by rangerone314 » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 15:26:44
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ALBY', 's')triking for another paid holiday or more governement largesse is hardly a brave thing.
wake up 'progressives'.
mcain feingold was BAD legislation. it violated the 1st amendment (1st for a reason) of the US constitution.
we've had 35 years of campaign finance reform and I can hardly imagine things being worse than they are now. look at the curve for campaign spending since nixon. it's gone parbolic.
we have the best government money can buy. this is more a reflection of the role of government in our lives than anything else. big governement makes it easy to control us. most of our elected representatives can be bought for 'half a can of bacon grease' (obscure deadwood reference). buying us one at a time would be more expensive and harder to accomplish.
#1) A corporation is not a person. They don't eat food, they don't poop, they don't cry, and they don't dream at night. They should have no rights, including free speech.
If Rupert Murdock, Ted Turner, Ray Tillerson or the Board of a Corporation want to express their 1st Amendment rights, then they can stand on a street corner or post on an internet blog like a normal person, but why should money be used to MAGNIFY political power?
Why can someone be prevented from wearing a T-shirt at a George Bush rally unless they are in a free speech zone, but the board of a corporation can donate whatever money they feel like?
I cannot "yell fire in a crowded movie theater" because causing a stampede is detrimental to the public, well isn't corruption detrimental to the public?
#2) Going on strike for another paid holiday is not a concept I endorse. Imagine though all that anger at bank bailouts being redirected into a strike against the politicians that brings the entire country to a standstill so they abandoned the idea instead.
#3) There should be no campaign financing except public and equal. Farting in public has more in common with free speech than donating money to serve as proxy bribes.
We are willing to limit our freedoms because of fear of terrorism that kills 0.001% of the population but allow corrupt plutocracy to exist because of NOT eliminating private financing of campaigns.
WTF!?!?Frack the Supreme Court. Their standard formula lately is give more power to the powerful, and take away power from those who have less power to begin with.
Another illustrious case for the black-robed Lords of the Sith, to put right next to Dred Scott v Sandford, Plessy v. Ferguson, Kelo v. City of New London.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right
Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take
You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown
Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy