by lper100km » Sun 17 Feb 2008, 14:48:49
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pedalling_faster', '
')
2000 Pro is a good OS. i wouldn't disable a system that is running good with 2000. you might need it.
i suggest buying a cheap second system & running Linux on that. then transitioning to that as you get more used to Linux.
Good advice. Or, install a second physical hard drive solely for use with Linux. A non expert risks too much attempting to partition an already loaded harddrive. Buy yourself a reference book on Linux, listing all the commands and become a techie yourself. It’s the only way.
I’ve tried Linux for the desktop in various forms from Ubuntu to Feather.
For the non techie user it’s amateurish, cranky, non intuitive, poorly documented and largely a waste of time. Let the techies extol it’s virtues and use it to their hearts content. However much you want to demean Microsoft and/or Gates, you have to grant that his genius was in producing and marketing a user friendly shell around a C:\ prompt that opened up the use of computers to everyone. Would that Linux could even approach that. Try setting up a wireless home network. Try setting up your printer drivers. It’s a nightmare of arcane commands and delving into obscure websites to find bits of code that might possibly do something useful. Then, if you are on a laptop, try accessing another network and/or printer! You can’t even get the kernel to install on a bootable hard drive or a flash drive without hours of effort. Most of the install programs touted on various websites simply do not work. As for installing dual boot with Windows, forget that pipe dream. Check the various chatlines and threads related to Linux to see all the grief that people go through as they try to escape the ‘tyranny’ of Windows. Never mind that there is always someone out there who will say “Just do this and it will be fine” and then reel off a string of commands a page long. It’s not fine. It may work for them on their computer, but will it work for you? No way. You have to do it your way, which means becoming a techie. This is not a user friendly environment.
When you actually do succeed in installing the OS, what then? A few stripped down office applications that look to Microsoft for inspiration, a web browser, an email client and a graphics tool. Well, whoop de doo.
There’s a reason Linux on the desktop is not used as well as it could be and that is that it’s still treated as a techies’s plaything. Of course, it’s open source, which means everyone owns it but no one can take responsibility. No wonder it goes nowhere. This is not to belittle the well intentioned people who honestly strive to do good things for Linux. But who is going to invest the hundreds of millions, probably billions needed to provide a mass consumer basic system that can compete with Windows and Apple, when they can’t own the code? Red Hat and Ubuntu fall well short of the standards long established by both those companies.
Servers are a whole different ball game.