Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Spouse with "Consumerist" syndrome

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: Consumerist spouse, or “Help me, I’ve created a monster!

Unread postby crapattack » Fri 10 Feb 2006, 05:13:42

In case anyone thought differently I was just kidding about the lesbos.

Longsword, good for you that must have been super tough. Have to say that the kid thing might me a deal breaker, once a woman gets this in her head a man might just find himself with kids whether he wants them or not...but hey, if you like kids it might not be so bad. What concerns me more is this woman seems like she is looking to fill some major holes in her life and is using shopping, or kids, thinking this is the next best thing to make her happy when in fact nothing will until she addresses the underlying issues.

I honestly think she might need some professional help, from what you have told us, and if so then no amount of junk, kids or anything else will satisfy her. I do encourage you to go to counselling together and if you do get a half decent psychologist they might be able to convince your wife to seek some individual counselling. Counselling isn't such a bad thing, it's helped millions of couples. Chances are if she's addicted to shopping she has other addictions you may not be aware of.
"Ninety percent of everything is crap."
-Theodore Sturgeon

Stay low and run in a random pattern.

List of Civilian Nuclear Accidents
User avatar
crapattack
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat 03 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Consumerist spouse, or “Help me, I’ve created a monster!

Unread postby Doly » Fri 10 Feb 2006, 05:40:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Longsword', '
')Child issue is a trickier problem: when I married my wife she was adamant that she NEVER wants to have any children, full stop. Now she has done a complete 180-degree turn. I personally am very fond of kids, but I simply cannot justify bringing another human being to this world to lay waste to it. If the urge gets too great, I will adopt. But I doubt this will go down very well with my wife.


I think it's quite important before considering children of any kind (own or adopted) that your wife demonstrates she's capable of being a good mother. Her shop addiction doesn't seem to make her ideal mother material. Does she have any experience of taking care of children? If she doesn't, she really should babysit somebody else's kids to get an idea of what she would have to deal with. You should go too, by the way. The realities of child-rearing might change her mind again. And if it doesn't, at least you'll both be prepared.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Consumerist spouse, or “Help me, I’ve created a monster!

Unread postby LadyRuby » Fri 10 Feb 2006, 10:41:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Longsword', '
')Child issue is a trickier problem: when I married my wife she was adamant that she NEVER wants to have any children, full stop. Now she has done a complete 180-degree turn. I personally am very fond of kids, but I simply cannot justify bringing another human being to this world to lay waste to it. If the urge gets too great, I will adopt. But I doubt this will go down very well with my wife.


I think it's quite important before considering children of any kind (own or adopted) that your wife demonstrates she's capable of being a good mother. Her shop addiction doesn't seem to make her ideal mother material. Does she have any experience of taking care of children? If she doesn't, she really should babysit somebody else's kids to get an idea of what she would have to deal with. You should go too, by the way. The realities of child-rearing might change her mind again. And if it doesn't, at least you'll both be prepared.


I have to agree with Doly. The fact that she's turned around so dramatically on the notion of having kids is worrisome. It could be that she just genuinely changed her mind, but I'd be worried that the "kid thing" is something she's focusing on to bring her a sense of fulfillment (like the shopping). But taking on the responsibility of a child, for life, is totally different, you can't just change your mind and you don't want either of you to resent the kid after the novelty wears off. It's not like a puppy that you can bring back to the pound if it doesn't "work out."

Before going down the kids road, I'd do some hard thinking about what this is all about. And I agree, spend a week with some small children before making any decisions. Being a parent is the hardest job in the world.
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US

Re: Consumerist spouse, or “Help me, I’ve created a monster!

Unread postby PrairieMule » Fri 10 Feb 2006, 18:44:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Shannymara', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LadyRuby', 'T')he fact that she's turned around so dramatically on the notion of having kids is worrisome.

That in itself doesn't worry or surprise me at all. The biological drive to have children that kicks in during our 30s is incredibly powerful. It's pretty much irresistible and a totally natural thing.


Shannymara is not fooling around about the biological drive of a woman in their 30's. It's a powerful force of nature and brother you better respect it. Remember how bad you wanted your driver's lisc when you turned 16, well it's like that. Thus you are expected and duty bound to empathize, understand, and procreate-right now Chop!Chop!

Two daughters later what I have learned is nothing you will do in your life will ever compare to creating life. I take my girls camping and to Paw Paw's ranch, they love the country. They love the cows, trees, deer and the time me and the girls spend there is right up there in value with the whole disney princess thing.

So your wife went nuts with credit cards hey me too! Your wife thinks Peak Oil is crazy, mine did to. My wife can't even change a tire and does not want to learn as long as Honda provides roadside service. That's where I fit in. As far as peak oil and the future, that's my dept. So when TSHF I'm the Knight and she's the Princess (are you catching the common theme?). Expecting your mate to be 100% on board is almost to much to demand for most women and some men. I let my wife discover it for herself then explain to her how I would feel if any thing were to happen to her and the girls, so this is what I have done to plan ahead. Paydirt! credit cards started cooling off on their own and more funds became available to prepare.
If you give a man a fish you will have kept him from hunger for a day. If you teach a man to fish he will sit in a boat and drink beer all day.
User avatar
PrairieMule
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2927
Joined: Fri 02 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a Nigerian compound surrounded by mighty dignataries
Top

Re: Spouse with "Consumerist" syndrome

Unread postby Seadragon » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 00:54:23

I have to go with Threadbear and others on this one...big screaming red stop signs everywhere in this relationship. Hope you can work it out to your satisfaction, but it sounds like you two are far apart on a couple of major issues. I know we've only heard one side of this story, but you sound like the reasonable one here...
Exporting oil is an act of treason"-- Heitor Manoel Pereira, president of AEPET in Brazil, January 06, 2006
come see me sometime... http://www.sonofchaos.blogspot.com/
Seadragon
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 183
Joined: Thu 06 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South Texas

Re: Consumerist spouse, or “Help me, I’ve created a monster!

Unread postby sameu » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 03:09:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BlisteredWhippet', '
')We're talking about rules, yes- structure. Otherwise, I'd love to try out Free Love except the concept died 25 years ago, if it ever existed at all. Most people are dreadfully unhappy; I think that is because Love is War. I just got done reading The Red Queen by Matthew Ridley on reproduction and evolution. His research shows that our biological urges toward mating frequently come at the expense of our own individual happiness, and that is the rule for all other species in the animal kingdom as well. Why should we be any different?

On another level, I also think very few of us will get the relationships "we deserve", because we don't know how to stand up for what we want. That phrase is just a cute bumper sticker with about as much truth value as an Ari Fleisher press conference.

My generation (X) in America, (can't speak for other cultures) got a bunch of garbage that masqueraded as wisdom from our elders on the subject of mating, whether society, or our own parents.

Again I would love to kick back in egalitarian bliss if everyone could be honest and open with one another, but thats not the way things are working. Evolution is working, and it cares not for our personal feelings. Exceptions to the rule? Few. I think people are capable of having open, honest, loving relationships but the fact is few of them have this relationship with themselves let alone another partner.

In the end the only thing you can control is yourself. Thats why having rules- for yourself- is a way of withstanding the onslaught of social pressures from society and people in your sphere of influence who tend to take more than give.

Love emotions give rise to antagonism, jealousy, hatred and the rest of pandora's box. Society and the media wear down our self-respect and tell us to throw away last year's model and get a new one in the relentless pursuit of self-indulgence. Our family and peer groups reinforce this dynamic.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hreadbear's Rules as I have interpreted them:

1. Never give a woman anything. Make her earn it. Otherwise she will not respect you.

2. Tell her how its going to be, don't act like your emotions are negotiable.


Neither of these "rules" are necessarily sex-specific, and are completely compatible with open, honest relationships between people will a modicum of intelligence and self-respect. The reason I used the male pronoun was simply because Longfellow is a man. Unfortunately, the male is who courts the female in our biological paradigm, and so it is generally on the man to make the rules- for himself.

In my experience, egalitarianism fails most of the time, regardless of how well it started in the beginning. Women are after the material comforts of male attention so as to take care of her offspring, as a primary rule, as it has been for 10,000 years... the personal happiness of the male mate is not her number 1 priority, regardless of what she thinks or feels at any given point in time. Eventually biological urges take over and perform a system override. Prime directives trump youthful idealism as it were.

The problem for males in this day and age is that they were spoon-fed pure bullsh*t about egalitarianism as a mating strategy. Time and time again they fall for the bait with the erroneous assumuption that the woman will be responsible in some way for his happiness. The erroneous reasoning goes, "If I perform "X" service (money, attention, shelter), I will recieve "Y" benefit (sex, affection, respect) in a relationship." What men are really exchanging is their power and self-respect for the mental illness that is the societal construction "love".

Love is pure biologcial warfare. My advice to all men is: be a caveman. Do not expect anything from women. Be prepared to walk out as soon as she fails or refuses to live up to your standards. There are other, better fish in the sea.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')ounds to me like your wife is using shopping to compensate for something else that is missing. You need to figure out what.


He already KNOWS what. He said it himself- she desires children. Who knows her better than anyone else? His problem is that he is not quite connecting the dots, but he sees the picture anyway.

Fact is, most women want to pop out carbon copies of themselves, regardless of what a man wants, or what the environment is telling them. This is deep-seated biological drive that cannot be thwarted- it is older than homo sapiens sapiens. Similarly, most men want sex- also a powerful drive- and if you choose to stupidly deny this drive you'll end up in a monastery knee-deep in choir boys. So to deny prima facie these two integral aspects of humanity or believe that some woman you're interested in is the exception to the rule is to err on the side of disaster. Any man who is fooled into thinking a woman will not eventually want children is just like a woman who thinks her man doesn't want to be comlpetely sexually satisfied.

Its true that when sexual mate selection turns into a contest of wills, tit-for-tat one-upmanship, bargaining, and power-brokering, something is obviously very wrong. I also believe that the best chance you have is being realistic and fixing yourself, since you cannot fix society, the media, or other people that want something from you because they have a huge void in themselves. They may not be responsible for their void- but you definitely can't fix them by not being honest about what it is you want.

I think because of this erroneous social "training" in egalitarian mating strategies, "enlightened" men today are less composed. Taught to be open, empathetic, understanding, and compassionate, we fail to set rules for ourselves and subsequently we pair with women who, like sharks, eventually smell blood in the water, and treat us like doormats- it is a way of determining if she can control us, and if so, prove to herself that she can do better. Inevitably the reaction from these men is "gee, I didn't see it coming- she was so sweet and lovely in the beginning," etc.

In such a scenario, the post-mortem reveals all the mechanisms of disaster. All the erroneous assumptions about men and women and relationships are laid bare, and the facts, although disturbing, will set you free.

Its truly a sick situation. I am in frequent contact with women in their 20s and it is absolutely universal in my experience that these women see men as a slightly distasteful aspect of life and are constantly upbraiding men to act more like women. Women grow up, contrary to popular belief, surrounded by messages that affirm their intrinsic value to society, family, and home. Men grow up in an environment where they are surrounded by messages that they are expendable, victimizers, and antisocial. The undercurrent of crisis in male underachievement and pathology has been overwhelmed by the rush to affirm female empowerment.

Women in their twenties I have talked to by and large see men as an appendage, an accessory to lifestyle. And they definitely see male assertiveness and reasoning as a problem to be rectified. They are in love with the idea that if women ran the country, and large corporations, there would be no war, famine, environmental destruction, etc., and they do not see the man is important in any way in terms of child rearing. They ask "where are all the good men?" exposing a bias against them generally.

In fact, scratch the surface of the average woman and you will find an enormous well of pain and confusion toward men. Why? Is it because so many had absent fathers? Broken homes? 2 in 5 molested as children or raped? Told (trained) that men "control" everything- that this is a "patriarchal" society? (Even though over half of U.S. wealth is controlled by women, over half of executive positions held by women, or over half of all incoming college students are women.)

I have lot of sympathy for women, they're just as f**ked up as men are, if not more so, but this fact does not make them more likely to see their own shortcomings or establish egalitarianism in relationships. It serves no one to pretend otherwise, especially men, who, on the whole, are damaged, confused, scared, and ill-served by clinging to an unworkable system of capitulation, supplication, and exclusivity in order to get their basic human needs of sex and companionship met.

Thats why we (men) need a few good rules that work in a real sense- not platitudes about sex roles or fantasies about abstract concepts like gender equality.

Pair-bonding is not a corporation- its a partnership between two people. These "rules" are about figuring out how to save the pair-bond, an achievable goal in our lifetimes- unlike figuring out how to save the culture at large, which, as far as I can tell, is terminal. Frankly, its our personal responsibility to the next generation not to leave them just as f**cked up, or more so, than we are. We need to give them tools so they don't have to go through what we're going through. Marraige may have to go by the wayside in favor of different approaches.

If Longfellow has already had the good sense not to breed with this person, he's already one step ahead of the game. Get out while the getting is good. Tell her you're holding her up to standards, and if she doesn't meet those standards, kick her to the curb.



wow, I have to say, this stuff makes a lot of sense

Here's another one for you, I'm not 'trained' to be empathic, sweet, open, understanding
It's just who I am, towards everybody, men or woman. But as a result my relations with woman mostly end up the way you described.
I hear stuff from woman like "you're too sweet", I already figured out that 'too' sweet is as bad or even worse as "you're an asshole"

I guess woman want a challenge, the controlling thing, Freud called it penis envy. They don't need a penis, they just want to be in control of it. And when that's too easy, the challenge is gone, they are not interested anymore and they move on.

But what am I supossed to do about this? I agree with you about the setting rules for yourself, you don't live up to my standard, goodbye. It's something I got more aware of recently. But on the other hand, when in love, you do everything to make the other person happy, you try to be understandble etc.., no?
Why do they make it so complicated, do they long for son of b*tches?

Furthermore, I'm not so keen on behaving like a caveman...

feedback (also by others, and preferably woman) is more then welcomed :-)
User avatar
sameu
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu 18 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Belgium, Europe
Top

Re: Spouse with "Consumerist" syndrome

Unread postby crapattack » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 05:30:39

Not to pick on just one part of the post, but

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') think because of this erroneous social "training" in egalitarian mating strategies, "enlightened" men today are less composed. Taught to be open, empathetic, understanding, and compassionate, we fail to set rules for ourselves and subsequently we pair with women who, like sharks, eventually smell blood in the water, and treat us like doormats- it is a way of determining if she can control us, and if so, prove to herself that she can do better. Inevitably the reaction from these men is "gee, I didn't see it coming- she was so sweet and lovely in the beginning," etc.

Hmmm. If men are so "enlightened", why this?

[web]http://www.aidv-usa.com/Statistics.htm[/web]

I think it's because of this:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')ove is pure biologcial warfare. My advice to all men is: be a caveman. Do not expect anything from women. Be prepared to walk out as soon as she fails or refuses to live up to your standards. There are other, better fish in the sea.


Just who are the sharks exactly? I don't see "shelters for physically abused men" appearing anywhere.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '(')Women are)Told (trained) that men "control" everything- that this is a "patriarchal" society? (Even though over half of U.S. wealth is controlled by women, over half of executive positions held by women)


ummm, not exactly

http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/censr-15.pdf
Evidence From Census 2000 About
Earnings by Detailed Occupation
for Men and Women

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he starkest illustration is to compare the median earnings of men and women (1) in the highest paid occupation for men and women — physicians and surgeons — for those aged 35 to 54 with the highest level of education (a Bachelor’s degree or more), and (2) in one of the lowest paid occupations for each — Dishwashers — for those aged 35 to 54 with the lowest level of education (less than a high school education). Overall, female year-round, full-time workers have median earnings of $28,000, 74 percent of comparable male median earnings. For Physicians and surgeons aged 35 to 54 with a Bachelor’s degree or more, this ratio is 69 percent; for Dishwashers aged 35 to 54 with less than a high school education, this ratio is 87 percent. Thus, after taking account of age, education, and occupation, some differentials remain, though they are reduced somewhat in some occupations.


Women and Men in the United
States: Census March 2002
Demographic Programs
Current Population Reports

http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/p20-544.pdf

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n 2002, 84 percent of adults aged 25 and over had completed high
school or more, and 27 percent had completed a bachelor’s degree or more (see Figure 4). While the high school completion rates for men and women aged 25 and over were both 84 percent, men were more likely than women to have completed a bachelor’s degree or more (29 percent compared with 25 percent). However, women were more likely than men to have some college or to have completed an associate’s degree (26 percent compared with 24 percent).

and ...

Women and men are not equally represented in all professions. In March 2002, 60 percent of women and 74 percent of men were in the labor force,7 but the proportions of men and women working in certain occupations differed greatly.8 Over half of men 16 and over (59 percent) worked in four occupational groups: precision production, craft, and repair (18 percent); executive, administrators, and managerial (16 percent); professional specialty (14 percent); and sales (11 percent). Among women in the same age group, 73 percent also worked in four occupational groups: administrative support, including clerical (23 percent); professional specialty (19 percent); service workers (except private household, 17 percent); and executive, administrators, and managerial (15 percent). Even though women have made progress in entering occupations predominantly held by men (especially executive and professional specialty occupations), the majority of women were still in traditional “female” occupations.9 For example, of the 18 million people in administrative support occupations (including clerical), 79 percent were women. In contrast, 91 percent of the 14 million people in precision production, craft, and repair occupations were men.
"Ninety percent of everything is crap."
-Theodore Sturgeon

Stay low and run in a random pattern.

List of Civilian Nuclear Accidents
User avatar
crapattack
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat 03 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC
Top

Re: Spouse with "Consumerist" syndrome

Unread postby diogenes » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 06:14:55

Crapattack, please examine divorce statistics. The vast majority of divorces are sought by women, who receive favorable concessions in divorce court: custody of children, alimony, child support, many assets----often fueled by accusations of physical or emotional abuse with little evidence.

Furthermore, there is a great deal of feminist propaganda which pervades our society. The extreme forms of feminism, popular on our college campuses and in many areas of public discourse, amount to misandry. As a man, walking by an "anti-rape" rally such as "Take Back the Night" is offensive. I have never and will never rape anyone. I have never tasted alcohol; I am not a person who goes to parties; I have never ingested any drug. Yet these "activists," many of whom had never done research or even thought logically about their accusations, were perfectly willing to yell slogans at all non-participant male passersby.

The moral conduct of women certainly hasn't improved, either. At the beginning of the Twentieth century, it was considered unseemly for a woman to be in the company of a man without a chaperone. Today, young people party, drink, and sleep with whatever happens to be warm and willing nearby----to what benefit?----

Consider the behavior of those around you. There is a pattern which is common enough now, particularly in minority communities and poor communities: a woman marries (or simply gets pregnant) young, generally by a man of poor prospects, and then seeks "stability." She has "matured" in her tastes, and now wants a stable man willing to support her and her child; how much love do you think will flourish in a marriage so founded? Do you think she will divorce him and seek support?

There are many young men who would have been considered good catches in former times who go for vast stretches of their adult lives without any prospects for pairing. When prospects arise, they are often degraded and uninteresting. If you dare to say this out loud--that a single mother of three kids is an uninteresting potential mate--then you are derided, called shallow, and so on.

The pitiful condition of mate-pairing in today's society is related intimately to the culture of consumption and the constant reiteration of pleasure and excitement, rather than contentment and stability, as an ultimate goal. It's the emotional equivalent of an economy based on infinite growth.

Am I bitter? I don't think so----just honest.
diogenes
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Spouse with "Consumerist" syndrome

Unread postby crapattack » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 06:48:08

Look, there's a lot of mysogyny going around too, and it doesn't aim to be 'equal'. You hear it in the locker room all the time. Come on. Women have lots of problems too, but face it - 2 in 5 women get abused - who do you think's doing it? Not other women. Men have a responsibility to do better, not whine about how they want their brutal 'king of the castle' birthright back, and if you don't do it yourself you've heard other men talk like it. Do you say anything to them? Instead of being offended by those women trying to take back some of their power, we should be supporting them. Guys who winge away feeling threatened by women make me ill. Women wanting equality doesn't threaten you in any way, and strong free women who speak their minds make damn fine lovers :-D
Last edited by crapattack on Sat 11 Feb 2006, 07:13:34, edited 1 time in total.
"Ninety percent of everything is crap."
-Theodore Sturgeon

Stay low and run in a random pattern.

List of Civilian Nuclear Accidents
User avatar
crapattack
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat 03 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Spouse with "Consumerist" syndrome

Unread postby diogenes » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 07:03:49

I am not familiar with the common topics of discussion in locker rooms, being a rural fellow without a gym membership or anything similar.

Two in five women get abused. If this statistic is accurate, perhaps their selection of mates is flawed. I've certainly never abused a woman. I have many friends who haven't, either. Oddly enough, most of my friends remain bachelors well past the stereotypical age. Several have never even had girlfriends: and why? They're educated, stable individuals. They're simply not "exciting."

"Men have a responsibility to do better?" "Brutal 'king of the castle' birthright?" I have already said that I haven't engaged in any abusive acts, and my chosen social circle is not abusive, either. Why shouldn't I be offended by a group assuming that I am a threat (at best; possibly a criminal) simply because of a trait I can neither choose nor change? Any benefits due me as a member of the Patriarchy are certainly tardy in their arrival. It's good to know that the debits of the Patriarchy can fall squarely on my head, though----

I am not trying to condemn only women, of course. Our entire society is ridiculous. We expect constant entertainment, and that's what even our mate selection has become. Do you honestly think that more women were abused when society was more structured, and courtship was a years-long affair rather than weeks (or hours)? Do you think that our society has been improved by the loss of extended family networks and close friendships? The consumerism which the original poster complains about is the contemporary attempt to fill the void left by these institutions--institutions which have certainly not been helped by the ideologies of feminism or moral libertinism.
diogenes
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Spouse with "Consumerist" syndrome

Unread postby crapattack » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 08:19:13

Sounds to me that you're just bitter you can't get a date.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')perhaps their selection of mates is flawed


Sure, it's their fault...
On March 31, 1991 in Alton, New Hampshire, a twenty-five-year-old intruder named John La Forest broke into the home of Florence Holway (a seventy-six-year-old woman) and brutally raped and sodomized her in the bedroom of her farmhouse.
http://www.suite101.com/welcome.cfm/women_abuse

Was this Florence Holway's fault?

And btw, take it from me, you have no idea how your friends treat their women, only they and the women do.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hy shouldn't I be offended by a group assuming that I am a threat (at best; possibly a criminal) simply because of a trait I can neither choose nor change?


Take back the Night marches aren't about YOU. They are about many women feeling unsafe, and feel they have to stay in their houses after dark 364 days of the year. One night a year they want to literally take the night back. They are 50% of the population, they own 50% of the streets, yet they don't feel safe, and you get offended because they give you a look. It's not other women attacking them - you figure it out. It's not personal. It's not about you. If men didn't attack them marching wouldn't be necessary. This is not just a woman's issue, this is a human right's issue. Men would be marching too. Instead of sulking about them looking at you sideways because you're a guy, why don't you stop blaming them (doing exactly what mysogynists do by the way). Right now you're just being part of the problem.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')enefits due me as a member of the Patriarchy are certainly tardy in their arrival


Hmmm, whiff of bitterness here. Did you read my posts above? Men get paid on average 30% more than women. Seems like a benefit to me. As for the other benefits, you are so accustomed to them you don't even notice them either.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hy shouldn't I be offended by a group assuming that I am a threat. The consumerism which the original poster complains about is the contemporary attempt to fill the void left by these institutions--institutions which have certainly not been helped by the ideologies of feminism or moral libertinism.


Here we finally get to the real root of your position. You're not an 'enlightened' man, you're not a liberal. You feel threatened by women wanting a safer world to exist in. 2 in 5 of them are being abused, that means 2 in 5 men are abusing (or a bit less due to repeaters) and you still think that woman are supposed to just know you're a good guy. Women have a right to judge for themselves who is safe.

The ideologies of feminism have their problems but in their day they brought about massive freedoms that all North American women take for granted today - they have been 'helped' by it, and what institutions have been harmed? Our entire capitalistic system and consumerist society was not created by feminism. As far as I can see, your post has nothing to do with consumerism or Longsword's wife, and my original point was in response to BlisteredWhippet's post.
"Ninety percent of everything is crap."
-Theodore Sturgeon

Stay low and run in a random pattern.

List of Civilian Nuclear Accidents
User avatar
crapattack
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat 03 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC
Top

Re: Spouse with "Consumerist" syndrome

Unread postby threadbear » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 11:36:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('crapattack', 'L')ook, there's a lot of mysogyny going around too, and it doesn't aim to be 'equal'. You hear it in the locker room all the time. Come on. Women have lots of problems too, but face it - 2 in 5 women get abused - who do you think's doing it? Not other women. Men have a responsibility to do better, not whine about how they want their brutal 'king of the castle' birthright back, and if you don't do it yourself you've heard other men talk like it. Do you say anything to them? Instead of being offended by those women trying to take back some of their power, we should be supporting them. Guys who winge away feeling threatened by women make me ill. Women wanting equality doesn't threaten you in any way, and strong free women who speak their minds make damn fine lovers :-D


I would question the stats and what constitutes abuse. Also, domestic abuse happens in a dynamic situation of which the woman is a part. The kinds of institutions that create stats like these actually operate from an antiquated viewpoint, one that sees women as perpetual victims. Of course some are, but not 40%!

I've got to tell you Crap. I think on this one, you're dead wrong. Women can be every bit as nasty and power hungry as men. We're not the meeker sex or the sweeter sex. And the moral problems aren't all due to male oppression or living in a patriarchy, or whatever.

You had better contend with that aspect of our personalities, just as we have to contend with that aspect of your's. Support us to be independant? Hell. The education system is churning out more female than male grads. Get a grip, man. Do you want to end up like a male angler fish, who after mating shrinks down to the size of his sex organ and is absorbed into the body of the female? For every man who is a complete pig, there's a woman who can match him, it just manifests in a different way.

If you want to support us, avoid putting us on a pedestal.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Spouse with "Consumerist" syndrome

Unread postby sameu » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 13:39:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('diogenes', '
')Two in five women get abused. If this statistic is accurate, perhaps their selection of mates is flawed. I've certainly never abused a woman. I have many friends who haven't, either. Oddly enough, most of my friends remain bachelors well past the stereotypical age. Several have never even had girlfriends: and why? They're educated, stable individuals. They're simply not "exciting."



héhé same here
I know a lot of guys like that, intelligent, smart, funny, good job and or good education
yet they are all single having trouble to find a mate

and yes this frustates me
because in a normal logical world these would be considered to be the supreme examples and they would be lining up for guys like these
User avatar
sameu
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu 18 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Belgium, Europe
Top

Re: Spouse with "Consumerist" syndrome

Unread postby entropyfails » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 16:06:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('diogenes', '
') I have never tasted alcohol; I am not a person who goes to parties; I have never ingested any drug. Yet these "activists," many of whom had never done research or even thought logically about their accusations, were perfectly willing to yell slogans at all non-participant male passersby.


I think you need a new nickname. *grin* My favorite story about Diogenes is where he hangs out in front of a brothel and screams "You are a sinner! You are evil and degenerate!" to all of the men going into it until they gave him money to shut him up. Then he took the money and went in the whore house! *laugh*

As for this topic, perhaps try some marriage counseling? If you think Peak Oil will hurt that badly, you’ll need all the long term emotional support you can get. If you walked the isle and said “I do” then act like you meant it and fix the relationship with the love of your life. You may not have time to “shop around.”
EntropyFails
"Little prigs and three-quarter madmen may have the conceit that the laws of nature are constantly broken for their sakes." -- Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
entropyfails
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 565
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Spouse with "Consumerist" syndrome

Unread postby diogenes » Sat 11 Feb 2006, 16:46:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('entropyfails', 'I') think you need a new nickname. *grin* My favorite story about Diogenes is where he hangs out in front of a brothel and screams "You are a sinner! You are evil and degenerate!" to all of the men going into it until they gave him money to shut him up. Then he took the money and went in the whore house! *laugh*

We all have our weaknesses. :lol:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('crapattack', 'S')ounds to me that you're just bitter you can't get a date.

This old ad hominem again. I have not complained about not getting a date--I was discussing a mate. There is a difference.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('crapattack', 'W')as this Florence Holway's fault?

And an anecdote of a horrible crime. Look, there was a woman who strapped her children into a car and drove it into a lake. In Scandinavia a woman was recently prosecuted for raping a man. There are horrible people of both genders. The gender as a whole is not responsible for them.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('crapattack', 'A')nd btw, take it from me, you have no idea how your friends treat their women, only they and the women do.

One of my biggest annoyances with our society is the failure of close friendship. I have known everyone I count as a "friend" for at least ten years. Several of us grew up together. I see them at least three or four times a week. I know my friends well--which is, perhaps, unusual today.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('crapattack', 'T')ake back the Night marches aren't about YOU. They are about many women feeling unsafe, and feel they have to stay in their houses after dark 364 days of the year.
Did you go to an American university? When I was there, I saw women going out every week-end to parties. I saw them shopping after dark, at restaurants after dark, at night classes after dark. A few times, I walked a girl home from a late class because she felt unsafe--or because she was flirting with me, which?--but I assure you, women are out as much as men. Interesting that someone who knew me asked me to walk her home, and that those who didn't assumed that I was a part of some amorphous and poorly defined "threat" and shouted rather unpleasant slogans at me as I passed.

Regarding the "benefits of the Patriarchy" comment----I was being facetious. As I said, I am poor. You have somehow decided that being male is a benefit, no matter your socioeconomic background, social connections, or what-have-you. It isn't true.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('crapattack', 'H')ere we finally get to the real root of your position. You're not an 'enlightened' man, you're not a liberal. You feel threatened by women wanting a safer world to exist in. 2 in 5 of them are being abused, that means 2 in 5 men are abusing (or a bit less due to repeaters) and you still think that woman are supposed to just know you're a good guy. Women have a right to judge for themselves who is safe.

The ideologies of feminism have their problems but in their day they brought about massive freedoms that all North American women take for granted today - they have been 'helped' by it, and what institutions have been harmed? Our entire capitalistic system and consumerist society was not created by feminism. As far as I can see, your post has nothing to do with consumerism or Longsword's wife, and my original point was in response to BlisteredWhippet's post.
It's interesting that you equate "enlightenment" with being a "liberal." Anyone willing to label themselves a liberal or a conservative is ignorant. Neither political position addresses the fundamental problems with our society. I believe that our social problems stem from a society which has been strongly affected by consumer capitalist pseudomorality. Certainly, under traditional systems, there were constraints upon women, but there were also more constraints upon men. We have purposefully been convinced, as a society, that "freedom" involves doing whatever we like, free of the opinion of others--which is ridiculous, given that humans are social creatures. We aren't to judge paraphilia, we aren't to judge addictions, we aren't to judge poor life decisions----judging has become the only activity we can condemn. Unless, of course, the person might be guilty of not being aligned with us politically: that, we can judge.

Really, though, this is a moot point. Individual "freedom," in the modern sense, is completely dependent upon a lifestyle fueled by petroleum products. If the pessimistic views of peak oil scenarios are correct, a far more traditional society will have arisen within two generations. Even if we simply enter a period of economic depression, which seems inevitable, you will see a great deal of retrenchment. Consider the Great Depression following the "roaring Twenties."
diogenes
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Spouse with "Consumerist" syndrome

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Sun 12 Feb 2006, 02:04:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('crapattack', 'N')ot to pick on just one part of the post, but

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') think because of this erroneous social "training" in egalitarian mating strategies, "enlightened" men today are less composed. Taught to be open, empathetic, understanding, and compassionate...


Hmmm. If men are so "enlightened", why this?

http://www.aidv-usa.com/Statistics.htm


Specifically, I'm referring to men who are egalitarian, in other words, treat women with the same standards they treat men, in the spirit of "equality". This backfires because "equality" is a myth.

RE: domestic violence. Here's a touchy subject. The studies I have seen indicate that far more often it is the women that commit domestic violence. Surprising? Consider the lay term "henpecked husband". How many women are in jail for beating on their husbands? Do husbands report this crime? Not many and not usually.

In my own experience through observation, some women put themselves in the position of inviting physical confrontation. Consider this difference between male and female gender roles: Go and get in someones face and berate them. When they tell you to go away, stay and continue to berate them.

Now the difference: any man will tell you that when another man steps inside his comfort zone and starts screaming, yelling, and making threatening gestures, and does not heed warnings to back off, physical violence (grappling, pushing hitting- whatever) is the rule, not the exception.

If a woman exhibits the same behavior, and the man treats her with "equality", he is promptly thrown in jail and persecuted. There is clear evidence of bias against men in these cases, and for the society of men at large, guilt is often assumed and more or less expected. Men are seen as violent as a general class of people exhibiting or being capable of the behavior. Guilt by association- the woman that wraps her coat around her and walks faster when you're walking ten steps behind on a dark street at 12 am. Then, when she finally gets home, she turns on Oprah or America's Most Wanted or Discover and gets terrorized by a endless lineup of male thugs who rape for fun, duplicitous murdering husbands, Grandfathers who keep rape dungeons in the basement, etc. etc...

Under the law, just the threat of violence perceived is assault. Actually touching someone makes that Assault & Battery. "Domestic Violence" poster children are black and blue. The majority are actually just "threatened".

Does domestic violence happen: yes. Is it overreported as male on female violence: yes. Do "assaults" most often include physical violence: no.

I could go on, but I won't, its not my area of expertise. I have never witnessed a male committing violence on a female. I have seen male on male violence, and female on male violence, and male on children violence. I have also known plenty of women for whom seeking out violent responses is a great way of getting attention, negative or otherwise.

Male gender violence concept: Don't go picking fights. Female equivalent: There is no female equivalent.

I think it's because of this:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')ove is pure biologcial warfare. My advice to all men is: be a caveman. Do not expect anything from women. Be prepared to walk out as soon as she fails or refuses to live up to your standards. There are other, better fish in the sea.


Just who are the sharks exactly? I don't see "shelters for physically abused men" appearing anywhere.


And you won't because female on male violence is under-reported. There is cultural stigma against it, and moreso than that is the litany of social programming that men get growing up (with no female equivalent) such as: don't be a snitch, have some pride, stick up for yourself, don't dishonor yourself, don't appeal to a higher authority, don't take crap from anyone. A "battered" husband won't go to the cops unless she's "Fatal Attraction", toting a gun or something.

Secondly, I don't like blaming the victim, and yet, if a man is battered in a relationship, no one hesitates to say to him, "Yeah, well, if you stuck around, you deserved it." In fact- you would say he's stupid. How un-P.C. is it to say a battered woman is just plain stupid for not being able to avoid her situation? Again, a double standard that refutes "equality".

The idea of going into a battered women's shelter and saying, "Hey, ladies... uh, didn't you see the warning signs when you married that troglodyte? Perhaps it was the way his knuckles scraped the floor when he staggered around high on methamphetamines and Jack Daniels...." is preposterous. More than a few examples I've seen indicate to me that this aggressive B.S. is exactly what attracted them in the first place. So can I explain that site? Yeah... these women need some profound help in the self-respect and "smarts" departments, and they need to get counseling from somewhere.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '(')Women are)Told (trained) that men "control" everything- that this is a "patriarchal" society? (Even though over half of U.S. wealth is controlled by women, over half of executive positions held by women)

ummm, not exactly

I don't keep a scrapbook of all the studies I've read. But I did work for the department of commerce on the 2000 census... and don't get me started on that.... :roll:

I will say this: I have never worked anywhere where there was discrimination. Nada.

On those statistics: these are loose numbers. The discrepancies in the median are easily adjusted when you consider the type of work men do and the type of work women do. When both work equally hard they both get paid the same. But if a woman has a child, it forces that median down because she's out of the workforce for that amount of time. A man does not have kids. Secondly, men work more unpleasant or physically demanding or dangerous jobs. How many women work shrimp boats in the Bering Sea? Again forcing the median downward. I'm sure you can find your own examples.

If there is widespread wage discrimination going on, its totally eluded me. I know plenty of women making more than many men I know. As far as dishwashing goes... well... thats quite a physical job. The stronger you are, the more stamina you have, the longer, and faster you work, you get paid more.

On the subject of strength.... most women I know have none. They say they have "strength" but start shivering if the thermostat drops below 60 degrees. Far be it from me to interpret these numbers but... if I was a woman I'd probably want to work in an air-conditioned office where the heaviest thing I would have to pick up is the stapler. These broad statistics don't indicate discrimination, it indicates that the type of work males and females perform is different.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he starkest illustration is to compare the median earnings of men and women (1) in the highest paid occupation for men and women — physicians and surgeons — for those aged 35 to 54 with the highest level of education (a Bachelor’s degree or more), and (2) in one of the lowest paid occupations for each — Dishwashers — for those aged 35 to 54 with the lowest level of education (less than a high school education). Overall, female year-round, full-time workers have median earnings of $28,000, 74 percent of comparable male median earnings. For Physicians and surgeons aged 35 to 54 with a Bachelor’s degree or more, this ratio is 69 percent; for Dishwashers aged 35 to 54 with less than a high school education, this ratio is 87 percent. Thus, after taking account of age, education, and occupation, some differentials remain, though they are reduced somewhat in some occupations.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n 2002, 84 percent of adults aged 25 and over had completed high
school or more, and 27 percent had completed a bachelor’s degree or more (see Figure 4). While the high school completion rates for men and women aged 25 and over were both 84 percent, men were more likely than women to have completed a bachelor’s degree or more (29 percent compared with 25 percent). However, women were more likely than men to have some college or to have completed an associate’s degree (26 percent compared with 24 percent).


There was a recent article in the NY Times and carried on the AP newswires that commented on women surpassing men in college admissions- newer statistics than these 2002 stats.

The article reported that for many women, the careers that they chose were not careers they thought they would have in 10 years time- by then they would be comfortably married and raising children, whereas you would be hard pressed to find a man proposing an ambition to stay home with the kids. Again, "equality" takes a hit.

and ...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')omen and men are not equally represented in all professions. In March 2002, 60 percent of women and 74 percent of men were in the labor force,7 but the proportions of men and women working in certain occupations differed greatly.

Equality takes a hit...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ver half of men 16 and over (59 percent) worked in four occupational groups: precision production, craft, and repair (18 percent); executive, administrators, and managerial (16 percent); professional specialty (14 percent); and sales (11 percent). Among women in the same age group, 73 percent also worked in four occupational groups: administrative support, including clerical (23 percent); professional specialty (19 percent); service workers (except private household, 17 percent); and executive, administrators, and managerial (15 percent).

Just like I said, extrapolate the 2002 data to 2006 following the progression. Women now outnumber men in executive positions. The concept of this being a "man's world" is completely undermined. Hillary Clinton could be the next president. Condie Rice was warmonger-in-chief and she's the third highest ranking public official.

Women are literate, educated,and empowered. There is no glass ceiling anymore unless your ambition is to play for the Pittsburgh Steelers.

What I see is that women have adopted all the masculine postures that grant them power in social and personal spheres and treat classic feminist political positions as irrelevant or anathema! Take abortion rights: 30 years after NOW and Roe vs. Wade, the camps are split so evenly there is worry that abortion rights will be overturned. Why? Because one group of women (that want power over reproduction) are allayed against another group of women (that want power to choose when they reproduce). There is no rational understanding between these two groups. Young women I talk to frame the debate in the most radically illogical, emotional, and contradictory terms that can be imagined, and completely disconnected from any political or historical awareness.

Some might blame it on Barbie but I say f**k that. I think the schools, the parents, and the media are to blame, but mostly the parents, since only they can really control all the variables. But where are the parents?

Kids today are just ornamental, like the family dog. Their existances are not product of some spiritually-enhanced life tradition, they exist because they filled a void- a self-indulgence- deemed by their parents as a "non-negotiable" part of a picture of a "fulfilling" life. Who painted that picture? The Media? Religion? Society at large?

Most people have no f**king clue how to raise children, and most people simply don't raise their children. If most people aren't independent critical thinkers, how can you expect them to raise independent critical thinkers? Where else are they going to learn these skills?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
') Even though women have made progress in entering occupations predominantly held by men (especially executive and professional specialty occupations), the majority of women were still in traditional “female” occupations.9 For example, of the 18 million people in administrative support occupations (including clerical), air conditioning 79 percent were women. In contrast, 91 percent of the 14 million people in precision production, craft, and repair occupations were men. outsourcable positions

Look, I have no doubt that there is massive shifts going on in gender spheres right now that are currently and will have major psychological and sociological consequences. But I think the fact is, since 1969, "Baby's" come a long way. Only now, they're running a boardroom. They've burned the old bra and got a new one. And they could give a rip about politics.

I think it would be interesting to raise a generation of Americans and train them in civics, logic, and self-respect instead of a bunch of watered down bullcrap and then see what the world looked like.
Last edited by BlisteredWhippet on Mon 13 Feb 2006, 17:55:57, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Spouse with "Consumerist" syndrome

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 13 Feb 2006, 16:21:49

This is a great thread. Threadbear, your candor about women is helpful and it seems to come from a tough-love standpoint. Bravo. Blisteredwhippet, sometimes I scroll past your lengthy posts, but not here. Riveting posts, you're on fire when it comes to this subject. Well done. Now for Diogenes, (the ancient one), he was written about more than just about anyone in the ancient world. People pondered his life and message which was very unusual.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('entropyfails', '
')My favorite story about Diogenes is where he hangs out in front of a brothel and screams "You are a sinner! You are evil and degenerate!" to all of the men going into it until they gave him money to shut him up. Then he took the money and went in the whore house! *laugh*
Diogenes reminds me of R. Crumb's Mr. Natural:
ImageImage
ImageImage
Image
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Consumerist spouse, or “Help me, I’ve created a monster!

Unread postby ubercynicmeister » Mon 13 Feb 2006, 19:56:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('crapattack', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Mostly, though I know a few lesbians who like 'em. Mind you: they hate men and draw everyone's attention to the fact at every occasion.

Yet: they dress like men; Don't wash (themselves, and BOY do they reek!), they smoke (more than most men); drive huge vehicles (like men); swear like men, have more tattooes than men,...


These are only the lesbos you see. There are lesbos who infiltrate the masses and 'pretend' to be normal, but really their mission is to force men into economic ruin by buying things. They figure they can get back at men for having dicks by runining them financially and taking the profits. With the profits they will harvest the 'man seed' and fertise themselves, buy larger trucks, and continue the cycle of world global domination.


LOL, I got the joke, but I dunno how many others did. In any case, this is a whole lot less of a joke than you think: the girls get a guy drunk, have sex with him, get pregnant and then dump him...until it comes time for the money, then the lesbian(s) get a good lawyer and he ends up paying for a kid he didn't even know he'd fathered! But I'm sure you'll support the right of the feminazi's to do that.

In Australia, it's not well know, but if you agree to be a sperm donor, there is now legal precedent for you to be "sued" for child support for the rest of the kid's "childhood" (ie : up to 18) if you;re in Europe that Child Support can last until the child is in his 40's! Think it "won';t happen here"? Think again.
.
"To Get Rich you have to:

*Get up early;

*Work Hard;

*Strike Oil"

J Paul Getty
User avatar
ubercynicmeister
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun 25 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia
Top

Re: Consumerist spouse, or “Help me, I’ve created a monster!

Unread postby LadyRuby » Mon 13 Feb 2006, 23:25:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrairieMule', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Shannymara', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LadyRuby', 'T')he fact that she's turned around so dramatically on the notion of having kids is worrisome.

That in itself doesn't worry or surprise me at all. The biological drive to have children that kicks in during our 30s is incredibly powerful. It's pretty much irresistible and a totally natural thing.


Shannymara is not fooling around about the biological drive of a woman in their 30's. It's a powerful force of nature and brother you better respect it. Remember how bad you wanted your driver's lisc when you turned 16, well it's like that. Thus you are expected and duty bound to empathize, understand, and procreate-right now Chop!Chop!


Yeah, on second thought you're right, a lot of it must be biology at work!!!
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US
Top

Re: Spouse with "Consumerist" syndrome

Unread postby crapattack » Tue 14 Feb 2006, 00:35:58

diogenes
ubercynicmeister
PenultimateManStanding
Blisstered Whippet

Hmm. I seemed to have touched on some things and obviously you guys have some cherished beliefs there. Whatever, I don't really care to be the only one supporting women's rights on this thread -- strangely, including the women -- Sounds like alot of you guys are feeling victimized by women , think they are some kinda manipulating hell-spawn who just want your money and your seed, when in fact they're people, just like us - but the funniest was Blistered Whippets comment,

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')E: domestic violence. Here's a touchy subject. The studies I have seen indicate that far more often it is the women that commit domestic violence.


What studies? Really? Who were they conducted by? I just find it hard to picture. Honestly. Most men are bigger and stronger than women. I just don't see this. The odd women taking a small man here or there, but really, most of the time it's no contest unless she's had some sort of special training. I hate to say it but without some training there's very few women who could take me unarmed, or even put me in the hospital, it's not ego, it's just a fact. I happen to be pretty big and I've done some martial arts - but most men can hold their own against most women without training. Unless they build women alot bigger from where you guys are from. If a woman is screaming at me and is all up in my face, I just choose to walk away, timeout. Some guys obviously don't. That's a problem. It's about choices.

http://www.ncadv.org/resources/Statistics_170.html

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 't')he girls get a guy drunk, have sex with him, get pregnant and then dump him...until it comes time for the money, then the lesbian(s) get a good lawyer and he ends up paying for a kid he didn't even know he'd fathered! But I'm sure you'll support the right of the feminazi's to do that.


Hey, guys have been getting women drunk, fucking them, impregnating them, and leaving them to raise the kids for years. Or marrying them young, getting her to push out the kids, and when she gets old leaving her for something young and bendy. Payback is a bitch ain't it?

As for women being out at night, most often you will see them in groups. This is for safetly. Da. There are 2 reasons why a chick asks you to walk her home -- either she is coming on to you, or for safety. DA! Clue in yet? Trouble is most women don't realize that if there's going to be an attack it's most likely the guy they know. Anyway, have you given any thought to why they have 'take back the night marches', I mean what do you think they are doing there diogenes? picking on you personally?

Look, this original thread was Longsword and his wife's shopping problem. BlisteredWhippet made a few comments I felt compelled to address and now the thread is quickly going off topic.

We can take this to hall of flames if you want, but personally I'm kinda bored by all this mysogynist and victim based talk. Personally, I don't much care if you believe that or not, but men aren't victimized by women. There have been some improvements but I can see plenty of evidence that women are still victimized by men.
"Ninety percent of everything is crap."
-Theodore Sturgeon

Stay low and run in a random pattern.

List of Civilian Nuclear Accidents
User avatar
crapattack
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat 03 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest