by bobcousins » Tue 13 Dec 2005, 22:07:45
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bobcousins', 'L')ife is a biological machine. Both life and our machines ("technology") require a constant throughput of energy to produce useful results. A byproduct of the process is always an increase in entropy
Doesn't this throughput hold entropy at bay in the local system (living creature/machine)?
Or are you saying there are no "local" effects of entropy?
I will attempt to address your points Ludi as you ask a fair question and deserve a decent response.
Thermal entropy is only reduced in a limited or temporary sense. You have to define the scope of the system in an arbitrary way to make it stick. In the fridge example, if you define the scope as the inside of the fridge, then entropy is reduced. Entropy is increased somewhere else - the immediate environment, or the kitchen. For practical purposes you have to consider a fridge as a device that requires energy and produces heat (entropy) as a byproduct.
Muscles work by converting ATP to ADP. The body creates a stock of ATP from energy derived in food. So at a narrow level entropy is being reduced. But at the practical level of the whole organism, it's a device that requres energy and increases thermal entropy (it dissipates usable energy as heat).
But the utility of fridges is not to reverse entropy, their "useful function" is to preserve food. The useful function of an organism is to create more DNA, it is not to stockpile energy in a usable form.
For all practical senses, all operations of life, machines, society create a net increase in thermal entropy. There is no sense in which a city say creates a local reduction in entropy, which will be reversed as soon as the power is turned off. In fact it is the opposite. A city increases entropy while powered.
If you consider the
organisation of an organism or a city to represent a reduction in entropy, you can only be talking about logical entropy. Logical entropy is operating at a different level to thermal entropy. So while thermal entropy applies to all physical processes, and overall always increases, logical entropy can be decreasing. The nature of what the terms order and logical entropy even mean are not well understood. To get into a philosphical debate about these things will always lead to controversy, and anyway they are not directly important to Peak Oil or its implications.
So this is where I have my beef with Monte. By a careless blurring of the strict thermodynamic version of entropy with various other kinds of entropy, he makes statements which are simply not justified by physical laws, they make great soundbites but are effectively meaningless. We lose the core point and get sidetracked into blind alleys.
As I pointed out before, it is clear that complexity and organisation can arise and operate within the boundaries of the laws of thermodynamics. So considering entropy may be essential for mechanical engineers, but it really has nothing useful to say about the limits of complexity. About the only useful observation we can make at the macro level is that we need a sufficient amount of usable energy to power processes - both mechanical and biological.
So I find the phrase "holding entropy at bay" is confused, and confusing. It doesn't convey the essence of what is going on, and tries to describe it as a negative. While it is true the paint on my car slowly peels, I don't actually care about that. The useful function of my car is to get me from A to B. That may or may not reduce entropy, it doesn't matter, what matters is that it requires regular dollops of energy to perform it's useful function of transportation. (It is true maintenance also requires regular dollops of energy, but maintenance is secondary to the primary function).
That is why I prefer the formulation in its positive form "machines require a constant throughput of energy to produce useful results". You do not need to get into arcane details of entropy with a dubious justification, and it is clear that when the energy input stops flowing, the useful results stop too.
Hopefully some of that made sense, these things make perfect sense in my head but never seem to come out quite right.
