Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Apple Company Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Apple has more cash on hand than the federal government

Unread postby Pretorian » Sat 30 Jul 2011, 14:02:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '
')In a few days your local hardware store will have more cash on hand the federal government.

In few days my kids will have more money than US government. :-D :-D :-D



They probably already do. But do they have as much power as US government?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby Sixstrings » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 14:22:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Foxconn to replace workers with 1 million robots in 3 years

SHENZHEN, July 29 (Xinhua) -- Taiwanese technology giant Foxconn will replace some of its workers with 1 million robots in three years to cut rising labor expenses and improve efficiency, said Terry Gou, founder and chairman of the company, late Friday.

The robots will be used to do simple and routine work such as spraying, welding and assembling which are now mainly conducted by workers, said Gou at a workers' dance party Friday night.

The company currently has 10,000 robots and the number will be increased to 300,000 next year and 1 million in three years, according to Gou.

Foxconn, the world's largest maker of computer components which assembles products for Apple, Sony and Nokia, is in the spotlight after a string of suicides of workers at its massive Chinese plants, which some blamed on tough working conditions.

The company currently employs 1.2 million people, with about 1 million of them based on the Chinese mainland.
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-07/30/c_131018764.htm


Wow, I've talked about it before a long time ago and now it's here.. the rise of the robot worker..

I've also talked a lot about how Apple suppliers employ one million Chinese when the US needs these jobs. But even Chinese wages are too high, or there are too many suicides, or whatever the reason -- all one million of them are going to be replaced by robots within 3 years.

An article on the robot they'll be using:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')img]http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/04/frida-abb-concept-assembly-worker-robot.jpg[/img]

FRIDA 'concept' robot will solve all of Foxconn's problems by replacing its workers (video)

Don't be fooled by the "concept" label that ABB has affixed to its new robot. There can be only one logical conclusion to this endeavor: FRIDA and its ilk will one day replace the millions of young Chinese workers assembling our gadgets. It's no coincidence that this uniquely agile, dual-arm robot is compact enough to "fit into spaces ergonomically designed for human workers" and can be carried around "easily" to begin work with a minimum of installation requirements.

In fact, ABB admits that several prototypes are already being piloted. The obvious advantage for Foxconn and friends is that FRIDA doesn't require a swimming pool, cafeteria, housing, or professional counseling to keep out of the dormitory nets. Watch FRIDA obey the first law of robotics at the 44 second mark of the video posted after the break as assembly line workers everywhere lament their lack of a handle.
http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/13/frida-concept-robot-will-solve-all-of-foxconns-problems-by-re/


Incidentally.. if one has money to invest.. one should look into the company making these robots. They might be the next Microsoft.
Last edited by Ferretlover on Wed 10 Aug 2011, 18:21:20, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged thread.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby DomusAlbion » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 14:34:16

Kurt Vonnegut predicted this dystopian future in 1952 in the novel "Player Piano".
"Modern Agriculture is the use of land to convert petroleum into food."
-- Albert Bartlett

"It will be a dark time. But for those who survive, I suspect it will be rather exciting."
-- James Lovelock
User avatar
DomusAlbion
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Beyond the Pale

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby Sixstrings » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 14:44:59

The company sounds like a great investment:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')BB is a Swiss-Swedish multinational corporation headquartered in Zürich, Switzerland, operating mainly in the power and automation technology areas. It ranked 143rd in Forbes Ranking (2010).

ABB is one of the largest engineering companies as well as one of the largest conglomerates in the world. ABB has operations in around 100 countries, with approximately 124,000 employees,[2] and reported global revenue of $31.6 billion for 2010.[1]

Profit US $2.561 billion (2010)[1]
Total assets US $36.30 billion (2010)[1]
Total equity US $15.46 billion (2010)[1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABB_Group


Long term stock chart:

Image

Six month:

Image

Five day:

Image

Stock has been flat since '08, down today and last five days. I wonder why? They already have $2.5 billion in annual profits and this Foxconn thing is big news. That's a million robot order. And just the beginning.

Why is this stock so cheap.. ?
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby Pretorian » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 15:46:21

May be because they wait for you to buy.
On the other hand, these little guys looks almost like human beings. And freed labor force can join the military. Imagine billions of young people with nothing to do , all over the world== millions of wars, little and big ones.
Last edited by Pretorian on Mon 01 Aug 2011, 17:47:47, edited 1 time in total.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 16:54:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DomusAlbion', 'K')urt Vonnegut predicted this dystopian future in 1952 in the novel "Player Piano".

+1

One of Vonnegut's best, in terms of predicitve social commentary. Generally, as I have watched the general disruption of much of the high wage first world job market over the past 15 years or so, passages from this novel come to mind.

My favorite plot point was was one of some smart go-getter tech. employee who figured out some technology to eliminate his own job. He was rewarded, as I recall, with a plaque, a $500 check, and a pink slip, whereupon he joined the manual (low skill) labor category, disdainfully referred to as the "reeks and wrecks".

Following his dismissal, he would be congratulated on his "award" by friends, who, then, didn't quite know what to say, as I recall. (I read this nearly 30 years ago).
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY
Top

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 17:06:51

On the one hand, you can't stop tecnological progress without completely changing the way society works. Someone will build such robots as electronics and computer software continue to advance.

The classic example of job dislocation goes back to the buggy whip elimination when cars took over the role of horses as the primary means of private transport.

OTOH, supposedly, such technological advances (in time) create more (and better) jobs than they displace, and generally improve our standard of living, overall.

At least one problem/breakdown in this model, IMO, is the declining standard of education, at least in the U.S. Burger flippers who can't run a cash register (beyond pushing on a picture of a hamburger -- and they have no clue if the total is correct, and are COMPLETELY lost if the LAN goes down) are NOT going to be able to, for example, fix or improve such robots, or any other such "advanced or better" job that I can readily think of.

Aside for advocating better teacher pay, which seems to have little bearing on real success beyond where the unions have taken most teacher total compensation packages -- I see VERY LITTLE serious input on this issue. IMO it is THE primary long term issue first world countries which wish to REMAIN first world face, in the medium to long term. (Peak Oil included).

But no, let's focus on how many bombs to build, which unions to prop up, and of course, regulate everything much more. THAT will surely alleviate the unemployment problem, especially long term. :roll:
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby kublikhan » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 17:47:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', 'T')he classic example of job dislocation goes back to the buggy whip elimination when cars took over the role of horses as the primary means of private transport.
I'm not sure the buggy whip analogy is a very good one. In that example, an old industry was destroyed by a new industry. The workers could change industries with retraining. In this example, industry is increasing their use of automation technologies and decreasing their use of labor.

On the other hand, many countries, China in particular, are going to be facing a labor shortage in the coming decades because of demographic issues. Perhaps increased automation will help alleviate these labor shortages.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')hina's once inexhaustible pool of excess labour is starting to dry up as its population ages. A growing labor shortage will also lead to wage growth in China.

One of the big questions exercising academics inside and outside China is the timing of the Lewis Turning Point -- when wages in industrializing countries begin to rise quickly as the supply of surplus labor from the countryside runs out. All indications suggest that point is about now. Exacerbating the evaporation of the excess labor pool, China's population is about to start ageing. Estimates of when range from last year to 2014, as the one-child policy and concomitant birth rate below the natural replacement rate starts to affect its huge population base.

Green also concludes that China is creating jobs faster than the population is creating new workers. The labour problem points to a lower growth rate for China, but the flip side is that, along with a better education workforce, it will also drive productivity improvements. Wages need to rise for supply and social equity reasons but if they go up too quickly, inflation, at present the biggest of many economic headaches, will add to the problems.
Labor shortages, a more serious headache for China in 2011

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'J')apan is an extreme case of demographic shifting: the median age of Japanese citizens is currently the oldest in the world at 42.9 years old (Global Fund News, 2006). In response, the Japanese government directly increased the number of workers in the labor market by increasing the government employee retirement age from 60 to 65. The Japanese government and corporations have also made attempts to encourage women to seek employment and participate in the workforce in higher numbers. Japan’s immigration researchers are recommending a policy of opening its borders to foreign workers to decrease the labor gap and support the elderly population (McNeill, 2006). This strategy of increasing immigration is actively being explored in Europe as well, where there is also an anticipated labor shortage.
Demographic Consequences of China’s One-Child Policy
The oil barrel is half-full.
User avatar
kublikhan
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 5064
Joined: Tue 06 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Illinois
Top

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 18:02:45

There are about a billion workers in SE Asia earning similar wages and China is starting to be a popular option. For robotization to be effective in a given sector, there has to be product longevity to back up the investment. Of course the bots beome more adaptable over time.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 18:03:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kublikhan', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', 'T')he classic example of job dislocation goes back to the buggy whip elimination when cars took over the role of horses as the primary means of private transport.
I'm not sure the buggy whip analogy is a very good one. In that example, an old industry was destroyed by a new industry. The workers could change industries with retraining. In this example, industry is increasing their use of automation technologies and decreasing their use of labor.

Perhaps we are having a semantics issue here.

1). I went on to point out that the LACK of meaningful high quality education is THE fundamental problem in the employment issue. (I equate education with your retraining comment -- but private industry no longer tends to retrain (nor does government), which is a big problem).

2). I would argue that automation IS another industry, which to maintain, extend, improve, keep safe, etc. will require lots of HIGH SKILLED jobs.

It's not a clear one-for-one replacement of course, and my argument may be bogus. But this seems like another example of technology BOTH destroying old jobs and CREATING OPPORTUNITIES for new SKILLED jobs (and a higher standard of living for all) to me -- which fits right in with the buggy-whip analogy, IMO.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY
Top

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby Sixstrings » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 18:37:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'T')here are about a billion workers in SE Asia earning similar wages and China is starting to be a popular option. For robotization to be effective in a given sector, there has to be product longevity to back up the investment. Of course the bots beome more adaptable over time.


This robot is pretty adaptable. This isn't like those bots in the car plants where they're specifically built to do one kind of job on the assembly line.

This new robot has hands. And fingers, and elbows and arms and shoulders and full range of motion. There's no way it's as dexterous as human fingers, but apparently it's good enough to build all of Apple's products.

So that's the key here, this new robot is made to do jobs humans are doing now, not unlike NASA robots being developed to use the same tools astronauts do with their human fingers. See that's efficiency, robot just uses the human infrastructure so you save money by not having to build new infrastructure to fit the robots.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby kublikhan » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 19:24:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', 'P')erhaps we are having a semantics issue here.

1). I went on to point out that the LACK of meaningful high quality education is THE fundamental problem in the employment issue. (I equate education with your retraining comment -- but private industry no longer tends to retrain (nor does government), which is a big problem).

2). I would argue that automation IS another industry, which to maintain, extend, improve, keep safe, etc. will require lots of HIGH SKILLED jobs.

It's not a clear one-for-one replacement of course, and my argument may be bogus. But this seems like another example of technology BOTH destroying old jobs and CREATING OPPORTUNITIES for new SKILLED jobs (and a higher standard of living for all) to me -- which fits right in with the buggy-whip analogy, IMO.
I generally agree with what you said, but I think the direct jobs created in the automation industry are insufficient to cover the jobs lost. This is not a big deal however. One point that I did not consider in my initial post is that productivity gains produced via automation will eventually get recycled back into the general economy. This will create new jobs in the process, many of which are higher paid and skilled than the displaced jobs. Of course you can have bottlenecks that retard this process, such as the education problem you mentioned. But I have to agree with you that in general automation does create opportunities for new skilled jobs.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')ome, echoing Obama, suggest even greater cause for concern today: since technology is now displacing jobs not only in agriculture and manufacturing, but also in the service sector, there will be no new job-generating growth sectors to employ all those who lose their jobs. But this view fails to recognize that savings from a more efficient industry, for example, the grocery industry, would flow back to the economy in one or more of the following three ways: lower prices (e.g., lower cost for groceries), higher wages for the fewer remaining employers, or higher profits. In a competitive grocery retail market, most of the savings would flow back to consumers in the form of lower prices. Consumers use the savings on lower groceries to go out to dinner a few times, buy books, watch movies, or any number of other things. This economic activity stimulates demand that other companies (e.g., restaurants, book stores, movie theaters, airlines, and hotels) respond to by hiring more workers.

This common sense view is borne out by many economic studies. For example, economists at the Federal Reserve write that, “Productivity grew noticeably faster than usual in the late 1990s, while the unemployment rate fell to levels not seen for more than three decades. This inverse relationship between the two variables also can be seen on several other occasions in the postwar period and leads one to wonder whether there is a causal link between them. The empirical evidence presented here shows that a positive technology shock leads to a reduction in the unemployment rate that persists for several years.” Likewise, in a definitive review of the studies on productivity and employment, the OECD’s Jobs Study: Facts, Analysis, Strategy report stated that, “Technology both eliminates jobs and creates jobs. Generally it destroys lower wage, lower productivity jobs, while it creates jobs that are more productive, high-skill and better paid. Historically, the income-generating effects of new technologies have proved more powerful than the labor-displacing effects: technological progress has been accompanied not only by higher output and productivity, but also by higher overall employment.” As consumers pay relatively less for goods and services, they have more purchasing power which stimulates a growth in other sectors, leading to a self-reinforcing economic expansion.
Technology and Automation Create, Not Destroy, Jobs
The oil barrel is half-full.
User avatar
kublikhan
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 5064
Joined: Tue 06 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Illinois
Top

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby Novus » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 19:44:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DomusAlbion', 'K')urt Vonnegut predicted this dystopian future in 1952 in the novel "Player Piano".

+1

My favorite plot point was was one of some smart go-getter tech. employee who figured out some technology to eliminate his own job. He was rewarded, as I recall, with a plaque, a $500 check, and a pink slip, whereupon he joined the manual (low skill) labor category, disdainfully referred to as the "reeks and wrecks".


What was once Fiction is now a fact of life in 2011.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby peeker01 » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 19:53:23

I suggest them little chinamen go learn how to repair robots.
peeker01
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 725
Joined: Fri 24 Jun 2011, 18:19:54

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby AgentR11 » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 20:24:10

Kinda reminds me of the original transition in computers, from analog machines, purpose designed to execute a single action or calculation repeatedly, to digital machines which could be readily programmed, to today where the programming is so removed from the hardware and its location that you may not even know what state the CPU that executed the code is in.

These robots show every bit the signs of being software adaptable as opposed to having to be hardware adaptable. Thus, they can be mass produced, and the specialization happening in the software where it can be continuously updated or changed as jobs and tasks change.

It begins.

Want three.
Yesterday.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby copious.abundance » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 20:36:53

The problem with anti-utopian pieces like Vonnegut's is twofold. Even if were somehow true that all those workers could be replaced by robots ...

1. If most workers except a handful of engineers and managers lost their jobs to robots, not many people would have enough money to buy the products the robots manufactured. It would ultimately be self-defeating.

2. There is an alternative possibility that #1 would be overcome by vastly increased productivity coupled with a collapse in prices. Kublikhan above touched on this. Automation could make things so inexpensive that even part-time workers would be able to afford them. And society would become so productive that most people could work part-time and, with the help of automation, produce a very high value of goods, thus enabling high wages per hour and large paychecks for relatively little work. This could also free up a large segment of the population to work in non-goods producing sectors of the economy. We've already been seeing this phenomenon the past several decades. Imagine just 5% of the population engineering & producing material goods needed for the whole population, while the other 95% works as artists, bankers, real estate agents, retail clerks, government bureaucrats, etc. Even if the wages of the 95% aren't that high, the high productivity of the first 5% means that the goods they produce would be cheap enough for everyone to afford.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby Fiddlerdave » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 21:44:21

The buggy whip-automotive analogy breaks down entirely in this case.

The robots can build themselves.
User avatar
Fiddlerdave
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 582
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby Pretorian » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 22:29:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'I')magine just 5% of the population engineering & producing material goods needed for the whole population, while the other 95% works as artists, bankers, real estate agents, retail clerks, government bureaucrats, etc. Even if the wages of the 95% aren't that high, the high productivity of the first 5% means that the goods they produce would be cheap enough for everyone to afford.



You've just described what is happening right now. Question, what's in it for the 5%? How many services do they possibly need?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby AgentR11 » Mon 01 Aug 2011, 23:16:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'I')magine just 5% of the population engineering & producing material goods needed for the whole population, while the other 95% works as artists, bankers, real estate agents, retail clerks, government bureaucrats, etc. Even if the wages of the 95% aren't that high, the high productivity of the first 5% means that the goods they produce would be cheap enough for everyone to afford.


Ok..... being an engineering type person, and in the 3rd SD of intelligence, with a decent education...

WHY am I going to want to work hard enough to provide the goods and services for the remaining 95% of the population?

I don't need much income, I don't have a large family, my widgets will be just as cheap as the widgets bought by others..... If you are to appeal to greed, its apparent to me that if I were to use those funds for anything noticeable at all, I'd all of a sudden be characterized as that arrogant, nasty, rich SOB with the job Bob supposedly wants.

This doesn't sound like a very good deal to me.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Apple supplier to replace workers with 1 million robots

Unread postby copious.abundance » Tue 02 Aug 2011, 00:18:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')HY am I going to want to work hard enough to provide the goods and services for the remaining 95% of the population?

You won't really be working harder than anyone else. You'll probably be programming or designing robots, or maybe working in front of a control panel in a factory. You might not even be working full-time. It's just that you'll be making more money (per hour) than anyone else. Some people will simply choose to do this for a living because they either want the big paycheck, or they simply like doing it. Others will choose to do something else. Same as it is now.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron