by Timo » Thu 26 Apr 2012, 12:36:30
Good point, pfreyere. The more $$ that is spent on fuel, the less $$ will be available for everything else, like food, shelter, and every other consumer gotta-have-it product out there. Shifts in transportation costs will inherently cause shifts in every other sector of the economy, so even if we collectively manage to keep traveling BAU, we'll be wearing fewer, or more raggedy clothes, eating less food, buying fewer iPods, building much smaller houses (or no new houses, at all). In essence, absolutely everything about how we live will change. Given the American appetite for products made in China, we'll be buying less from them, meaning they'll be facing economic turmoil of their own, and on and on around the planet. On the other hand, rising fuel prices will also inherently speed up renewable energy technologies, thus possibly mitigating some of the downward spiral upheaval. Unfortunately, it's just not possible to feed 9,000,000,000 people with batteries, or wind, or solar, or fusion, or coal, or oil, or ........
I know this subject is taboo, but just for the heck of it, imagine the future, given the current levels of our known finite resources, being used by only 2 billion people. We'll either get their voluntarily, or we'll get their involuntarily, via famine, resource wars, plagues, droughts, floods...... We do have a choice in the matter, but humanity is not too well known for making good choices.