Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

What will you cut back on to compensate for higher energy prices?

Travel
95
No votes
Eating out/Entertainment
89
No votes
Groceries
2
No votes
Purchases of capital goods
33
No votes
Tech Toys: Cell phones, cable TV, etc.
77
No votes
Investments
10
No votes
Recreation
18
No votes
 
Total votes : 324

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby cube » Sun 18 Nov 2007, 17:44:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LoneSnark', '.')..But PO by itself does not negate someone’s ability to pay; all it does mean is that when they do pay that money will afford less oil.
:wink:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LoneSnark', '.')..What I suspect is you have not been apprised of the history of the past 80 years. As of the late 70's the human race knows how to create a stable money supply, even if you do not.
:lol:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LoneSnark', '.')..This is why we created the Federal Reserve: to regulate the money supply, come hail or high water. Come prosperity or depression, money will never again be scarce as it was during the 1930s; at least, not until the Treasury runs out of ink and paper, which they do stockpile for just such occasions.
8O

I hope you stick around. There is much to be said about PO.....too much to be covered in 1 day or in 1 month or maybe even in a full year.

I'm going to keep my reply short.
We have a "growth" based economy. It's based on the idea that the future will always be a brighter day. No matter how bad it gets today, whether war or economic depression, humanity will bounce back up and rise above even higher then the previous peak....so the theory goes.

PO will change that. First there will be a crash where at least 50% of humanity dies off. Afterwards we will have a "steady" state economy. Imagine a future world were everything is "steady" and nothing goes up: not the stock market, not population, not technology,......
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby Andrew_S » Sun 18 Nov 2007, 18:20:31

Money doesn't make the world go round; energy does.
Andrew_S
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 634
Joined: Sun 09 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby LoneSnark » Mon 19 Nov 2007, 01:50:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e have a "growth" based economy

Anyone that has ever lived through a recession or god forbid a depression should be surprised to hear this.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')o matter how bad it gets today, whether war or economic depression, humanity will bounce back up and rise above even higher then the previous peak....so the theory goes.

An odd theory, good luck proving it. I can name numerous examples in history where this has not been the case.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')O will change that. First there will be a crash where at least 50% of humanity dies off.

Odd. How will a world producing 83 million barrels a day (instead of today's 87 mbpd, assuming a 4% decline) be suddenly incapable of feeding itself?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')fterwards we will have a "steady" state economy. Imagine a future world were everything is "steady" and nothing goes up: not the stock market, not population, not technology,

Ok, I am fascinated. Short of instituting a communist world where free enterprise is illegal, how are you suggesting to finally bring technological progress to a stop? You would first need to kill off all the engineers, but we tend to be a hardy-bunch (most engineers I know have a conceal-carry permit).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')oney doesn't make the world go round; energy does.

No, technically speaking momentum makes the world go round. But the spirit of your statement is still wrong. "energy" is just a part of the universe, worthless until a human does something with it, and the only way to get a human to do something with it is with money. Without money all the oil in the world would just sit in the ground doing anything, as it did for billions of years until some guy in PA realized someone else would pay $20 a barrel for the stuff.

With money you can put people to work building a nuclear power plant and turning out electric vehicles and tractors, thus giving you energy. Raw energy can do no such thing, without trading it for money of course.
User avatar
LoneSnark
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby Duende » Tue 20 Nov 2007, 00:44:27

Whoa, I feel like someone just did a cannonball off the highdive '8O'

LoneSnark, I don't even know where to start. I recommend reading some of the older posts on this website to familiarize yourself with many of the concepts discussed before boldly setting everyone straight. Having said that, passionate discussion is welcomed. :)

First, it's useful to understand that economic practice is a subset of physical law; dollars and cents ultimately answer to gravity and thermodynamics. Second, human society is a subset of ecology; our patterns of consumption answer to nature.
"Where is the man who has so much as to be out of danger?" -Thomas Huxley
User avatar
Duende
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Sat 27 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: The District

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby roccman » Tue 20 Nov 2007, 01:09:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LoneSnark', 'I') don't suppose just telling you that you are mistaken would do any good, would it?


Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
Rocc you do not need to use the hammer EVERY time...
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert
Top

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby LoneSnark » Tue 20 Nov 2007, 02:14:28

Hi Duende.

I have read all the arguments for peak oil before. Regretfully, I am schooled as an Engineer with Economics as a furvent hobby. There is a strong element of catch phrasology in Peak Oil. When you say that "dollars and cents ultimately answer to gravity and thermodynamics," it sounds like you are being profound. But cents and dollars are just stand-ins for value, an intangible human concept. Concepts are not physical, so your statement is not really saying anything at all.

Similarly, who is this 'nature' that you seem to believe we answer to? From an engineering perspective mankind is not living off nature. In some instances, nature is living off us. You see, we have bred and genetically altered plants to be more efficient. Most grain crops now manage around 3 percent efficiency (turning sunlight into chemical stores). Not to mention reorganizing the Earth to spread irrigation and nutrients where they will be most effective. These crops of ours replaced natural fauna which often managed only about 0.1 percent efficiency.

The universe is not a zero sum game. There is a lot of energy in the universe and by human standards nearly all of it is wasted. We are making nature more efficient and then harnessing the overage.

Yes, oil is nice to have. But running low does not change our place in the Universe as efficiency boosters.
User avatar
LoneSnark
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby Revi » Tue 20 Nov 2007, 10:43:35

We live off the oil. Yes, there is a lot of energy hitting this place in the form of sunlight, and it's useful as heck, but we have been living off of the black goo instead for a long time.

Most people are too dumb to understand how to use the sun.

They will die. Sun people will live. Lots of weird stuff will happen in the meantime.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby RdSnt » Tue 20 Nov 2007, 11:10:40

You're arrogance is stunning, if not surprising.
"We are making nature more efficient.." That's quite laughable but again not particularly surprising. It could be true, provided your perspective is as narrow as a pinhead.
We are manipulating the energy around us to suit our needs for the moment. It has absolutely nothing to do with efficiency.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LoneSnark', 'H')i Duende.

I have read all the arguments for peak oil before. Regretfully, I am schooled as an Engineer with Economics as a furvent hobby. There is a strong element of catch phrasology in Peak Oil. When you say that "dollars and cents ultimately answer to gravity and thermodynamics," it sounds like you are being profound. But cents and dollars are just stand-ins for value, an intangible human concept. Concepts are not physical, so your statement is not really saying anything at all.

Similarly, who is this 'nature' that you seem to believe we answer to? From an engineering perspective mankind is not living off nature. In some instances, nature is living off us. You see, we have bred and genetically altered plants to be more efficient. Most grain crops now manage around 3 percent efficiency (turning sunlight into chemical stores). Not to mention reorganizing the Earth to spread irrigation and nutrients where they will be most effective. These crops of ours replaced natural fauna which often managed only about 0.1 percent efficiency.

The universe is not a zero sum game. There is a lot of energy in the universe and by human standards nearly all of it is wasted. We are making nature more efficient and then harnessing the overage.

Yes, oil is nice to have. But running low does not change our place in the Universe as efficiency boosters.
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby Duende » Tue 20 Nov 2007, 11:18:46

LoneSnark, allow me to indulge you.

LoneSnark wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hen you say that "dollars and cents ultimately answer to gravity and thermodynamics," it sounds like you are being profound.

Ah, shucks.

LoneSnark wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut cents and dollars are just stand-ins for value, an intangible human concept. Concepts are not physical, so your statement is not really saying anything at all.

I beg your pardon, but there is something very tangible about the value of cheap energy to our economy. Ours is a growth based economy. Is there any denying that? For the past 150 years, seemingly limitless energy supplies have allowed our economy to expand wildly to create this happy motoring fast food utopia. This continued expansion - this economic model -demands return on investment. Think of the steady supply of cheap energy as the "infrastructural underpinnings" of the economic "superstructure." Many people are really fascinated by that superstructure shooting way up in the sky, without appreciating the foundation - the cheap resources they take for granted - doing all the grunt work to hold it all up. Just as the superstructure is dependent on the infrastructure, the growing economy is dependent upon increasing supplies of energy.

LoneSnark wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')imilarly, who is this 'nature' that you seem to believe we answer to? From an engineering perspective mankind is not living off nature.

Nature is not a "who", LoneSnark. Mankind cannot divorce himself from Nature. Nature overarches humanity, categorically speaking.

LoneSnark wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n some instances, nature is living off us. You see, we have bred and genetically altered plants to be more efficient... Not to mention reorganizing the Earth to spread irrigation and nutrients where they will be most effective. These crops of ours replaced natural fauna which often managed only about 0.1 percent efficiency.

Wow, thanks for bringing that to my attention. Here we go improving(?) on nature, and those ingrateful plants aren't even paying rent on the land they live on! We ought to do something about that, too.

LoneSnark wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he universe is not a zero sum game.
Are you familiar with the second law of thermodynamics?

LoneSnark wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')es, oil is nice to have. But running low does not change our place in the Universe as efficiency boosters.
Are you familiar with Jevon's Paradox?
"Where is the man who has so much as to be out of danger?" -Thomas Huxley
User avatar
Duende
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Sat 27 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: The District
Top

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby IslandCrow » Tue 20 Nov 2007, 11:42:20

Today I turned down the heating to 18C (61F) and put on some more clothes. I could turn the heat down because the wife was not here at the time...it will have to go backup for her before her return!

This was particularly in response to the interest rates (Euribor - which affects my bank loan) starting to rise again, rather than the oil situation. I know that it will not save me a lot of money, but I reckon that if things go bad then every little bit saved now will help. Also I want to see to what level I can power-down to and still remain comfortable [I know the current temperature is already below my wife's comfort level]
We should teach our children the 4-Rs: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and Rejoice.
User avatar
IslandCrow
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Finland

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby MrBill » Tue 20 Nov 2007, 12:33:02

IslandCrow I would not worry too much about rates as 3-month EURIBOR dropped about a tenth of a percent in OCT/NOV as money market traders start to factor in that the ECB will not likely raise rates anytime soon. That plus the strong euro should be moderating your heating bills. Still, if you can lower your costs, so much the better. Good luck! ; - )
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby LoneSnark » Tue 20 Nov 2007, 13:14:06

Duende, thank you for indulging me. This stuff is fun!
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')urs is a growth based economy.

Again, you are being profound without actually saying anything. 'Growth' of What? It is clearly not based upon growth of the population, as many European countries have falling populations and their economies are doing just fine. It is obviously not based upon the growth of resource consumption, since resource consumption fell throughout the 80s with no serious consequences. Perhaps what you mean is our economy is based upon the growth of value, which is true more than not. But the value of what? The growth of intangible human value (dollars and cents) as entered in some government ledger somewhere?

You say our economic model demands a return on investment, this is a reasonable statement (ask any investor, a good return is hard to come by). But even during a raging depression people are still making money. A war is the epitome of value destruction, yet profits are made servicing them. All expensive energy does is shift purchasing power away from energy users towards energy producers. You sell the same amount of fuel and get far more $$$ for doing so. It in no way changes the rules of the game, all it changes is who the winners are.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')ankind cannot divorce himself from Nature. Nature overarches humanity, categorically speaking.

Again, what does this mean? If by nature you simply mean the general rules of our environment then sure enough. We cannot re-design our environment without taking into consideration the complex interaction between the earth's various systems. But these systems are not magical, neither are they personified as a God. Our environment follows set rules and as long as we take these rules into consideration we can do whatever we want to spend time doing. If anything our stewardship of this planet has improved immensely judging by the falling pollution levels in all industrialized countries.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')re you familiar with the second law of thermodynamics?

Evidently you are not. The law specifically states that it only applies in a closed system, which the Earth is not.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')re you familiar with Jevon's Paradox?

Yes. What bearing does it have here? This economic concept makes the assumption that more of the resource can be had. If it cannot then the other economy theory of 'demand destruction' will swamp it thanks to high prices.
User avatar
LoneSnark
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby Duende » Tue 20 Nov 2007, 15:02:00

Ok, well now we're getting somewhere. :)

LoneSnark wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his stuff is fun!

Yes, indeed. The concept of peak oil interests me - check that - scares me, as it should everybody, in a profound way. Therefore, I'd like nothing better than for you or anybody else to convince me that I'm worried about nothing. That way we can all pack it up and do better things with our lives. So far, that hasn't happened, though.
Now, you just said that our economy is not growth-dependent. I'm interested in hearing more - please extrapolate on that, because that would be big news.

LoneSnark wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ur environment follows set rules and as long as we take these rules into consideration we can do whatever we want to spend time doing.

Yes, assuming we know the outcomes of what we spend our time doing - in humanity's case - burning gargantuan amounts of fossil fuels. The effects are wider-reaching than just needing another fill up when the gas tank is empty. They include climate change and resource depletion. For both, there are no "set rules" in place; there is no precedent. If anything, the "set rules" we are aware of (via scientific investigation) show that we are damaging the environment, and inform us that we will not be able to depend upon the Earth forever as a mine for our finite natural resource needs.

LoneSnark wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Quote:
Are you familiar with Jevon's Paradox?

Yes. What bearing does it have here? This economic concept makes the assumption that more of the resource can be had. If it cannot then the other economy theory of 'demand destruction' will swamp it thanks to high prices.

Demand destruction? What resource will replace oil? And praytell how high prices are going to destroy demand for a good as inelastic as oil. I think time will show that demand won't fall at any price, until the realization hits that supply - production - is gone.
"Where is the man who has so much as to be out of danger?" -Thomas Huxley
User avatar
Duende
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Sat 27 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: The District
Top

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby LoneSnark » Tue 20 Nov 2007, 17:15:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ow, you just said that our economy is not growth-dependent. I'm interested in hearing more - please extrapolate on that, because that would be big news.

It is more an economics lesson than anything else. Too much to go into. But, short of telling you to go read a book, I will give you an example of a shrinking economy.

Every few years the statisticians do a study and find that Americans are working about as much time per week as ever. At the same time, they find that productivity has increased. This Jevon's Paradox all over again. But it is not a rule: the number of hours worked has fallen before, there is no reason to believe it could not in the future. There is nothing inherent in the system to prevent workers from accepting their higher wages and then demand more time off from work. GDP would remain flat in this example. But if a furvent religious revival swept the country and everyone started working even less than productivity grew then GDP would fall. I know of no reason to believe such an eventuality would be damaging, much less disasterous.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')es, assuming we know the outcomes of what we spend our time doing

Of course, our knowledge is limited, we are not God. But, similarly, the rules are not nearly as complex as some pretend. Yes, no one knew introducing rabbits to Australia would be less than ideal. But dumping tons of CO2 into the atmosphere is knowable. People get obsessive about the 0.1% cases, but we know what the effects will be: higher sea levels and warmer winters. We can plan for that, we can adjust to that, and we can help nature adjust with us (don't buy oceanfront property unless you are willing to invest in dutch windmills).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')emand destruction? What resource will replace oil? And praytell how high prices are going to destroy demand for a good as inelastic as oil.

About $100 a barrel. Adjusted for inflation, that is about the price it reached in 1979. By 1983 U.S. oil consumption was down 21%. Of course, by 1986 prices were back to historic lowes so consumption resumed with gusto. Similarly, that is the price oil reached just this year, and just in the last month oil consumption is down 1.6% annualized and accelerating. In both instances the value of stuff created by the economy grew, just less of that stuff used oil. The fact is oil is usually cheap, and so we use it in ungodly wasteful ways, which we are all to ready to give up given sufficient incentive. As consumption falls it becomes ever easier to substitute with other energy sources or to simply make do with what production remains.
Image

But I do have one complaint. Most Peak Oillers have a catch they choose to defend. Some latch onto the collapsability of the fiat money system. Others cling to the myth of extraction efficiency (costs more to extract oil than it is worth). In this post you have not made any of these, just a general appeal to catch phrases. Perhaps I should ask you to explain the steps you believe Peak Oil will cause our downfall, then I can disprove your reasoning instead of throwing text at generalized concepts.
User avatar
LoneSnark
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby UncoveringTruths » Tue 20 Nov 2007, 17:58:47

Lonesnark,

Would you explain how the economy will keep chugging along with an increasing decline rate year upon year? IMO it will become harder year upon year to hit the economic reset button once PO is realized.

Have you been to the Oil Drum and looked at the export land model? I am sure they would be happy to show you the numbers.
Net Oil Exports and the "Iron Triangle"

Have you debunked Hirsch, Simmons, etc? No sense in coming in here and debating with us cats until you have thrashed the proffesionals. Good luck with that!

PEAKING OF WORLD OIL PRODUCTION:
It's a cold cold world when a man has to pawn his shoes.
User avatar
UncoveringTruths
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu 04 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby LoneSnark » Tue 20 Nov 2007, 19:37:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ould you explain how the economy will keep chugging along with an increasing decline rate year upon year?

Simple: as I said, high oil prices will cause demand destruction and encourage the development of alternatives until demand is below supply, at which time the price will collapse because consumption is falling faster than production and must be arrested, just as occured in the late 1980s when Saudi Arabia discovered that at $100 a barrel it would soon no longer be an oil exporter, and so it slashed its price.

It is all right there in any economics textbook.

As for your links, I have already read such irrelevance. That OPEC countries find themselves ruined by peak oil is not my problem. Oil consumers will find supply elsewhere or simply stop wasting so much oil.

As for the paper you linked, they failed to address why what occured in the early 80s could not be repeated. In a 91 page paper on the economic ramifications of falling oil consumption, they spent only one paragraph discussing the last time such an event occured. Let me just say I was disappointed. Not to mention all the assumptions stated without any defense. That the normal fleet turnover takes 30 years does not mean it will take the same amount of time when oil is at $100.
User avatar
LoneSnark
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby Duende » Tue 20 Nov 2007, 20:27:12

LoneSnark wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')erhaps I should ask you to explain the steps you believe Peak Oil will cause our downfall, then I can disprove your reasoning instead of throwing text at generalized concepts.

Our downfall? I never said anything about a downfall. If you mean concern about our total and utter dependence upon finite natural resources, then ok.

LoneSnark wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')imple: as I said, high oil prices will cause demand destruction and encourage the development of alternatives...

What alternatives? Please explain how you see that playing out.

LoneSnark wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.')..until demand is below supply...

The day that comes, I'll buy everyone dinner. :)
"Where is the man who has so much as to be out of danger?" -Thomas Huxley
User avatar
Duende
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Sat 27 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: The District
Top

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby LoneSnark » Wed 21 Nov 2007, 00:25:06

Well, I guess we might as well wring it to a close. You can be concerned about whatever you want, I guess. But stop making up myths about "our total and utter dependence upon finite natural resources" when there is no dependence. We are not 'addicted' as as some politician once said. We would still have a technological civilization if there had never been any oil to discover. We already know everything we need to in order to continue to prosper without oil; yet even you admit we will still have oil for decades to come.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat alternatives? Please explain how you see that playing out.

Easy, those economic activities which produce the least end-user surplus will be phased out. For example, the airlifting of the latest electronics from factories in Asia will probably be one of the uses we give up. Flat-screen TVs can be transported by high-speed cargo ship for 1/10,000th the quantity of oil of a plane ride. Similarly, over 10% of the world's electricity is produced by burning oil. This is inefficient even when oil is cheap. Similarly, oil is used very wastefully by many industries, such as in concrete production. Some of these industries have already transitioned to alternative methods in Europe because of greenhouse emission standards, but $100 oil for a long time would provide a similar incentive.
User avatar
LoneSnark
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby UncoveringTruths » Wed 21 Nov 2007, 01:11:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LoneSnark', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ould you explain how the economy will keep chugging along with an increasing decline rate year upon year?

Simple: as I said, high oil prices will cause demand destruction and encourage the development of alternatives until demand is below supply, at which time the price will collapse because consumption is falling faster than production and must be arrested, just as occured in the late 1980s when Saudi Arabia discovered that at $100 a barrel it would soon no longer be an oil exporter, and so it slashed its price.

It is all right there in any economics textbook.

As for your links, I have already read such irrelevance. That OPEC countries find themselves ruined by peak oil is not my problem. Oil consumers will find supply elsewhere or simply stop wasting so much oil.

As for the paper you linked, they failed to address why what occured in the early 80s could not be repeated. In a 91 page paper on the economic ramifications of falling oil consumption, they spent only one paragraph discussing the last time such an event occured. Let me just say I was disappointed. Not to mention all the assumptions stated without any defense. That the normal fleet turnover takes 30 years does not mean it will take the same amount of time when oil is at $100.


Its in the economic books but is it in legislation a bill or an act? Starting fom the effects of an issue instead of addressing an issue head up sounds like "reacting" after the fact. Is that economics?

Respectfully you sound like an economics major straight out of the assembly line. Your posts lacks life experiences! V/R
It's a cold cold world when a man has to pawn his shoes.
User avatar
UncoveringTruths
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Thu 04 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The Near Term Economic Effects of Peak Oil

Unread postby yeahbut » Wed 21 Nov 2007, 01:53:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('UncoveringTruths', 'R')espectfully you sound like an economics major straight out of the assembly line. Your posts lacks life experiences! V/R
C'mon buddy, play the ball not the man...smart, ain't he?
User avatar
yeahbut
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Tue 30 Oct 2007, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests