Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Income inequality: comparing the US states to the 3rd world

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Income inequality: comparing the US states to the 3rd world

Unread postby rangerone314 » Wed 30 Dec 2009, 10:38:46

European-style Socialism would never work in the US because the gov's are too inefficient... even IF you get your tax's worth in Europe, you'd never get your tax's worth in the US...

Also the US has a larger scum/useless class of people than Europe does, so comparisons are bound to be apples/oranges.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: Income inequality: comparing the US states to the 3rd world

Unread postby Sixstrings » Wed 30 Dec 2009, 10:51:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', 'E')uropean-style Socialism would never work in the US because the gov's are too inefficient... even IF you get your tax's worth in Europe, you'd never get your tax's worth in the US...

Also the US has a larger scum/useless class of people than Europe does, so comparisons are bound to be apples/oranges.


In an equitable first world nation, all people are guaranteed a roof over their heads, food, health care, and enough income so that they aren't in abject poverty. This comes with some strings attached, like having to report in for job training and such (not just sending out a blind check like we do here).

Also in an equitable first world nation, the benefits of working are greater than what they currently are for the US working class. In France, they're guaranteed something like 30 hour workweeks (with full time pay), they have strong unions, workers' rights, and guaranteed 4 weeks vacation (maybe it's 6 weeks, I can't remember).

Given fair treatment (which strong unions ensure), great benefits, lots of vacation time, and a real living wage, then of course people would choose work over welfare.

EDIT: To clarify, I'm not really advocating a full-on massive welfare state. We just need to give working folks a chance.. that means universal healthcare, allowing strong unions in all 50 states (card check), and aggressively protecting US jobs (time for some import taxes and completely shutting down all immigration so that the labor market can stabilize and recover).

But the globalist capitalists and corporations control the government, so alas these things will never come to pass.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Income inequality: comparing the US states to the 3rd world

Unread postby MarkJ » Wed 30 Dec 2009, 11:16:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n a closed system free market, the farmer would have to raise the offered wage until it's high enough to attract labor. Unfortunately, we're now living in an open system, global free market. This means there's no end in sight to the downward pressure on wages. Rather than raise the offered wage, the farmer just hires some illegal Mexican immigrants. If consumer demand requires more dairy than illegals can milk, then we go to the world market where it's a bottomless chasm of slave labor wages.


When our family was still actively working our farms, the wages were decent, but much of the compensation was in the form of housing, building lots,(financing) meals, meat, vegetables, dairy, transportation, vehicles, gas, vehicle repairs, shop/tool/equipment use, firewood, hunting, fishing and recreational rights.

The workers gained valuable knowledge as well. Most learned to do basic construction, carpentry, plumbing, electrical, welding, metalworking, vehicle and equipment maintenance/repairs.

Some of the workers literally didn't know how to change a flat tire when they started.
User avatar
MarkJ
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Income inequality: comparing the US states to the 3rd world

Unread postby cephalotus » Thu 31 Dec 2009, 05:36:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '[')
As a German you get hammered by taxes like there's no tomorrow. If you are a well educated unmarried professional (not banker millionaire), you fork over 70% of your income. That is not good, because it begs the question, why work if you could get almost the same standard of living by being a unemployed social disfunct idiot?


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', '.')..
If you make $100k and pay $50k in taxes and the lazy asshole next door lives on $20k wellfare. Does it bother you? Maybe not, you've got job satisfaction. What if you pay $70k in taxes and he gets $30k in wellfare? And he gets to hang out at the bar everyday while you work 10 hour days. Still don't bother you? There's a point everybody breaks.


Why are you lying?

If you are earning 69k Euro a year (= 100k US$ a year) you are paying 18.6kEuro on taxes in the highest(!) tax category.

You are also paying 11,6kEuro for insurances (not taxes) for unemployment, health care and pensions. (that's the maximum, you don't pay more for that even if you earn 1 Mio Euro a year)

If you are umemployed (and not to old) you will get "Arbeitslosengeld 1" which is roughly 60% of your previous income for 12 months.

If you are unemployed for longer times or if you are the "unemployed social disfunct idiot" in Germany you get "Arbeitslosengeld 2", which includes a paid rent + heating costs (+free health care) and 351 Euro a month = 4,212 Euro per year.

Now compare that with the income of your tax payer...

If you have a low wage job earning only 20kEuro a year you are paying exactly 1843 Euro per year on income taxes in the highest tax category, if you have a wife you are paying exactly zero income taxes with that income.
cephalotus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue 18 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Germany

Re: Income inequality: comparing the US states to the 3rd world

Unread postby VMarcHart » Thu 31 Dec 2009, 11:07:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cephalotus', 'N')ow compare that with the income of your tax payer...
Indeed, Cephalotus, there's this perception that collecting unemployment compensation is living large, you know, parties, skiing, luxury cars, beach house, big plasma TV, memory foam mattress, massages, the works. Usually that comes from somebody who's never experienced unemployment.

Here in California, unemployment compensation is $430/week (net). That's $22,360/year. Good luck lving large with that.

This thread was about comparing the US with 3rd World Countries. Sure, we're nowhere near the conditions of Ethiopia and Bangladesh --I've never been to either--, but many folks in the US live comparable lives to those in Central and South America, Northern White Africa, etc. I've been there.

Again, would somebody please tell me where I apply for my share of the wealth spreading benefit?
On 9/29/08, cube wrote: "The Dow will drop to 4,000 within 2 years". The current tally is 239 bold predictions, 9 right, 96 wrong, 134 open. If you've heard here, it's probably wrong.
User avatar
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Now overpopulating California
Top

Re: Income inequality: comparing the US states to the 3rd world

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 31 Dec 2009, 11:15:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('VMarcHart', '
')Again, would somebody please tell me where I apply for my share of the wealth spreading benefit?



You're the wrong gender. If you were a female, you could get free houses, cars, and money by cranking out extra babies. Didn't you know? :wink:
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Income inequality: comparing the US states to the 3rd world

Unread postby MarkJ » Fri 01 Jan 2010, 07:12:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('VMarcHart', 'H')ere in California, unemployment compensation is $430/week (net). That's $22,360/year. Good luck lving large with that.


Some locals live well on $430 per week in unemployment benefits due to the low cost of living, they have low debt, they own homes/mobile homes/camps and acreage outright, they own used cars, trucks, boats, motorcycles, quads, snowmobiles, campers, equipment, tools, hunting, fishing and sporting equipment outright, they own investment/income properties, they have low mortgage payments, they have low rents, they live with relatives or friends, they live in 2/3/4 income households, they perform big money side jobs for cash, they rent rooms for cash, they buy, repair and sell vehicles, toys and equipment etc.

The other night we were snowmobiling and ice fishing with over a dozen unemployed tradesmen, machinists, maintenance workers etc. Many of their 4WD trucks, enclosed trailers and sleds were newer than ours.

Many of the unemployed are self sufficient skilled tradesmen and manufacturing workers with multiple skills, trucks, vans, plow trucks, trailers, tools and equipment. These types save money since many built their own homes, renovated their own homes and don't have to pay professionals to maintain, service or repair homes, investment properties, mechanical systems, equipment, vehicles, motorized toys etc.

There's always plenty of cash side jobs for people with residential or commercial construction, plumbing, electrical, heating, cooling, refrigeration or home improvement property maintenance experience.

Many of our working customers, tenants and our unskilled/semi-skilled or part-time employees make less than $430 per week, but live well due to the low cost of living, low debt many of the things mentioned above, low/zero income taxation, low/zero property taxation $X,000 tax refunds, plus numerous government/state/local/private freebies and subsidies.

When it comes to many government, state, local and private freebies and subsidies, qualifications and the amount of the benefits are based on income, family size and need. One of the largest benefits, subsidized private/public housing is in short supply, so the units generally go to the most needy, single mothers with multiple kids, families facing eviction, homeless families and people living in shelters, emergency housing and homeless motels.

We have single apartment seekers that have been on subsidized housing waiting lists for years. Often the only available apartments are small private slumlord units in extremely poor condition in bad neighborhoods. Since many of these units are century old inefficient, uninsulated units, the cost of heating them is often substantially higher than the HEAP and Emergency HEAP grants.

Since benefits scale with household size, the single people barely squeak by, hence why many receive financial help from relatives and/or perform cash jobs and services, sublet rooms etc.
User avatar
MarkJ
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Income inequality: comparing the US states to the 3rd world

Unread postby Pretorian » Fri 01 Jan 2010, 07:22:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('VMarcHart', 'H')ere in California, unemployment compensation is $430/week (net). That's $22,360/year. Good luck lving large with that.




50-60 cents a day will supply you with everything you can possibly need. Especially in california, you wont need even a sleeping bag there.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: Income inequality: comparing the US states to the 3rd world

Unread postby Pretorian » Fri 01 Jan 2010, 07:28:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('VMarcHart', '
')Again, would somebody please tell me where I apply for my share of the wealth spreading benefit?


You get it automatically, didnt u know? You spread your wealth so poor people dont kill you for your money and/or entertainment. Didnt you know? The state exist to protect the rich from the poor.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Previous

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron