Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Resource Wars Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Resource Agression??? WTF - are these people insane???

Unread postby Eli » Thu 08 Nov 2007, 17:58:19

Yup that is it.

I read something from him on WND. which leans to the right a little.

It does not really matter what is politics are he is still full of it. I am not going to waste my time (wasting my time right now actually) on some supposed expert oil trade who says the Saudis are screwing us over.

He may have made money as commodities trader but that does not mean he is an expert on oil. He should attack all the independent oil companies too they are screwing us all by having total liquids decline by 6% year over year.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: Resource Agression??? WTF - are these people insane???

Unread postby Eli » Thu 08 Nov 2007, 18:04:12

Yup that is it.

I read something from him on WND. which leans to the right a little.

It does not really matter what is politics are he is still full of it. I am not going to waste my time (wasting my time right now actually) on some supposed expert oil trade who says the Saudis are screwing us over.

He may have made money as commodities trader but that does not mean he is an expert on oil. He should attack all the independent oil companies too they are screwing us all by having total liquids decline by 6% year over year.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: Resource Agression??? WTF - are these people insane???

Unread postby efarmer » Thu 08 Nov 2007, 20:54:00

It sort of make one wonder if the KSA knows that we are supposed to get their petroleum. Surely in the 70 years we have been active in their oil fields and partnered with them we have dropped a hint or two.

I think if they feel our money is second class or that our military umbrella is not reliable, we can kiss "our oil in their ground" goodbye.
It is after all trade and not manifest destiny if I remember it correctly.

"Whoever thought our two favorite inventions, fire and the wheel, would get together and kick our ass."
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Resource Agression??? WTF - are these people insane???

Unread postby PeakingAroundtheCorner » Thu 08 Nov 2007, 21:58:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', 'C')heck the source, Huffington Post is a loony far left post. Wouldn't worry about them much, as they lean to the far left they tend to whine much and do little. Peak oil will hit the left far worse, can't maintain all those folks under a nanny state unless plenty of money is rolling in the system, might actually have to take care of yourself and family, and OH MY GOD, be responsible for your own actions.
Or, maybe Huffington Post is correct.


Ummm...I beg your pardon?
User avatar
PeakingAroundtheCorner
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 522
Joined: Sun 08 Apr 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Resource Agression??? WTF - are these people insane???

Unread postby Zardoz » Thu 08 Nov 2007, 22:31:12

Fishman, do you realize how often you use the term "nanny state"?
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia

Coming Resource Wars/China/India/Water

Unread postby deMolay » Tue 09 Dec 2008, 11:23:40

Last edited by Ferretlover on Mon 09 Mar 2009, 12:47:56, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged with THE Resource Wars Thread.
"We Are All Travellers, From The Sweet Grass To The Packing House, From Birth To Death, We Wander Between The Two Eternities". An Old Cowboy.
User avatar
deMolay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Coming Resource Wars/China/India/Water

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Tue 09 Dec 2008, 12:08:58

I have noticed a lot of links to news stories, begun by many different people, with not even a tease to let us know what the story is about. While we do not want to quote the whole story, it might be a good idea to:
1. highlight a bit of the article,
2. right click,
3. press "copy,"
4. come to po.com,
5. right click,
6. press "paste,"
7. and then use the quote function.

It only take a few seconds once you get use to it and it accomplishes two things:

A) those who might be interested are more likely to click through and comment on the issue.
B) We will not run a foal of the Code of Conduct

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '3').1.5 Copyrighted material: All comments are the responsibility of the poster. Posters have a responsibly to obey copyright laws for their home nation and state. Please do not post entire copyrighted articles. If you wish to reference an article, provide a short, quoted excerpt with a link back to the original source.


and

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '3').1.13 Link baiting: prohibited. Posts created with the primary intent of directing traffic to a web link are prohibited. Such posts are subject to deletion. The behavior is regarded as a serious violation of the COC.


[marq=left]Thank you[/marq]
------------------------------------------------
To the subject at hand:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')ven as India and China are yet to resolve their decades-old territorial dispute, another conflict is looming. China's diversion of the waters of a river originating in Tibet to its water-scarce areas could leave India's northeast parched. This is expected to trigger new tensions in the already difficult relations between the two Asian giants.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is reported during his recent Beijing visit to have raised the issue of international rivers flowing out of Tibet. Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao has said that water scarcity threatened the very "survival of the Chinese nation".
The river in question is the Brahmaputra, which begins in southwestern Tibet where it is known as the Yalong Tsangpo
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: Coming Resource Wars/China/India/Water

Unread postby deMolay » Thu 11 Dec 2008, 14:50:10

Did you read the Headline at all?
"We Are All Travellers, From The Sweet Grass To The Packing House, From Birth To Death, We Wander Between The Two Eternities". An Old Cowboy.
User avatar
deMolay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Paying for resource wars

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 30 Nov 2009, 08:40:35

I'm admittedly extremely dim when it comes to the economy, so I hope you'll cut me some slack if this is a stupid question:

Folks here at po.com like to talk about the coming great wars over resources and collapsed economies, but my question is, if your economy has collapsed, how do you fund great wars? How will these massive resource wars be paid for? The current resource wars in the Middle East have been hugely expensive, and they are not on any kind of massive scale.

Total Cost of Wars Since 2001

$937,451,740,132

http://costofwar.com/
Ludi
 

Re: Paying for resource wars

Unread postby Kristjan » Mon 30 Nov 2009, 09:10:32

I'm not going to pretend to know the future but from having read books on economics and history I would say the most likely scenario is running huge fiscal deficits. Economies of the world haven't collapsed yet and governments around the world are able to raise funds by selling bonds to foreigners and banks. During war and economic depression, I would expect these bonds to be sold primarily to the country's own citizens (and banks). The British-Napoleonic wars were financed with bonds as were the First and Second World War (this is just a small example of wars financed by debt, I'm sure you'll be able to find more from history books or the web). The secondary aim of war bonds is to remove money from circulation to prevent inflation, which is something Banana Ben sure would enjoy.
User avatar
Kristjan
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon 10 Nov 2008, 04:00:00
Location: EU

Re: Paying for resource wars

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 30 Nov 2009, 09:14:03

But if the world economy has collapsed from Peak Oil, who will be lending money?

:?:

If you have no money, how do you buy a bond?

:?:
Ludi
 

Re: Paying for resource wars

Unread postby Gerben » Mon 30 Nov 2009, 09:42:45

Wars are not that expensive. Guns are not expensive, nor are bullets. The poorest african nations can afford to fight wars. It's the jets, tanks and artillery that make it all expensive. Just send people with guns and accept that half of them will not survive.
User avatar
Gerben
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 629
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Holland, Belgica Foederata (Republic of the Seven United Netherlands)

Re: Paying for resource wars

Unread postby Prince » Mon 30 Nov 2009, 09:43:25

It will be funded in the same way wars prior to WW1 were funded--through the sacrifice and expendability of the working poor and the proletariat. Such practice was common going back several centuries, and I believe it will return once energy costs pass the breaking point in which a gallon of oil is worth more than a life. What does this mean? In so many words, instead of spending ~ $1 trillion to fight wars where only a few thousand men die, we spend millions of dollars and let thousands or millions of people will die.

I also believe the so-called 'war on terror' is a special case, in that the cost of the war does not necessarily reflect the (a) long-term benefits and (b) intended costs when the war was initiated. By benefits, I am referring to oil. Clearly the war on terror had, at least, something to do with securing oil fields and US authority in the Middle East. However, I don't the powers that be ever expected the costs to go this high and for this long. They expected these countries to roll over and renounce their sovereignty; nine years later, this still hasn't happened.
User avatar
Prince
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon 26 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Paying for resource wars

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 30 Nov 2009, 09:50:17

I guess I'll find it more plausible when the draft is reinstated.... :cry:
Ludi
 

Re: Paying for resource wars

Unread postby Kristjan » Mon 30 Nov 2009, 09:57:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'B')ut if the world economy has collapsed from Peak Oil, who will be lending money?
If you have no money, how do you buy a bond?

Peak oil does not destroy money. It only destroys the economy. I'm sure the governments of the world will devise a plan how to get the public to participate in their oil wars with their own funds. The Second World War was also financed by the public. Great Depression hadn't properly ended when the war started. But there was still plenty of money flying around. If the government manages to dampen inflation and guarantee the return of investment and return on investment, I see no reason why the public would not participate. It's not like they would have much luck putting their money elsewhere during such a war. There will always be a handful on lucrative companies on the stock markets, but during a war resources are tight (which makes succeeding more difficult) and the money that is currently in money market funds, corporate bonds, foreign stocks etc. would all come rushing back into the US to avoid exposure to outside risk. There is no way this money would just sit and wait for a better day. Sooner or later it would find a new home and given that we are talking about trillions of dollars, the only market large enough for that would be the government bond market. Of course, this is all speculation, we're all talking probabilities here, but I view this as a very likely scenario.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t will be funded in the same way wars prior to WW1 were funded--through the sacrifice and expendability of the working poor and the proletariat.

That too, of course.
User avatar
Kristjan
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon 10 Nov 2008, 04:00:00
Location: EU
Top

Re: Paying for resource wars

Unread postby rangerone314 » Mon 30 Nov 2009, 10:09:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Prince', 'I') also believe the so-called 'war on terror' is a special case, in that the cost of the war does not necessarily reflect the (a) long-term benefits and (b) intended costs when the war was initiated. By benefits, I am referring to oil. Clearly the war on terror had, at least, something to do with securing oil fields and US authority in the Middle East. However, I don't the powers that be ever expected the costs to go this high and for this long. They expected these countries to roll over and renounce their sovereignty; nine years later, this still hasn't happened.

Isn't that the case with most wars?

TPTB always expect it will go better & more quickly than it does. (Great case in point, early American Civil War: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Battle_of_Bull_Run )

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he wealthy elite of nearby Washington, including congressmen and their families, expecting an easy Union victory, had come to picnic and watch the battle. When the Union army was driven back in a running disorder, the roads back to Washington were blocked by panicked civilians attempting to flee in their carriages
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: Paying for resource wars

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 30 Nov 2009, 10:12:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kristjan', '
')Peak oil does not destroy money. It only destroys the economy. I'm sure the governments of the world will devise a plan how to get the public to participate in their oil wars with their own funds.



What "own funds"? Do you mean the money they get from the government in the form of unemployment checks, welfare, etc?
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Paying for resource wars

Unread postby Kristjan » Mon 30 Nov 2009, 11:28:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'W')hat "own funds"? Do you mean the money they get from the government in the form of unemployment checks, welfare, etc?

Are you just being bitter because you lost some money during the credit crunch or do you just like to play stupid? There are plenty of people with enough income to put some aside. All the money that is standing idle in CDs would be funneled into war bonds. And don't forget the multitrillion pension and insurance funds. America is still one of the richest countries on Earth and even though millions live in poverty, many millions more don't. In fact, most Americans have a pretty decent income and enjoy all the benefits of that. Don't come telling me that America doesn't have money to invest.
User avatar
Kristjan
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon 10 Nov 2008, 04:00:00
Location: EU
Top

Re: Paying for resource wars

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Mon 30 Nov 2009, 11:36:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kristjan', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'W')hat "own funds"? Do you mean the money they get from the government in the form of unemployment checks, welfare, etc?

Are you just being bitter because you lost some money during the credit crunch or do you just like to play stupid? There are plenty of people with enough income to put some aside. All the money that is standing idle in CDs would be funneled into war bonds. And don't forget the multitrillion pension and insurance funds. America is still one of the richest countries on Earth and even though millions live in poverty, many millions more don't. In fact, most Americans have a pretty decent income and enjoy all the benefits of that. Don't come telling me that America doesn't have money to invest.


Amazingly, Bob Chapman says the first thing to go on 1/1/10
will be CRE loans from any bank receiving TARP.

Second thing will be the FDIC being collapsed and all
CD's/multitrillion pension and insurance funds forced
into US Bonds.

America doesn't have any money to invest:

Black Friday weekend spending down 8 pct per person -NRF
20,000 people added to Food Stamp Roles every day.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Within the next 12 months, the U.S. Treasury will have to refinance $2 trillion in short-term debt. And that's not counting any additional deficit spending, which is estimated to be around $1.5 trillion. Put the two numbers together. Then ask yourself, how in the world can the Treasury borrow $3.5 trillion in only one year? That's an amount equal to nearly 30% of our entire GDP. And we're the world's biggest economy. Where will the money come from?


8O :roll: :evil:
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Paying for resource wars

Unread postby mcgowanjm » Mon 30 Nov 2009, 11:40:31

Speaking of Resource Wars, whose gonna pay for this?

http://images.vesseltracker.com/images/ ... urus-39403

which is full of oil and now headed for Somalia.

VLCC Tankers ( Names A - K )
Auke Visser's International Super Tankers. VLCC Tankers ( Names A - K ) ... Astro Castor · Astro Centaurus · Astro Challenge · Astro Chorus · Astro Corona ...
www.aukevisser.nl/supertankers/part-1/id17.htm - Cached -
mcgowanjm
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Fri 23 May 2008, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron