by Bytesmiths » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 15:41:14
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '.').. soon the government will take the first incremental steps on a long march to take control of the US health care system.
The health care system is arguably out-of-control, and so needs control somehow, from someone. The US spends 16% of GDP on health care -- over
twice as much as the next highest (a cluster of Canada, Japan, Germany all spend about 7% of GDP on health care).
The system is clearly broke, and needs fixing. It is said by some that the US health care system is the "best in the world," but that is only true if you are rich. It used to be true merely if you were employed by a company with good benefits, but I think "Sicko" put an end to the notion that having insurance means access to this "best in the world" health care.
If you're following me so far, if not the government, who can fix US health care? The insurance companies? The doctors? Local governments?
If you disagree that US health care is broken, that's another matter entirely. But if you do agree it is wasteful, dysfunctional, self-serving, and inaccessible to a growing large minority of Americans,
who do you propose fix it, if not the government?
I used to think US health care was the finest example of capitalism run amok, until this financial melt-down provided another excellent example.
I'm no big fan of unfettered capitalism
nor unfettered socialism. It seems to me that localized, hybrid models have the best potential for seeing us through.