Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

What's wrong with groundless optimism?

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Unread postby heyhoser » Tue 03 May 2005, 08:04:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', ' ')I think many people on these boards are scared they might have to get off their fat backsides and walk or live in a less energy intensive way – we’ve heard all the excuses why they don’t do this, is if somehow that makes it alright.


Mayhaps you're focusing your frustration at the wrong people.
heyhoser
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Czech Republic

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 03 May 2005, 08:06:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', ' ')I think many people on these boards are scared they might have to get off their fat backsides and walk or live in a less energy intensive way .


I think that's true, change is very hard and often scary. It might be uncomfortable.

I get the impression you're a younger person, Wildwell. ( I might be wrong.) Monte is an older person. It's even more difficult for older people to change. I don't personally have a problem with older people pointing out flaws in the system they've helped build and suggesting solutions to the problems in that system, without actually implementing all of the solutions themselves.
Ludi
 

Unread postby Wildwell » Tue 03 May 2005, 09:02:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('heyhoser', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', ' ')I think many people on these boards are scared they might have to get off their fat backsides and walk or live in a less energy intensive way – we’ve heard all the excuses why they don’t do this, is if somehow that makes it alright.


Mayhaps you're focusing your frustration at the wrong people.


No, it's aimed at those like Monto who say one thing and do another. There is ways out of some of these problems if everyone does their bit - all you can do is make sure you do yours. You don’t have to get heavy handed or cut back on everything, just simple things, there are many lobby groups about, you don’t have to start your own, you can join them for next to nothing a year and change things. We are intelligent beings after all, use that gift.
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Unread postby Wildwell » Tue 03 May 2005, 09:11:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', ' ')I think many people on these boards are scared they might have to get off their fat backsides and walk or live in a less energy intensive way .


I think that's true, change is very hard and often scary. It might be uncomfortable.

I get the impression you're a younger person, Wildwell. ( I might be wrong.) Monte is an older person. It's even more difficult for older people to change. I don't personally have a problem with older people pointing out flaws in the system they've helped build and suggesting solutions to the problems in that system, without actually implementing all of the solutions themselves.


I can be hard to change, but sometimes it's just little things, different purchasing decisions, doing things slightly differently, such as if the food store is 1 mile away, try walking instead. Sometimes it's moving house, getting a smaller car. Other people are more hardcore and want to join lobby groups, do voluntary work or even start political groups, write books or make statements in art or music. Some people of course believe in things so strongly they break the law, which I wouldn't suggest.

I’m 32 Ludi, not straight out of school, but not stuck in my ways, yet.
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 03 May 2005, 12:58:15

I'm just wondering, Wildwell, how you feel you have such intimate knowledge of Monte's life that you know about all his purchasing decisions. You know he has a sharp car, but that's about all, isn't it? I'm just not seeing the justification for giving him such a hard time.
Ludi
 

Unread postby Wildwell » Tue 03 May 2005, 13:19:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I')'m just wondering, Wildwell, how you feel you have such intimate knowledge of Monte's life that you know about all his purchasing decisions. You know he has a sharp car, but that's about all, isn't it? I'm just not seeing the justification for giving him such a hard time.


I don’t know all his personal details. I know he has a large ranch and a sports car. If he’s that worried get a horse and cart. I’m merely disagreeing with him and pointing out a few alternatives, we cannot all live on 272 acre ranches. It almost of if he's saying, well I'm okay folks, I have my ranch and nice car and I won't be using less fuel because of Jevon's paradox, so two fingers.

I see nothing wrong with coming out with alternatives if it ensures survival here and that’s all I’ve ever done, never once said it’s ‘not a problem’ or people shouldn’t respect the planet. Nothing to do with greed, we cannot all go back to the farm and really we don't need to here because of some of the things pointed out.
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Unread postby threadbear » Tue 03 May 2005, 14:04:46

Why not be an optimist? Prepare for the worst, but don't assume it must happen. Cover all bases. The best I can do is go with my own hunches, because it's hard to get a fix on the future from a purely intellectual point. And it feels like things are going to be really tough, but people will prevail and populations will be cut by choice and attrition, not by grim peak oil reaper.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby sampo » Tue 03 May 2005, 16:07:46

WILDWELL WAKE UP! You and Monte are on the same side!

stop wasting your breath being petty about his personal decisions and heed what he says. he is sage beyond your years and has thought much longer and harder on these issues than you have. your optimism is only a byproduct of your ignorance (whether induced or by lack of effort in attaining knowledge).

You can't refute his message with blind hope. When you have facts, figures, and arguments to back up your optimism then people will tend to pay more attention to you. Go forth and get those things so that you can start to change peoples minds. If you keep approaching this the same way people will just hit the ignore button and your ideas will be only stillborn.

You keep trying to call monte a hypocrite, but the reality is that we all are. We are born to be. We were created by this machine only to exist within it. Change is so hard and that is the reason that there will be a die-off. Monte does more than most in his quest to spread information to enhance and further the enlightenment of people like you and me. I happen to think that he has done far more than his share already. It makes me feel guilty sometimes that i dont do enough.

NEVER STOP LEARNING!
User avatar
sampo
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed 27 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 03 May 2005, 16:41:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'I')t almost of if he's saying, well I'm okay folks, I have my ranch and nice car and I won't be using less fuel because of Jevon's paradox, so two fingers..


Wow, I've never seen him say anything even remotely like that.....
Ludi
 
Top

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 03 May 2005, 16:43:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'W')hy not be an optimist? .


Groundless optimism is what I'm complaining about, not optimism per se. I'm an optimist, myself, but I try also to be pragmatic and not count on long shots, miracles, or monkey butlers.
Ludi
 
Top

Unread postby johnmarkos » Tue 03 May 2005, 17:37:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '
')Groundless optimism is what I'm complaining about, not optimism per se. I'm an optimist, myself, but I try also to be pragmatic and not count on long shots, miracles, or monkey butlers.

I don't aim for groundless optimism, either. I aim for the kind of goal-oriented optimism that improves the chances of success in a high stress environment. This attitude requires an acknowledgement of obstacles and the chance of failure, persistence in working towards the stated goal, openness to reason and change, and a sense of humor, as well as a generally positive attitude. Pollyannas don't usually do so well in rough times.

That said, I'm still an optimist.
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California
Top

Unread postby Wildwell » Tue 03 May 2005, 17:39:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sampo', 'W')ILDWELL WAKE UP! You and Monte are on the same side!

stop wasting your breath being petty about his personal decisions and heed what he says. he is sage beyond your years and has thought much longer and harder on these issues than you have. your optimism is only a byproduct of your ignorance (whether induced or by lack of effort in attaining knowledge).

You can't refute his message with blind hope. When you have facts, figures, and arguments to back up your optimism then people will tend to pay more attention to you. Go forth and get those things so that you can start to change peoples minds. If you keep approaching this the same way people will just hit the ignore button and your ideas will be only stillborn.

You keep trying to call monte a hypocrite, but the reality is that we all are. We are born to be. We were created by this machine only to exist within it. Change is so hard and that is the reason that there will be a die-off. Monte does more than most in his quest to spread information to enhance and further the enlightenment of people like you and me. I happen to think that he has done far more than his share already. It makes me feel guilty sometimes that i dont do enough.

NEVER STOP LEARNING!


Well he thinks he knows it all yep, how do you know I haven’t been thinking long and hard about it, I’ve thought about these issues for over 20 years.

The fact is most of this arguments are skewed, not everything depends on oil or is needed for its running. My optimism is a by product of ignorance eh? What are YOU doing about it, what have you researched?

There isn’t going to be a die off because you cannot run cars or fly planes. For heck sake grow up why don’t you. We have renewables galore, coal for hundred of years, hydro and god know what else. The entire economy is man made, if even see people write ‘The banks bailiffs will turn up and repossess everything and people will be starving!’. What planet are you on? We’re already making enough renewable energy where I live to maintain a transport system. If you believe everything he says and spend your next 30 years in here in abject depression feel free. This is a classic case of figures being skewed to prove a point. Below I have posted two links on things that depends on no oil input or very little and have energy pay back times in a matter of months, perfectly modern, produces no Co2 and can be made today.


http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/vids/natur ... dband.html

http://www.tgv.com/EN/apropos/galerie/index.htm

Keep running your sports cars folks…enjoy the ride!
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Unread postby vegasmade » Tue 03 May 2005, 18:51:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', '
')Well he thinks he knows it all yep, how do you know I haven’t been thinking long and hard about it, I’ve thought about these issues for over 20 years.

The fact is most of this arguments are skewed, not everything depends on oil or is needed for its running. My optimism is a by product of ignorance eh? What are YOU doing about it, what have you researched?

There isn’t going to be a die off because you cannot run cars or fly planes. For heck sake grow up why don’t you. We have renewables galore, coal for hundred of years, hydro and god know what else. The entire economy is man made, if even see people write ‘The banks bailiffs will turn up and repossess everything and people will be starving!’. What planet are you on? We’re already making enough renewable energy where I live to maintain a transport system. If you believe everything he says and spend your next 30 years in here in abject depression feel free. This is a classic case of figures being skewed to prove a point. Below I have posted two links on things that depends on no oil input or very little and have energy pay back times in a matter of months, perfectly modern, produces no Co2 and can be made today.


http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/vids/natur ... dband.html

http://www.tgv.com/EN/apropos/galerie/index.htm

Keep running your sports cars folks…enjoy the ride!


You've been thinking about these issues since you were 12. Really? All that time and you still list coal in a sentance with renewables. I'm glad to hear your area exists with minimal oil use, but you're the exception, not the rule. How well will your solutions scale up to provide London a continued existence?
Great video clip from greenpeace. It's exactly the kind of proactive thinking all nations should be pursuing. The only issue I take is the scope of production. A goal of 10% renewable energy by 2010 is positive, but small. What amount of power is currently being produced by renewables? The numbers I've seen for global use reflect no more than 4% total output. Even at 10%, that's alot of energy that must come from elsewhere.
www.hubbertpeak.com/us/NETL/OilPeaking.pdf
remember-we don't inherit the earth from our parents, we lease it from our children
User avatar
vegasmade
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun 01 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby Wildwell » Tue 03 May 2005, 19:11:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vegasmade', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', '
')Well he thinks he knows it all yep, how do you know I haven’t been thinking long and hard about it, I’ve thought about these issues for over 20 years.

The fact is most of this arguments are skewed, not everything depends on oil or is needed for its running. My optimism is a by product of ignorance eh? What are YOU doing about it, what have you researched?

There isn’t going to be a die off because you cannot run cars or fly planes. For heck sake grow up why don’t you. We have renewables galore, coal for hundred of years, hydro and god know what else. The entire economy is man made, if even see people write ‘The banks bailiffs will turn up and repossess everything and people will be starving!’. What planet are you on? We’re already making enough renewable energy where I live to maintain a transport system. If you believe everything he says and spend your next 30 years in here in abject depression feel free. This is a classic case of figures being skewed to prove a point. Below I have posted two links on things that depends on no oil input or very little and have energy pay back times in a matter of months, perfectly modern, produces no Co2 and can be made today.


http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/vids/natur ... dband.html

http://www.tgv.com/EN/apropos/galerie/index.htm

Keep running your sports cars folks…enjoy the ride!


You've been thinking about these issues since you were 12. Really? All that time and you still list coal in a sentance with renewables. I'm glad to hear your area exists with minimal oil use, but you're the exception, not the rule. How well will your solutions scale up to provide London a continued existence?


Very well I'd imagine. The entire city already has an electrified transport network due to be powered by renewable. Maybe you should lobby your government to build more renewable power sources and sustainable transport systems? It's not the whole solution, no. Nuclear may be required and tidal. But some of the information I was looking at earlier there's more than enough renewable to power the whole country. So the problem remains transport, which uses 70% of oil. Well, planes take more money out of the country than they bring in, so we can reduce those a bit. Bit of biodiesel for some of the trucks, maybe a downscaling of road transport for small electric cars in cities and more bike use. Many places already have hundred of miles of cycle paths. I'm not saying it's no problem, far from it, but we are moving in the right direction here as is much of Europe and Japan.

The reason I mention coal is there is plenty of it, as long as it's cleaned up, to power plants for quite some time yet. 200 years worth here. I’d be amazed if we hadn’t figured out a new energy source by then.

Yep, I have been hearing about the end of oil since school many times, it's something that's always been on my mind.
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Unread postby Wildwell » Tue 03 May 2005, 19:32:41

Here's round one and round two of what's being built here in the next few years, click on the speadsheet for the power output info.

http://www.bwea.com/offshore/round-2.html

http://www.bwea.com/offshore/round1.html

all approved, then there's tidal.

http://www.bwea.com/marine/resource.html

The power will be ramped up over the next fifty years to get to 100%

As we keep saying still a question of the hydrogen economy, it may be they will make some of that out in the deserts around the world. But Biodesel will keep enough trucks and tractors going and we can power the rail network, so there's transport. According to the soil association is country is self sufficient in organic produce. The indigenous population is rising here at just 0.1% and may shortly go into decline.

I don't want to paint an overly rosy picture, but I don't see die off.
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 03 May 2005, 19:48:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vegasmade', ' ')A goal of 10% renewable energy by 2010 is positive, but small. What amount of power is currently being produced by renewables?


I've seen .8% worldwide, not counting hydro, and most good largescale hydro sites are taken.

US currently about 6%, so 10% by 2010 is maybe possible. I'd like to see it happen, but I'm not counting on it, except to do my own personal part by buying some PV panels.

We should be able to see renewables making up the additional percentage this time next year. (I can't do maths so someone else will have to figure the annual percentage increase needed to reach that goal, something less than 1%, right?)
Ludi
 
Top

[/quote]

Unread postby sampo » Tue 03 May 2005, 20:09:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', '
')There isn’t going to be a die off because you cannot run cars or fly planes. For heck sake grow up why don’t you.

Oh boy here we go...AD HOMINEM #1
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'W')e have renewables galore, coal for hundred of years, hydro and god know what else. The entire economy is man made, if even see people write ‘The banks bailiffs will turn up and repossess everything and people will be starving!’.

If we have "renewables galore" why is the ten year plan for brittish wind power to only provide 10%? coal for how many years at what consumption rate, provide links to the info please! Almost every useful hydroelectric site is already utilized, there are nothing but marginal options left. Yes the economy is man made, but ask yourself what it does. I like to think of the economy as the ultimate tool that humanity has developed to exploit the resources of the planet as fast as possible. The economy "builds" as many humans as it needs to accomplish its goals of marginal added consumption. what happens when the resources are all used up?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'W')hat planet are you on?

AD HOMINEM #2
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'W')e’re already making enough renewable energy where I live to maintain a transport system. If you believe everything he says and spend your next 30 years in here in abject depression feel free. This is a classic case of figures being skewed to prove a point.

Please prey tell where exactly is this place and where is the link to the statistics and figures and facts about your magical renewable city...You say monte skews his facts and figures? go through his posts and you find abundant references to the actual data that he makes his inferences and calculations on. You have yet to post anything even approaching the level of credibility that montequest does in even his smaller posts.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'B')elow I have posted two links on things that depends on no oil input or very little and have energy pay back times in a matter of months, perfectly modern, produces no Co2 and can be made today.
http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/vids/natur ... dband.html
http://www.tgv.com/EN/apropos/galerie/index.htm
a link to a video showing the optimistic dreams of the brittish labor party's master plan for offshore wind farms. and a link to some pictures of a french train? and you think those information free fantasies are going to back up the wild claims you make?

Lets take your wind power example: fuel to run the mining equipment to get the iron ore, gas to run the refinery, electricity to create the steel, fuel to transport all the parts from around the world, fuel to run the tug boats that drag it all out to sea, the drilling the concrete, the maintenance...my god man will we have enough oil to create the infrastructure of it all? Sure it looks great when you restrict yourself to tiny examples, but scale it all up to the level necessary to actually make a difference and you will see all the problems that worry the rest of us so much.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'T')he entire city already has an electrified transport network due to be powered by renewable. Maybe you should lobby your government to build more renewable power sources and sustainable transport systems?
What city, where are the links to back up your statements. Oh yeah about lobbying governement, how do you tell a politician to make these decisions? how does he go to his voters and say "vote for me and i will take all your pretty little toys away and make you work on farms so you can eat and oh no more driving and stuff!" BULLS**T!! no politician would ever do that, and that is one of the biggest parts of the problem and another cause for huge amounts of worry. political and cultural inertia are forces that are strong in the extreme. the fact that american congressmen operate on two year referrendums only compunds our problems.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'I')t's not the whole solution, no. Nuclear may be required and tidal. But some of the information I was looking at earlier there's more than enough renewable to power the whole country.
Once again, SHOW ME THE INFORMATION! nuclear may be required? im not going to go through the example of nuclear power to show you how much fossil fuel goes into the life cycle of a nuclear power plant because i'm lazy (and its already been done so search for it) but the EROEI for nuclear is not so good. And tidal power, get me some links showing how viable large scale tidal power is...everything i've seen about tidal have only been tiny demonstration projects (and then the fossil fuel portion of the tidal life cycle is your homework!)
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'S')o the problem remains transport, which uses 70% of oil. Well, planes take more money out of the country than they bring in, so we can reduce those a bit. Bit of biodiesel for some of the trucks, maybe a downscaling of road transport for small electric cars in cities and more bike use. Many places already have hundred of miles of cycle paths.
Bit of this, bit of that, add some of this and take some of that away and blah blah blah pet project blah blah stuff that cant work blah blah...and then EUREKA! Wow you solved peak oil!!!! Ooops, wait...no you didn't.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'T')he reason I mention coal is there is plenty of it, as long as it's cleaned up, to power plants for quite some time yet. 200 years worth here. I’d be amazed if we hadn’t figured out a new energy source by then.

Coal for 200 years given current consumption rates!!!! Numbers dont exist in a vaccuum man! and clean coal is EXPENSIVE AND HAS LOW EROEI!

I'd be amazed if you posted some actual data supporting your arguments!
User avatar
sampo
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed 27 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby Wildwell » Tue 03 May 2005, 20:47:00

1. 10% in ten years isn’t bad, 20% by 2020. It’s a start. What happens when all resources are used up? Some can be recycled, a lot is going to last much longer than anyone’s lifetime on these boards.
2. The entire rail system, including one of the world’s largest urban railways uses the equivalent of 340,000 barrels of oil in electrical power, about 650 wind turbines. To electrify the rest you would need 1,000 wind turbines or one of those planned off-shore wind farms – which are being built, it‘s not a dream. To reopen what we closed in the 1960s you would need another 500 wind turbines. The light trucks of this country use 6 million tonnes of oil, with efficiency you could get that figure down to 4 million or less, even less feeding railheads. Most of this can be made up with biodiesel. Therefore you have a complete transport network to move food and passengers about. In the cities this network is very extensive.

And yes there is electric tractor and horsepower if needed.

http://www.renewables.com/Permaculture/ ... ractor.htm

Before the 1950s horses were used to bring goods to rail yards and shunt trucks.

This excludes any breakthrough in other areas, but more than provides a network to prevent die off.

3. Look I’m not interested in the rest of the world. The US could become 50% more efficient tomorrow but they aren’t interested in cutting back and feel it is quite okay to drive 15mpg SUVs about even though there are 60mpg cars on the market. I’ve got on about this to the point of tedium.
4. London, Paris, Milan, and most Japanese and European cities have sustainable transport networks that can be powered by renewables. I’m so sorry in America it’s limited to the NE corridor, New York, Boston and Chicago. But you all wanted freedom of your cars.
5. 70% of oil in the US, UK and Europe is used by cars and planes, things that hardly existed before the war, please get a grip, they are not necessary for life.
6. No, the problem is not solved, it’s psychological. But 1) Oil will be coming out the ground for 100 years or more, same with gas. 2) Pebble nuclear reactors could supply a secure power source for 500 years. 3) There’s enough coal world wide for at least 100 years. 4) No one has any idea what might be invented in the next 100 years, it’s like predicting the telephone in 1750. 5) Climate change is probably a more serious problem anyway.
7. Look I could go on and on and on about this, sadly you (and others) have been reading too much of MQs doom to think outside the box. I’m not interested in backward US views, get on and lobby people to do something about it, we have 1000s of pressure groups here that lobby government, I don’t suspect where you are is any different.

For a more detailed breakdown on something similar to what I have wrote, see below

http://www.after-oil.co.uk/
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 03 May 2005, 21:19:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'W')ell first of all you insult people and patronise them, never a good way to prove any point other than you are arrogant.


Wildwell, you have demonstrated an observed ignorance on many facets of the peak oil debate and have equally demonstrated an unwillingness to learn when empirical data is presented to you. No, it is not from arrogance that I admonish you, it is from a lack of patience in the face of mediocrity. You don't do your homework.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Montequest', 'P')eak oil will not have easy solutions. Let us try to think our proposals and solutions through, if for no other reason than to avoid the inevitable "holding of our feet to the fire." We all post here to be heard, but do your homework first, and for sure, do the math. Coal to gasoline will not solve the problem. More nuclear power will not solve the problem. This isn't a problem that must be solved with technology. This is a consequence that must be coped with and adapted to. Mankind will eventually, either willingly or unwillingly, evolve a steady-state economy which fits within the planet's ecological limits. If we develop it willingly, it could become more efficient, more rewarding, and more enjoyable than the infinite growth monster system we have now. If we fight the transition, we will experience nature at her best, finding once again, balance, where there was none.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', '.') You talk about greed but fail to point out that many people do live a very low footprint life – including me.


I don’t?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Montequest', 'W')hereas residents of poor nations are acutely aware of every aspect of their energy use; every stick of wood, (sometimes carried for miles) and every gallon of cooking fuel is closely watched. Oil, in our affluent culture has become an invisible commodity, something we vaguely understand as to be important on a national and international level, but something that doesn't really affect our personal daily lives, except in the price of gasoline. This energy obliviousness helps explain why we have so often misspent our "efficiency dividend;" we make lights more efficient, and we install more of them. Gas mileage improves and we build bigger cars. These mindsets help make it clear why, despite great improvements in energy efficiency, demand continues to spiral upwards. No matter how efficient we become, we must somehow alter the historic trend whereby any gains made through energy efficiency are more than wiped out by a corresponding increase in overall energy consumption.



$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'Y')ou also fail to address where most oil goes, which I have pointed out many times it’s frequently wasted. You also fail to point out 1/6th of the worlds’ population uses most of it, and the biggest consumer of all is your country.
I do?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Montequest', 'W')e are less than 5% of the world's population and consume 40-50% of all the resources, while being the most overpopulated country in the world in terms of impact on our environment. We took more than our share and set it up as a standard of living. The three first words out of an American baby's mouth are, dada, mama, and more. In my opinion, we are the most unstable country in the world with regard to being prepared to weather a peak oil crisis.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'I')nstead you talk about the 2nd law of thermodynamics and the way you are applying it is a specific belief system and you know it.

Specific belief system? It is a specific understanding that you fail to grasp.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Montequest', 'T')here will be those who will stubbornly refuse to accept the fact that the Entropy Law reigns supreme over all physical reality in the world. They will insist that the entropy process only applies in selective instances and that any attempt to apply it more broadly to society is to engage in the use of metaphor. They will be wrong. The laws of thermodynamics provide the overarching scientific frame for the unfolding of all physical activity in this world.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Wildwell', 'I')’m not sure what your agenda is: Anti capitalism, hard core environmentalist, maybe even promoting oil interests or a pro war scenario, who is to know. But you know very well, we cannot survive in a self sufficiency basis therefore we must make things sustainable as possible, yet you rubbish this as well, claiming this will not solve the bigger problem. It is not in our nature to do nothing nor live like animals. Really I don’t think you have anything useful to say, and, you don’t live in the ways you subscribe. May I suggest you are a hypocrite of the worst kind?

You own a large ranch and a sports car. I live in a 16th century stone-built terraced house with very thick walls and a garden 10foot by 20foot. I walk everywhere and use my local electric train service, which we are already generating more than enough renewable energy to sustain. I also never fly. So you tell me who is living beyond their means and depends more on oil? At least I am doing it, you just talk about it or come up with excuses not to.

Only the ignorant and ill-informed revert to ad hominem attacks. Like Ludi stated, you know nothing of how I live, and to attack me speaks volumes of your agenda. My farm uses neither inorganic fertilizers nor pesticides. It has virgin prairie and stands of virgin timber and is a haven for wildlife. Other farmers would have turned this into cropland by now. While our crop yields are usually much less, the saved costs involved for fertilizers and pesticides and equipment offset the difference over time. And since we don’t have the upfront capital costs, we can wait for the market to rise, while most farmers must sell right away to service their debt. When we plow, the birds flock to the fields for the worms and insects in the soil. This rarely happens on intensively farmed land utilizing petrochemicals. And since when is owning productive land a short-coming, much less hypocritical?

My car is a lightweight, fuel efficient vehicle with only 27,000 miles on it. It is a 2001, so it is obvious I don’t drive it much. I walk and ride my bicycle mostly. We have no mass transit where I live. From 1984 until last year, I lived in a recycled 1966 Bluebird bus that I converted to a motorhome. I have lived quite spartan over many years.

I pay $26/month for electricity, while my neighbor in the same size apartment pays $200. I recycle everything I can and compost the organics. I am debt free and live within my means. I have spent the majority of my life on the front lines trying to bring about needed change. I have been involved in resource management for over 30 years. I was a National Park Ranger at 6 different national parks. I was a backcountry ranger for the US Forest Service, and did photography work for the US Fish and Wildlife Service. I was an interpreter/guide for the Anza-Borrego Desert State Park and San Diego County Parks and Recreation. I served on the Governor’s Commission on the Arizona Environment, the Phoenix Wastewater Management Program, and co-founded the Arizona Environmental Alliance. And as you know, I volunteer a lot of time as a moderator for peakoil.com. When you were two years old, I started the first door-to-door recycling service in the city of Phoenix. You want to call me a hypocrite? Go ahead.

My agenda is environmental education and to promote an understanding of the limits and laws of nature—and man’s imperative to learn to live within those laws and limits. I have never said we shouldn't embrace all sustainable alternatives, what I have said is that they will all come up short. And since my private mail runs 99 to 1 in favor of what I write and say, I shall continue in the same vein.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 03 May 2005, 21:29:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'T')he criticism I see leveled at him is that he is not personally implementing this plan to the extent apparently desired by Wildwell, that is, Monte is still driving his car. Now in the big scheme of Monte's life, driving this car might not be such a big use of energy if Monte has given up some other things he might have done which use lots of energy, like having kids. That might be his trade-off, car in place of kids.
(if I seem like a Monte apologist, I am! I like him. :) )


Thanks, Ludi. And no, I don't have any children. After reading Limits to Growth in 1972, I figured the world had enough people already. My teachings as a park ranger and ecologist over these last 33 years would have fallen on few ears had I not stayed engaged in the system somewhat. And believe me, working as an EMT, firefighter, search and rescue specialist and carrying a gun and wearing a bullet proof vest for $9.00/hr was not very conducive to wanton consumption. :lol:
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests