Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Energy & Meat Thread (merged)

How to save energy through both societal and individual actions.

Do you think meat consumption reduction could save oil and delay peak oil problems?

Poll ended at Sat 11 Mar 2006, 01:27:27

Yes, I'm a vegan and if everyone was, the world would be a more peaceful place.
14
No votes
Yes, but I eat meat. It doesn't matter what I do. It's what everyone does that matters.
6
No votes
No, Jevon's Paradox still applies.
9
No votes
No, there are other ways to reduce oil consumption than to deny people an essential food group.
14
No votes
No, I deny the facts presented in this post.
5
No votes
Yes, but the MEAT lobby will never let that happen.
7
No votes
No, it's too late to implement anything to stave off any peak oil effects.
6
No votes
No, it is a cultural possibility for people to stop eating something that has been the centerpiece of their meals.
2
No votes
No, meat will get more expensive as oil gets more expensive and the market will handle it.
18
No votes
 
Total votes : 81

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby rangerone314 » Tue 27 Oct 2009, 12:17:59

If global warming is considered either moot or not a problem, then how about the 5,000 gallons water it takes to produce one pound of meat?

Or about 10 lbs of feed, like corn, to make a pound of meat?

Farting cows is one thing, but fresh water is an issue, and so is that fact that we are using so much land to feed animals.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby hardtootell-2 » Tue 27 Oct 2009, 12:55:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', 'I')f global warming is considered either moot or not a problem, then how about the 5,000 gallons water it takes to produce one pound of meat?

Or about 10 lbs of feed, like corn, to make a pound of meat?

Farting cows is one thing, but fresh water is an issue, and so is that fact that we are using so much land to feed animals.


While I agree that humans must either change their diet or reduce their numbers, there is something I must point out. I was having a resource depletion discussion recently with an arts graduate. She was under the impression that water was a single use substance. I know that most people on here are better informed but I wanted to point out that water is recycled and actually cleansed by the earth (within reason)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_cycle

As far as industrial meat production is concerned, I think antibiotic resistance could take us out sooner even than global warming. We have been dancin with the devil on this one for a while now. :(

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antibiotic ... sk_factors

"Other factors contributing towards resistance include incorrect diagnosis, unnecessary prescriptions, improper use of antibiotics by patients, the impregnation of household items and children's toys with low levels of antibiotics, and the administration of antibiotics by mouth in livestock for growth promotion."

"Its like a doom buffet"<- Me
User avatar
hardtootell-2
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat 23 May 2009, 18:38:02
Location: 12th dimension

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby mos6507 » Tue 27 Oct 2009, 12:57:16

If the cows were not eating soybeans how much less land would they require to be fed grass? I know the information is out there, but I haven't seen these sorts of comparisons. It seems to me that industrialized agriculture is driven in large part due to the need to minimize human labor, and having cows spread out in a pasture doesn't lend itself to that, such that cost would skyrocket for grass-fed dairy and beef. But I'd like to be pointed to some data if there is some. I know all about Salatin and his operation. I'm talking about the feasibility of scaling this out.
mos6507
 

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby hardtootell-2 » Tue 27 Oct 2009, 13:37:09

Mos

I don't think it matters that much what they are fed. Cattle, at least, are ruminants and they produce large quantities of methane (100l/day/cow) as a product of breaking down cellulose in their rumen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumen

Oh Oh- I may be getting off topic a little- "Dont taze me bro" :)
Last edited by hardtootell-2 on Tue 27 Oct 2009, 14:51:12, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
hardtootell-2
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat 23 May 2009, 18:38:02
Location: 12th dimension

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby dohboi » Tue 27 Oct 2009, 14:22:10

There are, of course, other benefits to reducing your meat consumption:

The China Study

"The authors state that “as blood cholesterol levels in rural China rose in certain counties the incidence of “Western” diseases also increased. What made this so surprising was that Chinese levels were far lower than we had expected. The average level of blood cholesterol was only 127 mg/dl, which is almost 100 points less than the American average (215 mg/dl). ...Some counties had average levels as low as 94 mg/dl. …For two groups of about twenty-five women in the inner part of China, average blood cholesterol was at the amazingly low level of 80 mg/dl.”

The authors state that “several studies have now shown, in both experimental animals and in humans, that consuming animal-based protein increases blood cholesterol levels."
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby Pretorian » Tue 27 Oct 2009, 15:02:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'P')eople will need to consider turning vegetarian if the world is to conquer climate change, according to a leading authority on global warming.



here we go again...
less people eat meat==more crappy food;
more crappy food== more people;
more people == more peope eat meat
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby davep » Tue 27 Oct 2009, 15:12:18

The chap actually just said that people should eat less meat. He was on the radio after the Times article, saying the article was incorrect.
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby jedrider » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 02:40:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('davep', 'T')he chap actually just said that people should eat less meat. He was on the radio after the Times article, saying the article was incorrect.


Well, sometimes people retract what they really meant to say. The article seemed to make a coherent point about our diet being a significant factor in global warming and what will have to be done about it.

I posted about the RAVE diet and finally finished the 110 minute video. Started out just trying to shed a few pounds and got hooked into curing heart disease and cancer and saving the world from 'meat'.

http://peakoil.com/psychology/the-r-a-v ... 55076.html

The last hour is about industrial farming that supports the industrial livestock industry and promotes deforestation the world over. So the message is save yourself, save the world, too. Eighty percent of grain goes to feeding our livestock.

Obviously, when resource depletion hits, our diets will revert to vegetarian. The ironic thing is that we'll probably be much better off, health wise.

Power down and de facto vegetarianism will go hand in hand. Not much chance people will embrace this overnight.

Electric cars and celery anyone? (I'm joking about the electric cars, though.)
Last edited by jedrider on Wed 28 Oct 2009, 21:54:23, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jedrider
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3107
Joined: Thu 28 May 2009, 10:10:44

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby frankthetank » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 15:03:34

Screw the planet :), give up meat to save your life! Anyone seen Food Inc?
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby jedrider » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 15:38:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'S')crew the planet :), give up meat to save your life! Anyone seen Food Inc?


YouTube Trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqQVll-MP3I
Last edited by jedrider on Wed 28 Oct 2009, 21:40:50, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jedrider
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3107
Joined: Thu 28 May 2009, 10:10:44

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby dohboi » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 16:38:12

And of course, there is always...

The Meatrix!
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby jedrider » Wed 28 Oct 2009, 21:53:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', 'A')nd of course, there is always...

The Meatrix


That's adorable and I like the name.

The times when I go to Guatemala, sometimes we drive a great distance in order to eat, especially breakfast, at a family farm/restaurant. Everything is so incredibly delicious -- the milk, the butter, the oaks, the whole-wheat bread, the eggs, the honey -- I skipped the bacon, but I'm sure that was good too. Before or after breakfast we just roam the farm admiring all the animals.
User avatar
jedrider
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3107
Joined: Thu 28 May 2009, 10:10:44
Top

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby hardtootell-2 » Thu 29 Oct 2009, 11:04:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dohboi', 'A')nd of course, there is always...

The Meatrix!


Yep, eating factory farmed meat is just another in the long line of cognitive dissonances that we and our society embraces. No wonder we are all half crazy!
User avatar
hardtootell-2
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat 23 May 2009, 18:38:02
Location: 12th dimension
Top

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby Pops » Thu 29 Oct 2009, 13:54:37

Unfortunately, methane comes from gut flora digesting cellulose - the main carb in grass. The more starch (grain) fed as carb ration, the less methane is produced because cows can digest starch directly. Grain finishing also gives higher daily gain.

Aside from all the other problems with CAFOs it's probably safe to say they produce less warming than grass finishing mainly because methane is such a potent GHG. I've read of some research into developing more easily digested grass but not seen anything in a year or so...
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby nocar » Thu 29 Oct 2009, 22:48:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'J')onathan Scurlock, of the National Farmers Union, said: “Going vegetarian is not a worldwide solution. It’s not a view shared by the NFU. Farmers in this country are interested in evidence-based policymaking. We don’t have a methane-free cow or pig available to us.”


This defense of the meat industry is strange in many ways, but I want to focus on the last sentence. Ruminants like cows, sheep and deer depend on a digestive system that produces methane. Pigs and chickens are not ruminants and do not necessarily emit methane, although perhaps the handling of their shit and urine in factory farms does.

How things change: a decade ago the dominant ecological view was that eating pork and chicken was worse than eating beef because this animals eat about the same kind of food as humans, while ruminants in contrast to people can digest grass. Should we turn to geese? They eat grass but are not ruminants. Fish are better protein converters than birds or mammals because they are cold-blooded and do not waste a lot of food energy in just keeping warm.
nocar
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 810
Joined: Fri 05 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby dohboi » Fri 30 Oct 2009, 12:34:16

"Fish are better protein converters than birds or mammals because they are cold-blooded and do not waste a lot of food energy in just keeping warm."

Perhaps, but if you have to chug out into the middle of the ocean to catch the fish, then haul them back in to shore and put them on an airplane for fresh fish meals in the midwest, you're still going to end up with a mighty high carbon footprint.

According to this excellent video (about half way through, as I recall) fish are very high impact indeed:

post peak
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby Pops » Fri 30 Oct 2009, 12:40:35

Really, there isn't any food that is going to feed 9 billion people with no impact on the environment.

Ausies are trying to figure out how to reduce the amount of methane producing bacteria in cattle. The problem is the methane bacteria reduce hydrogen in the gut which is important for some reason beyond my understanding.

http://www.csiro.au/files/mediaRelease/ ... estion.htm
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby dohboi » Fri 30 Oct 2009, 12:50:09

I wasn't aware that the Aussies were doing research into this, too. A few years ago, I heard that folks in New Zealand were trying to crack this nut, since sheep...off-gassing represents a significant portion of their contribution to GHG's (most of their electricity comes from hydro, I believe.)

No one is pretending that there are zero-impact ways of doing anything, but I do think it is important to have some idea of whether some activities (gastronomic or otherwise) have impacts multiple times greater than others that give comparable values (in nutrition, if not in pleasure or other hard-to-quantify areas).
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby Pops » Fri 30 Oct 2009, 16:45:28

Here in Missouri there is a large contingent of New Zealand Dairymen building grass based dairy farms - BIG farms, so I'm not surprised they are interested too.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: UK climate chief: give up meat to save the planet

Unread postby frankthetank » Mon 02 Nov 2009, 15:01:12

Grass fed=omega3s (GOOD)
Grain fed =omega6s (too many BAD)

Big reason right there to make the switch. Our lack of omega3s in our diets right now can be linked to all kinds of ailments. Its the reason cold water fish our so healthy, along with flax and hemp.
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

PreviousNext

Return to Conservation & Efficiency

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron