Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby Stonemason » Tue 27 Oct 2009, 20:29:02

Actually, the United States was not intended to be a democracy, but a republic. Democracy is mob rule (51% rule 49%), arguably one of the worst methods of herding people around. The Constitution along with the Bill of Rights were ostensibly purposed to avoid this outcome. Then a few industrialist-bankers hijacked the system and took control of the propaganda spouts (education, marketing, tv, etc) bought the houses of government, and their corporations removed their prior charter-based (public service based) existance after the Civil War (arguably the purpose to remove the agrarian non-industrialised opportunity the south had remaining).

Among that propaganda is the idea that the US is a democracy, perhaps because of all the hubris special interest groups bring to the table.
User avatar
Stonemason
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri 02 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby americandream » Tue 27 Oct 2009, 20:43:15

stonemason

In bowing to the vested interest of landowners (who invariably are to be found in the ranks of industrial investors) with the advent of unpaid agricultural labour (slavery), early America struck a Faustian bargain with the father of social decay, kleptocracy. One cannot compromise the quest for freedom and liberty without losing one's own freedom and liberty. Nothing less than Dickensian poverty will ignite the flames of your country's radical beginnings unfortunately.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby VMarcHart » Tue 27 Oct 2009, 22:09:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kristen', 'C')apitalism is ... full of greed and its stratagem seems to end with one holding all of the cards, dictating the world...
It's a good wa to put it. In the end, what's the difference between capitalism, socialism, comunism, what's the end between the US, France, the USSR, Cuba, if only the priveledged minority has access to the good life?

p.s. I'm in the Cities this week. Nice weather, eh?
On 9/29/08, cube wrote: "The Dow will drop to 4,000 within 2 years". The current tally is 239 bold predictions, 9 right, 96 wrong, 134 open. If you've heard here, it's probably wrong.
User avatar
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Now overpopulating California

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby KrellEnergySource » Tue 27 Oct 2009, 23:27:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Stonemason', 'D')emocracy is mob rule (51% rule 49%), arguably one of the worst methods of herding people around. The Constitution along with the Bill of Rights were ostensibly purposed to avoid this outcome.


Funny how that's still where we end up with a two party system polarizing our very governmental bodies. I shudder when I hear that this party or that party is 'in power'.

Brian
User avatar
KrellEnergySource
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon 31 Oct 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby rangerone314 » Tue 27 Oct 2009, 23:32:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KrellEnergySource', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Stonemason', 'D')emocracy is mob rule (51% rule 49%), arguably one of the worst methods of herding people around. The Constitution along with the Bill of Rights were ostensibly purposed to avoid this outcome.


Funny how that's still where we end up with a two party system polarizing our very governmental bodies. I shudder when I hear that this party or that party is 'in power'.

Brian

My philosophy is that if the 49% is that unhappy, they should be allowed to go their own way in a Democracy. (As opposed to a Republic, which burns homes & cities down like Atlanta)

In a true Democracy, government should have a small impact on individual lives, so it shouldn't be as large of a factor in 51% vs 49%. And this divide assumes each issue will divide up between two identical groups. Choosing the "lesser of two evils" is bogus. For example who does a liberal vote for if they disagree with other liberals on crime?

Who does a conservative vote for if they are Pro-Choice?

I'll take "mob" rule over Proxy-Plutocracy (Republic) which merely has the pretenses and trappings of democracy, when it is really just plutocracy angling for "legitimacy" Hence the "everyone must vote" drives.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Tue 27 Oct 2009, 23:38:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('VMarcHart', ' ')As for punishing the slacker ... wait until you are not physically able to work, which can happen to everyone.


Capitalism is cruel. It stomps right over anybody in a blink of an eye. It shows no compassion, no room for the weak, no room for illness or any other defficiency. That's why capitalism is augmented with some form of socialism in each developed nation. Nothing is perfect and everything has a weakness.

However as of today, even though they are not perfect, capitalism and democracy are the best forms of society we have.


Capitalism funds socialism. No capitalism= no tax= no social services.
Utopian distopia is the end result of either polarity. We don't have democracy or capitalism. We have social experimentation by brainwashing and the hypnotic power of money.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby Stonemason » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 00:00:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KrellEnergySource', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Stonemason', 'D')emocracy is mob rule (51% rule 49%), arguably one of the worst methods of herding people around. The Constitution along with the Bill of Rights were ostensibly purposed to avoid this outcome.


Funny how that's still where we end up with a two party system polarizing our very governmental bodies. I shudder when I hear that this party or that party is 'in power'.

Brian

My philosophy is that if the 49% is that unhappy, they should be allowed to go their own way in a Democracy. (As opposed to a Republic, which burns homes & cities down like Atlanta)

In a true Democracy, government should have a small impact on individual lives, so it shouldn't be as large of a factor in 51% vs 49%. And this divide assumes each issue will divide up between two identical groups. Choosing the "lesser of two evils" is bogus. For example who does a liberal vote for if they disagree with other liberals on crime?

Who does a conservative vote for if they are Pro-Choice?

I'll take "mob" rule over Proxy-Plutocracy (Republic) which merely has the pretenses and trappings of democracy, when it is really just plutocracy angling for "legitimacy" Hence the "everyone must vote" drives.


"John Adams defined a constitutional republic as "a government of laws, and not of men."[1] Constitutional republics are a deliberate attempt to diminish the perceived threat of majoritarianism, thereby protecting dissenting individuals and minority groups from the "tyranny of the majority" by placing checks on the power of the majority of the population.[2] The power of the majority of the people is checked by limiting that power to electing representatives who are required to legislate with limits of overarching constitutional law which a simple majority cannot modify."
- Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_republic)
User avatar
Stonemason
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri 02 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby Kristen » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 00:03:35

Well one thing is for sure, we have the power to make a new system. If we have the intellect to create electricity, computers, space travel and so many awesome things, why can't we apply it to a social system. Perhaps it will evolve by itself. To be bleak our next chapter will be the craigslist era. Instead of buying a set of new tires, or a new phone, you can trade or buy it at a fourth of the cost! I have hope that people will one day wake up and not purchase a thirty dollar shirt when it cost two cents to make with slave labor. The age of comfortality is over.
User avatar
Kristen
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon 17 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby Stonemason » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 00:03:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('VMarcHart', ' ')As for punishing the slacker ... wait until you are not physically able to work, which can happen to everyone.


Capitalism is cruel. It stomps right over anybody in a blink of an eye. It shows no compassion, no room for the weak, no room for illness or any other defficiency. That's why capitalism is augmented with some form of socialism in each developed nation. Nothing is perfect and everything has a weakness.

However as of today, even though they are not perfect, capitalism and democracy are the best forms of society we have.


Capitalism funds socialism. No capitalism= no tax= no social services.
Utopian distopia is the end result of either polarity. We don't have democracy or capitalism. We have social experimentation by brainwashing and the hypnotic power of money.


You are failing to distinguish between voluntarism and the state's use of the monopoly of force. Arms dealers making deals with a government is no the same as Dell selling laptops. Capitalism is not the problem, it is a tool. (I'm not saying I support capitalism)
User avatar
Stonemason
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri 02 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby americandream » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 01:18:51

Checks and balances are only as good as their socio-economic basis. Societies based on private title over commonwealth will naturally gravitate towards established hierarchies with all that entails in terms of political power. As naturally as night follows day.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Stonemason', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KrellEnergySource', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Stonemason', 'D')emocracy is mob rule (51% rule 49%), arguably one of the worst methods of herding people around. The Constitution along with the Bill of Rights were ostensibly purposed to avoid this outcome.


Funny how that's still where we end up with a two party system polarizing our very governmental bodies. I shudder when I hear that this party or that party is 'in power'.

Brian

My philosophy is that if the 49% is that unhappy, they should be allowed to go their own way in a Democracy. (As opposed to a Republic, which burns homes & cities down like Atlanta)

In a true Democracy, government should have a small impact on individual lives, so it shouldn't be as large of a factor in 51% vs 49%. And this divide assumes each issue will divide up between two identical groups. Choosing the "lesser of two evils" is bogus. For example who does a liberal vote for if they disagree with other liberals on crime?

Who does a conservative vote for if they are Pro-Choice?

I'll take "mob" rule over Proxy-Plutocracy (Republic) which merely has the pretenses and trappings of democracy, when it is really just plutocracy angling for "legitimacy" Hence the "everyone must vote" drives.


"John Adams defined a constitutional republic as "a government of laws, and not of men."[1] Constitutional republics are a deliberate attempt to diminish the perceived threat of majoritarianism, thereby protecting dissenting individuals and minority groups from the "tyranny of the majority" by placing checks on the power of the majority of the population.[2] The power of the majority of the people is checked by limiting that power to electing representatives who are required to legislate with limits of overarching constitutional law which a simple majority cannot modify."
- Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_republic)
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby Thralen » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 01:57:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kristen', 'W')ell one thing is for sure, we have the power to make a new system. If we have the intellect to create electricity, computers, space travel and so many awesome things, why can't we apply it to a social system.


To answer your question, not espousing a view either way on capitalism. Why can't we apply it to a social system? Because all the former things you mentioned (electricity, computers, space travel) make someone a profit due to capitalism. The social system would not and so, in a capitalistic society, the lesser minds (generalities here, there are exceptions to this rule) end up working on things like the social system while the better minds work on things like electricity, computers, and space travel. Cultural indoctrination (read:Brainwashing) from a young age leads those who are more intelligent to want to make their fortune off of their intelligence and not use it to serve their fellow man.

You may knock capitalism but in a roaring, healthy, capitalist society innovation and invention run rampant. People are built that way, they put more effort into something that benefits themselves than into something that doesn't. So when there are tangible rewards for their efforts they put their utmost effort into something. Seemingly they put less effort into those things that have no tangible reward for themselves.

Thralen
User avatar
Thralen
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon 12 Jan 2009, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby Kristen » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 02:17:35

Actually computers were invented to calculate missle ranges, not to make a profit. Space travel was invented to explore the universe and electricity was made to make life easier for mankind. The whole idea that you need a material incentive to work hard is not true. Take starvation for example. If we go back a few thousand years your argument does not apply to those who hunted and invented tools to be more effecient. Unless you consider the more food as profit. But the way I read your response, you were only referring to materialism which may mean wealth to some.... The wise however know weallth comes from within
User avatar
Kristen
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 711
Joined: Mon 17 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby americandream » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 02:26:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Thralen', 'Y')ou may knock capitalism but in a roaring, healthy, capitalist society innovation and invention run rampant. People are built that way, they put more effort into something that benefits themselves than into something that doesn't. So when there are tangible rewards for their efforts they put their utmost effort into something. Seemingly they put less effort into those things that have no tangible reward for themselves.

Thralen


These bald statements made in the midst of a society enjoying the fruits of earth's largesse fails to account of the fact that capitalism will in due course run into the earth's limits. Peak oil is one of those limits and we are all here presumably as we see this as something of a future event of systemic proportions. Yet you make these assertions as if they are some unassailable cosmic truth. I take it that you are one of those who believes that we shall colonise the universe, time travel or synthesise the wherewithal for an indefinite Walmart style consumption out of the thin air? Perhaps you have some fixed state of wealth creation in mind.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby VMarcHart » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 02:43:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Thralen', 'Y')ou may knock capitalism but in a roaring, healthy, capitalist society innovation and invention run rampant. People are built that way, they put more effort into something that benefits themselves than into something that doesn't. So when there are tangible rewards for their efforts they put their utmost effort into something. Seemingly they put less effort into those things that have no tangible reward for themselves.
So, if you stumble on the cure for cancer, and after extensive marketing analysis you learn you will not make a penny off ot it, you will just burn it, right? Because the intangible reward for being the greatest guy ever is not enough of a driver, correct?

Thank God we don't depend on your generosity.
On 9/29/08, cube wrote: "The Dow will drop to 4,000 within 2 years". The current tally is 239 bold predictions, 9 right, 96 wrong, 134 open. If you've heard here, it's probably wrong.
User avatar
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Now overpopulating California
Top

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby Thralen » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 10:42:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ctually computers were invented to calculate missle ranges, not to make a profit.
note first, "missile", second: Gee, you don't think a means for projecting force (missile) had anything to do with capitalism, you don't think that the means to project force had anything to do with preserving "our way of life" read: capitalism?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')pace travel was invented to explore the universe
Read your history, the initial ideas for space flight were military in nature and involved, once again, force multipliers.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')and electricity was made to make life easier for mankind.
While William Gilbert may have discovered electricity (not invented as it existed prior to the discovery) and may not have made a great deal of profit from it, nearly every invention/discovery regarding it since has made the inventor a profit. read: Edison, Tesla (admittedly died penniless but was extremely rich for much of his life), etc... I'd list many more but I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader since I'm laughing to hard at the naivety of the post to which I am responding to pull the citations.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he whole idea that you need a material incentive to work hard is not true. Take starvation for example. If we go back a few thousand years your argument does not apply to those who hunted and invented tools to be more effecient. Unless you consider the more food as profit.
first "efficient", second: I specified a tangible reward. In that day and age, being well fed and healthy was a tangible reward, it also resulted in a more successful quest for a mate and so on and so forth... I specified nothing about cash, just a 'tangible' reward. Something that lets other people KNOW that you are more successful than them.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he wise however know weallth comes from within first: "wealth", second: The best way to convince me you are not wise, is to insinuate that you are. Please, give it a rest. Look at society as a whole and not just your slice and you will see that the statements I made in my post are true, beyond a doubt.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') take it that you are one of those who believes that we shall colonise the universe, time travel or synthesise the wherewithal for an indefinite Walmart style consumption out of the thin air? Perhaps you have some fixed state of wealth creation in mind. first: "colonize", second: "synthesize"
(Good lord people, did you all flunk out of grammar school or does your attempt to communicate on a forum make you think that you can throw letters together and make new words? Simple vocabulary words, spell them right! If you can't then use a spell checker)
third: universe: no
time travel: no
synthesize the wherewithal: no

I think we are going to crash and burn, I think the human race, should it survive, will NOT learn the lesson involved and potentially repeat its mistakes (see thread title). Dream on americandream, it seems that you are attempting to live in your own dream. Wake up, smell the coffee, and look at the idiots that surround you. You actually trust them to take care of problems that involve the whole world? I don't, not in the slightest. What hope I hold out comes from competing research, due to capitalism, not anything done by the dreamers and idealists. Dreamers and idealists are wonderful in principle, however they tend to get nothing done since their dreams and ideals get in the way of taking action.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o, if you stumble on the cure for cancer, and after extensive marketing analysis you learn you will not make a penny off ot it, you will just burn it, right? Because the intangible reward for being the greatest guy ever is not enough of a driver, correct?

Gee, tangible... Are you unfamiliar with the definition of the word? It has a component that means physical and able to be touched, it also has a component that means "able to be recognized by the mind". You don't, perhaps, think that the renown for developing a cure for cancer could be ' tangible '? How much do athletes make off of marketing their name for clothing? Due to their renown? You have no imagination if you think that developing a cure for cancer would have no tangible reward.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hank God we don't depend on your generosity.

Thank that imaginary friend in the sky that we don't depend on your intelligence or that of the other idiots wearing blinders that see what they want to and ignore what they don't.

Thralen
User avatar
Thralen
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon 12 Jan 2009, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 11:00:20

Thralen, just calm down. AD was being brief and technically critical of the possible interpretations of your post. Possibly there was an anal retentiveness to his retort but in defense of the lurkers it's best not to over react to clarification.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby Thralen » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 11:43:33

SeaGypsy: That was a calm critique. You wouldn't want to read the non-calm version, even PO forum would probably edit or delete it as filled with disgust, contempt and sarcasm as it would be. I won't continue for now but to repeat that that was the calm version.

Thralen
User avatar
Thralen
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon 12 Jan 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby americandream » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 16:06:21

Thralen

1 We do not use a "z" in that context in British English.

2 I ask you again. How will any future capitalist system resource itself on a finite planet. Hard facts please, not vague opinions.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') take it that you are one of those who believes that we shall colonise the universe, time travel or synthesise the wherewithal for an indefinite Walmart style consumption out of the thin air? Perhaps you have some fixed state of wealth creation in mind.
first: "colonize", second: "synthesize"
(Good lord people, did you all flunk out of grammar school or does your attempt to communicate on a forum make you think that you can throw letters together and make new words? Simple vocabulary words, spell them right! If you can't then use a spell checker)
third: universe: no
time travel: no
synthesize the wherewithal: no

I think we are going to crash and burn, I think the human race, should it survive, will NOT learn the lesson involved and potentially repeat its mistakes (see thread title). Dream on americandream, it seems that you are attempting to live in your own dream. Wake up, smell the coffee, and look at the idiots that surround you. You actually trust them to take care of problems that involve the whole world? I don't, not in the slightest. What hope I hold out comes from competing research, due to capitalism, not anything done by the dreamers and idealists. Dreamers and idealists are wonderful in principle, however they tend to get nothing done since their dreams and ideals get in the way of taking action.Thralen[/quote]
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby americandream » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 16:29:30

For the edification of all those who aren't otherwise aware. British English and the variant spoken in America; they are not quite the same:

English[edit] Alternative spellingssynthesize (US)
[edit] VerbInfinitive
to synthesise
Third person singular
synthesises
Simple past
synthesised
Past participle
synthesised
Present participle
synthesising


to synthesise (third-person singular simple present synthesises, present participle synthesising, simple past and past participle synthesised)

(transitive) To combine two or more things to produce a new, more complex product.
(intransitive, of two or more things) To be combined producing a new, more complex product.
(transitive, chemistry) To produce a substance by chemical synthesis.
(intransitive, chemistry, of a substance) To be produced a by chemical synthesis.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/synthesise
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Repeating your mistakes is the problem

Unread postby Thralen » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 18:39:14

Americandream: Strangely enough, I prefer to use the appropriate version of English for where the board is hosted. Which is American English. I am well aware that the two languages, while similar, are actually different (Bloody Wanker!).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ow will any future capitalist system resource itself on a finite planet. Hard facts please, not vague opinions.


The exact answer is: In the same manner that any other system will resource itself as, regardless of capitalism, socialism, or whichever system you prefer the same resources are still necessary for the system to work. It seems that your reading comprehension is lacking, perhaps it's that British English you are touting. Allow me to quote my first message here that you replied to:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')o answer your question, not espousing a view either way on capitalism.


Translation for the vocabulary impaired: I was answering Kristen's question, I was not writing to support capitalism.

Espouse: to take up and support as a cause : become attached to.

Please note that I said I was NOT espousing capitalism, henceforth why would you ask me to defend it, this isn't your debate club where you are assigned a side to defend.

If you disagree with my statement, then please give your own answer to Kristen's question, don't attack mine simply because you don't like it. I didn't see you give an answer at all so I don't understand why you felt the need to attack mine when you offer no constructive alternative for an answer. A reminder for you, in case you were cherry picking messages and missed what I was replying to:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ell one thing is for sure, we have the power to make a new system. If we have the intellect to create electricity, computers, space travel and so many awesome things, why can't we apply it to a social system.


I replied with what I saw as the answer to her question. You, seemingly, do not have one since you didn't answer it and instead chose to attack my answer. Please, feel free to actually give an answer to Kristen, remember "Hard facts please, not vague opinions!" Once you give an answer I will happily argue mine vs. yours but in the meanwhile, comprehend what you read better and you won't make a fool out of yourself insisting that someone defend something that they said they do NOT espouse.

Thralen
User avatar
Thralen
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon 12 Jan 2009, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron