by mos6507 » Fri 30 Apr 2010, 13:04:14
This makes me think of
the Faesta report covered on The Oil Drum lately had this little nugget:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')What does seem clear is that those who, through fear or averice, try and insulate themselves from the impacts by disproportionate hoarding or land grabs for example, will imperil not only their communitys security and wellbeing, but their own. This will be a time when we really will need the cooperation and support of others, and where the idea of autonomous security through wealth and the market system will be revealed as a transient illusion.
Translation:
Abandon all hope, doomsteaders. In a world of overshoot, after the phantom carrying capacity evaporates, anything over a shoebox apartment and a grinding starvation diet of gruel, cockroaches, and an occasional tomato grown on your windowsill will be seen as disproportionate hoarding and a land grab, subject to the raiding of the riteous horde.
I suggest everyone come to grips with the moral ambiguity of lifeboat ethics in the age of overshoot. If you're going to live, then it means it's at someone else's expense somewhere down the line. Whether you've got a lifeboat or an aircraft carrier, somebody's gonna be left to drown. It's only a matter of scale. Try to pick everyone up and everyone drowns. So in the end, you have to be pragmatic first, moral second.