Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Doomers Don't Believe In America

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby Carlhole » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 12:27:19

The American Constitution and Bill of Rights have been battered and kicked around since 911.

The country's broke and has no credit.

We're fighting two overseas wars.

We're talking about the end of Capitalism.

People want to reject Science, Technology and innovation as means to solve problems facing us.

Optimism is considered naive.

What is left of America?

Lip service?
Carlhole
 

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby AgentR » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 12:46:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'W')ell, thank you for that vapid, non-response. Obviously, you don't have any good ideas to expound upon... so you might as well just go on some blind, irrational attack.
I'm not the one attacking anyone here. I am optimistic and believe in the American spirit; you're the one who is asserting if some measure of doom goes splat on the US/world and we lose ground on the technological front, that America is dead and innovation is dead.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')re you going try to argue that an inventive, innovative spirit is NOT a fundamental part of the America character as it looks toward the future?

You are the one arguing against innovation that comes in any form that you don't approve of.
I like ALL innovation.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')turning away from scientific, technological and innovative adaptations to the energy crisis in favor of a returning to the village and tribal life of the past?

I use American words like TOWN. And there is no "returning to" anything here; if the energy and economic puzzle plays out like I think it will; there won't be any choosing going on.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f you are in favor of retrenching into a past paradigm of human life, then you are fundamentally at odds with one of America's cherished ideals.

Strawman, I'm in favor of no such thing. I am in favor of continuing this spirit of innovation even if the physical realities of the world throw us back to an 1800's level of power consumption.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby mrsea » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 12:53:35

It is interesting to watch you all turn on one another and accuse each other of a lack of patriotism. It reminds me of pigs at the trough when the word is passed that rations will be reduced. Those of you who often come here and read this forum surely subscribe, in some degree, to the theory of Peak Oil, overpopulation and economic collapse. Now, as the collapse draws nearer, is certainly not when we should be losing our heads.

Placing blame at this juncture in time is counterproductive. It matters not what brought us to this point but rather what direction we take from here. While I don’t believe we should return to the forge I do think that when we find ourselves on the wrong path, rather than strike out in a new direction, it is sometimes wiser to retrace our steps to a place of familiarity and regroup before heading out again.

One thing that I find bewildering with all that is going on is, where is the youth of our nation? Why are they silent? Regardless of what country we speak of, history has shown us that it is the young people who are the vanguard of change. I recall what it was like being a young adult in the 60’s. The people back then rose up and took their dissatisfactions to the streets. Why don’t we see any of that today? Is everyone in America happy and satisfied?

Maybe, subconsciously, we know that our ability to take it to the streets is no longer an option. There was no Department of Homeland Security in the 60s. One thing is for sure, if the populace does openly revolt, we will finally find out what those FEMA camps are really for.
User avatar
mrsea
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed 16 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: At the precipice

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby AgentR » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 13:05:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mrsea', 'O')ne thing that I find bewildering with all that is going on is, where is the youth of our nation? Why are they silent? Regardless of what country we speak of, history has shown us that it is the young people who are the vanguard of change. I recall what it was like being a young adult in the 60’s. The people back then rose up and took their dissatisfactions to the streets. Why don’t we see any of that today? Is everyone in America happy and satisfied?

The youth of today understand the score. What change would you have them attempt? The die has been cast, and already exceeds the capability of political systems to undo. The system has protected itself to such an extent that the only remaining branches either continue its survival with a new, huge source of energy; or takes everything and everyone down with it if its hunger is not met.

Sometimes... David can kill the giant. Sometimes... the giant remembers to put on his helmet before going into battle. Our giant is paranoid and ain't forgettin nuttin.

PS: people will willingly go to the FEMA camps because there will be ice, water, and food there.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby Carlhole » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 13:08:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', '.')..you're the one who is asserting if some measure of doom goes splat on the US/world and we lose ground on the technological front, that America is dead and innovation is dead.

I don't know what you're talking about. I have always been deeply interested in science and technology and post often on these subjects.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'A')re you going try to argue that an inventive, innovative spirit is NOT a fundamental part of the America character as it looks toward the future?
You are the one arguing against innovation that comes in any form that you don't approve of.

That's a big whopping lie. Show me where I have ever made any such value judgment about science and technology. I'm a fervent supporter of all things scientific. Anhd I have repeatedly said that expect to see an era of intense innovation in response to the Peak Oil crisis. That's one of my fundamental positions as a poster here at PeakOil.com
Another fundamental position that I have is that peak oil will lead to resource wars and intense, dangerous geopolitics.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f you are in favor of retrenching into a past paradigm of human life, then you are fundamentally at odds with one of America's cherished ideals.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', 'I') am in favor of continuing this spirit of innovation even if the physical realities of the world throw us back to an 1800's level of power consumption.
Well, who is NOT in favor of using less power? You're just stating the obvious. It will take a great deal of innovation and adaptation to adjust to lower power consumption while maintaining a country with traditions and character that is recognizeable as "American".

More likely than not, whenever I post some scientific or technological breakthrough here on PeakOil.com, it gets a whole lot of snarky, ridiculing comments. So I am addressing the Doom Culture when I say it is at odds with basic American ideals.

Doomers don't believe in America. And if you say you are not a Doomer, then you don't have to defend yourself against my accusation.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby AgentR » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 13:17:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'D')oomers don't believe in America. And if you say you are not a Doomer, then you don't have to defend yourself against my accusation.

Oh, but I AM a Doomer. You just don't like dealing with my partcularly variety.

I am a Doomer. I do believe in America. And I do believe in the spirit of innovation and adaptiveness that have served us well so far.

I do however, anticipate that efforts to find a technological solution to the energy and economic problems ahead will fail. Not through lack of passion, effort, or resolve, but simply because, sometimes there are no solutions.

Thus,
The world will be crushed by the results of its gluttony.
Darkness will rule for many years. However,
Americans will remain, Americans; and they will fight.
They will struggle, and grasp, and claw, and think,
until there is once again, light. Even if ever so dim.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby Carlhole » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 13:26:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mrsea', 'I')t is interesting to watch you all turn on one another and accuse each other of a lack of patriotism.

Leadership in scientific, technological and industrial innovation has been a hallmark of the two American centuries. It is an observation that has been endlessly repeated and confirmed throughout our history. Americans are very proud of their science and technology. We regard it as a pillar of our national strength.

It is a completely fair comment to remark that the Doomer assumptions about our relatively near future are anti-thetical to this basic spirit of optimism and faith in the ability of Americans to come up with solutions to the problems we face.

To give up on an innovative future is to give up on America. This is an observation that is different than attacking someone's patriotism. I am talking about a basic cultural feature of America that defines our country for Americans; whereas 'patriotic' carries a merely political judgment.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby Carlhole » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 13:36:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', 'T')he world will be crushed by the results of its gluttony. Darkness will rule for many years. However, Americans will remain, Americans; and they will fight. They will struggle, and grasp, and claw, and think, until there is once again, light. Even if ever so dim.

Oh, how poetic! I'll send it to my mother.

Right! As if "after many years of darkness", America, unchanged, would rise again like a Phoenix. Like the Phoenicians rose again? Sure. Whatever re-emerged "after many years of darkness" would be an entirely different culture.

I'm not talking about some Doomer fantasy. I'm talking about the America of today as the country begins to face up to declining energy supplies in the decades ahead. Americans will want to see a scientific/technological response. It is fundamental to the way Americans deal with problems.

Doomers will tell you that no matter what sort of scientific/technological innovations are proposed, it is all to no avail. And I am saying that this is a basic rejection of American ideals as they exist now.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby AgentR » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 13:50:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'W')hatever re-emerged "after many years of darkness" would be an entirely different culture.

America is not our toys. Sorry, the culture would be much the same.
Battered and bruised for sure, and perhaps a bit wiser for the wear.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')mericans will want to see a scientific/technological response. It is fundamental to the way Americans deal with problems.

You can want, till the end of days, but wanting does not insure GETTING.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd I am saying that this is a basic rejection of American ideals as they exist now.

Oh come on, Americans are as champion at "Repent, the end is near" as they are at innovation. We've been doing both for as long as there's been a Constitution.

Should Americans attempt to find a technological answer to the challenges of Peakoil? absolutely. If such an answer does not exist, does America die? absolutely not. Does innovation die? absolutely not.

My position is that innovation will continue to be well established within the American culture whether peakoil has a technological fix or not; you seem to have trouble believing in America if things don't go your way.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby ProudFossil » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 13:51:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'N')onsense, Carlhole. I'm a doomer but I believe in America---the dream of America as embodied in the Constitution. Just as I'd still believe in life if I had a fatal disease.

So abortion is embodied in the Constitution?
So allowing illegal immigration is embodied in the Constitution?
So income taxation is embodied in the Constitution?

Or are you saying we should get rid of these items?
User avatar
ProudFossil
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby ProudFossil » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 13:59:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'T')he American Constitution and Bill of Rights have been battered and kicked around since 911. The country's broke and has no credit. We're fighting two overseas wars.
We're talking about the end of Capitalism. People want to reject Science, Technology and innovation as means to solve problems facing us.
Optimism is considered naive. What is left of America? Lip service?

1940 - the country was really broke and there was not credit anywhere in the world.

1942 - we were fighting two wars over both oceans with the loss and damage to millions of our soldiers.

1945 - the Communist party was strong and submitting candidates for elective office.

1942 - started the biggest push in science and technology in history.

1940 - remember there was a great depression, unemployment running at 20%, soup lines, etc. The only optimism was going to a movie.

Sounds to me as if we are still in the early 40's only now we have abortions, illegal immigrants welcomed, racial quotas, and immense taxation. Where in the Constitution are these 'rights' given?
And the only people I know who think optimism is naive now are the pathetic doomers on this forum (and possibly on Prison Planet.com, Democratic Underground, and moveon.org).
User avatar
ProudFossil
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby Carlhole » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 14:04:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', 'M')y position is that innovation will continue to be well established within the American culture whether peakoil has a technological fix or not; you seem to have trouble believing in America if things don't go your way.


I don't have any idea what you're talking about when you say "things don't go my way".

There are all kinds of things happening in energy science. I don't control or influence or judge any of it. I'm just interested in it and I expect to see an explosion of innovation as cheap energy continues to decline.

I am an interested observer of things that scientists and engineers do. And I agree with just about every cultural historian that scientific and technical innovation is a proud hallmark of the American culture.

Doomers turn away from this proud American heritage of optimistic problem-solving. They insist that attempts to research and develop our way out of our present energy predicament are entirely DOOMED.

That's why they call themselves "Doomers".
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby StuckInPhilly » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 14:09:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mrsea', 'I')t is interesting to watch you all turn on one another and accuse each other of a lack of patriotism.
Leadership in scientific, technological and industrial innovation has been a hallmark of the two American centuries. It is an observation that has been endlessly repeated and confirmed throughout our history. Americans are very proud of their science and technology. We regard it as a pillar of our national strength.
It is a completely fair comment to remark that the Doomer assumptions about our relatively near future are anti-thetical to this basic spirit of optimism and faith in the ability of Americans to come up with solutions to the problems we face. To give up on an innovative future is to give up on America. This is an observation that is different than attacking someone's patriotism. I am talking about a basic cultural feature of America that defines our country for Americans; whereas 'patriotic' carries a merely political judgment.

This is nonsense.
America has a culture of worship of the common man and in general does not respect education or science. Only after Russian beat us in the space race did have the mass of children put their nose to grindstone and now we've reverted back to out real selves and look upon anyone with "book-learnin" as elitists.
We have had an enormous wealth of resources and have been fortunate not to be scarred by wars. This endless drumming of how innovative we are has yet to show itself in reality.
StuckInPhilly
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu 24 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby AgentR » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 14:14:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'I') don't have any idea what you're talking about when you say "things don't go my way".

You have repeatedly refused to acknowledge that there can be an American spirit of innovation if your expected explosion of innovative adaptations fails to deliver.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')oomers turn away from this proud American heritage of optimistic problem-solving. They insist that attempts to research and develop our way out of our present energy predicament are entirely DOOMED.

The research is doomed, most likely. That does not imply that it is not a worthy cause to pursue. If we doomers are wrong, I will rejoice. I would love nothing better than to spend my last, grey, aging years in a comfortable chair, with air conditioning, a cold drink, and some internets. Am I willling to bet anything substantial that I will be granted such a benign and pleasant future? nope.

And that is why I drop your arguments into the "my way or the highway" bin; you can not seem to acknowledge that failure *IS* possible.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby AgentR » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 14:21:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('StuckInPhilly', 'T')his endless drumming of how innovative we are has yet to show itself in reality.

I think you're overreaching a bit; there has always been an innovative edge to American practices; not in the sense Carhole wishes of course, but we make our own solutions to things. Inventors have always had various venues to promote and sell their solutions.

OTOH, to most of us Americans. honestly. Inventors are excentric nutbars. More interesting than respected. But they'll continue to have their place in the basement, and if one gets the lights running again, maybe we'll build him a barn or something useful.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby Starvid » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 14:28:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'S')eems to me that if you are a Doomer, you do not believe in America.

Though it seems most doomers are Americans.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby Carlhole » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 14:33:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'I') don't have any idea what you're talking about when you say "things don't go my way".
You have repeatedly refused to acknowledge that there can be an American spirit of innovation if your expected explosion of innovative adaptations fails to deliver.

Doomers reject scientific and technological innovation out of hand as ever being capable of delivering solutions to the energy crisis. This is a tenet that Doomers have raised to the level of belief. Just ask MonteQuest - he'll tell you.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'D')oomers turn away from this proud American heritage of optimistic problem-solving. They insist that attempts to research and develop our way out of our present energy predicament are entirely DOOMED.
And that is why I drop your arguments into the "my way or the highway" bin; you can not seem to acknowledge that failure *IS* possible.

To invoke "Doom" is to invoke an utter certainty - NOT a possibility. Doom means an unavoidable destiny.

The American spirit of inventiveness has been historically very optimistic about the possibilities and potentials of things that human ingenuity is able to bring into existence.

When you say that you are a Doomer, you say that you have given up on this basic cultural feature of optimism about technology which has been a hallmark of American achievement.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby mos6507 » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 14:37:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mrsea', 'w')here is the youth of our nation? Why are they silent?

They are on myspace and facebook.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby AgentR » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 14:40:06

The problem, carhole, is that you are insisting on defining "TypeA is feature X" and then harranging TypeA for being X.

I am a doomer. That does not mean that the future is certain. It does mean that I think I have a notion about how its going to play out. That notion.... is bad.

Now, Monte is of course locked in a degree of absolutism that makes it almost impossible to have a conversation with him about the subject, but that does not mean that ALL DOOMERS are clones of Monte.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: Pat Buchanan - The Party's Over

Unread postby mos6507 » Sat 20 Sep 2008, 14:40:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ProudFossil', '1')940 - the country was really broke and there was not credit anywhere in the world.
1942 - we were fighting two wars over both oceans with the loss and damage to millions of our soldiers.
1945 - the Communist party was strong and submitting candidates for elective office.
1942 - started the biggest push in science and technology in history.
1940 - remember there was a great depression, unemployment running at 20%, soup lines, etc. The only optimism was going to a movie.

Guess what, during that time we had domestic oil in great quantities.
mos6507
 
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron