by MonteQuest » Tue 05 Jan 2016, 20:21:07
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', ' ')But there is another point....let's say, for sake of argument, that you can prove that he was lying and not confused or delusional. You have not established WHY he was lying. It could be for a number of reasons one of which is simply to pass a good story to make himself seem netter than he was. I'd say that if so he was pretty successful.
Some tinfoil conspirators have claimed he wasn't lying and he wasn't delusional--he just let the cat out of the bag. He
did watch the first plane hit on TV in his limo on the way to the school. They
knew the attack was coming and set up a live feed to this limo.
Preposterous? Sure, but not any more preposterous that he would claim what he did. Maybe today, in his senility he would say such nonsense, but less than two months after 911? Confused? Delusional? People don't make shit up out of whole cloth like that. Especially this line:
“I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower—the TV was obviously on. And I used to fly, myself, and I said, well, there's one terrible pilot. I said, it must have been a horrible accident."
Even if he was confused about whether he had been watching plane one or plane two on TV, he
knew it wasn't an accident, as Andrew Card told him we were under attack
in the classroom on
live TV, not before.
A head scratcher for sure.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."