by MrBill » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 10:50:55
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'W')ow! Greenspan sounds like one of us!
Mr. Bill, where do you see us in say, 5 years? Will the average middle class person in the US have the living standard of Portugal or that of India?
As human as we are we tend to be rather centric in our time horizons. We tend to think for example in terms of
The Ming Dynesty,
The Roman Empire,
The Middle Ages, and
George Bush's Presidency
as being world changing events. When in reality, important events usually play out over a much longer time horizon. It took almost 75-years for the Soviet Union to spend down their capital and resources, which combined with a costly arms race, lead to the dissolution of the USSR.
Countries like China have stumbled badly and then regained their step. So the results are not always
A leads to
B which automatically lead linearly to end point
C. Especially, as some have pointed out given feedback loops in complex systems that tend to make them more robust than we give them credit for?
I am pretty sure in five years there will have been precious little change in how we go about our daily lives. In the slow decline this may look like the beginning in hindsight, or just a nasty patch that we have recovered from, not knowing that it was still part of an overall downward trend just the same. It will take 20 or 50 years to look back and see the next 5-years for what they are in the context of what then came later. Either more of the same, or worse, or better? It depends on collective decisions made today by many stakeholders including individuals, firms, governments and countries.
Many countries tend to evolve in similar directions simultaneously partly due to group-think. Or necessity forces them to seek out common responses to perceived common problems. Or in fact misery loves company, which may be why Latam countries might be getting together to thumb their noises at the Yankis even though their own present prosperity is a cruel illusion and they are currently on a path that will leave them even poorer than they were with or without these recent windfalls in commodities and energy.
I do not see another Great Depression in the next five years. I see a lot of ups and downs as the global economy adapts to new trade patterns and addresses old financial imbalances. I really do not believe that the US' external imbalances can persist un-addressed until that time? They are just so pronounced and the world's central bankers and policy makers are in open revolt. However, for the US' imbalances to unwind we still need to see a willingness on behalf of others to address their own structural imbalances that have contributed to the current account surpluses/deficits between savers and borrowers. So far, none of the exporters have been willing to bite that bullet, which will taste of bile given the easy ride they have had for so long now.
I know it is fashionable to blame the US for everything, and they have screwed themselves in so many ways, but those current account and trade imbalances have been a two way street. Exacerbated by a jobs and growth at any cost mentality amoung many of the US' trade partners, but also European politicians who have been unable and unwilling to make painful structural changes at home too. European exporters are already whining about a stronger euro against the dollar. No one likes pain it seems, but everyone is willing to heap blame on the US as the world’s consumer of last resort.
At this juncture, I would be playing the stagflation card with higher inflation along with lower growth. I would be allocating more savings to interest earning accounts as interest rates move higher in real terms and reduces the attractiveness of stocks. And I would use a currency overlay to hedge out some of the foreign exchange risk. A basket approach against the dollar for example. I like the ruble, and as it is an energy and commodity play, I think it is a natural looking forward 18-months to two years?
One reason I like Russia over China is that Russia has had expensive capital since the Russian crisis, and country risk spreads for mainly bank borrowing and debt have been wide, so there was a natural allocation of capital to projects that could afford to pay back principle and interest to their investors. China on the other hand has mainly received FDI in the form of equity and JVs that have not been profitable. Yes, companies produced cheaply in China and then re-exported, but JVs and Chinese companies have not been profitable. And foreign investors have had a poor track record of extracting any gains in the form of stock appreciation or dividends from their JVs or Chinese stocks, at the same time as many have suffered losses and lost intellectual property to their Chinese partners.
Just pull-up a chart of Russian versus Chinese stock market gains in the past 2-3 years and you will see what I mean. China is a black hole to invest billions into with little to show for it, while investors in Russia have generally made money with a few glaring exceptions like the Yukos fiasco.
So besides rambling on and not answering your question, let me summarize by saying that the wobbly pillar of growth that is the USA at the moment, might be replaced with a few other economies that step-up to the plate and take over as growth engines. That might be in Central and Eastern Europe as well as the Middle East or it might be domestic demand in parts of Asia? So long as parts of the global economy are growing, the system is likely robust enough that there will be not meltdown.
Perhaps we will get lucky and it will just be an unwinding of imbalances with a net transfer in wealth to the commodity and energy producers as well as forced improvements to productivity that will favor some countries over others? However, red flags that could upset such a sanguine apple cart would be any disruption to ME oil exports through the Straits of Hormuz; or a dirty suitcase bomb going off in any major European or US city; or an outbreak of human to human transmitted avian influenza; or other so-called low probability, but high impact events. Those are harder to predict in advance, but are none-the-less just as real as what will happen on June 29th!
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.