Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby jato » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 02:59:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e're going to do it this time because production is going to fall down and stay down.


I agree production will go lower. However, most people don't believe in Peak Oil. The US oil sector has known about Peak Oil since the 1970s. How much time is it going to take Tyler? In my entire life I have only seen an electric motor vehicle on the road two times.
jato
 

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby mos6507 » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 05:37:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '[')img]http://i.treehugger.com/files/chevy-volt-a01.jpg[/img]

The Chevrolet Volt.

40 mile battery range and a 150 MPG fuel economy at 60 miles/day.

Is your commute less than 40 miles both way? You'll never burn a drop of oil getting to work.

That's 80% of America, folks.

And this baby hits the streets in a year or two with a starting production capacity that is 10 times the level of the starting production capacity of the Prius.

Moreover, it can run on E85 ethanol (if you want to bother) and I'm sure that later models will include other forms of biofuel as well. That assumes that anyone actually needs to drive more than 40 miles one way on a daily basis.

Cost to build/retool the ENTIRE US auto manufacturing capacity AND all of the manufacturing capacity of the plants that we import our cars from?

$60-$80 billion. Also known as a rounding error in the broaden scheme of things. We spend about a trillion dollars per year on cars already, what's another 6%? Especially when you consider that it's a one time charge.

We haven't touched our ability to conserve oil.



80% of America? What percentage of americans are in foreclosure or are paying mortgages for rapidly depreciating homes?

This baby doesn't hit the streets in a year or two. This baby is coming out in early 2011. We've been living on borrowed time, riding a peak plataeu for over two years. Expect the full brunt of peak oil to be felt before the Volt debuts. And when it does debut, there are already hints being dropped that it will be closer to $40K than $30K and may even have a LEASED battery pack.

The sad thing about electric cars (or solar panels for that matter) is that when we need them the most, we'll be the least able to afford them.

So since everyone's finances will be hurting by the recession, most adaptation will involve the least amount of up front costs. That means NOT to buy a brand new car, but to downsize to a small used car and drive less by any means necessary. This will have the unfortunate effect of slowing down the electrification of transportation.

So I see a lot of used Honda Fits on the road.

I hope I'm wrong, but that's my prediction.
mos6507
 

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby dorlomin » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 05:58:00

High oil prices did not create the credit bubble, I dont really think it had more than a perhipheral role in the current downturn.

Demand destruction is likely to be most pronounced in the airline industry, followed by a large switch to smaller cars, although widescale economic problems may in effect "lock in" many families to there gas guzzlers.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby Heineken » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 11:22:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'W')e're going to do it this time because production is going to fall down and stay down.

The decline in global oil production is going to put a floor under oil prices and force us to get serious about alternatives.

And not a minute too soon. :)


Tyler, oil production falling down and staying down is going to fuck up the economy so badly, in so many ways we can't even imagine yet, that people aren't going to be able to afford millions of shiny new Storms. Or all those other expensive, relatively inefficient "alternatives."
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby Battle_Scarred_Galactico » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 11:55:45

The Chevrolet Volt.

40 mile battery range and a 150 MPG fuel economy at 60 miles/day.



I'd like to know how many people could afford one of those, as usual with this type of bullshit the price was strangley left out of the equasion.
---
Battle_Scarred_Galactico
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 935
Joined: Thu 07 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby LoneSnark » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 11:58:22

Well, it is three years away, I am sure they have no idea how much the thing will cost. In addition, they have no idea what they can charge for the thing (since the two are not always related).

As for mos:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '9')6% of all mortgages are being paid on time. Thirty percent of American homeowners have no mortgage. Delinquency rates were higher in the 1980s than they are today. Only 2 to 3 percent of all mortgages are in foreclosure.
User avatar
LoneSnark
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby mos6507 » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 15:04:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LoneSnark', 'W')ell, it is three years away, I am sure they have no idea how much the thing will cost. In addition, they have no idea what they can charge for the thing (since the two are not always related).


Then let's not trot it out as the last best hope for humanity. The world is still waiting for the electric equivalent of the Tata nano and it isn't here yet. For all we know the Mitsubishi iMiev might steal GMs thunder if they can make it cheap enough.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby evilgenius » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 16:48:54

If the recession doesn't work as advertised how long will it take an actor like Russia to realize that the only answer is to eliminate the United States from the peak equations?
When it comes down to it, the people will always shout, "Free Barabbas." They love Barabbas. He's one of them. He has the same dreams. He does what they wish they could do. That other guy is more removed, more inscrutable. He makes them think. "Crucify him."
User avatar
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3730
Joined: Tue 06 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Stopped at the Border.

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby Tyler_JC » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 17:28:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jato', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e're going to do it this time because production is going to fall down and stay down.


I agree production will go lower. However, most people don't believe in Peak Oil. The US oil sector has known about Peak Oil since the 1970s. How much time is it going to take Tyler? In my entire life I have only seen an electric motor vehicle on the road two times.


Could it be that oil was trading at $20/barrel or less for most of your adult life?

$100 oil changes that equation.

The cost to build an entirely new auto manufacturing sector (including the cost to build enough capacity to replace all imported autos) is less than $80 billion. That's not a lot of money when you're talking about a 14 trillion dollar economy.

Time?

A decade or two. But oil isn't going to run out tomorrow.

More importantly, people aren't suicidal. They aren't going to sit in their houses and starve to death because gasoline costs $10 a gallon. They are going to ask their neighbors if they can share a ride into town. They will take the bus. They will telecommute. Get a job closer to home. Move closer to the job.

[Before I get the "But I can't do that!" cry]

Each person is a small part of the much larger system. The attitude of "I can't replace my car therefore no one else can" doesn't reflect reality.

80% of Americans commute less than 40 miles to work. A 40 mile battery pack cuts out the single largest source of oil consumption.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby Tyler_JC » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 17:37:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Battle_Scarred_Galactico', '[')b]The Chevrolet Volt.

40 mile battery range and a 150 MPG fuel economy at 60 miles/day.


I'd like to know how many people could afford one of those, as usual with this type of bullshit the price was strangley left out of the equation.


Intended Price Tag Of Chevy Volt is Around $30,000

Average price of a new car in the United States? $29,746.

And I can assure you that you will save money on your gasoline bill, freeing up more cash to make the car payment.

This stuff isn't rocket science. It's middle school math.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby Tyler_JC » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 17:41:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'W')e're going to do it this time because production is going to fall down and stay down.

The decline in global oil production is going to put a floor under oil prices and force us to get serious about alternatives.

And not a minute too soon. :)


Tyler, oil production falling down and staying down is going to fuck up the economy so badly, in so many ways we can't even imagine yet, that people aren't going to be able to afford millions of shiny new Storms. Or all those other expensive, relatively inefficient "alternatives."


Inefficient?

Electric motors are more efficient than gasoline motors even after taking out transmission losses, battery losses, and the waste of power plants. An ICE is a terrible waste of fossil fuels.

The economy only gets fucked up if there is no alternative and I've just shown you one of the potential alternative.

The Peak Oil Doomer arguments are circular logic. We can't replace oil because the economy will be screwed if we don't replace oil and a screwed economy can't replace oil. :roll:
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby benzoil » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 17:57:48

Tyler-
Where does the $80 billion pricetag come from? That number sounds awfully low given that it's costing the U.S. $150 billion just to mail everyone an $800 tax rebate.

I don't disagree with you that efforts will be made to adapt and there will be some successes, but I don't think it's going to be all that painless economically.
TANSTAAFL
User avatar
benzoil
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Windy City No Longer

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby Heineken » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 18:35:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'W')e're going to do it this time because production is going to fall down and stay down.

The decline in global oil production is going to put a floor under oil prices and force us to get serious about alternatives.

And not a minute too soon. :)


Tyler, oil production falling down and staying down is going to fuck up the economy so badly, in so many ways we can't even imagine yet, that people aren't going to be able to afford millions of shiny new Storms. Or all those other expensive, relatively inefficient "alternatives."


Inefficient?

Electric motors are more efficient than gasoline motors even after taking out transmission losses, battery losses, and the waste of power plants. An ICE is a terrible waste of fossil fuels.

The economy only gets fucked up if there is no alternative and I've just shown you one of the potential alternative.

The Peak Oil Doomer arguments are circular logic. We can't replace oil because the economy will be screwed if we don't replace oil and a screwed economy can't replace oil. :roll:


Inefficient in a relative sense, that is, compared with the standard we've ridden like a bronco for the past century: Virtually free energy. IC engines can be mechanically inefficient and still be fantastically economically efficient when fuel is cheap.

The PO doomer argument isn't necessarily as absolutist as you imply, Tyler.

There will be a new economy of course, but it can't be based on growth anymore, and that changes everything. It will be an economy of things getting smaller and fewer. A shrinking population. Shorter and more difficult lifespans. Less travel. Localization.

Most reasonable people here agree that alternatives cannot replace the existing energy regime. In the end there will be much less net energy, and it will cost much more.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby LoneSnark » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 18:54:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here will be a new economy of course, but it can't be based on growth anymore, and that changes everything. It will be an economy of things getting smaller and fewer.

Of course not. All PO means is that the new economy will not be built upon cheap energy, it will be built upon expensive energy and both businesses and people will need to rationalize every joule of energy they use because it might be better used by someone else, and the high prices will inflict that upon all of us as necessary.
User avatar
LoneSnark
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby jato » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 21:21:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ould it be that oil was trading at $20/barrel or less for most of your adult life?


Yes and for the first half of my father’s life oil prices were consistently around $3. Looking at the last 100 years, monetary inflation will eventually bring oil prices down (or the price of everything else up).


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '$')100 oil changes that equation.


IMO it does not change anything. We went from $3 to $30 (10x increase) and still did not get your (ReserveGrowthRulz's) electric cars.
jato
 
Top

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby Tyler_JC » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 21:50:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jato', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ould it be that oil was trading at $20/barrel or less for most of your adult life?


Yes and for the first half of my father’s life oil prices were consistently around $3. Looking at the last 100 years, monetary inflation will eventually bring oil prices down (or the price of everything else up).


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '$')100 oil changes that equation.


IMO it does not change anything. We went from $3 to $30 (10x increase) and still did not get your (ReserveGrowthRulz's) electric cars.


Prices went from ~$20 to ~$50 inflation-adjusted and then spiked up to $100 a barrel but fell back below $50 after a few years. In the mean time, US oil demand crashed and it took us more than a decade to demand as much oil as we did in 1980.

We didn't have the technology for the kinds of electric cars we have today.

The prices crashed back down in the 1980s and we lost much of the momentum we had gained but didn't lose the CAFE standards. :)
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby Tyler_JC » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 21:52:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('benzoil', 'T')yler-
Where does the $80 billion pricetag come from? That number sounds awfully low given that it's costing the U.S. $150 billion just to mail everyone an $800 tax rebate.

I don't disagree with you that efforts will be made to adapt and there will be some successes, but I don't think it's going to be all that painless economically.


Source of my calculations

At a cost of $1.2 billion, Kia Motors will be able to build 300,000 cars per year.

Do the math out and you find that building a car requires $4000 worth of capital investment.

16 million cars per year, $64 billion.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby benzoil » Tue 22 Jan 2008, 23:13:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('benzoil', 'T')yler-
Where does the $80 billion pricetag come from? That number sounds awfully low given that it's costing the U.S. $150 billion just to mail everyone an $800 tax rebate.

I don't disagree with you that efforts will be made to adapt and there will be some successes, but I don't think it's going to be all that painless economically.


Source of my calculations

At a cost of $1.2 billion, Kia Motors will be able to build 300,000 cars per year.

Do the math out and you find that building a car requires $4000 worth of capital investment.

16 million cars per year, $64 billion.


While I don't disagree with you that electric cars will play an important part in the future, I think your math is flawed. The link above references your previous post which links to the article that Kia Motors is building a new plant in Georgia.

Here are some of the problems:

The article doesn't state that they plan to pay off the plant in one year. No surprise there. The Atlanta Journal says that they got $410 million in taxes, etc. over 15 years. That means the true cost of the plant would be more like $1.6 billion.

Your $4000 covers the cost to build the plant. It doesn't cover *any* of the cost to design, build, and produce the actual car. The dealer profit margin on cars is 5% to 25% - higher on luxury cars and trucks than on economy models. I'll take a stab and say that manufacturers are making 10%. Let's take a Kia Sedona minivan with a sales price of $20-26K. 75% of $25K is $18750. (That's slightly inaccurate math, but close enough for government work.) A $30,000 Chevy Volt would be even higher.

I found figures for Kia sales in the US for the first quarter of 2007. They were on a pace to sell 184,000 vehicles for the entire year. If all of those vehicles were made at the Georgia plant and they were, indeed, amortizing the cost of the plant over one year then the cost per car would be $8695 (Remember the plant is costing someone $1.6B)

$18750 + $8695 = $27445/car + 25% profit = $34306 USD/car

Multiply by 16 million cars =~ $549 billion

Now. I found the $410 million figure in an Atlanta Journal article dated May 18, 2006. The plant opens in 2009. Assume that they took 18 months to find a plant site before the announced it and that means a lead time of 4.5 - 5 years before car number one rolls off the assembly line. That's a long time to wait.

At 300,000 cars per year, it would take that one plant 53.3 years to build 16 million cars. That's even longer to wait. I'd be long dead. Maybe we could build more plants? To do that we'd have to include the $1.6 billion costs for all of those extra new plants. $85 billion or so for 53 new plants. Assuming we could convert some old plants, lets call it $42.5 billion. I'll assume that this is a government project though and that they gave a no-bid contract to Bechtel Corp to build the plants. By some miracle, Bechtel only overruns cost by 10% and 10% inflation over the course of the project. $51.4 billion.

$600.4 billion. And it would STILL take 3-5 years to get the plants built. And we'd still need to build extra power plants to generate electricity for those 16 million cars. And we'd still need to build plants to build the batteries in those cars. And find someone who wanted to buy all that debt (I didn't include interest on the $600 billion).

This is not a simple problem. My math isn't that great, but I'd say $600 billion is probably more accurate than $64 billion. It's still doable, but it's not chump change. And it only considers automobiles. How many trains, trucks, barges do we need to upgrade as well? Could we do it in 5-10 years?

I'm not a doomer. We'll improvise , carpool, walk more, take the train, and drive electric cars, but if we could solve this problem easily, quickly and cheaply, we'd already be driving electric cars.
TANSTAAFL
User avatar
benzoil
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Windy City No Longer
Top

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby Tyler_JC » Wed 23 Jan 2008, 03:07:44

1.Your inflated $600 billion figure is roughly what we already spend on cars every year.

I am perfectly content to devote $600 billion a year towards automobile consumption because...we already do it. 8)

2. I never said they have to pay it off in one year. I said that the cost to build enough plants to build 16 million cars a year is $64 billion.

I often hear from doomers that retrofitting our industry is impossible because it would cost trillions of dollars. Well I've just proven that building the plants is cheap. Even if I'm off by 100 billion dollars, it's still cheaper than Bush's economic stimulus plan.

3. I don't care what the taxes are, what the design fees are, building costs, production costs, etc. All of that stuff is already included in every single other car on the road today. I'm not saying that electric cars will be free, I'm saying that they are going to cost the same amount of money (or less money) than every other car on the road RIGHT NOW.

The only difference between an electric car and a Chevy Suburban is that we have the plants to build a Suburban, we don't have the plants to build a Volt. Fine, spend the $64 billion and build a 16 million car/year capacity to do just that.

4. The average sticker price on a new car was $30,000 in 2004. The Chevy Volt will retail for something similar. Even if the Volt was as inefficient as your average Chevy Trailblazer, the world wouldn't be significantly worse off because the money is already being spent. Instead, we can redirect it towards far more efficient cars and cut down on wasted energy expenses dramatically.

As for 5 years being a long time to wait...is oil going to run out tomorrow? Next year?

And that 5 years assumes new construction, the more likely scenario is a cheaper and faster retrofit of existing infrastructure.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Postponing Peak Oil or Perfect Storm

Postby Heineken » Wed 23 Jan 2008, 11:23:04

Those billions you throw around, Tyler! We'll be standing in bread lines, not lining up at the debt store for Volt notes to replace our Suburbans.

Perhaps there will be an electric-car fleet in the future, but its size will be a tiny fraction of today's IC fleet.

It's the infrastructure. That's the biggest flaw in your thinking. Batteries can't build and maintain roads, perpetuate the vast networks of shopping strips, or stock their shelves. Many of the roads of the future will be roads to nowhere.

You are stuck in the current model, Tyler. A model that evolved in lockstep with development of the once-in-history, fossil energy bonanza. You seem to think that the model has all interchangeable parts, that can be smoothly replaced indefinitely to keep the same basic dinosaur lumbering on forever.

Also, your thinking seems divorced from other looming resource constraints, mass environmental degradation, and global warming. These factors will have huge economic impacts that will permanently undermine the feasibility of your giant fleet of Volts.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron