver » Tue 18 Dec 2007, 21:57:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'Y')ou aren't really engaging our refutations
Yeah, he still hasn't addressed the issue of scale

Tony, can you give me a few concise sentences describing what the issue of scale is? What exactly is the problem that we cannot solve? The precise thing we cannot do?
Or, alternatively, can you describe what would constitute a solution to the scale issue, in your book?

I have a strong suspicion that:
a) You can't actually describe the problem in any coherent way
b) There is no conceivable response that would change your mind (i.e. your view is more akin to religion than science)
How does the energy we get from oil get replaced with alternatives and how do we increase that available energy to power economic growth? For this, you need to consider all of the resources needed to make the alternatives available. We should also consider any side-effects (such as environmental degradation, or reduction, or lack of growth, in crops for food) but let's leave that for another time. However, as natural gas and coal could also start to decline within a decade or few, they will also become a problem. But the nearly 40% of primary energy we get from oil will be a good starting point. Note that fast decline is not needed for the substitution to be a problem, though it would obviously exacerbate it. Ultimately, we need to substitute for all of that energy, in all of its uses, with the total amount increasing every year. Efficiencies are an acceptable substitute though the economic effects of that would need to be considered.

Heck, I've said as much in numerous posts, so I don't know how you can claim not to understand. This has nothing to do with religion. I'd love to know that there is nothing to worry about for the next, say 90 years but, so far, the so-called optimists have offered nothing but wishful thinking (that's not to say some alternatives aren't possible but it's not clear that they are possible in the scale required, in the timelines required and without detrimental side-effects).


Tony, you seem to be looking for a massive USSR-style planning document which describes all investment and movement of goods, services and people throughout the global economy for the next 90 years or so. You'll have to forgive me if I don't bother whipping that up for the sake of your peace-of-mind.
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby JohnDenver » Tue 18 Dec 2007, 22:06:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', 'E')ngland, Norway, Mexico, Oman


Show the curves, bas, and prove your point. England and Norway are both declining according to their Hubbert curves.

Here's Norway:
Image

There's no assymetry or cliff there. The decline is following the curve.

Oman dropped from its EIA C&C peak of 970kbd in 2000 to 707kbd today. That's an annual decline rate of 4.4%.

The EIA C&C stats for Mexico after its peak in 2004 look like this:

2004: 3383kbd
2005: 3334
2006: 3256
2007: 3126

That's an annual decline rate of 2%. That's not a cliff.
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby Bas » Tue 18 Dec 2007, 22:20:05

the superstraws have only been in wide use for the last decade, but indeed look at your own curve for norway and how steep it went up and how steep it's now expected to decline, much steeper slopes than other fields/countries in the past, it's obvious, a hubbert curve on steroids... Thanks for digging up that curve.
Bas
 

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby TonyPrep » Tue 18 Dec 2007, 22:24:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'T')ony, you seem to be looking for a massive USSR-style planning document which describes all investment and movement of goods, services and people throughout the global economy for the next 90 years or so. You'll have to forgive me if I don't bother whipping that up for the sake of your peace-of-mind.
I thought I might have missed some of these issues in your posts and blog, but, from your reluctance to address them here, I assume I didn't and that your reasons for trying to convince others that fossil fuel declines are nothing to worry about is possibly more to do with convincing yourself. If you can't even attempt to address scale (an incredibly relevant issue for alternatives) then you don't have an argument.

Until I see more than wishes, I will remain skeptical of the optimists' case.
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby Bas » Tue 18 Dec 2007, 22:31:41

I found this Oman graph and it seems to me that there is definately a skewed Hubbert's curve developing here.
Bas
 

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby Heineken » Tue 18 Dec 2007, 23:23:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'Y')ou aren't really engaging our refutations. Also like Lorenzo.

When I see that happening, I know I'm on the winning side.


If you're on the winning side, then what are you right about? Coming on 3 years ago, peak oil came, and went, and it hasn't even caused a recession. The decline in crude oil production hasn't even stopped growth, let alone caused relocalization, stock market collapse, endless depression, world war 3, mass death, people drinking dog piss out of hubcaps and all the other calamities you people have been barking about for the last 3 years.

*I* was right, and that's why I'm gloating about it here.

What are you right about, Heineken?


Your problem is that you're getting ahead of the game, JD. That's the underlying flaw in your whole argument here. This elementary point seems to blow right past you.

Not even I expected Goetterdaemmerung by December 2007. I never claimed there would be instantaneous collapse; neither have most of us; you're creating that straw-man argument here. Although a very rapid collapse is certainly possible, overall I subscribe to the long-emergency view. Unraveling will take some time; certainly more than your "three years."

Whether PO has actually occurred or is about to occur is a subject of ongoing, valid debate. Your charts and graphs of such very recent---and oft-unreliable---data prove nothing other than what we already know: production is slowing, for all the reasons we know (or should know). Meanwhile, total global demand has been and is rising, along with total economic activity, although naturally the rate of demand increase varies and at times may give the illusion that it has halted or even reversed. All temporary moves that the debunk-artist seizes on.

The build-out of oil-dependent infrastructure, from houses to roads to malls to ball-bearing factories etc., has been spectacular during the economic "boom" that essentially goes back to the 1980s. During the same period, population and its food needs have soared. Oil and NG demand are hard-wired into all this.

Connect the dots and even a child can see the birdie.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby SchroedingersCat » Wed 19 Dec 2007, 00:22:03

There are fuel shortages in much of the developing world. China is having a huge problem with diesel shortages right now. There are rolling blackouts in much of the developing world. (Check out the Olduvai Gorge thread for details.) World grain stores are at their lowest in over 50 years. Grain prices are higher than ever. The global economy is on the brink of a major meltdown with the possibility of a global recession.

This is only because oil production has plateaued, overall decline has not yet set in.
JD, you seem to think that the doomers here have somehow failed. Just wait a few years and see how many of the doomer predictions come true.

I am always surprised and dismayed when I see predictions and projections from a couple years past not only being met but being surpassed.

I don't think anyone here has put a date on the terrible things that will come to pass. This site provides a very typical risk analysis process. When this happens, then we can assume that that will happen. If you're smart you'll collect the lists of this-es and thats so you can be ready for the chaos to come.
Civilization is a personal choice.
SchroedingersCat
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu 26 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The ragged edge

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby TheDude » Wed 19 Dec 2007, 02:49:59

You might factor this in as well:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Robert Rapier', 'E')IA data show a small decline in world net oil exports from 2005 to 2006, led by a 3.3% per year decline rate in net exports from the top three net oil exporters--Saudi Arabia, Russia and Norway. Furthermore, recent data suggest that the net export decline is continuing, and probably accelerating.


Image

Declining net oil exports--a temporary decline or a long term trend?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hile overall world oil production is important, oil importers are focused on two things: their domestic production and world net oil export capacity. In our opinion, we should base our plans on the very real possibility of a rapid decline in world net oil exports.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby Heineken » Thu 20 Dec 2007, 00:35:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SchroedingersCat', 'T')here are fuel shortages in much of the developing world. China is having a huge problem with diesel shortages right now. There are rolling blackouts in much of the developing world. (Check out the Olduvai Gorge thread for details.) World grain stores are at their lowest in over 50 years. Grain prices are higher than ever. The global economy is on the brink of a major meltdown with the possibility of a global recession.

This is only because oil production has plateaued, overall decline has not yet set in.
JD, you seem to think that the doomers here have somehow failed. Just wait a few years and see how many of the doomer predictions come true.

I am always surprised and dismayed when I see predictions and projections from a couple years past not only being met but being surpassed.

I don't think anyone here has put a date on the terrible things that will come to pass. This site provides a very typical risk analysis process. When this happens, then we can assume that that will happen. If you're smart you'll collect the lists of this-es and thats so you can be ready for the chaos to come.


It strikes me how many eerie parallels there are between this description and what is going on with GW. You can almost substitute one for the other. Remarkable.

Yes, I'm struck by the underlying ridiculous irony of this thread: JD's assertion that a "Big Fizzle" is in progress when the evidence to the contrary is so breathtaking, even though events are just barely starting to move relative to where they're headed.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby vfr » Mon 31 Dec 2007, 20:51:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'A')t the moment, EIA stats indicate that peak oil is not a future event, and in fact occurred roughly 2.5 years ago in May 2005. The peak value was 74.3mbd, and the most recent value (for Aug. 2007) was 72.5mbd -- down by 1.8mbd or 2.5% from the peak:
Image
Considering that this message board is called peakoil.com, and is inhabited by peakoilers, and we've all been told that peak oil will be TEOTWAWKI , it seems a little odd that nobody is talking about the actual event of "global peak oil".

Thus, this thread. Let's talk about how peak oil came and went, and was basically a non-event which hasn't even caused a recession.





TEOTWAWKI come in stages. Peak oil is not like a nuke. it takes time to unfold.

V
User avatar
vfr
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon 31 Dec 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby JustinFrankl » Thu 03 Jan 2008, 12:31:56

I knew there was a reason why I hadn't posted here in a while, and why I let the "two-week ban" for publicly criticizing site policies on my other ID actually be the permanent ban it was intended it to be.

People like JD ruin this place, where as the comment my other ID was banned for would have actually helped.

Maybe I'll post again in 2009 to again contribute to the circle-jerk among those of us still standing.
"We have seen the enemy, and he is us." -- Walt Kelly
JustinFrankl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 623
Joined: Mon 22 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby jbeckton » Thu 03 Jan 2008, 18:42:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JustinFrankl', '
')Maybe I'll post again in 2009 to again contribute to the circle-jerk among those of us still standing.


I am sure we will all be waiting with anticipation :lol:
Those that cannot do..... teach. Those that cannot teach......teach gym.-Jack black
User avatar
jbeckton
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2082
Joined: Fri 05 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby AgentR » Thu 03 Jan 2008, 20:26:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'Y')es, I'm struck by the underlying ridiculous irony of this thread: JD's assertion that a "Big Fizzle" is in progress when the evidence to the contrary is so breathtaking, even though events are just barely starting to move relative to where they're headed.


I like the term "Big Fizzle"... Not that Peak Oil has fizzled, but that the existing economic system is in the process of a nice long fizzle out. Granted, such an outcome is probably disappointing in a weird way to some of the survivalist types, but is also more consistent with reality.

Still a long, long way to go on this slippery hill to oblivion.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby Zardoz » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 17:55:19

Troll, indeed. He knows perfectly well that the refineries are still well-supplied with crude, and that nothing bad will really start until they can't get enough feedstock, yet he's claiming he was "right" about something.

The only mystery here is why we waste so much time responding to his silly posts. This thread is a tribute to his troll skills, I suppose.

That's all it is, though. Nothing more.
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby FreddyH » Tue 15 Jan 2008, 02:15:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', ' ') Thus, this thread. Let's talk about how peak oil came and went, and was basically a non-event which hasn't even caused a recession.


Hey JD, good to see that u are back ... and hammering home those precious reality checks.

Over the last three decades, there have been 8 years where Supply was lower than the year prior, the last being 2002. And no global calamity ensued.

Many here are late pilers on. They are unaware of all the gloom merchantry that was spewn in 2003 & 2004 wrt consequences of zero growth in Supply. This little plateau was a good lesson to Doomsters of how demand destruction and substitution works in the marketplace.
www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits)
User avatar
FreddyH
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon 14 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: The Yukon
Top

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby TonyPrep » Tue 15 Jan 2008, 03:53:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreddyH', 'H')ey JD, good to see that u are back ... and hammering home those precious reality checks.
No reality checks here; oil consumption has continued to rise, thanks to the plateau and stocks.
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: Peak Oil: The Big Fizzle

Unread postby FreddyH » Tue 15 Jan 2008, 04:34:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', ' ')Freddy take a look up there, just north of you. One of the world's last great oil regions, the North Slope is in 8% annual decline. It's little itty bitty neighbor Anwar might have 9 months more reserves. Little or nothing else of this magnitude has been discovered since. And you are feeling happy about this? You need to find some shelter or warmth you seem addled?


The Reserve/Production ratio has been 40 yrs forever. It is this industry's metric for supply management. All players are comfortable with that time frame. Did u not notice that Reserves have not declined ever? Even tho another 31-Gb is lost each and every year to consumption?

Despite annual consumption, BP's Reserves have risen 323-Gb in the last ten years. They should have declined by 269-Gb to account for extraction. Thus the real improvement is 592-Gb over those ten years. That's 59-Gb/yr. In Y2k, USGS forecast that Reserves would rise 54-Gb/yr 'til 2025 and the Doomster pundits laffed their asses off. Well, they aren't laffing anymore, eh!

Reserves have two components: Discoveries & Reserve Growth. The pre-occupation with Discoveries is absurd in light of the awesome Reserve Growth. Why would any sane company knock themselves out with expensive explorations costs just to build up that R/P ratio? Do u feel 40 yrs is not enuf? Do u think it should be 50yrs? 60yrs?

Global URRhas doubled since 1992. The Resource/Production ratio is 83 years. Please understand that there is no shortage of oil in the ground. The globe's problem next decade will be based on dismal flow rates from the non-conventional oil sources ... not poor Reserves.
www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits)
User avatar
FreddyH
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon 14 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: The Yukon
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron