by Heineken » Mon 19 Nov 2012, 10:33:29
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'I') continue to see nuclear war as the biggest near-term threat. There are so many plausible scenarios. But few people here seem to incorporate it into their system of major fear-referents. Mysterious. I suppose we've become inured to living with a dagger suspended over our heads.
. . .
The other half of that of course is the incontrovertible fact that the last time one was used against people was August 9, 1945...67 years ago. When it eventually happens you will see mass panic because the mass of people know nothing about what it means, how to protect themselves, and so on and so forth. I lived through the panic commentary for Chernobyl, where effects in the USA were below perceptibility, I lived through the panic commentary for Fukishima where again the effect on the USA was below perceptibility. If India and Pakistan go at it with everything they have
and nobody else gets involved then you will see the same kind of reporting, it will will described in graphic end of the world terms but the direct effects on the USA will be meager. The economic impact will be a much bigger deal than any potential radiation, but the media loves wild radiation scenario's so that is what will be talked about.
Yes, but how likely is it that no one else would get involved if India and Pakistan "go at it," Tanada? Or any other pair of nuke-equipped countries you'd care to name? That's a facile assumption IMO. The world is more interrelated than ever.
Even if just that region of the world were decimated, think what that would mean. Let's not be too US-centric.
My feeling is that, since the weapons exist and are spreading to increasingly unstable, resource-strapped countries, the weapons will eventually be used, and in a big way. Maybe it won't extinguish humanity, but it'll put a serious hurting on us. Yes, 67 years have passed since the last use of nuclear weapons, which is actually a negative because we are becoming ever more complacent about them. People tend to repeat history, not learn from it.