by Pops » Wed 03 Aug 2011, 08:45:42
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('prajeshbhat', 'T')he computer was supposed to bring the 4 day work week. How did that work out?
It worked out fine for me. I work about 20 hours a week average, maybe more this year.
By and large we are greedy, grasping creatures with short attention spans and insatiable appetites. The poorest people on this board are better off that 99% of the humans that have ever lived. Yet what is the one thing we all have in common? We all want more, bigger, newer - the next big thing, even if it's a bunker.
The solution to the falling requirement for humans in the workforce is reducing the length of the work week. This has already been happening since, well since the "workweek" began with the industrial revolution. In the 1850s the average week was 66 hours - in 2009 it was 34. The percent of the population in the workforce is 45%, higher than the 1970 when it was 40% but down from the peak in 2000 of 49%.
The solution on the personal level is to learn to be happy with a smaller income, which isn't hard because basic stuff is so cheap. The solution on the macro level is to encourage flexible work rules, stuff like job sharing, telecommuting, flex-time, etc.
It will take completing the socialization of medicine and retirement to be successful. Our businesses have basically adopted the Wal-mart model, which is simply to cut costs to undercut the competition. They've thrown every cost possible onto the society at large, from pollution to healthcare and retirement.
Society obviously is having a problem coming to terms with that, but it will, there really isn't any choice.
http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/whap ... k.hours.ushttp://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/ ... rs-are-up/
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)