by Voice_du_More » Thu 28 May 2009, 22:39:43
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'D')uring the last run-up it averaged almost 10% per month.(370% in 39 months).
We are going to see oil at around $110 at that
rate by the end of the year.
That's my unscientific prediction.
Are we talking compound or ten percent of todays value cuz compound I get $139.99 by January.
Of course that won't happen. In an odd side note, did you know that a team whose five starters averaged 17 points scored a total of 5*17=85 points no matter what the individual scores were? Of course that is kids stuff for us scientists n*avg=sum(scores). But now we both know that two teams whose starters both averaged 17 points, where one group had a variance of 14 and the other 322, the first probably had the better game. If consistently they have a small variance and a high total that is the team I want in the playoffs because that one guy cannot score 49 everynight. Also there are issues that can happen with small sample errors within a very large data set when you start trying to do different types of predictions because the mean for a small demographic might still have a large variance itself when we think of how that group (team) will perform into the future. Things get out of control quickly when we try saying what will hapen in the future that way. And still (this is not a rant btw) the system dynamics, like say when the equilibrium changes because suddenly Internet comes in as a channel and the distribution among channels is going to move from 98% catalog to 20% catalog, 80% internet in five years, you see the exact numbers have nothing to do with that. The dynamics of the system changed suddenly and no matter what you do you are going to watch that calalog curve trend down to a new range while the internet trends up. You can't blame your analytical team for that! Not if you really understand how these things work.
I do get to call myself a scientist but I think of it only as a way of thinking about problems and most of that came from studying logic for proofs in mathematics. I have long since grown beyond my own ego and realized that in no way do I come anywhere near being a leader in any field.
I get 6.8% interest when I use 65$ now and $110 in January, you know
Interest = ((110/65)^(1/8)-1)*100
These numbers whether accurate or just bad estimates do not change the underlying dynamics of the system or the set of possible outcomes, all a change in the real numbers can do is change the probabilities associated with those outcomes. Unfortunately the range probabilities are now certainly skewed toward doom IMAO (in my arrogant opinion).
My spouse has actually been pretty impressed with my ability to predict oil and gas prices, but mostly with my ability to understand the trends the spikes etc. I don't get those estimates anymore by trying to build a quantitative model, I make alot of rough estimates in my head about things, ranges, probabilities and then I come up with a range for a certain date and usually I am there. Now it works though where I have to pick the date. If someone said what will oil be next year at this time, I would say it could be $40 or it could be $70 or somehwere in between, or we could be seeing the emergence of a super spike over $200.
Can we at least all agree that the numbers for supply for the last five years make it seem very likely that we have peaked and that we all know what that menas in the end, whether we get all the numbers right or not?
Numbers cannot save me and like many here I have stopped trying to use them as if they can.
My guess is $70/$2.75 sometime in June, then we either pull back and band trade because demand and the economy got worse or we see $85 or higher by labor day. In an odd worse case we might find that the supply decline numbers will be steeper than we thought and the economy will be worse than we thought so that even though millions more will lose jobs and ?houses? oil will still rise slightly into the fall.
Will TPTB have the guts to let us know the things that will be necessary to stop the bleeding? I am starting to doubt it, since I place a high probability on the notion that they do in fact understand where we are at with oil supply.
Nothing good lies ahead for the US in the next five to ten years Revi, of that I am gut level certain.
Again nice work with that TV thing. That was encouraging to me.
