Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Energy & Meat Thread (merged)

How to save energy through both societal and individual actions.

Do you think meat consumption reduction could save oil and delay peak oil problems?

Poll ended at Sat 11 Mar 2006, 01:27:27

Yes, I'm a vegan and if everyone was, the world would be a more peaceful place.
14
No votes
Yes, but I eat meat. It doesn't matter what I do. It's what everyone does that matters.
6
No votes
No, Jevon's Paradox still applies.
9
No votes
No, there are other ways to reduce oil consumption than to deny people an essential food group.
14
No votes
No, I deny the facts presented in this post.
5
No votes
Yes, but the MEAT lobby will never let that happen.
7
No votes
No, it's too late to implement anything to stave off any peak oil effects.
6
No votes
No, it is a cultural possibility for people to stop eating something that has been the centerpiece of their meals.
2
No votes
No, meat will get more expensive as oil gets more expensive and the market will handle it.
18
No votes
 
Total votes : 81

Re: Ethanol Reduces US Meat Output

Unread postby dohboi » Thu 15 Mar 2007, 00:36:07

Frankthetank asks:

"Why is pork so damn cheap?"

My understanding is cheap pork is the result of both enormous subsidies and huge factory-farmed feed lots--very, very polluting, but agribusiness will not be responsible for paying clean up costs.

Any one know how much sh** a pig produces?
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Ethanol Reduces US Meat Output

Unread postby Tanada » Thu 15 Mar 2007, 05:53:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', 'F')rankthetank asks:

"Why is pork so damn cheap?"

My understanding is cheap pork is the result of both enormous subsidies and huge factory-farmed feed lots--very, very polluting, but agribusiness will not be responsible for paying clean up costs.

Any one know how much sh** a pig produces?


Take thw weight of the feed going in, minus the weight gain of the swine in question, then subtract 10% from the remainder as CO2 and Voila' you get about 80% of the weight of the feed. Also because Swine are omnivores and consume a portion of plain old protien in their feed the resulting fecees stinks with broken amino acid chains like nobodies bussiness.

On the other hand the amino acids make excellent fertilizer, so almost all commercial pig farms make the waste into a liquid fertilizer and spray it on crop fields.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Ethanol Reduces US Meat Output

Unread postby PhebaAndThePilgrim » Thu 15 Mar 2007, 10:42:09

Good day from Pheba From the farm:
I am so glad to be able to contribute to this web site with farm information. I am not an educated farmer like my husband, but I do see things happening around me.
Hubby has been investigating grass fed beef intensely for a few years now.
Here is some of what he has discovered.
You need a very high quality grass to raise grass fed cattle.
We do not have that quality of grass. Most of Missouri does n ot have that quality of grass.
Missouri is mostly K31 fescue. I have written about fescue in the past. Not a good pasture for grass fed beef.
Grass fed beef has a much much slower growth rate than corn fed beef.
Grass fed beef is lean, and not heavily marbled. A person has to actually chew grass fed beef to consume it. This is something the American beef consumer just does not like, and will not purchase.
That being said, we are still going to try grass fed beef on a limited basis.
All of our mama cows are grass fed. We give them mineral, and a protein supplement, and they exist on grass/hay. They do very well. The whole ideal behind a cow/calf operation is to let the land support the breed cow. Young animals, beef animals, and breeding bulls get some corn as a supplement.
Last year a 3,000 sow hog operation began 3 miles southeast of us. Now they are putting in another one northwest of us.
One way or another it looks like we are in for a world of hurt.
I am not so concerned with the smell. I am concerned with how it is going to contaminate our water supply.
As far as moving to a different area is concerned, I don't think it makes a difference. When TSHTF I don't think it will matter much where a person lives. it's going to be bad.
Also, with where I see us heading in the next couple of years, I don't think the hog operations will stay operating for very long.
Especially considering what ethanol is doing to corn prices.
That's just the way I see it, from the farm. Pheba
PhebaAndThePilgrim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Show-Me State

Re: Eating meat: I'm not giving that up!

Unread postby ACrisisAwaits » Tue 10 Apr 2007, 19:47:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('manu', 'M')y arguement against cow killing is that when there are no more tractors to till the land, the bull does that job. The cow gives its milk, and combined with grains, fruits and vegatables one can live a healthy life. So post peak oil, people will begin to see their value. When the cow and bull die naturally, one can use their skin for shoes, ect. and eat the meat. If you do eat meat such as deer, pig, or fish, you should go and kill the animals yourself. In this way you can see that you are taking a life. Meat is tamasic, or mode of ignorance in nature so if you want to remain in ignorance then keep killing and eating animals.

Just out of curiousity, are you lacto-vegetarian or vegan? The dairy industry is responsible for killing large amounts of animals as well. Veal exists because dairy products exist.
User avatar
ACrisisAwaits
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed 28 Mar 2007, 03:00:00

Energy & Meat

Unread postby sirrom » Mon 13 Aug 2007, 10:27:08

When oil becomes so expensive that most people can't afford to use it to heat their homes,many people are going to turn to wood to keep their houses warm.
The problem is that in alot of place,there are not alot of trees left for people to cut down and once all the trees have gone,people will have to do without heating or just start burning books or furniture,but eventually that will run out.

The reason i'm saying this is that without fire there is going to be no way for people to cook meat(i'm assuming here that the electrical grid has collapsed and gas is also very expensive). Without anyway to cook the meat this will mean that keeping animals for meat is completly pointless. Once people get rid of the animals, they will use the land to grow things like vegatables and fruit and anything that they can eat raw.
For those of you who do not know, growing crops is a much more efficient use of land,water and energy. so with all the animals gone this means we will be able to produce more food and more people will survive.(providing they live in a temperate climate,like the UK,and don't need heating).

This is the reason why i think that peak oil is a good thing(no more animal murder).
what did YOU do in the eco-war?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayz1SK4KbX4
User avatar
sirrom
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu 08 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: England

Energy & Meat

Unread postby TheTurtle » Mon 13 Aug 2007, 10:38:16

You do realize that the bulk of daily calories that most people consume comes from grains and that grains require cooking? Right?
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi

Energy & Meat

Unread postby Fishman » Mon 13 Aug 2007, 12:03:05

Oh Darn you Turtle! You keep bringing up reality. How's a vegan to argue with that?

Sorry Sirrom, animals in the pre oil times were uses as beasts of burden, transport, conversion of non arable land to food, and it will be that way in the future also.
PS meats a lot easier to cook than grains
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: Peak oil & gas and meat consumption

Unread postby Twilight » Mon 13 Aug 2007, 12:23:05

Once energy shortages seriously interfere with meat production, everything that moves and breathes will die. It will only be a matter of time. We are going to hunt every source of protein to extinction.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Energy & Meat

Unread postby jbeckton » Mon 13 Aug 2007, 13:03:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sirrom', 'W')hen oil becomes so expensive that most people can't afford to use it to heat their homes,many people are going to turn to wood to keep their houses warm.
The problem is that in alot of place,there are not alot of trees left for people to cut down and once all the trees have gone,people will have to do without heating or just start burning books or furniture,but eventually that will run out.
The reason i'm saying this is that without fire there is going to be no way for people to cook meat(i'm assuming here that the electrical grid has collapsed and gas is also very expensive). Without anyway to cook the meat this will mean that keeping animals for meat is completly pointless. Once people get rid of the animals, they will use the land to grow things like vegatables and fruit and anything that they can eat raw.
For those of you who do not know, growing crops is a much more efficient use of land,water and energy. so with all the animals gone this means we will be able to produce more food and more people will survive.(providing they live in a temperate climate,like the UK,and don't need heating).
This is the reason why i think that peak oil is a good thing(no more animal murder).

Ever heard of a solar oven?

Actually, most fresh meat is edible but there will always be something to burn like grass or PETA posters/hats/t-shirts.
User avatar
jbeckton
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2082
Joined: Fri 05 Jan 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Peak oil & gas and meat consumption

Unread postby Blacksmith » Mon 13 Aug 2007, 13:11:49

Your excercise today show you accept it will be to check out all the available food sources within 100 km or 60 miles. In a post oil senario that what your diet will be. Transportation of meat will revert to the old cattle drive, try eating your shoes to see how tough the meat will be.
Employed senior
Blacksmith
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sun 13 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Athabasca, Alberta

Re: Peak oil & gas and meat consumption

Unread postby fecteau » Mon 13 Aug 2007, 13:32:28

Cooking will not be the main reason people should eat a mostly vegetarian diet in post oil. It takes ten time the energy to produce a gram of protein from beef than to produce it from soy. In fact the planet cannot support the current population on a western diet.
Once the oil and the fishes (ocean depletion is under way faster than oil depletion) are gone, people will have some hard choices.
Fortunately, we can live nicely on very tasty vegetarian dishes. People will get use to it.
User avatar
fecteau
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun 25 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Toronto Canada

Re: Peak oil & gas and meat consumption

Unread postby fecteau » Mon 13 Aug 2007, 13:35:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Blacksmith', 'Y')our excercise today show you accept it will be to check out all the available food sources within 100 km or 60 miles. In a post oil senario that what your diet will be. Transportation of meat will revert to the old cattle drive, try eating your shoes to see how tough the meat will be.


Most of France train network is nuclear powered and can transport food large distances economically.
User avatar
fecteau
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun 25 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Toronto Canada
Top

Re: Peak oil & gas and meat consumption

Unread postby Bas » Mon 13 Aug 2007, 14:13:40

ten times the energy.....depends. It certainly does require ten times as much arable land, something we are already starting to be short of and which we will be dramatically short of if crop yields start to fall and the world's population keeps on growing. And before you say that crop yields falling would be in favor of meat production; animal feed crop yields will fall too. All in all, food will become much more expensive in the future and I expect that in the long term meat will only be for the rich or for a special occasion.
Bas
 

Re: Peak oil & gas and meat consumption

Unread postby Blacksmith » Mon 13 Aug 2007, 14:20:43

[quote="fecteau Most of France train network is nuclear powered and can transport food large distances economically.[/quote]

Toronto is a long way from France :P
Employed senior
Blacksmith
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sun 13 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Athabasca, Alberta

Re: Peak oil & gas and meat consumption

Unread postby Blacksmith » Mon 13 Aug 2007, 14:24:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SpringCreekFarm', 'F')arm animals raised under the conditions of industrial agriculture require more energy............maybe. There are other ways to raise livestock for food and it is easier than growing crops.

If I stand a cow out on the pasture for the summer, how is that using more energy then tilling, planting, caring for the crop, harvesting, etc? For one, ruminants ie cattle can take marginal pasture and turn it into protein. Try growing your grain on hilly, rocky terrain and then get back to me. They also supply milk, hides and even fertilizer. I'd like to see you get that out of your crops.

If you are suggesting that people wont have fire at some point then they won't have much of anything else either at that point.

These comments often come from people that have never grown a vegetable or raised an animal.


Exactly
Employed senior
Blacksmith
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sun 13 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Athabasca, Alberta
Top

Re: Peak oil & gas and meat consumption

Unread postby frankthetank » Mon 13 Aug 2007, 14:35:00

I think in Mongolia they use shit to heat their food? Same can be done here? I too believe the forests of N. America are doomed at SOME point. It'll take a lot of wood to heat the northern cities. Look @ England back before they used coal. They were running out of wood. I suppose we will import some or steal from Cananda and i wouldn't doubt seeing tropical woods being brought north from the Amazon. I also see a sort of exodus from the north to warmer climates when heating becomes too expensive. Most people don't like cold homes, hell right now most people can't deal with 65F or less.
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: Peak oil & gas and meat consumption

Unread postby billp » Mon 13 Aug 2007, 20:37:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')nce energy shortages seriously interfere with meat production, everything that moves and breathes will die. It will only be a matter of time. We are going to hunt every source of protein to extinction.


Providing we have the energy to reach the hunting ground and back.

Cheers
User avatar
billp
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 414
Joined: Sun 11 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: albuquerque
Top

Energy & Meat

Unread postby sirrom » Tue 14 Aug 2007, 09:19:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jbeckton', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sirrom', 'W')hen oil becomes so expensive that most people can't afford to use it to heat their homes,many people are going to turn to wood to keep their houses warm.
The problem is that in alot of place,there are not alot of trees left for people to cut down and once all the trees have gone,people will have to do without heating or just start burning books or furniture,but eventually that will run out.
The reason i'm saying this is that without fire there is going to be no way for people to cook meat(i'm assuming here that the electrical grid has collapsed and gas is also very expensive). Without anyway to cook the meat this will mean that keeping animals for meat is completly pointless. Once people get rid of the animals, they will use the land to grow things like vegatables and fruit and anything that they can eat raw.
For those of you who do not know, growing crops is a much more efficient use of land,water and energy. so with all the animals gone this means we will be able to produce more food and more people will survive.(providing they live in a temperate climate,like the UK,and don't need heating).
This is the reason why i think that peak oil is a good thing(no more animal murder).

Ever heard of a solar oven?
Actually, most fresh meat is edible.

ever heard of a british summer? As i write this, it is pouring with rain outside.

do you eat your meat raw?
what did YOU do in the eco-war?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayz1SK4KbX4
User avatar
sirrom
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu 08 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: England
Top

Re: Peak oil & gas and meat consumption

Unread postby Homesteader » Tue 14 Aug 2007, 09:29:58

I prefer my wheat, corn, dry beans, chick peas, winter squash and potatoes cooked as well.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad

Re: Peak oil & gas and meat consumption

Unread postby jbeckton » Tue 14 Aug 2007, 09:44:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sirrom', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jbeckton', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sirrom', 'W')hen oil becomes so expensive that most people can't afford to use it to heat their homes,many people are going to turn to wood to keep their houses warm.

The problem is that in alot of place,there are not alot of trees left for people to cut down and once all the trees have gone,people will have to do without heating or just start burning books or furniture,but eventually that will run out.

The reason i'm saying this is that without fire there is going to be no way for people to cook meat(i'm assuming here that the electrical grid has collapsed and gas is also very expensive). Without anyway to cook the meat this will mean that keeping animals for meat is completly pointless. Once people get rid of the animals, they will use the land to grow things like vegatables and fruit and anything that they can eat raw.

For those of you who do not know, growing crops is a much more efficient use of land,water and energy. so with all the animals gone this means we will be able to produce more food and more people will survive.(providing they live in a temperate climate,like the UK,and don't need heating).

This is the reason why i think that peak oil is a good thing(no more animal murder).


Ever heard of a solar oven?

Actually, most fresh meat is edible.


ever heard of a british summer? As i write this, it is pouring with rain outside.

do you eat your meat raw?


I like it a little bloody, say med rare. But If I had a cow, berries, and nothing to burn, I'd eat the cow raw and have the berries for desert.
User avatar
jbeckton
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2082
Joined: Fri 05 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Conservation & Efficiency

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron