Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Geko45 » Fri 18 May 2007, 21:59:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Omnitir', 'O')f course PO is a car issue. Our cars consume the bulk of oil. All the associated problems only exist because of cars. Cars are the root of all evil.

The ignorance of this statement is so profound that I am at a loss for words. Reach out from where you are sitting and grab something. Is it made of plastic? What country was it made in? China? Do you think it crosed the ocean in a car? Look at the food in yor fridge. How was it planted? How was it harvested? How was it brought to your local grocery store? Do you have a light on? How do they maintain the electric grid?
Geko45 - Producer of Doomer Porn
User avatar
Geko45
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Omnitir » Sat 19 May 2007, 02:44:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Geko45', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Omnitir', 'O')f course PO is a car issue. Our cars consume the bulk of oil. All the associated problems only exist because of cars. Cars are the root of all evil.

The ignorance of this statement is so profound that I am at a loss for words. Reach out from where you are sitting and grab something. Is it made of plastic? What country was it made in? China? Do you think it crosed the ocean in a car? Look at the food in yor fridge. How was it planted? How was it harvested? How was it brought to your local grocery store? Do you have a light on? How do they maintain the electric grid?

And likewise, your statement is so ignorant and based on the standard doom hyperbole that I am at a loss.

Yes, oil is a part of everything. But how much? You point at all these small things and say "Look, they are made of oil!", but you don't consider the percentages. You think all those little things together consume even a fraction of the oil that cars consume? If so, you'd be wrong.

Again I ask you: theoretically, if suddenly every single car in the world was abandoned and every driver started bicycling around, would you honestly argue that PO would still be such a big issue?

The internal combustion engine in general, and the private automobile in particular, is responsible for the vast majority of our oil consumption. All the other things, our food, even shipping goods from the other side of the planet, make up only a small fraction of oil consumption.

Unfortunatly we aren't giving up cars easily. And so the smaller percentage of oil use, all the things that are more important than zipping around in a social statement, are the things that may decline with peak oil. But make no mistake about it, cars are the reason why.

Regardless of how integrated oil is into our daily lives, cars are still responsible for consuming the vast bulk of oil, and cars are reason peak oil is going to bite. Peak oil is a car issue. Not because cars are the only thing that will be effected by it (they are not), but because cars are responsible for it. Open your eyes and view cars for what they really are: the most destructive and limiting technology ever that has grown like a cancer across the developed world and now look poised to chock the developed world to death. What the hell were we thinking?
"Mother Nature is a psychopathic bitch, and she is out to get you. You have to adapt, change or die." - Tihamer Toth-Fejel, nanotech researcher/engineer.
User avatar
Omnitir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Down Under

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Ender » Sat 19 May 2007, 03:43:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Geko45', '
')Reach out from where you are sitting and grab something. Is it made of plastic? What country was it made in? China? Do you think it crosed the ocean in a car? Look at the food in yor fridge. How was it planted? How was it harvested? How was it brought to your local grocery store? Do you have a light on? How do they maintain the electric grid?


But then we need to consider other things. I see some of the plastic items on my desk (not all of which were made in China, by the way), and consider how many of them I could do without - and how minimal the effect on my quality of life would really be if I were to do without them.

The ships that cross the oceans consume a lot less oil for the amount of product they move than other means of transportation. Sure, heavier bulky products will increasingly become expensive or tend to be made closer to where they're consumed. We'll probably also see more nuclear powered ships or even a return to coal-fired steamboats and sails (at least as a secondary source of propulsion).

Bear in mind we are not going to wake up on the day after oil has peaked and discover there is no more oil (we know that because on all the evidence, that day isn't coming any more - look behind you). There will just be less of it - and that means the most prolific and least justified uses of it will have to be curtailed. Someone, somewhere will be pumping oil out of the ground a hundred years from now, and ships will still cross the oceans a hundred years from now.

As for the food in my fridge, most of it was produced within a 300km radius of here - the fruit and vegetables would come mostly from around werribee (except the oranges - at this time of year they come from California, and I'm going to miss them when it's too expensive to ship them here, and the bananas, which are from North Queensland). The grain-based foods would be mostly Australian wheat (much of it grown in the Mallee/Wimmera), the milk would come from Gippsland or the Western District, the canned fruit from the Goulburn Valley (except the tomatoes, they come from Italy, but there are Australian ones available at a similar price, which come to think of it I should start buying more often - they're just as nice).
User avatar
Ender
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri 21 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Omnitir » Sat 19 May 2007, 05:29:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ender', '
')The ships that cross the oceans consume a lot less oil for the amount of product they move than other means of transportation.

Yes. It's a common and great misunderstanding in the PO community that shipping is going to greatly suffer post peak due to expensive fuel. The fact is, fuel costs actually make up only a tiny fraction of the operational costs of intercontinental shipping. Shipping cheap goods from China is not an issue. Consumers being able to afford them in the first place may be much more of an issue.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Sure, heavier bulky products will increasingly become expensive or tend to be made closer to where they're consumed. We'll probably also see more nuclear powered ships or even a return to coal-fired steamboats and sails (at least as a secondary source of propulsion).

Sorry, but I disagree. Upon researching shipping operations, I found that the cost of marine diesel is of minimal concern in shipping goods intercontinental. By the time oil is so expensive as to become a concern in shipping operations, the rest of the world will be bankrupt already. I believe that shipping will be one of the last fronts of globalisation to suffer.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')As for the food in my fridge, most of it was produced within a 300km radius of here.

And not only is much of our food in our fair land produced reasonably locally, much of it is transported via rail. Oil is unlikely to be an issue for our food supply here. Unfortunately, the severe water shortage, and the occasional tropical cyclone, do have big impacts on the cost of food. Have you noticed the price of food lately? It's ridiculous. Our food is getting almost as expensive as it is in the rest of the world! Well, almost.
"Mother Nature is a psychopathic bitch, and she is out to get you. You have to adapt, change or die." - Tihamer Toth-Fejel, nanotech researcher/engineer.
User avatar
Omnitir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Down Under
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Judgie » Sat 19 May 2007, 08:16:52

Food for thought.

Your average container vessel or bulk carrier has an engine, usually a two-stroke diesel of inline configuration, with anywhere between 6 and 14 cylinders making anywhere from 20,000 up 108,000 brake horsepower (usually at a continuous output with the propeller pitch being used to control speed). The Sulzer-Wartsila RTA-96C is the best example I can think of, with the 14 cylinder version being the world's largest and most powerfull marine diesel. It is a continous output motor, making rated power for 100% of it's operating house, at 104rpm. I won't crap on about the details though, you'll find them here (for the 12 cylinder version):
http://people.bath.ac.uk/ccsshb/12cyl/

The largest model consumes 1660 g/ph or 1 Escalade's (26 gallon tank) worth of heavy diesel oil every minute. In 24 hour's, you'd burn 39.840 gallons or 1532 escalade tank's worth every day. That's apparently at maximum efficiency. There are currently 84 of these engines in service across the world, predominantly of 8 through to 12 cylinder configurations. For kick's, let's say If they were all 14 cylinder versions as above and just 40 were in operation at any given time, you're looking at 1.5 million gallons approx. 57692 Escallade's worth of heavy fuel oil being consumed per day. Scary, isn't it?

Edit:
2 week trip from West-Oz LNG terminal (Port Hedland) to Japan, assuming the South China Sea pirates don't get you :D, approx: 21448 Escalades :D
Judgie
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Mon 07 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Omnitir » Sat 19 May 2007, 10:44:50

Some more food for thought - the kind that doom sayer's don't want you to think about. :twisted:

Yes, it may take a huge amount of fuel to produce the huge amount of power to send a ship around the globe. But it arrives with a huge cargo. ;)

Regardless of the large numbers in powering a ship, the fuel prices for long distance shipping are only a fraction of the retail price of the end product.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Reality', 'S')hipping is by far the most energy efficient method of moving goods around. Careful analysis has found that a long-haul truck uses between 0.7 to 1.2 megajoules per tonne-kilometre , while a train hauling a load of freight wagons consumes around 0.6 megajoules per tonne-kilometre. A fairly fast ship carrying around 25,000 tonnes of cargo at 18.5 knots uses only 0.12 megajoules per tonne-kilometre
Source

0.12 megajoules per tonne-kilometre by ship. Compared to about 1 megajoule per tonne-kilometre for each of the vast number of trucks (a figure which is underestimated by most standards), never mind all the cars in the world which average something like 4 megajoules per tonne-kilometre, the oil consumption of shipping really is just a tiny drop in the ocean.

Using the figures from that site, ship fuel accounts for about 0.4% of the cost of the retail product. Shipping is the least of our worries on high oil costs.
"Mother Nature is a psychopathic bitch, and she is out to get you. You have to adapt, change or die." - Tihamer Toth-Fejel, nanotech researcher/engineer.
User avatar
Omnitir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Down Under
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby thuja » Sat 19 May 2007, 12:13:51

Listen my friends Ender and Omnitir, I am less doomer than many on this site but you have to look at things historically. In 1973, an OPEC oil embargo went into effect. Prices of gasoline quadrupled, rising from just 25 cents to over a dollar in just a few months. The American Automobile Association recorded that up to twenty percent of the country’s gas stations had no fuel one week during the crisis. In some places drivers were forced to wait in line for two to three hours to get gas.

Now this took placed after one embargo taking oplace between 73-74. The embargo led to a series of recessions and massive inflation that were not fully damped down until the 80's. All costs went up during that time- oil, manufactured goods, food...just check out a history book...

Now that was one embargo affecting a small percentage of oil imports. Now imagine when oil depletion happens at a very conservative rate of 2-3% a year. The first couple years will seem like the 73 embargo---but after that? Dramatic and overwhelming problems.

Omnitir- your solution is that everyone abandon their car? Did that happen in the 70's? Just look to history to see what is likely to happen...

And then extrapolate what will happen when depletion continues on beyond the small percentage that was taken off the market in '73.
User avatar
thuja
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sat 15 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Geko45 » Sat 19 May 2007, 18:15:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', 'A')nd then extrapolate what will happen when depletion continues on beyond the small percentage that was taken off the market in '73.

I already proposed this argument using the 1981 oil shock from the Iran / Iraq war as an example. This shock was the steepest in terms of oil supply lost (if not in crude prices). What Ender and Omnitir fail to grasp is the cumulative effect of energy use in the economy. They calculate the cost of oil for one industry and conclude that the percentage is small therefore there won't be a significant problem. What they don't realize is that all costs are really energy costs in disguise. Labor, raw materials, everything.

So, the cost of fuel in shipping is actually quite small, but what about the oil used to get the cargo to the ship and from the ship to its destination? The oil used by the workers loading the cargo? What about the oil used to transport the workers to the ship yard during construction? What about the oil used to mine and smelt the ore to build the ship? The transport usage of the mine and steel workers? The oil used to raise and deliver the food for all these workers? To build their housing?

When it comes right down to it, every expenditure is really an energy expenditure (even if disguised by several layers of transactions). The dollar itself represents an amount of energy that you are entitled to use and oil represents a substantial amount of total energy available.
Geko45 - Producer of Doomer Porn
User avatar
Geko45
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Houston, TX
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Geko45 » Sat 19 May 2007, 18:29:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ender', 'A')s for the food in my fridge, most of it was produced within a 300km radius of here

If that is true then you are the exception not the rule. Plus, it is not the radius that is most important, but the distance traveled before it gets to your plate. I suspect that would be a substantially larger number.
Geko45 - Producer of Doomer Porn
User avatar
Geko45
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Houston, TX
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Geko45 » Sat 19 May 2007, 18:35:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Omnitir', 'A')gain I ask you: theoretically, if suddenly every single car in the world was abandoned and every driver started bicycling around, would you honestly argue that PO would still be such a big issue?

Despite the ludicrous fantasy of people biking around given today's urban structure, yes Peak Oil would still be a problem. All you would accomplish is to shift the usage around, you would not get rid of it.
Geko45 - Producer of Doomer Porn
User avatar
Geko45
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Houston, TX
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby roccman » Sat 19 May 2007, 19:25:58

User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Omnitir » Sat 19 May 2007, 21:16:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Geko45', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Omnitir', 'A')gain I ask you: theoretically, if suddenly every single car in the world was abandoned and every driver started bicycling around, would you honestly argue that PO would still be such a big issue?

Despite the ludicrous fantasy of people biking around given today's urban structure, yes Peak Oil would still be a problem. All you would accomplish is to shift the usage around, you would not get rid of it.

Well first of, it was a theoretical argument to get you to think about oil use. However, bicycling in today's urban structure is hardly ludicrous. Millions do it every day, including myself. You would be surprised the distance that can be covered in only an hour on the bike, once you are a fit and competent cyclist. Though cycling would look ludicrous to anyone married to their car. Just like easting healthy looks crazy to people with a steady junk food diet.

But back to oil use. 2/3 of oil demand in the US is for transport. The US consumes about 20 million barrels per day. So you are honestly arguing that if the US could suddenly cut around 13.5 million barrels per day from it's usage, along with the rest of the world doing a similar usage cut, that there would still be a major problem? What, is the US suddenly going to start producing an extra 13.5 million bbd worth of plastic bottles or something?

Now I must again point out that this is hypothetical. My argument is that cars are indeed the issue here. I'm not saying that cars are the only thing that will be effected by skyrocketing oil prices, but I am saying, that as consumer of by far the largest piece of the oil pie, cars are the number one culprit for any oil related energy crisis. Anyone that argues otherwise must be blinded by their car's headlights, sorry to say.

I suspect that the biggest doomers of all are those that struggle to imagine life without a car. The idea of cycling for a few hours a day must sound like torture to some people. I also suspect that optimists may tend to be people that have learnt to see through the lies of the automobile, and dream of a world without car culture.
"Mother Nature is a psychopathic bitch, and she is out to get you. You have to adapt, change or die." - Tihamer Toth-Fejel, nanotech researcher/engineer.
User avatar
Omnitir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Down Under
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Omnitir » Sat 19 May 2007, 21:44:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Geko45', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ender', 'A')s for the food in my fridge, most of it was produced within a 300km radius of here

If that is true then you are the exception not the rule. Plus, it is not the radius that is most important, but the distance traveled before it gets to your plate. I suspect that would be a substantially larger number.

Nope, just not American. And I would argue that what is important is the method of transport - the total energy used. In some cases foods in Australia do travel thousands of kilometres, but they do so by rail or ship, which are both far more efficient than the trucking produce on the highways.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Geko45', 'T')he dollar itself represents an amount of energy that you are entitled to use and oil represents a substantial amount of total energy available.
Yes, oil represents a substantial amount of total energy currentlyavailable, however it also represents the ideal energy source for our needs. Two thirds of that energy in the US is used just for transport. We use oil because we need a liquid fuel, so it’s ideal. The argument that oil comes into every aspect is flawed. Its energy that comes into every aspect, but clearly oil is primarily used in the transport sector. If we developed a way to transport with less oil (by using other energy sources to transport, even if one of those sources is human muscle), then we alleviate the problem.

While energy is everything, oil is not, oil is almost entirely about transport. Peak oil is primarily a transport issue. We are only making it a more encompassing issue by refusing to budge on our love affair with the blasted automobile.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', ' ')The American Automobile Association recorded that up to twenty percent of the country’s gas stations had no fuel one week during the crisis. In some places drivers were forced to wait in line for two to three hours to get gas.

That was a very different situation to the global peak. A more realistic scenario to expect is that as oil prices gradually rise, gasoline prices will also gradually rise. Unless it’s a completely unexpected an sudden even, such as the 70’s oil shocks, the economy should function to balance gasoline supplies. No service station should ever run out of gas – if they run out, it means they are selling it far too cheaply.

Most likely, the problem won’t be supply shortages, but skyrocketing prices in order to balance supply/demand. That’s how the economics of limited resources works and gasoline should be no different.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', ' ')
Omnitir- your solution is that everyone abandon their car? Did that happen in the 70's? Just look to history to see what is likely to happen...

And then extrapolate what will happen when depletion continues on beyond the small percentage that was taken off the market in '73.
That would be my solution – everyone should have abandoned their car a long time ago. However, I have no illusions about it actually happening. People are addicted to their cars like a hard drug. They won’t give them up without kicking and screaming. My arguments are simply to point out that cars are responsible for all the evil in the world! :twisted:

But I don’t agree with you about global peak looking anything like US domestic peak. This is a lengthy topic, but one point is gasoline rationing – should never happen. The should be plenty of gas in the stations, it’s just that it will be unaffordable by most people.

The lard-asses are gonna be in a world of hurt as they try to figure out how to get around without their truck.
"Mother Nature is a psychopathic bitch, and she is out to get you. You have to adapt, change or die." - Tihamer Toth-Fejel, nanotech researcher/engineer.
User avatar
Omnitir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Down Under
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Judgie » Sat 19 May 2007, 21:54:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Omnitir', 'S')ome more food for thought - the kind that doom sayer's don't want you to think about. :twisted:

Yes, it may take a huge amount of fuel to produce the huge amount of power to send a ship around the globe. But it arrives with a huge cargo. ;)

Regardless of the large numbers in powering a ship, the fuel prices for long distance shipping are only a fraction of the retail price of the end product.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Reality', 'S')hipping is by far the most energy efficient method of moving goods around. Careful analysis has found that a long-haul truck uses between 0.7 to 1.2 megajoules per tonne-kilometre , while a train hauling a load of freight wagons consumes around 0.6 megajoules per tonne-kilometre. A fairly fast ship carrying around 25,000 tonnes of cargo at 18.5 knots uses only 0.12 megajoules per tonne-kilometre
Source

0.12 megajoules per tonne-kilometre by ship. Compared to about 1 megajoule per tonne-kilometre for each of the vast number of trucks (a figure which is underestimated by most standards), never mind all the cars in the world which average something like 4 megajoules per tonne-kilometre, the oil consumption of shipping really is just a tiny drop in the ocean.

Using the figures from that site, ship fuel accounts for about 0.4% of the cost of the retail product. Shipping is the least of our worries on high oil costs.


Well, can't argue with that :)

However i'd like to remind you that the financial aspects of shipping (profits per cargo, etc) cease to mean anything when the vessels are laid up, due to lack of fuel to actually go anywhere. There will always be the same (declining mind you as long as we use it) amount of oil available.

If you'd like to see the maritime industries' perspective on global warming and peak oil, go here, in fact the current hot topic seems to be ............ "Squeezing the bunker barrel" and "Marine Fuel Sustainability". Some of the sub-thread titles (such as:
Editor, Platts Oilgram Price Report, Platts
The rise and rise of bunker fuel prices - a statistical view of shipping's new conundrum.) are interesting too. Unfortunately, you can't actually read any of the actual material, unless you were a delegate to the bunkerworld summit, or are willing to pay $795 per annum subscription fee :(

Go here: www.bunkerworld.com
Last edited by Judgie on Sun 20 May 2007, 10:08:02, edited 4 times in total.
Judgie
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Mon 07 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Rogozhin » Sat 19 May 2007, 22:20:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'U')sing the figures from that site, ship fuel accounts for about 0.4% of the cost of the retail product. Shipping is the least of our worries on high oil costs.


The cost of harvesting wheat per bushel is a calculation I've not made yet.

Rogo
User avatar
Rogozhin
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 318
Joined: Tue 26 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Eastern Washington
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Geko45 » Sun 20 May 2007, 00:23:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Omnitir', 'T')hat was a very different situation to the global peak.

For someone that has equated global Peak Oil to the transition from rail to highways (in this very thread), you are in no position to challenge someone else's analogy.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') more realistic scenario to expect is that as oil prices gradually rise, gasoline prices will also gradually rise. Unless it’s a completely unexpected an sudden even, such as the 70’s oil shocks, the economy should function to balance gasoline supplies. No service station should ever run out of gas – if they run out, it means they are selling it far too cheaply.

It will make little difference to the economy whether people are forced to do without because it is too expensive or because it is unavailable. The net energy available as a whole will be the same which means that the economy will be forced to contract. Yes, those contractions will be more painful if they happen quickly, but now you are arguing over which level of Hell you would like to live in. Furthermore, I would like to reiterate that the economy will always return to equilibrium, but the mechanism by which that equilibrium is restored is neither reasoned nor compassionate. Demand destruction is the economic form of amputation. Here's hoping you are not on the losing end of that equation.
Geko45 - Producer of Doomer Porn
User avatar
Geko45
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Houston, TX
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Geko45 » Sun 20 May 2007, 01:15:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Omnitir', 'T')hough cycling would look ludicrous to anyone married to their car. Just like easting healthy looks crazy to people with a steady junk food diet.

Please stop lecturing us on the virtues of cycling. I know what it's like to WALK 27 miles in a single day, so bicycling is hardly unimaginable. The argument at present is what that means to our economy, not whether or not any particular individual is "married" to their car.

Your bicycle fantasy is simply unrealistic. Yes, we will be bicycling eventually, but it won't be the happy go lucky, wind in your hair, carefree experience you portray it as. You will be bicycling 30 miles each way to a job that pays below minimum wage (minimum wage having been abandoned) becasue its the only option you have left to feed your family. You won't be able to relocate closer because you will be crippled by debt. You WILL be grateful for it in a way, because the alternative will be to end up like the starving people you pass each day on the way to work.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut back to oil use. 2/3 of oil demand in the US is for transport. The US consumes about 20 million barrels per day. So you are honestly arguing that if the US could suddenly cut around 13.5 million barrels per day from it's usage, along with the rest of the world doing a similar usage cut, that there would still be a major problem? What, is the US suddenly going to start producing an extra 13.5 million bbd worth of plastic bottles or something?

Now you are just being intellectually dishonest. You know that is not what I am saying. What I am saying is that all those people and items that were transported by that 13.5 mbpd still need to be transported by some other means if the economy is to maintain status quo (and bicycles aren't going to do the job). Yes, there is room for efficiency gains, but what happens after those are consumed? Peak Oil will be a permanent phenomenon not a transient event. We have real world historical examples of what happens when 5% or more of available supply is removed from the market. Your assumption that the transition will be slow and manageable is simply wishful thinking at its worst.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he lard-asses are gonna be in a world of hurt as they try to figure out how to get around without their truck.

And now your bias and contempt are truly showing. Your argument is not based on reason, but rather on hatred for a culture that has probably excluded you in some imagined way.
Geko45 - Producer of Doomer Porn
User avatar
Geko45
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Houston, TX
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Ender » Sun 20 May 2007, 04:01:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Geko45', '
')Your bicycle fantasy is simply unrealistic. Yes, we will be bicycling eventually, but it won't be the happy go lucky, wind in your hair, carefree experience you portray it as. You will be bicycling 30 miles each way to a job that pays below minimum wage (minimum wage having been abandoned) becasue its the only option you have left


I realise you're lecturing m'learned friend rather than me, but I live six kilometres from the Melbourne CBD. If I really had to, I could walk there in just over an hour, or cycle there in half an hour. And I don't think my particular line of work is going to be an early casualty of peak oil.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Now you are just being intellectually dishonest. You know that is not what I am saying. What I am saying is that all those people and items that were transported by that 13.5 mbpd still need to be transported by some other means if the economy is to maintain


Yes. By some other means: ships, trains, smaller cars (hybrids, in due course electros), trams, buses, ferries, motorbikes, scooters, pushbikes and a smaller fleet of road trucks (running on natural gas in the medium term). As well as, of course, changed practices. Do I really need to travel those six kilometres every day? No: I could do most of the work here, where I have a computer and a telephone, if I could get into my employer's systems from here (which, currently, I can't). Does that tin of tomatoes I referred to earlier (and mention at the end of this post) really need to come from Italy, or do we have tomatoes here in this country (or could I eat less tomato and eat something else instead if I wanted or needed to?).

Large passenger cars, aircraft and truck transport will contract. Yes, it might well be bad for truck drivers, pilots, air hostesses, tourism and the like. I'm glad I don't work in any of those industries. Those who sell heavy, bulky and/or unnecessary goods that need to travel a long way to market might have to re-think their business model. I might have to go without oranges from December to May (navel oranges are in season here from June to November - the rest of the time they're imported either from Spain or from California).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Yes, there is room for efficiency gains, but what happens after those are consumed?


There will be efficiency gains in various senses: passenger cars will get smaller (ie. you Americans will be driving little Smartcars like the Europeans and Japanese have been doing for years), hybrids will proliferate, technology will advance, people will drive less. You have a very negative outlook on the ability of humanity to adjust to change. Bear in mind that our great-grandparents lived their lives through the use of virtually no oil at all. We'll have much more access to it than they did.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Peak Oil will be a permanent phenomenon not a transient event. We have real world historical examples of what happens when 5% or more of available supply is removed from the market. Your assumption that the transition will be slow and manageable is simply wishful thinking at its worst.


It was once said that by the year 2000, the streets would be knee deep in horse-shit, such would be the demand for horse-based transport. We move on. We're already a lot less oil dependent than we were at the time of the 1970's crises - oil prices trebled between about 1998 and 2001 ($10 to $30) and have practically trebled again since then (though they haven't quite touched $90 yet, I expect they will later this year).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Your argument is not based on reason, but rather on hatred for a culture that has probably excluded you in some imagined way.

No, he's simply observing that the present way of life that is prevalent especially in the Southern and Midwestern United States, and to a slightly lesser extent in the remainder of the US, and to a slightly lesser extent again in Canada, Australia and New Zealand is not sustainable.

Some people will recognise that and adjust. Others will continue to assert that cheap petrol is their right and will complain and riot and rave about how the government and the oil companies are fleecing them. Others will recount wide-eyed doomsday scenarios about how the end of the world is at hand.

I should get the popcorn ready.


(Just as an aside, I noted in the supermarket today that cans of tomatos and chickpeas seem to all come from Italy. And they're available for seventy-nine cents in the case of the tomatoes, and a dollar and fourteen cents for the chickpeas. I don't know how much of that is the cost of transporting that steel can of food from Italy to Australia, but I can't imagine it's more than a few cents. So it's quite conceivable that when oil is $150 or $200 a barrel, it'll still be just as cost effective to bring tomatoes from Italy than to grow them locally. I didn't think to look closely, but the Australian grown tinned tomatoes were the same price, I think.)
User avatar
Ender
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri 21 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Geko45 » Sun 20 May 2007, 11:48:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ender', 'I') realise you're lecturing m'learned friend rather than me, but I live six kilometres from the Melbourne CBD. If I really had to, I could walk there in just over an hour, or cycle there in half an hour. And I don't think my particular line of work is going to be an early casualty of peak oil.

You're right Ender. Peak Oil won't affect you. You'll just walk to work when you have to and telecommute the rest of the time. You'll buy your tomatoes and chick peas from local growers and you'll do without your oranges from December to May. You will be totally unaffected by that large mass of displaced people that use to work in those unsustainable industries. The massive unemployment and inflationary pressure of high oil prices will have no effect on you. Go back to sleep.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou have a very negative outlook on the ability of humanity to adjust to change. Bear in mind that our great-grandparents lived their lives through the use of virtually no oil at all. We'll have much more access to it than they did.

Our great-grandparents lived through the Great Depression. If only they were here to remind us how bad it can get. Just look to history to see how well we adapt to change. A Great Depression and two World Wars should be your first clues. We don't adapt to change well as a species. Whenever we have reached a great shifting point in history, there has been hardship and bloodshed.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')thers will recount wide-eyed doomsday scenarios about how the end of the world is at hand.

I have said repeatedly in this thread that equilibrium WILL eventually be re-established. The difference is that I take a realistic approach when considering the mechanisms that the market uses to achieve that equilibrium. I look to history to see how things have been done in the past and I conclude that there will be severe hardship before we have fully re-adjusted to a less energy dependent lifestyle.

Considering the strong correlation between our population growth and our expanding energy supply, I conclude that a contracting energy supply will mean a contracting population. Will that be achieved through lower birth rates across a generation or will it result from global wars and famine? I don't know, but I do know (from human nature) that the world will be a violent and ugly place and it will probably stay that way for a generation.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') should get the popcorn ready.

Yes, you should and stock up on tomatoes and chick peas while you're at it.
Last edited by Geko45 on Sun 20 May 2007, 14:24:38, edited 1 time in total.
Geko45 - Producer of Doomer Porn
User avatar
Geko45
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Houston, TX
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby thuja » Sun 20 May 2007, 14:12:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ender', '
')
There will be efficiency gains in various senses: passenger cars will get smaller (ie. you Americans will be driving little Smartcars like the Europeans and Japanese have been doing for years), hybrids will proliferate, technology will advance, people will drive less. You have a very negative outlook on the ability of humanity to adjust to change. Bear in mind that our great-grandparents lived their lives through the use of virtually no oil at all. We'll have much more access to it than they did.


Ender I am glad that you are still contributing to PO.com---as of late it has become the purview of uber-doomers who propose collapse in a matter of a few years. They seem to rule the roost right now. Soft-landers are a rare breed around here so I want to respect your opinion even if I don't entirely agree with you.

In some ways you are right- the First World will find ways to make adjustments in the initial phases- we have survived two world wars and the Great Depression without civilization collapsing and I seriously doubt we will experience any collapse scenarios like the uber-doomers profess in the next 20 years.

The problem is that you seem to discount the idea that global oil production will deplete at a very conservative rate of 2-3% a year once we come off the plateau. At that rate, we will have to deal with ongoing and escalating shortages until we literally have no oil to produce with the span of a few decades.

We are talking about an escalating, intensifying and unabating crisis. Though I am hopeful for a transition to a lower tech, deeply energy conservative society- my heart knows that this cannot happen without overwhelming distress and chaos in many parts of the world.

We are seeing these elements of chaos and warfare in many parts of the world right now...Iraq, Nigeria, Sudan, Somalia, etc., are all experiencing massive chaos due to resource competition. How do you see the First World escaping this fate as resources such as oil, natural gas and water deplete rapidly over the next few decades?
User avatar
thuja
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sat 15 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron