Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Trader's Corner 2006

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Where will the price of WTIC oil be on December 29, 2006?

Less than $50
3
No votes
Around $55
4
No votes
Around $60
7
No votes
Around $65
15
No votes
Around $70
58
No votes
More than $80
101
No votes
 
Total votes : 188

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby Revi » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 10:18:13

I just bought eslr at $12.20. They just signed a contract to buy polysilicon from Scandinavia. They should have supply to make string ribbon solar panels. Will it go up? This is my first foray into the stock market. What do you think?
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby MrBill » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 10:26:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'I') just bought eslr at $12.20. They just signed a contract to buy polysilicon from Scandinavia. They should have supply to make string ribbon solar panels. Will it go up? This is my first foray into the stock market. What do you think?


I am not familar with ESLR so will have to find them on Bloomberg and take a look? While I am at it, I will have to Google String Ribbon Solar Panels, too? ; - )

The effects of the Iran announcement now becoming more pronounced as the trading day wears on. We just broached $70 in the Brent and touched $71.35 in the WTI. US Energy SEC just announced, World could handle Iran oil cutoff, whatever that means? What long-term or just for 100 days or so? Strange rhetoric when you're trying to finesse a deal. Maybe softly, softly might be better than slinging mud in the public?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby Revi » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 12:09:28

ESLR is up a bit already, but who knows? It's been fun already. I figure that it's like putting my money where my mouth is. If I really believe in alternatives why not support them. Also it has been going up lately. A friend bought last summer at $7 and it went up to $17, then slumped when they couldn't get silicon for their process. It started up again yesterday on news that they could get polysilicon from Norway. We'll see...
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby Revi » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 20:55:51

ESLR is at $13.24 in after hours trading. Does this happen often? I bought at $12.20 this morning. The rest of the market is down, way down. Wow! I have to be careful. This is too fun!

I have to remember that pride comes before the fall... Here's what others think of Evergreen's prospects:

http://yahoo.smartmoney.com/onedaywonde ... &afl=yahoo
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby drew » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 22:16:27

Don't worry Revi, unless of course we are witnessing the unfolding of the US econ... which people here have been predicting for some years now. Barring that crunch happening commodities will be back up again soon no doubt.

Sooner or later Bush or Amadinijad will say something stupid,

or worse, do something stupid..

Hurricane season is almost upon us...

Summer driving season is upon us..

and the Iraq situation is plodding along as usual...

Of course all this is good for us lucky fools playing on commodities..

Not that I'm a Black Sabbath fan (how appropriate today) but I am reminded of one of their songs 'Iron Man', when thinking about my mostly stress free gut-I don't get distressed at downturns-they are buying opportunities.

Anyways, some will recognize this...

'I AM IRON GUT' ........;-)

Drew
User avatar
drew
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Thu 22 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: canada

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby MrBill » Wed 07 Jun 2006, 02:24:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('drew', '
')Sooner or later Bush or Amadinijad will say something stupid,

or worse, do something stupid..

Hurricane season is almost upon us...

Summer driving season is upon us..

and the Iraq situation is plodding along as usual...

Of course all this is good for us lucky fools playing on commodities..


Drew



RE Hurricane Season
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his Year's U.S. Hurricane Predictions According to latest predictions from the Tropical Meteorology Project at Colorado State University, 2006 is set to be an above average year for Atlantic tropical storm activity. The research by Philip J. Klotzbach and William M. Gray predicts a total of 17 named storms for 2006, including 9 hurricanes. Those 9 hurricanes are expected to last an average of 5 days each for a combined total of 45 hurricane days this year. And among those hurricanes, 5 are predicted to reach winds of 111 mph or more.

These predictions follow closely with the 16 named storms and 6 major hurricanes predicted earlier this year by the NOAA. The report also predicted a 52% chance of a hurricane making landfall somewhere in the United States, with a 38% chance of a landfall in the Gulf of Mexico. As such, it is not likely that this year's hurricane season activity will reach the unprecedented level of activity for 2005. One of the report's authors, Philip Klotzbach noted that "Statistically, the odds of having four major storms make landfall this year are very small."


Energy Market Comments compliments of PruBache
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')nergy Complex: Main Features
The crude market was able to shrug off seemingly bearish news regarding Iran’s positive reaction to various US incentives that were proffered in an effort to curtail the Iranian uranium enrichment program.

The ability to do so was largely the result of a renewed buying interest into the unleaded futures. The gasoline strength appeared more related to renewed spreading against the heating oil than to any improvement in the fundamentals.

The progress in returning the Corpus Christi refineries back to normal production levels appears to be proceeding and there were no reported additional snags.

The cash basis appears routine and the lack of strength in the front unleaded switch would appear to attest to lack of bullish leadership from the spot market. The monthly EIA Short Term Outlook may have provided some slight support to the gasoline as the agency increased their 2nd quarter gasoline demand estimate to a year over year increase of 0.4% from last month’s estimate of 0.3%. Nonetheless, such an increase is still well off of normal historical trend gains and continues to reflect some price-induced deterioration in consumption.

It also suggests that some analysts may be off the mark in their forward demand estimates. As such, the argument that gasoline stocks remain unusually low in terms of forward inventory cover may not be completely legit. The front of the crude curve continues to show occasional strength with the nearby gasoline gains providing a price prop and with the prospect of another drop in Cushing crude barrels likely providing support. With July crude discounting July unleaded futures by $19.00/bbl, the possibilities of a sustained evaporation in risk premium are sharply reduced.

Tomorrow’s trade will be impacted largely by the weekly stats. We will again be viewing the gasoline supply figures as key to market direction across the complex. While we are looking for a stock build of about 2 mb, such a development will likely require a sizable downward adjustment in implied demand from the prior week’s strong pace.


Took some profit out of yesterday's first dip lower on the Iran news as the hourly chart action indicated a move lower in any case. It still looks offered here at $7050/7080 in the Brent despite the daily charts being constructive?

However, headline this morning that, Militants attack Shell Oil facility in Nigerian Delta, Five Kidnapped, according to industry sources. That is the type of headlines that can cause weak shorts to run for cover, so maybe will hold off hitting the bid and see if we test that $7080 area first?

Sometimes it is dangerous to trade too early before London gets it as they quite often square overnight positions changing the direction on low volumes. Better sit on my hands and wait to see which way it develops as the market digests the Iran and Nigeria news along with their morning coffee.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby Revi » Wed 07 Jun 2006, 10:55:33

ESLR is down a bit now. I shouldn't watch it so much...
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby Mechler » Wed 07 Jun 2006, 16:45:17

Revi,

Most energy stocks were off today. If you only lost a little, consider yourself lucky.

Welcome to the rollercoaster...
"It is certain that free societies would have no easy time in a future dark age. The rapid return to universal penury will be accomplished by violence and cruelties of a kind now forgotten." - Roberto Vacca, The Coming Dark Age
Mechler
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Thu 02 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Denver, USA

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby Bewildebeest » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 00:16:55

I'm looking for some advice on investing in other currencies. Maybe someone on this thread can help.

I currently have a large cash position (in a money market), which I plan to use for a house sometime in the next 1 1/2 years. I recently put 5% of this in gold and silver bullion.

I'm planning to put another 15-30% in Euros through a short-term CD. One question is whether there are other currencies that I should also strongly consider. It seems that almost everyone I've read on this board favors Euros as the safest hedge against a falling dollar. What about Asian (or other) currencies?

Everbank, for example, offers an "Asian index CD," which is actually a mix of the New Zealand dollar, Japanese Yen, Thai and Singapore currencies. Would this kind of diversification be a good choice?

Another question is whether I should put more than 30% in foreign currencies. What proportion would you recommend?

Thanks for any ideas.
User avatar
Bewildebeest
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu 25 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby MrBill » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 02:30:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bewildebeest', 'I')'m looking for some advice on investing in other currencies. Maybe someone on this thread can help.

I currently have a large cash position (in a money market), which I plan to use for a house sometime in the next 1 1/2 years. I recently put 5% of this in gold and silver bullion.

I'm planning to put another 15-30% in Euros through a short-term CD. One question is whether there are other currencies that I should also strongly consider. It seems that almost everyone I've read on this board favors Euros as the safest hedge against a falling dollar. What about Asian (or other) currencies?

Everbank, for example, offers an "Asian index CD," which is actually a mix of the New Zealand dollar, Japanese Yen, Thai and Singapore currencies. Would this kind of diversification be a good choice?

Another question is whether I should put more than 30% in foreign currencies. What proportion would you recommend?

Thanks for any ideas.


There is no right or wrong answer to this question, just a trade-off between risk and reward as well as higher nominal interest rates in one currency versus better underlying fundamentals in another. If it were otherwise, the exchange rate would have already gravitated to that new equilibrium.

30% of your underlying position hedged into another foreign currency is already substantial insurance, if for example you intend to buy a house in the next year or so.

If you are really bearish your home currency then 50% might be your upside goal. Beyond that and I question your logic in buying any asset, like a house, in your home market if your view is so pessimistic?

The euro is likely to benefit from any dollar weakness. The Asian currency basket sounds like a good play. They have some higher yielding NZD and THB in the basket to make up for zero real yields in the JPY which is a nice diversification. The problem with owning JPY outright is that you end-up with negative real interest rates, and have to rely exclusively on yen appreciation for your yield. If you have the chance to go that direction (Everbank CD) it is probably not a bad one as if the yuan appreciates, other Asian currencies are also likely to appreciate in the region, so the JPY and the SGD will also likely rise too.

An alternative is to sell USD futures on the CME. Then you get appreciation of a basket of currencies against the dollar, but no interest income. However, as you buy on margin, you also do not tie-up as much capital, so the rest can go into a money market account.

Good luck.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby MrBill » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 02:54:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
There is no right or wrong answer to this question, just a trade-off between risk and reward as well as higher nominal interest rates in one currency versus better underlying fundamentals in another. If it were otherwise, the exchange rate would have already gravitated to that new equilibrium.

30% of your underlying position hedged into another foreign currency is already substantial insurance, if for example you intend to buy a house in the next year or so.

If you are really bearish your home currency then 50% might be your upside goal. Beyond that and I question your logic in buying any asset, like a house, in your home market if your view is so pessimistic?

The euro is likely to benefit from any dollar weakness. The Asian currency basket sounds like a good play. They have some higher yielding NZD and THB in the basket to make up for zero real yields in the JPY which is a nice diversification. The problem with owning JPY outright is that you end-up with negative real interest rates, and have to rely exclusively on yen appreciation for your yield. If you have the chance to go that direction (Everbank CD) it is probably not a bad one as if the yuan appreciates, other Asian currencies are also likely to appreciate in the region, so the JPY and the SGD will also likely rise too.

An alternative is to sell USD futures on the CME. Then you get appreciation of a basket of currencies against the dollar, but no interest income. However, as you buy on margin, you also do not tie-up as much capital, so the rest can go into a money market account.

Good luck.


Caveat Emptor/ex-ante/post-ante/Code of Conduct/etc./

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Quote:
Important Certifications, Disclosures and Disclaimers

Important: These disclosures and disclaimers must be read in conjunction with the market opinions and recaps of which it forms part. Receipt and use of the information in this blog are subject to all aspects of these disclosures and disclaimers. Additional information about the companies and securities discussed in this report is publicly available and no information contained is based on insider information.

Certifications: The trader who prepared this report hereby certifies that the views expressed in this research accurately reflect the trader’s personal views about all of the subject companies and / or commodity, derivative, security, currency or other asset (together “assets”) , and no part of the trader’s compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly, related to the specific views or recommendations in these blogs.

Issuing Entities and Recipients: This blog is intended for infotainment only. This blog is not intended for, and should not be forwarded to any private investor and any such persons should disregard the contents of this blog.

Not an Offer or Solicitation etc: This research does not constitute an offer or solicitation of any transaction in any assets referred to herein and should not be construed as such.

Suitability: This research is for informational purposes only and is not tailored to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular requirements of any individual recipient. Each investor must make its own determination of the appropriateness of any assets referred to in this report based on the legal, tax and accounting considerations applicable to such investor and its own investment strategy. The value of any asset may be positively or adversely affected by changes in foreign exchange or interest rates, as well as by other financial, economic or political factors. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.

Sources, Completeness and Accuracy: This material is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but no independent verification has been made. As such the trader does not represent or guarantee that the information contained herein is accurate or complete and it should not be relied on as such. Opinions expressed herein are current opinions as of the date appearing on this material and are subject to change without notice. The trader is under no obligation to update or keep the information current.

No Legal Advice: The information provided in this research is not intended to be legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Investors seeking legal advice should contact a licensed attorney.Further, the trader may have financial interests in Assets mentioned in this research and in distributing research from other sources shall be under no obligation to disclose such fact, save as required by a regulator or applicable law.

Electronic Communications: The trader cannot be responsible for any electronic communication system used to relay this research to you either now or in the future. The trader will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered as a result of the corruption or incomplete transmission of the research and shall not be obliged to relay the information through another medium. No warranty, representation or guarantee is given with respect to the content or products advertised on any website to which a link is provided with this research.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby MrBill » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 03:13:07

A bearish DOE report further knocked some wind out of the crude complex's rally. Now we are plumbing support at the psychologically important $70.00 in the WTI. The daily support has already broken in the Brent with the hourly charts lending support to this bearish short-term view. As well metals and other commodities were very soft yesterday with follow through selling in the related stocks. The quicker long only profits evaporate in other asset classes the sooner integrated investors such as fund managers are to take profits in other long positions like the crude.

Yesterday's DOE inventory numbers were:

Crude +1.1 mio bbls to 346.6 mio bbls
Gasoline +1.0 mio bbls to 210.3 mio
Distillates +1.8 mio bbls to 120.7 mio
Refinery Runs -0.4% to 91%

TTL imports +39K to 10.88 mbpd
Produce imports -688K to 3.59 mbpd

TTL produce demand +3.8% YOY to 20.95 mbpd
Gasoline demand +0.7% to 9.33 mbpd
Distillate demand unch'd at 4.06 mbpd


Nice builds despite the start on the driving season over last week's long weekend and as refiners come back online after any seasonal maintenance and switchover to ethanol from MTBE. So far so good.

Unleaded still lending support overall to the cracks with the market still in backwardation. Again psychological, a real sell-off would only come as unleaded drops below $2.00 a barrel, which may not be possible now that summer is upon us and the hurricane season is so close at hand?

Certainly the stronger dollar on the back of the expectation of higher interest rates in the pipeline are taking their toll on future demand expectations despite what appears to me to be decent product demand on a year on year basis given we have come so far so quickly and given higher interest rates already?

Mr. Bubble's, I mean Mr. Greenspan's, testimony yesterday certainly questioned robust growth going forward if prices were to spike quickly higher on any supply interuptions, but then the Maestro of Sanguine seemed confident in the market's ability to absorb steadily rising prices, so long as their was no shock? As always, I expect demand destruction to occur around the margins in the form of what consumers give up in order to keep driving. So long as we have global growth at a healthy clip, we will burn more fossil fuels of every description and that will keep excess capacity tight as supply and demand are finely balanced.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby Doly » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 04:08:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'A')s always, I expect demand destruction to occur around the margins in the form of what consumers give up in order to keep driving.


Yes, but with so many people living from paycheck to paycheck, how long can this keep going?
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby MrBill » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 05:20:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'A')s always, I expect demand destruction to occur around the margins in the form of what consumers give up in order to keep driving.


Yes, but with so many people living from paycheck to paycheck, how long can this keep going?


Read an article yesterday on pensions and estimates that up to 66% would not earn enough to fund their retirement, given certain assumptions naturally, any of which you might argue about, however, the message was clear. But what is the implication?

Does that mean that 66% of the people will simply cease to exist? Not likely in a democracy. However, it does likely mean that they have saved inadequately for their retirement, with or without any nasty surprises from higher inflation and declining fossil fuel supplies, which would suggest much lower living standards for the majority in the future.

Western nations with a living standard comparable to Argentina or Russia (outside of Moscow) for example? Take a look at GDP per capita figures for different countries and take your pick? Without intelligent policies today, and there are none, the future will look very bleak indeed. If we are collectively lucky, we may see convergence at ASEAN levels, if not, then closer to EEMEA and hoepfully not African levels of income and growth? Certainly, not convergence at rich world levels. One could argue it is already too late for that, and the will to reform too weak to make any difference now? However, history is littered with examples of the rise and decline of great cities, nations and empires. Ashes to ashes and dust to dust and all that stuff. Nobody said that it would end.

So, in answer to your question, how long can this keep going? Well, demand destruction will keep going until people change their lifestyle built on driving*, consuming and accumulating debt to one built on walking, saving and paying-off debt. Call it the flipside of economic growth 'J'. Economic contraction 'n' if you prefer graphs?

I think Greenspan's comments were quite lucid yesterday. Some of them could have come directly from PO?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ') Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan on Wednesday offered a grim view of the world's vulnerability to high crude oil prices, saying he doubted producers would pump enough oil to meet future demand.

"The energy abundance on which this nation was built is over," Greenspan said in his first congressional appearance since departing the Fed in late January.

While he said the world economy had largely shrugged off sharp oil price gains so far, he said the immunity of U.S. consumers may be running out.
Greenspan says oil costs starting to pinch economy

Certain policies implemented in the very near term could help that transition and help manage that contraction instead of a free fall, but I am not optomistic on the whole. I think there will be winners and losers and the latter will outnumber the former.



*walking, biking, ride sharing, public transport, shuttle buses, fewer trips, living closer to work, moving work closer to home, etc.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby Revi » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 09:52:12

Wow! Greenspan sounds like one of us!

Mr. Bill, where do you see us in say, 5 years? Will the average middle class person in the US have the living standard of Portugal or that of India?
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby MrBill » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 10:50:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'W')ow! Greenspan sounds like one of us!

Mr. Bill, where do you see us in say, 5 years? Will the average middle class person in the US have the living standard of Portugal or that of India?


As human as we are we tend to be rather centric in our time horizons. We tend to think for example in terms of

    The Ming Dynesty,
    The Roman Empire,
    The Middle Ages, and
    George Bush's Presidency


as being world changing events. When in reality, important events usually play out over a much longer time horizon. It took almost 75-years for the Soviet Union to spend down their capital and resources, which combined with a costly arms race, lead to the dissolution of the USSR.

Countries like China have stumbled badly and then regained their step. So the results are not always A leads to B which automatically lead linearly to end point C. Especially, as some have pointed out given feedback loops in complex systems that tend to make them more robust than we give them credit for?

I am pretty sure in five years there will have been precious little change in how we go about our daily lives. In the slow decline this may look like the beginning in hindsight, or just a nasty patch that we have recovered from, not knowing that it was still part of an overall downward trend just the same. It will take 20 or 50 years to look back and see the next 5-years for what they are in the context of what then came later. Either more of the same, or worse, or better? It depends on collective decisions made today by many stakeholders including individuals, firms, governments and countries.

Many countries tend to evolve in similar directions simultaneously partly due to group-think. Or necessity forces them to seek out common responses to perceived common problems. Or in fact misery loves company, which may be why Latam countries might be getting together to thumb their noises at the Yankis even though their own present prosperity is a cruel illusion and they are currently on a path that will leave them even poorer than they were with or without these recent windfalls in commodities and energy.

I do not see another Great Depression in the next five years. I see a lot of ups and downs as the global economy adapts to new trade patterns and addresses old financial imbalances. I really do not believe that the US' external imbalances can persist un-addressed until that time? They are just so pronounced and the world's central bankers and policy makers are in open revolt. However, for the US' imbalances to unwind we still need to see a willingness on behalf of others to address their own structural imbalances that have contributed to the current account surpluses/deficits between savers and borrowers. So far, none of the exporters have been willing to bite that bullet, which will taste of bile given the easy ride they have had for so long now.

I know it is fashionable to blame the US for everything, and they have screwed themselves in so many ways, but those current account and trade imbalances have been a two way street. Exacerbated by a jobs and growth at any cost mentality amoung many of the US' trade partners, but also European politicians who have been unable and unwilling to make painful structural changes at home too. European exporters are already whining about a stronger euro against the dollar. No one likes pain it seems, but everyone is willing to heap blame on the US as the world’s consumer of last resort.

At this juncture, I would be playing the stagflation card with higher inflation along with lower growth. I would be allocating more savings to interest earning accounts as interest rates move higher in real terms and reduces the attractiveness of stocks. And I would use a currency overlay to hedge out some of the foreign exchange risk. A basket approach against the dollar for example. I like the ruble, and as it is an energy and commodity play, I think it is a natural looking forward 18-months to two years?

One reason I like Russia over China is that Russia has had expensive capital since the Russian crisis, and country risk spreads for mainly bank borrowing and debt have been wide, so there was a natural allocation of capital to projects that could afford to pay back principle and interest to their investors. China on the other hand has mainly received FDI in the form of equity and JVs that have not been profitable. Yes, companies produced cheaply in China and then re-exported, but JVs and Chinese companies have not been profitable. And foreign investors have had a poor track record of extracting any gains in the form of stock appreciation or dividends from their JVs or Chinese stocks, at the same time as many have suffered losses and lost intellectual property to their Chinese partners.

Just pull-up a chart of Russian versus Chinese stock market gains in the past 2-3 years and you will see what I mean. China is a black hole to invest billions into with little to show for it, while investors in Russia have generally made money with a few glaring exceptions like the Yukos fiasco.

So besides rambling on and not answering your question, let me summarize by saying that the wobbly pillar of growth that is the USA at the moment, might be replaced with a few other economies that step-up to the plate and take over as growth engines. That might be in Central and Eastern Europe as well as the Middle East or it might be domestic demand in parts of Asia? So long as parts of the global economy are growing, the system is likely robust enough that there will be not meltdown.

Perhaps we will get lucky and it will just be an unwinding of imbalances with a net transfer in wealth to the commodity and energy producers as well as forced improvements to productivity that will favor some countries over others? However, red flags that could upset such a sanguine apple cart would be any disruption to ME oil exports through the Straits of Hormuz; or a dirty suitcase bomb going off in any major European or US city; or an outbreak of human to human transmitted avian influenza; or other so-called low probability, but high impact events. Those are harder to predict in advance, but are none-the-less just as real as what will happen on June 29th!
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby quizz » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 11:21:11

Interesting article in Reuters about 'Treasury yield inversion curve' acting as an indicator that the Market will continue to suffer:
Reuters news

Seems to be a good indicator (has only failed twice):
A Stock Market Crash in 2006?
The Inverted Yield Curve: Your Investments Are Under Siege

(edit: ooops, I just did a search and see this is discussed elsewhere)
User avatar
quizz
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue 25 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby Bewildebeest » Thu 08 Jun 2006, 11:58:45

Mr Bill: Thanks for your reply, just what I was looking for.

Regarding the house, we have been renting for a long time and are still not necessarily in a hurry to buy. Ideally we would wait until the housing bubble deflates, but we also run the risk of our cash savings eroding from inflation in the meantime. I assume you believe that the housing bubble is a bigger risk than inflation? (We will probably be buying in the Seattle or Portland areas, where housing prices are continuing to rise.)

Thanks again.
User avatar
Bewildebeest
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu 25 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby MrBill » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 02:38:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bewildebeest', 'M')r Bill: Thanks for your reply, just what I was looking for.

Regarding the house, we have been renting for a long time and are still not necessarily in a hurry to buy. Ideally we would wait until the housing bubble deflates, but we also run the risk of our cash savings eroding from inflation in the meantime. I assume you believe that the housing bubble is a bigger risk than inflation? (We will probably be buying in the Seattle or Portland areas, where housing prices are continuing to rise.)

Thanks again.


RE the risk of buying versus renting. As strange as it may seem to many people, the cost of buying a house should be equal to renting if you take into account all costs and discount them into present value, much like you would value a share by taking all future dividend payments, plus expected capital appreciation, and discount those future cash flows into present value. Tax incentives in the USA distort this calculation, skewing it in favor of home ownership based on debt that is tax deductible.

Let us just say that housing prices in many, many markets, not just the USA, have little to do with equivalent rents or replacement values. But an economy expanding 3-4% p.a. should not experience housing price gains in the magnitude of 30-40% p.a. unless it was a) seriously undervalued before, or b) it is in a bubble, possibly due to too much money supply inflating all assets - again, the definition of a bubble.

That does not mean that the bubble cannot exist for a long time, partially deflate, and then let rents and/or economic growth catch-up to home values versus housing prices alone regressing to their mean?

As has been pointed out by many others, housing prices have more to do with employment expectations than interest rates or inflation expectations. Also, there is a first come, first served component to buying real estate. You want to buy the best properties if and when they come to market before someone else does. Someone else may be willing to pay a premium to live near schools and other ammenities.

However, in the meantime, you may want to look at these CME Housing Futures, which allow you to hedge out future price increases before you are ready to buy or in fact speculate that prices may move lower in the next 12-months.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ME has opened up an exciting new opportunity for investors interested in non-traditional investment products to diversify and manage their risk - CME Housing futures and options!

Now, for the first time, CME Housing futures and options allow you to hedge financial risk associated with fluctuations in real estate prices. In addition, you can gain exposure to real estate values in 10 major U.S. markets without direct ownership of properties, accomplish true portfolio diversification, and provide yourself with an opportunity to profit from a movement in housing prices.

Based on the S&P/Case-Shiller (CS) Home Price Indexes, CME Housing futures and options are cash-settled to a weighted composite index of U.S. real estate prices, as well as to specific markets in the following 10 major U.S. cities: Boston, Miami, New York, San Diego, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., Chicago, Denver, Las Vegas and Los Angeles.
CME Housing Futures

As for me, I think housing prices should deflate based on lower demand and negative personal savings, but hard to see them moving too much lower while you still have growth in the USA above trend (albeit slowing), and stagflation usually supports assets such as housing that are positively correlated with inflation? At least up that point where people a) walk away from their adjustable rate mortgages, or b) lose their jobs.

But I think many commentators have overstated exactly how many homeowners have ARMs versus fixed mortgages, confusing them with new mortgages using ARMs. And with unemployment still quite low in the USA, that is not yet a decisive factor, even if other household expenditures are being squeezed by high interest rates on other debt and higher gasoline prices.

To put it another way. Energy demand destruction will occur at the fringes as people give up other activities and consumption to keep driving. The same as they will give up almost all discretionary spending, and even driving, before they will likely default on their home mortgage. However, negative home equity would be a very serious drag on consumer spending and investment sentiment, and would be one major contributor to a nasty recession.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Postby MrBill » Fri 09 Jun 2006, 05:08:07

I do dislike days that start out like today! My first impression was to sell into weakness as we came off yesterday's dead cat bounce, supported by the fact that the products were in negative territory and it looked weak with no headlines to provide support? Now for some reason we are 50 pts. higher in the Brent lead by a rally in the Gasoil and there are absolutely no headlines out to indicate anything has happened? Uggh!

Stopped out and now sitting here flat wondering which way we'll leerch next? It is almost a universal truth. Once markets stop falling they almost inevitably go back up! Now if I could just figure out when that is?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')ummary:
Although today’s sell-off in the petroleum complex was substantial, the resiliency of the market was again put on display as downside follow through proved elusive and most parts of the complex were able to rebound by around 2% on average from the early session lows. While we are leaving open the possibility of further slippage in the crude oil to the $67.00-68.00 area, we would also advise that additional declines of some $2.00-2.50 could prove erratic and arduous unless accompanied by additional gasoline downside leadership. In other words, further weakness in the crack differentials will be a requisite to sustained crude price declines to below the $70.00 level. We remain of the opinion that product price support could easily trump bearish geopolitical developments as a price driver to the crude oil. Notwithstanding today’s late session recovery, we are not ruling out a further decline in the July unleaded contract toward the $2.00 area and an associated
narrowing in the July gas crack toward the $15.00-16.00 area. However, developments in both of these regards could be delayed by a Friday rally or any additional refinery problems. We are maintaining a bearish trading bias in the natural gas in anticipation of further slippage to the $5.75 area where support is expected to develop. The market began the week at the high side of our expected $5.75-6.75 trading range and appears poised to finish the week near the low side. We are maintaining this projected range through the balance of this month.
-Jim Ritterbusch
Consulting Analyst
Source: Prubache
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron