Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 11:22:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', 'A')nyone ever consider the need for a union of taxpayers to negotiate when the gov gets out of hand, sort of like a union that negotiates with management at a company?

Just imagine a taxpayer union. The gov decides to act like crap. Then the taxpayer union orders a 5 million man march on DC.



The "union of taxpayers" is called "citizenship."
Ludi
 

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby mos6507 » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 11:44:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '
')The "union of taxpayers" is called "citizenship."


Funny how that breaks down when people get so cynical that they stop voting. God forbid they should consider (gasp) running for public office themselves or becoming a judge who could one day sit on the supreme court and make the right decisions. Just think of the criticisms they'd face being put in the public eye like that. I really don't know where all these virtuous public servants are going to come from when so few people want to do it. It means those who step forward probably have questionable motives and personality traits.
mos6507
 

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby Jotapay » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 11:47:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', 'T')hey should just have the elections on EBAY. That way we could see who the high bidder was and what they paid for each one.


Wow, great line.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby Jotapay » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 11:51:19

I think corporations and PACs should be barred from donating to politicians. Or else corporations should just be outlawed. This is a national security issue as our country is literally dying while these corporations gut the USA.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby Homesteader » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 12:19:55

Corporations should be stripped of all rights and priviledges accorded to a natural person, to think otherwise is amoral.
"The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…"
Sir Winston Churchill

Beliefs are what people fall back on when the facts make them uncomfortable.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby efarmer » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 13:34:48

I pledge allegiance to the logos,
of the Corporate States of America,
and to the products for which it stands,
One conglomerate, with high yields,
With dividends and bonuses for some.

I am going to call President Cramer and get my
questions answered when they do the lightning
round in the Oval Office.
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby Tanada » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 13:39:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'W')ell, whatever regs they had in place weren't doing much to stop a lot of the activities you guys are saying is going to happen. I don't think it will be as bad (relative to the current system) as everyone thinks. Local elections are won by standard retail politics and won't be affected and I think the state candidates will be vulnerable if it is exposed that they are getting huge support from an outside or unpopular coporate entity. The national level election is all cartoon politics anyway.

I'd prefer a system that allows any amount and source of contribution, but requires full disclosure (whatever that can be made to mean).


Which do I fear more, fools in Government or Fools in corporations?

Have to say I think this might turn out to be a very good thing, expect the Pol's who talk constantly about evil corporate greed to discover their opponents being very well funded in the next election cycle. The USA has the highest corporate taxes of any industrialized nation, it is one of the big reasons corporations have been pulling their manufacturing capability out of this country and moving it to China.

I predict the USA will soon have very low Corporate tax rates, if not this year then soon after the next election. Building up our manufacturing capability for necessities (not consumer junk) would be a very good thing in the PO world that is almost here.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 13:40:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Homesteader', 'C')orporations should be stripped of all rights and priviledges accorded to a natural person, to think otherwise is amoral.



How are we going to strip them of their rights?
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 13:43:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '
')The "union of taxpayers" is called "citizenship."


Funny how that breaks down when people get so cynical that they stop voting.



I suppose the citizens could rise up against the government and attempt to overthrow it either by force or by ignoring it. But that would mean we'd have to live differently (very differently) and that would be hard! [smilie=llorar.gif] We're kind of used to having everything taken care of for us by "them."
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby Homesteader » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 13:47:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Homesteader', 'C')orporations should be stripped of all rights and priviledges accorded to a natural person, to think otherwise is amoral.



How are we going to strip them of their rights?


Consume all their cr@p so resources they depend on are exhausted and then they go bankupt!
Yeah, that'll work! :-D

And Ludi, you really should acknowledge that I took significant steps in order to not "feed the beast".

Your method of asking "how are we. . . " is cute and all, but gee whiz. . .

give credit where credit is due.
Last edited by Homesteader on Fri 22 Jan 2010, 14:02:58, edited 1 time in total.
"The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…"
Sir Winston Churchill

Beliefs are what people fall back on when the facts make them uncomfortable.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad
Top

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby rangerone314 » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 13:53:38

Organize a citizen's union of several million people to have "blue flu" on a given day or go on strike against the politicians.

Power company employees, air traffic controllers, computer network operators, cell phone company employees, truckers who deliver gasoline, limosine and taxi drivers.

Completely shut everything down.

We need to establish a 4th branch of government that represents the people and is not answerable to the other 3 branches.

Any institution that is part of the problem and has a vested interest in not solving the problem, cannot be part of the solution.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 14:00:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', 'O')rganize a citizen's union of several million people to have "blue flu" on a given day or go on strike against the politicians.

Power company employees, air traffic controllers, computer network operators, cell phone company employees, truckers who deliver gasoline, limosine and taxi drivers.

Completely shut everything down.

We need to establish a 4th branch of government that represents the people and is not answerable to the other 3 branches.

Any institution that is part of the problem and has a vested interest in not solving the problem, cannot be part of the solution.



Good idea! Get right on it!

I'll strike when you do. :) I'm serious, I really will!

Problem is, most Americans are too chicken to have a general strike, unlike the French.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby Roy » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 14:00:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better then the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsel or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen”


Ludi, when there are enough people who love liberty more than wealth, an who prefer the animating contest of freedom instead of the tranquility of servitude, things will start happening.

The way this jobless recovery is going, more people everyday are losing their wealth and their tranquility.

I don't know what the magic number is, but we'll all know when that number is reached.

Give it time.

And, to borrow a tactic from you: :What do YOU propose we do to make some sort of meaningful change to the way our government is running?" Because you seem to be in something of an agreement that it is not representing the best interests of the American people.

Vote for Democrats? Vote for Republicans? One in the same.

Who knows, maybe guys like KPeavey are right... reference to his sig line "You want to know the future? Imagine a boot stamping on a human face" or something like that.

Call me an idealist but I think there are at least 2-5% of Americans that have similar sentiments to mine and several others on this thread -- right now.

Isn't the historical level for a successful revolution something like 3% of the populace?
A nations military should only be used in a nations self defense, not to entertain liberal cravings for shaping poor nations into images of themselves by force. -- Eastbay

Shooting the messenger is typical when you are incapable of arguing against them. -- Airline Pilot
Roy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1359
Joined: Fri 18 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Getting in touch with my Inner Redneck
Top

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby pablonite » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 14:02:56

I hate to say it but I think maritime-banking-international law has been running the world for a very long time. In fact, I would go so far as to say this built government to give the people an illusion to cling to.

We may be moving into a new reality and that would be accepting this fact.

The only real and authentic government is one that is composed of the people.

Imagine an America where people were just plucked out of the population through a lottery to fill governmnet positions for a set time, say 2 years. Everyone from banksters to people living on the street. Heh, can you imagine what the senate would look like? There would be some serious change rather quickly.

This form of government has been used before and was quite successful!

There is no such government on the planet anymore and there hasn't been for some time. I think fear of your government will be the standard for years to come, when that government becomes global in scope so will the fear :(
User avatar
pablonite
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 723
Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby rangerone314 » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 14:09:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', 'O')rganize a citizen's union of several million people to have "blue flu" on a given day or go on strike against the politicians.

Power company employees, air traffic controllers, computer network operators, cell phone company employees, truckers who deliver gasoline, limosine and taxi drivers.

Completely shut everything down.

We need to establish a 4th branch of government that represents the people and is not answerable to the other 3 branches.

Any institution that is part of the problem and has a vested interest in not solving the problem, cannot be part of the solution.



Good idea! Get right on it!

I'll strike when you do. :) I'm serious, I really will!

Problem is, most Americans are too chicken to have a general strike, unlike the French.

And we have the nerve to call the French "surrender monkeys"... whatever happened to the "home of the brave"?

I guess we devolved from being the "home of the brave" to hiding under homeland defense's skirts and needing entitlement programs.

Imagine Congress doing some knuckleheaded crap, and then a general strike means no lights in DC, no planes flying or taxis running, no trash pickup, no phones, no internet, no gasoline. There ought to be some checks and balances against the corporation pimps and their politician whores.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby Homesteader » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 14:14:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GASMON', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Homesteader', 'C')onsume all their cr@p so resources they depend on are exhausted and then they go bankupt!
Yeah, that'll work! :-D


And don't pay for it either - then they go bankupt quicker !!

Gasmon


You have something there. If enough people maxed out their credit cards and stopped paying that would really screw the pooch.

Would also get the taxpayers their money back from the banksters, maybe with a little interest.

A slogan. . . hmmm, need a slogan. . .

How 'bout "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to pay for it anymore!"

or. . . "Bring the Bailout Back To The Taxpayer!"
"The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…"
Sir Winston Churchill

Beliefs are what people fall back on when the facts make them uncomfortable.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad
Top

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby ALBY » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 15:17:14

striking for another paid holiday or more governement largesse is hardly a brave thing.

wake up 'progressives'.

mcain feingold was BAD legislation. it violated the 1st amendment (1st for a reason) of the US constitution.

we've had 35 years of campaign finance reform and I can hardly imagine things being worse than they are now. look at the curve for campaign spending since nixon. it's gone parbolic.

we have the best government money can buy. this is more a reflection of the role of government in our lives than anything else. big governement makes it easy to control us. most of our elected representatives can be bought for 'half a can of bacon grease' (obscure deadwood reference). buying us one at a time would be more expensive and harder to accomplish.
User avatar
ALBY
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Fri 30 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Baltimore County, Md

Re: Supremes remove all limits on corporate campaign donations

Unread postby rangerone314 » Fri 22 Jan 2010, 15:26:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ALBY', 's')triking for another paid holiday or more governement largesse is hardly a brave thing.

wake up 'progressives'.

mcain feingold was BAD legislation. it violated the 1st amendment (1st for a reason) of the US constitution.

we've had 35 years of campaign finance reform and I can hardly imagine things being worse than they are now. look at the curve for campaign spending since nixon. it's gone parbolic.

we have the best government money can buy. this is more a reflection of the role of government in our lives than anything else. big governement makes it easy to control us. most of our elected representatives can be bought for 'half a can of bacon grease' (obscure deadwood reference). buying us one at a time would be more expensive and harder to accomplish.


#1) A corporation is not a person. They don't eat food, they don't poop, they don't cry, and they don't dream at night. They should have no rights, including free speech.

If Rupert Murdock, Ted Turner, Ray Tillerson or the Board of a Corporation want to express their 1st Amendment rights, then they can stand on a street corner or post on an internet blog like a normal person, but why should money be used to MAGNIFY political power?

Why can someone be prevented from wearing a T-shirt at a George Bush rally unless they are in a free speech zone, but the board of a corporation can donate whatever money they feel like?

I cannot "yell fire in a crowded movie theater" because causing a stampede is detrimental to the public, well isn't corruption detrimental to the public?

#2) Going on strike for another paid holiday is not a concept I endorse. Imagine though all that anger at bank bailouts being redirected into a strike against the politicians that brings the entire country to a standstill so they abandoned the idea instead.

#3) There should be no campaign financing except public and equal. Farting in public has more in common with free speech than donating money to serve as proxy bribes.

We are willing to limit our freedoms because of fear of terrorism that kills 0.001% of the population but allow corrupt plutocracy to exist because of NOT eliminating private financing of campaigns. WTF!?!?

Frack the Supreme Court. Their standard formula lately is give more power to the powerful, and take away power from those who have less power to begin with.

Another illustrious case for the black-robed Lords of the Sith, to put right next to Dred Scott v Sandford, Plessy v. Ferguson, Kelo v. City of New London.
Last edited by rangerone314 on Fri 22 Jan 2010, 15:45:02, edited 1 time in total.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests