Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Gloom Spreads North

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby Snowrunner » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 10:56:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he top 10 soundest banking countries are as follows:

Canada (6.8 )
Sweden (6.7)
Luxembourg (6.7)
Australia (6.7)
Denmark (6.7)
Netherlands (6.7)
Belgium (6.6)
New Zealand (6.6)
Ireland (6.6)
Malta (6.6)

source: Canadian banks the soundest in the world:
As you can see Iceland is not ranked number 9. And everyone who knows anything about anything knew that Iceland had financial troubles. I guess you're not a member of that club as you do not know the difference between a credit rating and a ranking.


Oh come on, they are serving the same goal: To give people confidence in who they give their money to. That you want to pretend they are something else.....

And BTW, even with your List... Fortis oh Fortis where are you?

Oh yes, there in your List Mr. Bill on 3, 6 and 7.
User avatar
Snowrunner
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 795
Joined: Wed 24 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Screwed

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby MrBill » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 11:12:06

I suppose the Dutch-Benelux take-over of Fortis is Mr. Harper's fault, too?

Come on we are in the middle of a global financial crisis. Possibly the worst since The Great Depression. Neither Canadian banks nor European banks are immune from the effects of the credit crisis or that rapid deceleration of growth in the real economy. To pretend otherwise is foolish.

I have no problem if someone wants to vote Liberal or NDP. That is their right. Let's hear their reasons for their choice. But as we are in the midst of incredible financial turmoil, and as Canadians go to the polls in less than a week to choose a new government, for crying out loud let's stop pretending that Stephen Harper is George Bush or that the Conservative Party are the Republicans.

Repeating the same old lies over and over again does not make them true.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')ormer President Jimmy Carter said on Friday the "atrocious economic policies" of the Bush administration had caused the worst global financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Carter told reporters on a stopover in Brussels that "profligate spending," massive borrowing and dramatic tax cuts since President George W. Bush took office in 2001 were behind the market turmoil and economic crisis.

"I think it's because of the atrocious economic policies of the Bush administration," said the 84-year-old Democrat, who served in the White House from 1977-1981 during a period of high inflation and energy crisis.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby some_math_guy » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 11:33:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nickel', '
')Me too. The only thing worse would be a Tory majority government where there'd be nothing at all to stop Harper from "stimulating" the economy by giving his $50 billion in tax cuts to his big business buddies. The only thing that would stimulate would be the boardroom fanny-pats they'd give each other as they stuffed the money in one another's back pockets. Bad enough the "bonuses" they'll soon be giving one another in congratulations for laying off another 1500 employees here, another 2000 there...


You said it Nickel. Dead on. The only way that those kind of big corporate tax giveaways can continue and nobody say anything about it is if the economy remains white-hot (ostensibly from 'economic incentives' like this), which it has been due to the commodity, real-estate, and financial sector boom in Canada over the past 5 years. Now we're entering a nasty bear market across the board in Canada so the public isn't going to put up with that crap.

Oh and that 'study' about the soundness of banks is rediculous, the ranking was between 1 (requiring government bailout) and 7 (completely solid), and almost every country's banking system averaged a ranking higher than 6 (mimimal risk). Most of the banks that are failing now are in the 6+ category. That's like saying our country's quality of life is significantly better than yours because our population lives to be 81.1 on average and yours lives to be 'only' 80.7. Also, the scores were compiled not by analyzing financial data or anything else, but rather by asking executives what they thought....a HAHAHAHAHAHA.

Ahh junk science - there's always a place for it.

Oh MrBill, the original comment was not intended to blame Harper for the global financial situation. Harper did refuse to acknowledge that Canada is, or shortly will be, experiencing a serious economic contraction during the televised debates, instead characterizing it as a 'stock market problem' that needn't concern the average Canadian. Within days of that messenging, his Finance Minister publicly stated that we do indeed have a problem, and shortly after that there is talk of needing to inject liquidity into Canadian banks. Not to mention the fact that canada is a manufacturing and commodities-based economy. With the USA going down, manufacturing will lose way more than the 400,000 jobs it has already lost, and the oil companies are already starting to sweat about the price of oil. Some tar sands projects are currently producing synthetic crude at a cost of over 65$ per barrel...another dip in oil prices spells contraction and consolidation for the only prospect for oil production growth in civilized North America...oh no!!!!!!!

How could he gloss over and marginalize such a key issue?

Mr. Harper lied to the public about Canada's economic prospects to minimize the issue until after the election. If it became obvious to the Canadian public that his economic policies had little or nothing to do with the meteoric rise in Canada's economic well-being over the past few years, then by golly we might see a Liberal minority on our hands in a matter of days? Can't let that happen!!!!
some_math_guy
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed 01 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby Snowrunner » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 11:55:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'I') suppose the Dutch-Benelux take-over of Fortis is Mr. Harper's fault, too?


You're not stupid, so stop pretending to be. We had it about the value of these "rankings" or "ratings".

Keep going on denial over these things if it makes you feel better, but at least have the decency and stop trying to twist the topic every two seconds just so that you can score an imaginative point.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ome on we are in the middle of a global financial crisis. Possibly the worst since The Great Depression. Neither Canadian banks nor European banks are immune from the effects of the credit crisis or that rapid deceleration of growth in the real economy. To pretend otherwise is foolish.


I am not the one who brought up the ranking of the Canadian banks and try to use it to defend my political preference, you started that. If you don't think it's a valid point, why bring it up in the first place?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') have no problem if someone wants to vote Liberal or NDP. That is their right. Let's hear their reasons for their choice. But as we are in the midst of incredible financial turmoil, and as Canadians go to the polls in less than a week to choose a new government, for crying out loud let's stop pretending that Stephen Harper is George Bush or that the Conservative Party are the Republicans.


I never made that comparision, please quote me where I said that. He's a control freak. He also is not a Leader, a Leader inspires, I have seen ZERO from him on that front. He tried to bully the HoC during his tenure every chance he got. What Canada needs (and THAT I said before) is a Leader with a vision, and yes, even if it would be a Trudeau, the fact that in the debate it was essentially 4:1 should have told you something, his "Let me be utterly clear here [followed by some useless gibberish]", was and is telling too.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')epeating the same old lies over and over again does not make them true.


Oh, you mean like you were one moment the ranking system is the bees knees and the next it doesn't really matter because it's all going down the drain either?

What IS your argument for Harper being re-elected, what do you think qualifies HIM for the job more so than the other four people that were at the table? Please, give me some concrete points on why one should vote for Harper, and don't try the "because he's not...." lines. POSITIVE things about the guy please.
User avatar
Snowrunner
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 795
Joined: Wed 24 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Screwed
Top

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby Maddog78 » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 13:16:38

I fail to see how tax and spend policies of the opposition are going to make things better.
Boils down to as simple as that for me.
User avatar
Maddog78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby Nickel » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 13:24:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'D')o your homework.


Okay, here's your math problem.

Canada is 117 years old. Mr. Trudeau kisses Canada good-bye at a speed of $250 billion dollars. Nine years go by, and Mr. Mulroney kisses Canada good-bye. When Canada is 128, Mr. Chretien manages to balance the budget, and the following year, begins paying down Canada's national debt. The national debt gets paid down every year afterward. At 141, though, Canada's national debt is still nearly twice what it was when Mr. Trudeau kissed Canada good-bye.

If x=the stupidity some people here either exhibit or believe is manifest in others for supposing that Mr. Mulroney's nine years of fiscal mismanagement was the solution and not the cause of the biggest kiss-off of all, solve for x.

(Answer: x=MrBill)
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America
Top

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby threadbear » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 13:32:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', ' ') Do you know what? You people really make me sick! As a proud Canadian I am embarassed to read your silly, uninformed comments.


Not embarrassed enough to quit supporting the American neo-con franchise, Harper.com. Proud Canadian? Start talking the talk AND walking the walk.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby Nickel » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 13:38:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Maddog78', 'I') fail to see how tax and spend policies of the opposition are going to make things better.
Boils down to as simple as that for me.


There are all kinds of ways the government can redistribute the wealth of the country such that people at the lower end of the economic spectrum don't suffer. Liquidity loans can be offered to businesses the banks turn down, the government can offer programs to upgrade production technology and training, public works projects can be undertaken, primary industries can be nationalized (temporarily or long-term) to maintain production and jobs, all kinds of ways.

Why don't you tell us how cutting taxes does anything besides enable rich guys to stick it into banks now reluctant to lend it and thus disappear it from an economy in dire need of circulating currency?
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America
Top

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby threadbear » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 14:19:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RdSnt', 'M')rBill,

That Harper is scrambling to get to the head of the parade is typical Conservative behaviour. He's is taking credit for the stability of a system he had nothing to do with creating.
Every Conservative government has left a deficit behind it. The Cretien liberals (I'm not a liberal myself) got us out of debt.
Harper prefers the American way of doing business and if he had a majority would have de-regulated the banks and cut more taxes for the wealthy, just as has been done in the US. It's worked out so well for them hasn't it?

And this contradicts your knee-jerk, neocon (I got mine, f&%k you) attitude towards our future;
http://www.reuters.com/article/environm ... X020081009


Hear hear!!. Is the idiot Harper still advocating accumulating surpluses or "balancing budgets" at this time? Much as I hate to see deficit spending, Canada did EXACTLY the right thing by bumping up social programs in prior deep recessions. That's what tax dollars are for. And yes.. payback was a bitch, but at least Canadians lived through it and nobody starved to death AND we paid the debt down, more or less.

I cringe to think what would have happened if rabid neo-conservative creeps had managed to acquire international power in the 70's.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby MOCKBA » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 14:40:16

So how about that looney racing towards 1.25 for a greenbuck? 25% volatility in a year. How about that?
User avatar
MOCKBA
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Mon 05 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby threadbear » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 14:45:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MOCKBA', 'S')o how about that looney racing towards 1.25 for a greenbuck? 25% volatility in a year. How about that?


Well how about it? You think it might have something to do with commodities taking a dump?
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby MOCKBA » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 15:34:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MOCKBA', 'S')o how about that looney racing towards 1.25 for a greenbuck? 25% volatility in a year. How about that?


Well how about it? You think it might have something to do with commodities taking a dump?


I am thinking more about credit markets that were closed in Canada from August till the end of the last year. Luckily credit markets were open in New York and London back then. So where did canadian companies borrowed to pay salaries, etc? Right, in New York and London...

Today credit markets everywhere are closed and those loans taken out last year have to be paid back in USD and GBP... Amazingly it correlates with USDCAD charts....

Also, BMO used to give me ~2% on US funds earlier this year and in Sept. they were planing to give me 1.6%... Now they publish 2.35%, but when I talked to my account manager yesterday he offered me 2.95% which is unprecedented - usually they gave me 0.25-0.35% on top of published rates, but this time it is 0.6%. Got me thinking that Canadian banking system is very short of USD...

Say one of just 14 canadian bank would collapse... any speculation what it would do to loony?
User avatar
MOCKBA
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Mon 05 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby Nickel » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 15:46:29

I keep trying to figure out what this is.

Image

Is it a tiny little monkey reading a book lodged in the scooped-out brain pan of a man, or a scorpion climbing the paper hat of some guy making fries at McDonald's?
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby Maddog78 » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 16:38:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nickel', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Maddog78', 'I') fail to see how tax and spend policies of the opposition are going to make things better.
Boils down to as simple as that for me.


There are all kinds of ways the government can redistribute the wealth of the country such that people at the lower end of the economic spectrum don't suffer. Liquidity loans can be offered to businesses the banks turn down, the government can offer programs to upgrade production technology and training, public works projects can be undertaken, primary industries can be nationalized (temporarily or long-term) to maintain production and jobs, all kinds of ways.




Even if I thought these were good ideas (Nationalization? Give me a break, this isn't Venezuela) I have zero faith in the Liberals or NDP executing any of these plans in an efficient and fair manner.

They will tax us to death and we will get nothing of any value in return.
User avatar
Maddog78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby Nickel » Fri 10 Oct 2008, 18:47:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Maddog78', '(')Nationalization? Give me a break, this isn't Venezuela)


Gee, pardon me, what planet do you live on? On this one called Earth, governments own and operate all kinds of things we count on, and they do it well enough to keep the wheels on. You know, schools, hospitals, highways, airlines, rail networks, not to mention the massive armed forces that right-wing dickheads love to play with... So what's your big idea? Let some guy cut his losses and walk away, lay off thousands of people and cease production somewhere simply because he can't hand out enough gold-plated enemas to shareholders to keep the lid on anymore? Grow up. Those days are over. That's what this is all about. Do you get that yet?
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America
Top

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby Maddog78 » Sat 11 Oct 2008, 13:23:27

Let me guess, you are either a student or a federal civil servant?
Yes, let's all work for the gov't and everything will be fine.
They'll take care of us.
LOL.
User avatar
Maddog78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby Snowrunner » Sat 11 Oct 2008, 13:48:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Maddog78', 'L')et me guess, you are either a student or a federal civil servant?
Yes, let's all work for the gov't and everything will be fine.
They'll take care of us.
LOL.


Why don't you explain to me (and Nickel) the difference between a Government run Economic system and a Corporate run economic system? Why is the latter so much better?
User avatar
Snowrunner
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 795
Joined: Wed 24 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Screwed
Top

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby Maddog78 » Sat 11 Oct 2008, 13:56:39

It's obvious you have never tried to run your own business and/or have had to deal with lazy, uncaring and unmotivated bureaucrats.

There is no point explaining further.
You are both obviously hard core socialists/communists and we will never agree.

In a way it would be interesting to see a Liberal/NDP coalition gov't run the place for a while.
We could all starve together in the Soviet Union of Canuckistan.
User avatar
Maddog78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby Snowrunner » Sat 11 Oct 2008, 13:59:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Maddog78', 'I')t's obvious you have never tried to run your own business and/or have had to deal with lazy, uncaring and unmotivated bureaucrats.


Yeah, that's why I have my own business, because I haven't. Assuming much?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here is no point explaining further.
You are both obviously hard core socialists/communists and we will never agree.


And you're obviously a hardcore ingoramus who was spoonfed an ideology and never bothered turning on your brain to think about it.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n a way it would be interesting to see a Liberal/NDP coalition gov't run the place for a while.
We could all starve together in the Soviet Union of Canuckistan.


Right, while everybody in the States lives in a Palacial Estate, even their Servants, eating only the finest foods and enjoying the Corporate Lifestyle they so richly deserve.
User avatar
Snowrunner
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 795
Joined: Wed 24 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Screwed
Top

Re: Hey, I thought Harper said Canada had no economic proble

Postby Maddog78 » Sat 11 Oct 2008, 14:04:44

LOL, let's hope your business is in a sector that will be one of the first ones nationalized.



Seriously though, you don't feel motivated to work harder to make you business a success because you will see the fruits of that labour?
If your business is nationalized and you get a fixed salary and benefits set by the gov't you don't think that would affect your motivation to work hard and run the business in a most efficient manner?
You don't think that you wouldn't just turn into a clock puncher?
User avatar
Maddog78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron