by Oakley » Wed 25 May 2011, 19:20:53
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'I')ts simply too soon for it to be any sign, one way or another, about Republican chances in 2012; but it *is* a very significant heads up, and goes as evidence supporting a nagging fear I've had for quite a while.
As far as I can tell, these are the realities:
Medicare can not be sustained in its current form.
Any attempt to change it will be met with fear and dread by a huge percentage of the middle class. (big net 40k - 400k).
Any attempt to pay for it will first destroy whoever passed the additional taxes, and then destroy the country that tries to make the payments.
And the fear is real enough, even I get a sense of dread at what I know would be required to unwind that beast and put something else in place. Its simply not realistic to anticipate success on that matter.
So, I guess we shrug and resign ourselves to just printing the money to pay for it.
From the politicians point of view:
You can't restrict Medicare's cost without losing your job.
You can't pay for Medicare's cost without losing your job.
That is a fair analysis. When the economy shrinks, as it is from diminishing per capita energy and from an unstable, unconstitutional, unsustainable, predatory monetary system, there is less and less of everything. And if a government insists on more war, as Bush and Obama have done, then there will be even less of everything else.
Some "rights" come from nature. You certainly have a right to defend your own life against an attempt by another to terminate you. But there are needs that we each have that some people misconstrue as rights. Food, shelter, medical care, for example are needs, but nobody has a right that comes from nature to have these needs met. You have no obligation, and I have no right to force you to take care of my needs. While there was abundance from cheap energy, politicians used some of the excess to buy votes by telling people that they had a right to have their needs met, an government took over more and more of what people had previously secured at their own expense or from charity. Now many are dependent upon these promises even though the promises cannot possibly be fulfilled.
Whether you recognize it or not, the law of survival of the fittest has not been repealed. People may continue to demand the impossible, and only vote for those who want to keep the shell game going a little longer, but because there is not enough to go around, there will be less passed out and as the shortages become more and more severe, more and more of those dependent upon the crumbling system of promises will suffer and die. Those who can provide food and shelter for themselves, and who have knowledge of how to maintain their own health and deal with problems outside the established medical system will have a survival advantage; this is how it should and will be.
Whether the Republicans or Democrats occupy the seats of government power will not matter. Whether government defaults on promises honestly and openly or by stealth printing of worthless money is only a problem for those who are dependent on those promises and do not have the ability to take counter measures.