Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby MonteQuest » Mon 14 May 2007, 21:20:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Geko45', 'M')ontequest,

You are making a valiant effort, but most people simply can not reason beyond their own experience base. They can't think systemically. All they think is "Hey, I could cut my own use by 10% and it wouldn't be a big deal". They don't get that if everyone did that all at once it would upset the balance of the whole system. Even the worst oil shock of all time (the Iran/Iraq War) only resulted in a 5.7% annual drop in available oil supply (1981).


I know. It's one of the reasons I have a dubious view of the future. Most, if not almost all, solutions proffered here are Solutions in Isolation.

Small picture rather than the Big Picture.

People just do not think these things through and it shows, big time.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Omnitir » Tue 15 May 2007, 10:11:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')Most, if not almost all, solutions proffered here are Solutions in Isolation.

I must point out the irony of this old argument. Most, if not all, of the problems we face are problems in isolation. The problem of 1 in 6 jobs tied to the auto industry fails to acknowledge that there is a wider economy that can replace those jobs. The problem of Megawatt solutions for a Gigawatt world fails to acknowledge that decentralized powering solutions frees up the requirements on the larger centralized power stations, the problems of scaling solutions up to fix everything fails to acknowledge that not everything needs to be powered by the one source etc., etc......

Yes, oil is an all encompassing resource, but some magic solution that fails to fix the whole encompassing big picture is not doomed to failure, it is simply realistic. You simply can’t change the big picture with one fell swoop, so of course every possible solution will always be a “solution in isolation”. Is anyone honestly expecting otherwise?



$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'H')ow does it reduce oil consumption to increase it by new consumption? Hybrids use more energy to make than conventional vehicles.


Energy, not oil. If new consumption and economic activity is generated through non oil sources, then clearly oil consumption is reduced.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Reducing oil consumption affects everybody along the gravy train, from tires, fan belts, batteries, auto parts, gas taxes, motel/hotels, fast food, car washes, car insurance, body shops, etc. and all the delivery companies that supply them.

Only if that oil consumption is not replaced with other forms of energy. Has replacing a percentage of oil with ethanol here in Australia resulted in economic collapse? The issue is not that reducing oil consumption will result in collapse. The issue is that replacing oil with sustainable energy sources is a monumental task.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')1 out of every 6 jobs is tied to auto use where most of our oil consumption goes. We spend a lot of money employing millions of people and supporting businessses while we are driving around town. You cut oil use 30% and you cut jobs, period.

Firstly, you only cut those jobs if you don’t replace the oil with a different energy source. But even if the auto industry contracts, the lost jobs can be redistributed. If currently 80 jobs are tied to the auto industry, and 20 jobs are tied to, say, public transport, and you contract the auto industry but expand the public transit industry, resulting in 70 automotive related jobs and 30 public transit jobs, where exactly is the economic collapse?

Obviously such a dramatic transition is not possible without serious economic upheaval. But ultimately the 1 in 6 jobs tied to the auto industry argument doesn’t fly, because over time, this scenario can change. The death of the railroads in the US didn’t trigger economic collapse because alternative industries appeared. This is what must happen to survive the decline of the auto industry.
"Mother Nature is a psychopathic bitch, and she is out to get you. You have to adapt, change or die." - Tihamer Toth-Fejel, nanotech researcher/engineer.
User avatar
Omnitir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Down Under
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Geko45 » Tue 15 May 2007, 12:09:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Omnitir', 'T')he death of the railroads in the US didn’t trigger economic collapse because alternative industries appeared. This is what must happen to survive the decline of the auto industry.

That is not a valid comparison. It's not like the railroad industry was dying due to peak coal and we were forced to switch to some other mode of conveyance. The new modes were discovered and developed (airlines, trucking, etc) and were superior to railroads so railroads were abandoned. That is not what will happen with Peak Oil. Rather, we will have the auto and air industry violently ripped away from us and we will be forced to revert to inferior methods of transport. The difference will be night and day.
Geko45 - Producer of Doomer Porn
User avatar
Geko45
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Houston, TX
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby MonteQuest » Tue 15 May 2007, 14:56:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Omnitir', ' ') If currently 80 jobs are tied to the auto industry, and 20 jobs are tied to, say, public transport, and you contract the auto industry but expand the public transit industry, resulting in 70 automotive related jobs and 30 public transit jobs, where exactly is the economic collapse?


Another solution in isolation. How does shifting the end use from one industry to another equal a reduction in consumption? You are robbing Peter to pay Paul.

You cut one industry so that supply can meet demand, thus there is no energy left to re-employ those people in another. There is no "wider economy" in a declining energy situation.

You say we use another energy source than oil.

Ok, what energy source is on the horizon that can offset the decline of oil, provide for economic growth, and that you can also pour into your gas tank?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby crapattack » Tue 15 May 2007, 18:28:11

Other jobs to consider besides the usual baker, butcher & candlestick maker, warriors, archers and smiths:

Scavengers
Hanglider scouts & glider makers
Horse trainers
wheelwrights
solar & mico hydro technicians
engineers specializing in fortifications
irrigation/water engineer - consultants
waste management experts (not of the Sopranos variety)

Story tellers (entertainers of all kinds) will probably organize into caravans in the old way.
"Ninety percent of everything is crap."
-Theodore Sturgeon

Stay low and run in a random pattern.

List of Civilian Nuclear Accidents
User avatar
crapattack
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat 03 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby MonteQuest » Tue 15 May 2007, 20:28:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Omnitir', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')Most, if not almost all, solutions proffered here are Solutions in Isolation.

I must point out the irony of this old argument. Most, if not all, of the problems we face are problems in isolation.


I am afraid you are in the minority with that position. 84% of respondents think otherwise.

http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic15043.html

Are these problems inter-related, or are they problems in isolation?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'I')n my opinion, any proposed solutions to the peak oil issue must address the following criteria to be viable long-term solutions.

1. They must address population growth.
2. They must address the global warming issue.
3. They must address the negative consequences of conservation efforts on the economy and efficiency gains increasing consumption.
4. They must address the economic issues of a no-growth economy and past debt.
5. They must be sustainable/ renewable and the least toxic to the environment.
6. And probably most important, they must be global in perspective.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he problem of 1 in 6 jobs tied to the auto industry fails to acknowledge that there is a wider economy that can replace those jobs.


A wider economy that only exists because of cheap, readily available oil and the revenues generated by those 1 in 6 jobs.

You don't have new employment as a result of a self-imposed recession.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby gg3 » Wed 16 May 2007, 10:57:37

Telephone operators.

As in, you lift your receiver and the woman at the switchboard plugs a cord into your line and says, "Number please?" And you say, "Oh, I'm trying to reach the hardware store at Main and 5th Street..." and she says, "That's Corner Hardware, their number is 3233, one moment please..." and she plugs a cord into their line, and then you hear the phone at the other end ring. "Hi, Corner Hardware..."

And for the most part they will be women, for the simple reason that the female voice is more intelligible over the phone than the male voice, as the telcos first discovered about a century ago.

I'm starting to think that a return to "manual telephony" (cord switchboards and operators) will occur in smaller towns as the cost of maintaining "automatic" (digital) systems increases and parts get harder and harder to obtain. On the other hand, cord switchboards and all the rest of the stuff of that era can be built and maintained with pre-petroleum methods and materials.

The switchboard will be open from 7am to 11pm, and you won't be able to stay on and talk after midnight because the evening operator will have to take down all the connections before she goes to sleep on a cot next to the switchboard. She'll be on duty overnight only for emergency calls only, as in, calling the sheriff or fire brigade. The next morning she'll go home and the day operator will be back on duty. The evening/night operators will work two such shifts per week; the day operators will work four day weeks alternated with three days (Friday through Sunday).

I suppose if the pubs are open late Friday and Saturday nights, the switchboard could stay open a bit later too, so that patrons who have hoisted a pint too many can call a carriage. And in a community defense emergency, someone will be on duty all night, with lines open to other towns, so the local militias can coordinate to repel whatever band of thugs might be trying to attack.

The hardware that makes all this work, will last a century or longer if it's kept clean and not mistreated.

As for long distance, "I'm sorry, all the circuits are busy, I'll call you when a line is free, it might take about twenty minutes..."

As for cellular and cordless and suchlike, that stuff will disappear after it starts breaking down and parts can't be found to keep it going.

There won't be touchtone dials or even rotary dials on these phones, they will look & work much as they did fifty years ago, and they will also be designed to last a century if properly taken care of.

By the end of the 21st century, communications will look & work much as they did at the beginning of the 20th.

And the post office will pick up & deliver the mail twice a day. Via horse-drawn wagon or just plain horseback.

And there things will remain until or unless a miracle comes along.

(This stuff I know well, being a telephone systems engineer and having worked in the industry for about 25 years.)
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby setag » Wed 16 May 2007, 13:09:17

I agree with gg3. I too have worked in the telecom industry. One exception, however, women will be on the switchboard not only for their voice quality, but because they listen more attentively.
User avatar
setag
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri 23 Mar 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby gg3 » Thu 17 May 2007, 08:00:30

Greetings, Setag, what part of the industry were you in?

Zensui, the answer is:

1) Take two broken wireless VOIP phones and try to turn them into one working unit. Compare to: Take two broken "Bell System type 500" telephones (or if you're in the UK, GPO 746, or in Japan, NTT 600) and try to get at least one of them working.

2) Take a wireless VOIP phone that has died due to rain or being dropped in a puddle and try to get it working. Try the same with any of the oldschool telephones mentioned above.

3) Try using a commonly-available battery to power a wireless VOIP phone. Try the same with a simple talking circuit between any two of the oldschool telephones mentioned above.

4) Take some sandpaper and rub the buttons on your cellphone for sixty seconds, to simulate about ten years of wear via normal use. Now hand it to someone and ask them to make a call without asking you for help. Now try the same trick with the touchtone dial buttons or rotary dial number plate on any of the oldschool telephones above (actually that would be Bell 2500, GPO 786, and so on). (Hint: on the old phones, the numbers don't rub off, they are molded all the way through the plastic, except in the UK they are printed on the underside of the rotary dial number plate.)

5) Look up the make and model number of any cellphone made 20 years ago and try to find one on Ebay. After that do a search for "telephone 500" and "telephone 2500."

The blunt fact is that the modern stuff is impossible to service and maintain and repair. The oldschool stuff lasts forever. I can take phones from any of four US manufacturers from 1955 through about 2005 and swap parts among them freely and they will all fit perfectly and work perfectly. I have 40-something-year-old PBX equipment that still works almost like new. And I know people who have switching systems that date back to the 1930s that also still work almost like new.

The design paradigm for today's hardware, with rare execptions, is the same as for other consumer electronics. The oldschool stuff was designed to be rugged, robust, reliable, and repairable forever.

I can build an entire village's telephone system, end-to-end including the cord-and-plug switchboard, with parts that are commonly available from electrical and electronic scrap material. It will last a century or longer. And it can be repaired all along the way. And it will be quite tolerant of fluctuations in DC power supply levels, anywhere from about 6 volts DC to about 52 volts DC.

Can't do that with wireless VOIP.

The place for wireless in the future will be what it was 50 years ago: to relay trunk calls across large distances of open countryside between settled areas. This will require all of the best knowledge and technically capable staff we can muster. These facilities will be carefully installed and meticulously maintained, and protected by armed guards who are duly sworn as auxiliaries to their local law enforcement agencies.

Internet-protocol transmission techniques may be used at the trunk level, to feed into the wireless relay system. But again that equipment will be scarce, meticulously maintained, and guarded like the life-safety critical resource that it is.

Your local loop, i.e. everything from your desk to the switchboard downtown, will be as I described in my previous posting.

In some places there will still be "automatic" service. In our community we will have digital PBX because I will be installing it myself. It will be backed up by a rotary dial "Strowger" system which a good friend of mine can install (he has warehouses full of the stuff). And that in turn will be backed up by the cord switchboard. So regardless of whatever happens in the outside world, in my community you'll still be able to call anyone in the village. For at least another century.

(I wouldn't be doing my job if I didn't also mention that our engineering services are available to any sustainable community that wants to engage us. We're not cheap and putting in a decent system is not cheap, but communication reduces transportation, communication is commerce, and communication is defense.)

---

About women as operators: The reason for the "more attentive" observation is: When men are in a multi-tasked or interrupt-driven situation, they lose about 15% of their IQ for the duration of the task. When women are in the same type of situation, they lose only 5%. This is apparently a matter of anatomy and physiology in the difference between male and female brains. This is also why women tend to do much better at office management than men. (Cheer up guys, men have a bit of an edge when it comes to doing 3-dimensional spatial tasks, which is why we tend to become hunters and mechanics.)

So while we want to preserve a society where every person is equal under the law, and has an equal opportunity to compete and cooperate, we shouldn't be surprised if some identifyable groups of people tend to perform better in-aggregate than others at specific types of tasks. The key sustainable values here are individual liberty, equality under law, diversity as a source of cultural strength, and a strong work ethic that views individuals as citizens and producers rather than as consumers.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Mircea » Thu 17 May 2007, 14:58:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Geko45', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Omnitir', 'T')he death of the railroads in the US didn’t trigger economic collapse because alternative industries appeared. This is what must happen to survive the decline of the auto industry.

That is not a valid comparison. It's not like the railroad industry was dying due to peak coal and we were forced to switch to some other mode of conveyance. The new modes were discovered and developed (airlines, trucking, etc) and were superior to railroads so railroads were abandoned. That is not what will happen with Peak Oil. Rather, we will have the auto and air industry violently ripped away from us and we will be forced to revert to inferior methods of transport. The difference will be night and day.


Of course it's a valid comparison. Capital, including labor, and resources are constantly shifting and being re-allocated to meet the demands of the "market." That's basic market economics.

With respect to the railroads, the Teamster's Union undersold its contracts to lure away business from the railroads, and for a while, highway cartage was more efficient that rail, plus the railroad unions acted stupidly, but the situation has now reversed itself.

Rail is now far superior to trucking. Rail can operate 24/7, trucks are limted to a maximum by law of 14 hours per day. Rail is not subject to road, traffic or weather conditions, except in rare cases where heavy snowfall may impede rail movement. A single truck has a maximum weight of 88,000 pounds, a single train can transport 260 times that.

Rising fuel costs will result in a reallocation of capital, labor and resources rail, which has been happening for some time now.

The auto and air industry will not be "violently ripped away from us" as you put it.

You don't seem to be able to grasp the economics of PO.

As oil prices rise, demand decreases, not increases, and that will delay the onset of PO for decades.

Each player in the game, households, business/industry and states, have a finite amount of money they can spend on oil/fuels (something many on this forum totally ignore or are totally oblivious to the fact).

Once that finite limit is reached, they're out of the game.

As each household reaches its limit, it will not consume any more fuel/oil. Many will abandon the suburbs to move into the cities so that they can have access, or cheaper access, to goods and services, as well as having more available disposable income. That will reviltalize the cities, because as people come, so do goods and services. The end result is a reduction in consumption and reduced demand.

Sure, business/industry can raise prices, but not too much, lest they price themselves out of existence. As their prices rise, the demand for their goods/services drops, resulting in reduced consumption, which results in less demand for oil/fuels.

It's no different for states, especially those that have mostly state owned or state-controlled industries. They have only a limited amount of money to spend on oil. Once that limit is reached, they must choose between spending money on oil, spending money on other required energy sources like coal, or spending money on raw materials/semi-finished goods to purchase for production in their industries.

They can get by without oil, but not without coal to run their electric power plants, or raw materials/semi-finished goods for their industries (which provides the governments with revenues).

Everyone will have to make adjustments, but it will happen over one or two decades (maybe three), but not "suddenly" or "violently."
User avatar
Mircea
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby dohboi » Thu 17 May 2007, 18:57:37

Mircea, I think you make many valid points. The poor will suffer first (and are actually suffering now). Then the not-quite poor. Then the middle- and upper middle-classes. The rich and super-rich will be the last to make major adjustments, and by that time most of the rest of us will be destitute--picking scraps of undigested scraps of food from the shit-piles of the wealthy (i.e. "trickle down economics").

Sorry. I guess I just summarized capitalism. But this will be capitalism on steroids.
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Geko45 » Thu 17 May 2007, 19:13:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Mircea', 'R')ising fuel costs will result in a reallocation of capital, labor and resources rail, which has been happening for some time now. The auto and air industry will not be "violently ripped away from us" as you put it. You don't seem to be able to grasp the economics of PO. As oil prices rise, demand decreases, not increases, and that will delay the onset of PO for decades.

LOL, this is the funniest thing I've heard all day. You restate exactly what I said in more PC terms and then tell me I'm wrong. Of course increasing prices mean that demand will decrease. That's basic Keynesian economics (which I have studied). You then say that this will delay the effects of PO for decades. Dear Mircea, those ARE the effects of PO. Violent, unforgiving, market balancing demand destruction. It won't be friendly, it won't be pretty, but it will happen. Keynesian economic theory says that the market will return to equilibrium, and it will, but it says nothing about whether we will like the manner in which that equilibrium is restored.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')veryone will have to make adjustments, but it will happen over one or two decades (maybe three), but not "suddenly" or "violently."

First, you put "suddenly" in quotes, but I never said it would be sudden. Second, this is where you fail to grasp the gravity of PO. It will take several decades to play out, but the supply drops will be relentless and unavoidable. The worst oil shock of all time occured in 1981 (Iran/Iraq War) and resulted in a 5.7% annual drop in available oil supply. Look at what that did to our economy. Was equilibrium restored? Yes, but it wasn't pretty. When PO hits, the decline will be even worse, but more importantly it will drop each and every year for DECADES. The great depression will seem like a simple correction by comparison.
Last edited by Geko45 on Thu 17 May 2007, 19:44:16, edited 1 time in total.
Geko45 - Producer of Doomer Porn
User avatar
Geko45
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Houston, TX
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby crapattack » Thu 17 May 2007, 19:33:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s oil prices rise, demand decreases, not increases, and that will delay the onset of PO for decades.


PO is a supply problem.
"Ninety percent of everything is crap."
-Theodore Sturgeon

Stay low and run in a random pattern.

List of Civilian Nuclear Accidents
User avatar
crapattack
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat 03 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Omnitir » Thu 17 May 2007, 20:44:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('crapattack', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s oil prices rise, demand decreases, not increases, and that will delay the onset of PO for decades.


PO is a supply problem.

Strictly speaking, sure, but that's not the way the world works, that's not the way economics works. There have always been rare resources, and because they are rare they are suitably expensive to keep demand maintainable.

We often hear PO described as demand passing supply (or vis versa), but this is impossible in the real world. The closer demand and supply come to each other, the more expensive a resource becomes forcing demand down.

So yes, the cause of PO is a supply problem, which will result in decreased demand, not an increase. Therefore it does stand to reason that the maximum in global oil production will be many decades away.

But that doesn't matter, because in the meantime oil will be very expensive. Peak oil is an economic problem.
Last edited by Omnitir on Thu 17 May 2007, 21:06:51, edited 1 time in total.
"Mother Nature is a psychopathic bitch, and she is out to get you. You have to adapt, change or die." - Tihamer Toth-Fejel, nanotech researcher/engineer.
User avatar
Omnitir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Down Under
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Omnitir » Thu 17 May 2007, 21:05:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')Ok, what energy source is on the horizon that can offset the decline of oil, provide for economic growth, and that you can also pour into your gas tank?

Solar. More energy hits the earth every day than we could ever use, and our ability to utilise that energy is following an exponential trend. As you know, exponential trends start out rather slow but ramp up amazingly quickly. Soon solar will be cheaper then oil.

Nanotech. Currently we require massive amounts of energy to function. But what if we could develop a new way of operating that wasn't so wasteful? Worrying about offsetting the decline of oil is irrelevant when suddenly you don't need all that energy in the first place.

New transport paradigms. What if you don't need to fill the gas tank? What if we had sufficient public transport, a cultural shift towards exercise and human propulsion, and electric transportation?

Solutions in isolation? These solutions could make fossil fuels irrelevant in the coming decades. These solutions would greatly raise the standard of living resulting in the population level stabalising. These solutions are green, addressing your global warming concerns. These solutions address the fundamental problems with civilization, and yet you and your ilk so readily dismiss them as "solutions in isolation, techno gee-wizardry".

Of course, I'm talking about technology still in development, so it's an irrelevant straw man argument, right? All that matters is meeting the oil demand so we can keep the status quo. And when that fails, as it surely will, suddenly we are heading for some fantasy agrarian society. Apparently.
"Mother Nature is a psychopathic bitch, and she is out to get you. You have to adapt, change or die." - Tihamer Toth-Fejel, nanotech researcher/engineer.
User avatar
Omnitir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Down Under
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Geko45 » Thu 17 May 2007, 21:27:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Omnitir', 'S')o yes, the cause of PO is a supply problem, which will result in decreased demand, not an increase. Therefore it does stand to reason that the maximum in global oil production will be many decades away.

This reasoning is incomplete. Yes, a constrained supply will cause prices to rise which, in turn, will cause demand destruction and market equilibrium will be re-established. However, it does not follow that this delays the point at which we reach maximum production in anyway. This is because the price rise will provide incentive to oil producers to attempt to increase supply. They will make significant investments in new fields (e.g. the current Saudi rig count) in an attempt to maximize profits. Ultimately, they will fail due to the geologic constraints, but not before running head first into the maximum possible production capacity. Therefore, as prices increase, we will race directly for the top of production even as consumers are being priced out of the market.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut that doesn't matter, because in the meantime oil will be very expensive. Peak oil is an economic problem.

Yeah, in the same way that famine is an economic problem. Peak Oil will be the greatest 'market failure' the world has ever known.
Geko45 - Producer of Doomer Porn
User avatar
Geko45
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Houston, TX
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Ender » Fri 18 May 2007, 19:03:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')Reducing oil consumption affects everybody along the gravy train, from tires, fan belts, batteries, auto parts, gas taxes, motel/hotels, fast food, car washes, car insurance, body shops, etc. and all the delivery companies that supply them.

1 out of every 6 jobs is tied to auto use where most of our oil consumption goes. We spend a lot of money employing millions of people and supporting businessses while we are driving around town. You cut oil use 30% and you cut jobs, period.

This has been covered ad naseum.


I don't accept any of that for a moment. When James Watt invented the steam engine, thousands of ten-year-old boys pulling coal trucks were thrown out of work. But that left them free to do other things, such as live to be eleven.

Before 1980 coal mining employed thousands of people in Britain - but it was a subsidised industry that couldn't compete with North Sea oil and gas, and coal could be imported more cheaply anyway. Yes, there were thousands of job losses and a tough time for many communities. But Britain today has a much smaller coal industry which is the most productive in Europe - and the British economy is doing extremely well too.

If we all cut our oil use 50% there's going to be a lot more work for people who provide the goods and services we need to do that. People who make and drive trains, trams, buses and ferries. People who make and sell pushbikes. Telecoms engineers (we'll be doing a lot more videoconferencing and similar rather than physically visiting people or going to work). That sort of thing.

If you and your country are so car-dependent that you can't see a way forward that involves using less oil, then it'll probably be a self fulfilling prophecy for you. That's going to be a bitch for the rest of us, because you're a major trading partner, so we'll have to adapt to you lot running around like headless chooks as well.
User avatar
Ender
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri 21 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Geko45 » Fri 18 May 2007, 20:09:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ender', 'I')f you and your country are so car-dependent that you can't see a way forward that involves using less oil, then it'll probably be a self fulfilling prophecy for you.

*sigh*

Peak Oil is so much more than a "car" issue. In a very real sense, the world EATS oil and natural gas. You good folks down there in Australia are no exception to that.
Geko45 - Producer of Doomer Porn
User avatar
Geko45
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Houston, TX
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby Omnitir » Fri 18 May 2007, 21:00:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Geko45', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ender', 'I')f you and your country are so car-dependent that you can't see a way forward that involves using less oil, then it'll probably be a self fulfilling prophecy for you.

*sigh*

Peak Oil is so much more than a "car" issue. In a very real sense, the world EATS oil and natural gas. You good folks down there in Australia are no exception to that.

I don't see why everyone sees the need to keep pooling natural gas into the same basket as oil. "Oh global peak oil is approaching and we are all doom. And by the way, the US is running out of domestic natural gas, so apply the same logic to global peak oil."
It doesn't make sense. It's a big problem in North America to be sure, but Natural Gas is a long way from global peak. Much NG is still treated as a waste product and burnt off.

Down here in Australia we are not about to run out of NG based agricultural products. Neither is most of the world. Peak oil will have very little effect of NG for most of the world.

And as for PO being much more then a car issue, answer me this: theoretically, if suddenly every single car in the world was abandoned and every driver started bicycling around, would you honestly argue that PO would still be such a big issue?

Of course PO is a car issue. Our cars consume the bulk of oil. All the associated problems only exist because of cars. Cars are the root of all evil.
"Mother Nature is a psychopathic bitch, and she is out to get you. You have to adapt, change or die." - Tihamer Toth-Fejel, nanotech researcher/engineer.
User avatar
Omnitir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Down Under
Top

Re: Roles in an agrarian post-peak society...

Postby thuja » Fri 18 May 2007, 21:02:24

Look- its quite simple- fossil fuel depletion is an issue that is imbedded in every layer of economic activity.

IN terms of liquid fuel, as supply decreases, price increases enough to cause demand destruction. Poorer countries and the lower classes of the First World feel the brunt of the effect and lower their oil consumption with each price increase.

But increasing oil prices affect the price of everything else as well, including food prices. We're seeing that now as a massive push for ethanol diverts corn to fuel instead of food. This raises the price not only of corn but all meat derived from livestock that consumes corn. Shipping, trucking and fertilizer costs increase the price of all food.

Manufactured goods all start increasing in price because industry needs fossil fuels to create consumer goods, as well as packaging, trucking and shipping them.

Virtually every element of the economy is now dependent on cheap fossil fuels. As they become more expensive, all goods will become increasingly wscarce and increasingly expesnive.

In essence we are looking at increasing unabated inflation in many different sectors. We are already seeing these factors play out right now. Eventually inflation will become so rampant that the underclasses and third world countries will not be able to afford essential goods. What will happen then? One can only guess, but historically and as we can see throughout the globe, this leads to riots, revolution, starvation, pestilence, war and genocide. Too many people for too few resources...

Now I think there are mitigating factors and I don't discount them, even ones taken in isolation. This is where I would differ from Montequest. Solutions in isolation will not stop the inevitable depletion of oil but they will allow certain areas to withstand the pressures of radically decreased energy.

For example, if a richer country, such as Germany, devotes massive amounts of money and energy into developing alternative energy systems such as solar and wind and nuclear, while conserving bbroadly, as well as devoting considerable subsidies toward local organic farms, then this country will be able to mitigate the worst effects of depletion better than, say...Sudan.

Will they be able to stop the cascading depletion of oil? No of course not- but they will be able to handle the effects better than other nations.
User avatar
thuja
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sat 15 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron