by benzoil » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 23:13:40
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('benzoil', 'T')yler-
Where does the $80 billion pricetag come from? That number sounds awfully low given that it's costing the U.S. $150 billion just to mail everyone an $800 tax rebate.
I don't disagree with you that efforts will be made to adapt and there will be some successes, but I don't think it's going to be all that painless economically.
Source of my calculationsAt a cost of $1.2 billion, Kia Motors will be able to build 300,000 cars per year.
Do the math out and you find that building a car requires $4000 worth of capital investment.
16 million cars per year, $64 billion.
While I don't disagree with you that electric cars will play an important part in the future, I think your math is flawed. The link above references your previous post which links to the article that Kia Motors is building a new plant in Georgia.
Here are some of the problems:
The article doesn't state that they plan to pay off the plant in one year. No surprise there. The Atlanta Journal says that they got $410 million in taxes, etc. over 15 years. That means the true cost of the plant would be more like $1.6 billion.
Your $4000 covers the cost to build the plant. It doesn't cover *any* of the cost to design, build, and produce the actual car. The dealer profit margin on cars is 5% to 25% - higher on luxury cars and trucks than on economy models. I'll take a stab and say that manufacturers are making 10%. Let's take a Kia Sedona minivan with a sales price of $20-26K. 75% of $25K is $18750. (That's slightly inaccurate math, but close enough for government work.) A $30,000 Chevy Volt would be even higher.
I found figures for Kia sales in the US for the first quarter of 2007. They were on a pace to sell 184,000 vehicles for the entire year. If all of those vehicles were made at the Georgia plant and they were, indeed, amortizing the cost of the plant over one year then the cost per car would be $8695 (Remember the plant is costing someone $1.6B)
$18750 + $8695 = $27445/car + 25% profit = $34306 USD/car
Multiply by 16 million cars =~ $549 billion
Now. I found the $410 million figure in an Atlanta Journal article dated May 18, 2006. The plant opens in 2009. Assume that they took 18 months to find a plant site before the announced it and that means a lead time of 4.5 - 5 years before car number one rolls off the assembly line. That's a long time to wait.
At 300,000 cars per year, it would take that one plant 53.3 years to build 16 million cars. That's even longer to wait. I'd be long dead. Maybe we could build more plants? To do that we'd have to include the $1.6 billion costs for all of those extra new plants. $85 billion or so for 53 new plants. Assuming we could convert some old plants, lets call it $42.5 billion. I'll assume that this is a government project though and that they gave a no-bid contract to Bechtel Corp to build the plants. By some miracle, Bechtel only overruns cost by 10% and 10% inflation over the course of the project. $51.4 billion.
$600.4 billion. And it would STILL take 3-5 years to get the plants built. And we'd still need to build extra power plants to generate electricity for those 16 million cars. And we'd still need to build plants to build the batteries in those cars. And find someone who wanted to buy all that debt (I didn't include interest on the $600 billion).
This is not a simple problem. My math isn't that great, but I'd say $600 billion is probably more accurate than $64 billion. It's still doable, but it's not chump change. And it only considers automobiles. How many trains, trucks, barges do we need to upgrade as well? Could we do it in 5-10 years?
I'm not a doomer. We'll improvise , carpool, walk more, take the train, and drive electric cars, but if we could solve this problem easily, quickly and cheaply, we'd already be driving electric cars.