Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Stand Your Ground thread

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 19 Apr 2012, 20:42:09

Something is seriously smelly with Florida:

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-ne ... rain2Cents

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut in 2010, Corey and Florida saw it fit to arrest and charge Marissa Alexander for discharging her gun at the roof of her home to scare off her husband. She was allegedly protecting herself, for he had been abusive before and was threatening her at the time.
No one was shot or even hurt. She reportedly had a permit for the gun and was Standing Her Ground. Prosecutors based their charges on the premise that Marissa could have retreated through a back door or window if she felt trapped by her husband.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby AgentR11 » Fri 20 Apr 2012, 19:55:15

I am saying that there is no right for Martin to exclude Zimmerman from his presence in the public space they were in.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Sat 21 Apr 2012, 09:35:02

My bad Cog, it seems you are much more aware of the actual detail. Did you see the story about the mother locked up for a warning shot?
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby Cog » Sat 21 Apr 2012, 11:48:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'M')y bad Cog, it seems you are much more aware of the actual detail. Did you see the story about the mother locked up for a warning shot?


Are you referring to the Marissa Alexander case?
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby dinopello » Fri 01 Jun 2012, 13:06:32

We just had our own little stand-your-ground-like thingy in my area last night.

In this case, an actual crime in progress was observed by a homeowner (vandalism), he went outside apparently with a knife and says the three guys confronted and took a swing at him so he stabbed one in the throat. The stabee fled in a car with his buddies and called the cops who arrested the homeowner for malicious wounding.

More than likely the dudes committing the vandalism were drunk suburbanites in town for a little partying. The street where this happened is where a lot of them park as it is close to the bars.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby dorlomin » Sun 14 Jul 2013, 15:31:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', '
')I pray those who disagree with the result are mature enough to move on with the rest of their lives and not dwell on it for another two years.
Hunt a black season now open in Florida.

Hunt them down then claim you were attacked. 8)

Not racism, eugenics by .38.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby Tanada » Sun 14 Jul 2013, 22:22:33

Clearly many people choose to focus on the skin color of the two men involved in this case. If we would be able to follow Martin Luther King's expectation and look at each of them based on the content of their character instead of the color of their skin what would we see?

A man sees another man walking through peoples yards on a rainy night in a neighborhood where there have been several recent burglary's. He follows the second man while calling the authorities to report what seems to him to be suspicious behavior. The second man is talking to his girlfriend on the phone when he realizes he is being followed. The authorities tell the first man he should stop following the second man. The second man tells his girlfriend he is going to confront the first man using a racial expletive in the process. The second man confronts the first man striking him in the nose and then kneeling over him continuing to pummel the prone first man. The first man has his head slammed into the concrete sidewalk at least twice. The second man at this point has no injuries except to his knuckles where he has been using his fists on the first man. More than one person who hears or sees the altercation calls 911 during this period of the altercation. A third man is an eye witness and testifies that man #2 is kneeling over man #1 and pummeling him. A woman on the phone with 911 is close enough for screams and cries pleading for help to be recorded by the 911 system. Man #1 on the ground being pummeled manages to pull his pistol from the holster and shoots Man #2. A police officer arrives on the scene and renders first aid to Man #2 who shows indications of a gunshot wound penetrating the plural cavity and causing a sucking chest wound. Despite the best efforts of the police officer and the paramedics who arrive soon after Man #2 dies from the gunshot wound. Police officers question the witnesses on the scene and Man #1, including taking photographic evidence of his injuries. It was a dark night with occasional drizzle and miserable weather to be outside.

A jury of six women spend considerable time listening to arguments by attorneys for the Prosecution and Defense as well as reviewing the timeline of events and many pieces of physical evidence. After a day and a half of deliberation in the Jury room they acquit man #1 of all charges by reason of self defense.

In the 14 months between the death and the trial numerous media personalities and politicians express their belief that racism was the motivating factor. The only racism testified to in the trial was the racial slur used by Man #2 in his phone conversation with his girlfriend.

I very much wish that either Man #1 or Man #2 had managed to avoid the confrontation that lead to the injuries to Man #1 and death of Man #2. However wishing will not change anything. Saying that if only Man #1 had done X or Man #2 had done Y might make you feel better, but it doesn't change a thing.

Everyone can play that game, for example what if Man #1 had been knocked unconscious from the repeated blows to his head, or had suffered a severe closed head injury leaving him crippled? Would the authorities have ever captured Man #2 for the assault and battery leading to great bodily harm? The odds are very good Man #2 would have escaped capture simply because nobody knew who he was, and it was a dark rainy night making hiding easy. The story would have been a one day blip in the news even if Man #1 had died from head injuries because assault is a common crime and assailants frequently elude capture. Counter example What If Man #1 drew his weapon while following Man #2 and threatened him with it to keep him from doing anything until the police officer dispatched earlier arrived and resolved the situation?

You can play out a thousand scenarios, but only one of them actually took place.

The fact that the media chose to interpret events in a racially biased manner and repeatedly used photographs of Man #2 when he was a pre-teen and young teen instead of as he appeared at the time of the confrontation can be seen as an attempt to mislead the public as to the nature of the confrontation. Having politicians and media personalities proclaim that the confrontation was Murder from very early on also slants the opinions of anyone who does not review the actual facts of the case as I laid it out above. Justice is depicted as blind folded because justice is perfect when the facts decide the outcome of a trial, not emotional appeals by either the defense or the prosecution.

Martin Luther King would be proud of this jury, they did their best in an emotionally charged situation. Today President Obama said$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he death of Trayvon Martin was a tragedy. Not just for his family, or for any one community, but for America. I know this case has elicited strong passions. And in the wake of the verdict, I know those passions may be running even higher. But we are a nation of laws, and a jury has spoken. I now ask every American to respect the call for calm reflection from two parents who lost their young son. And as we do, we should ask ourselves if we’re doing all we can to widen the circle of compassion and understanding in our own communities. We should ask ourselves if we’re doing all we can to stem the tide of gun violence that claims too many lives across this country on a daily basis. We should ask ourselves, as individuals and as a society, how we can prevent future tragedies like this. As citizens, that’s a job for all of us. That’s the way to honor Trayvon Martin.


Calm, compassion, understanding. Bravo, Mr. President, Bravo!
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Mon 15 Jul 2013, 00:34:42

Zimmerman can now go back to his life of being a schlub who screams like a little girl while getting b-slapped by a high school student.

The prosecution really dragged their feet considering they had a guy who admitted he'd killed a teenager and could not keep his story straight. It's been suggested Sanford FL wanted GZ to go free, and it sure sounds like that's the way the local politics work.

GZ said he felt he was doing "God's will." Does God tell him to kill more high schoolers, or has he bagged his limit?

This whole question "stand your ground" as "chasing a random person then shooting them" needs to be explored. Of course, now that GZ is an admitted killer who packs a gun, pretty much anybody should be able to claim that just seeing him puts them " in fear for their lives" and bust a cap in his ass.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Mon 15 Jul 2013, 12:15:52

There was the Miami case where someone saw a guy breaking into his car, chased the unarmed thief for a block with a knife, and stabbed him to death. The judge ruled that was a "stand your ground case." The best part was that the guy took the thief's bags of stolen radios and sold them, so it's OK to kill someone and take their stuff.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/201 ... lf-defense

And in this recent case, a Texas man shot a woman in the neck and killed her for refusing to have sex with him after he paid her $150.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/0 ... ?mobile=nc
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby Lore » Mon 15 Jul 2013, 12:57:33

This is why these laws are so screwed up. Old western gunslingers would escape prosecution the same way by instigating and provoking a fight. You then can essentially contrive any excuse to commit mayhem by forcing the other persons hand.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby AgentR11 » Mon 15 Jul 2013, 13:11:23

Kinda agree with yall on "stand your ground"; I like concealed carry, open carry, long arm open carry, I like "castle" law; but "stand your ground" feels like it encourages people to not attempt deescalation. A requirement to retreat does not require you to turn your back and flee hazardously; but it does encourage a path where neither party ends up seriously injured.

OTOH, it takes the complication out of a scene where someone is actively defending their own property from theft. Gets real murky there, but I'm most certainly on the side of being permitted to defend property with non-lethal force, with lethal force being acceptable if the thief goes on further to place the defender in danger of death or serious injury.n (and what is non-lethal force anyway... people die from punches to the head every year...)
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Mon 15 Jul 2013, 14:41:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', 'T')his is why these laws are so screwed up. Old western gunslingers would escape prosecution the same way by instigating and provoking a fight. You then can essentially contrive any excuse to commit mayhem by forcing the other persons hand.

And it works even better when the local power broker can hire a private security force, like in the western movie "Shane." Except today they would be more like Blackwater mercenaries.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Mon 15 Jul 2013, 16:17:20

Black man in Florida has stroke while driving and is charged with resisting arrest because the left side of his body is paralyzed. Left to die in a jail cell.

http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/civ ... 8#comments
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Mon 15 Jul 2013, 18:44:51

Florida gun owner shoots up a car and Walmart parking lot to stop a shoplifter. Shooting at a fleeing shoplifter all Judge Dredd style isn't exactly "stand your ground," it's wreckless vigilanteism.

http://www.clickorlando.com/news/Orange ... index.html
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby Lore » Mon 15 Jul 2013, 19:59:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', '
')Stand your ground is really a 'don't be the dead guy' law because dead men cannot tell their tales.


Stand your ground is nothing more then a law that escalates the violence.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet
Top

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby John_A » Tue 16 Jul 2013, 00:40:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', '
')Stand your ground is really a 'don't be the dead guy' law because dead men cannot tell their tales.


Stand your ground is nothing more then a law that escalates the violence.


Maybe, but now with a results bias in the right direction.
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
John_A
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 21:16:36
Top

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Tue 16 Jul 2013, 03:38:03

What ever happened to civility and manners?

Two rude a##holes come to a confrontation; one ends up dead. Court finds surviving a##hole not guilty. Bunch of a##holes get upset, other bunch cheers and gets ready to kill more a##holes.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby Lore » Tue 16 Jul 2013, 20:13:36

Personally, I'm less concerned about the specific case then the the creepy SYG laws.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: Homeowners could be sued in Trayvon Martin case

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Tue 16 Jul 2013, 21:32:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'U')nited States attorney-general Eric Holder has called for a rethink of controversial "stand-your-ground" laws following the acquittal of a neighbourhood watch volunteer who fatally shot an unarmed black teenager in Florida.

Mr Holder acknowledged the anger stirred across the country by the racially-tinged trial of George Zimmerman, 29, found not guilty on Saturday of murdering 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

"Separate and apart from the case that has drawn the nation's attention, it's time to question laws that senselessly expand the concept of self-defence and sow dangerous conflict in our neighbourhoods," Mr Holder told a meeting of the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People (NAACP) in Orlando, Florida.

"These laws try to fix something that was never broken," he said. "There has always been a legal defence for using deadly force if - and the "if" is important - no safe retreat is available."

Mr Zimmerman's trial lawyers did not explicitly invoke Florida's stand-your-ground law, arguing instead that he acted in self-defence in a confrontation with Martin in February last year.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-07-17/u ... ws/4825246

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')op music icon Stevie Wonder declared he would refuse to perform in Florida or any other state with a so-called stand-your-ground law.

The black Rock and Roll Hall of Fame enshrinee made his comments at a concert on Sunday in Quebec City, Canada, according to a video posted on YouTube.

"For the gift that God has given me, and for whatever I mean, I decided today that until the 'stand-your-ground' law is abolished in Florida, I will never perform there again," Mr Wonder said.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00
Top

THE Stand Your Ground thread

Unread postby dinopello » Thu 18 Jul 2013, 22:41:41

This thread maybe should be made into a THE Stand Your Ground thread. The trial of Michael Dunn begins soon

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')avis, 17, was shot to death by Michael Dunn in November 2012.
Dunn told police that he asked Davis and three other teens, who were parked next to him at a gas station, to turn down their music. Dunn says he heard threats from the teens and saw a gun in their car. He says he feared for his own safety, and that's why he grabbed his gun and fired into the vehicle.
Police say that they found no guns inside the teens' vehicle and that Dunn fired his gun eight or nine times
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron