Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby shortonsense » Thu 03 Sep 2009, 01:47:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'w')hatever


run Pstarr, run!
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Fri 04 Sep 2009, 00:52:00

Lets try just a little harder to refrain from calling each other names. It does not further discussion, nor does it do anything for your argument to offer credibility or support.

We'd like a bit more maturity here folks, please act accordingly.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby shortonsense » Fri 04 Sep 2009, 09:24:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', 'L')ets try just a little harder to refrain from calling each other names. It does not further discussion, nor does it do anything for your argument to offer credibility or support.


Well, this thread is about Simmons, and he has no support or credibility for his argument, so, perhaps its on topic in this particular case?
:-D
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Mon 07 Sep 2009, 12:33:37

Nice article by Matt:

Oil spin: Peak Oil is real
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby shortonsense » Tue 08 Sep 2009, 12:32:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I')s it possible you actually read his book "Twilight in the Desert" like many participants to the forum, and actually understand his analysis regarding Saudi oil reservoir issues?

Or are you just repeating soundbites and unsubstantiated internet gossip?


Read it? I agree with the guys conclusions, even if CERI has problems with his technical expertise in the field.

Simmons, M., Twilight in the Desert (New Jersey, John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2005 ), p.354:
"The twilight of Saudi Arabia's oil miracle, if properly understood and managed, could become the dawn of a more enlightened and sustainable global society....it could unleash the dawning of a genuine scientific investigation as the world's brightest minds tackle the challenges of inventing a series of new energy forms that create even greater security and prosperity for the evoling societies of our new century than we enjoyed through the bounty of affordable and dependable oil."

Emphasis mine.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Tue 08 Sep 2009, 12:57:17

SOS,

As long as there are fountains of cornucopia around like you Simmons point gets waved away and pushed down the road even farther and farther until it just doesn't matter anymore. Your attitude is part of the problem we wont see any transparency, or real effort into alternatives. Why? Who needs it if all is well and technology and reserve growth is going to save us! If that is the case as you so doggedly believe, than which one gets more play? The ugly reality of PO, or the one where everything is gonna be ok and transition will be some sort of techno alternative cornucopia? I fail to see why you even bother to hold up those words as some sort of agreement or hope. Your obvious denial of PO and how the ramifications of it plays out marks you as a sort of hypocrite really when you make a post like that.

I see those words of his as hollow. He is frustrated because as Hirsch sees there is no real momentum being applied to the transparency issue. There is no political or corporate will to move towards any of those alternatives because it means by definition we pull PO into the ugly light of day. Nobody wants that to happen on their watch. As Hirsch has said it's all just bad news and we cant have all bad news.

As long as that is the case those words are just fancy fluff for the masses, garbage in a book, I wouldn't hang my hat on them.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby hardtootell-2 » Tue 08 Sep 2009, 12:59:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonsense', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I')s it possible you actually read his book "Twilight in the Desert" like many participants to the forum, and actually understand his analysis regarding Saudi oil reservoir issues?

Or are you just repeating soundbites and unsubstantiated internet gossip?


Read it? I agree with the guys conclusions, even if CERI has problems with his technical expertise in the field.

Simmons, M., Twilight in the Desert (New Jersey, John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2005 ), p.354:
"The twilight of Saudi Arabia's oil miracle, if properly understood and managed[/b], could become the dawn of a more enlightened and sustainable global society....."

Emphasis mine.


Wow! You have hit the nail directly on the head!

"if properly understood and managed"

[b]I do not believe TPTB are competent to manage decline. All they have known is growth. As examples- look at the UK and Mexico- they are scrambling. Caught off guard by what was warned of repeatedly. Look at how governments handle crises like Katrina and the Credit Crunch!
The decline of oil will come as other crises converge. Governments will flail and ultimately fail.

Oil is 1000X more political. Movies like Syriana have such an air of authenticity. When push comes to shove TPTB will look after their own interests and the tax payer will pay the bill
Just my $0.02
User avatar
hardtootell-2
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat 23 May 2009, 18:38:02
Location: 12th dimension
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby TheAntiDoomer » Tue 08 Sep 2009, 13:44:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', '
')As long as that is the case those words are just fancy fluff for the masses, garbage in a book, I wouldn't hang my hat on them.


Or the rest of the book turned out to be garbage and that one conclusion was the only true statement. 8)
"The human ability to innovate out of a jam is profound.That’s why Darwin will always be right, and Malthus will always be wrong.” -K.R. Sridhar


Do I make you Corny? :)

"expect 8$ gas on 08/08/08" - Prognosticator
User avatar
TheAntiDoomer
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Wed 18 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby shortonsense » Sun 13 Sep 2009, 21:30:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', 'S')OS,

As long as there are fountains of cornucopia around like you Simmons point gets waved away and pushed down the road even farther and farther until it just doesn't matter anymore.


After we figure out which point Simmons is trying to make ( he seems to vacillate between post peak utopia and declaring shortages and disasters...back in 2005. ) maybe we can decide which one is worth waving away? The poor guy seems to want to have it all ways at once.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', '
')Your attitude is part of the problem we wont see any transparency, or real effort into alternatives. Why? Who needs it if all is well and technology and reserve growth is going to save us!


Actually, I haven't argued for technology to save us, but just run of the mill human ingenuity and the usual economic consequences of substitution upon certain price points being reached.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AirlinePilot', '
') I see those words of his as hollow. He is frustrated because as Hirsch sees there is no real momentum being applied to the transparency issue. There is no political or corporate will to move towards any of those alternatives because it means by definition we pull PO into the ugly light of day. Nobody wants that to happen on their watch. As Hirsch has said it's all just bad news and we cant have all bad news.


Hirsch also said we were running out of natural gas in America, and look how well THAT went. Turns out, Hirsch should perhaps stick to nuclear fusion if he isn't even capable of reading some of the reports on shale gas which were widely available pre-2005 DOE report.

This thread however is about Simmons, and his "two minds" when it comes to peak oil apparently.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby shortonsense » Mon 14 Sep 2009, 08:38:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')So you don't believe in peak oil? That's good short. You are a bright guy!


Peak oil apparently already happened, in either 2005 or 2008 depending on how you want to count the beans. Haven't you noticed? The world ended so definitively that we're all still posting on the web powered by electricity which was supposed to end with the Olduvai Cliff permanent blackouts last year. Get with the program, this thread isn't about peak oil happening a year or 4 ago, but Matt DA MAN Simmons. He apparently thinks that we'll all be fine post peak in an orgy of bright minds solving all the problems which peak oil was supposed to cause. Some think he's a peaker of some sort....he appears confused on the topic.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pstarr', '
')Why don't you start a web site called "Idon'tbelieveinpeakoil.dumb"? Then you can repeat you false attributions, red herrings, distractions, isolated or out-of-context quotes, etc.


I attribute accurately, but I don't expect a true believer under any circumstances to pay attention. Thanks for proving the point....again....
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby mos6507 » Fri 18 Sep 2009, 13:58:19

Thought I'd bump this thread. Has Matt gotten much airtime on cable news lately? I'm wondering whether maybe he made one too many bad calls. Do you think he's done himself in as an a-lister?
mos6507
 

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby Maddog78 » Fri 18 Sep 2009, 14:06:23

I haven't seen him in the media lately.
He'll get back on the a-list when crude goes over $100 again.
User avatar
Maddog78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby shortonsense » Fri 18 Sep 2009, 14:31:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'T')hought I'd bump this thread. Has Matt gotten much airtime on cable news lately? I'm wondering whether maybe he made one too many bad calls. Do you think he's done himself in as an a-lister?


He'll be in Denver next month at the ASPO meeting pimping the circuit, just like normal.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby rangerone314 » Fri 18 Sep 2009, 14:49:01

Peak oil is misinterpreted as a tipping point.

It is not peak oil which should have been considered a tipping point, but a point beyond that, which causes the collapse.

Peak oil is just a mile marker. It marks the MOST oil being produced. Its the decline that will be the killer, but never underestimate inertia.

The common pattern mathematically that occurs right before many tipping points is serious instability. I'm not sure if the $147/bbl was a true indicator of instability. I think it will take 3-4 years to see if we are at a point of instability that is the precursor to the tipping point that collapses the world economy permanently. I caveat that 3-4 years as being 3-4 years AFTER the first year the economy picks up again and oil demand goes up.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby mos6507 » Fri 18 Sep 2009, 15:32:13

I don't think volatility by itself makes the case for peak oil. We've had non-peak-oil induced volatility in the past and it's too easy to find aboveground factors (speculation, geopolitics, lack of investment). What will make the case will be the sustained failure of supply to meet demand, resulting in sustained >$150 prices, with the resulting economic problems (damage to the airline industry, etc...) Anything less than that can be explained away with as a temporary anomaly.

So there is the point beyond which the converted are convinced we've peaked, which for many of us is already in the past, and there is the point where everyone else concedes we've peaked. I'm much more concerned with the latter because until that happens, we're not going to accomplish much in the way of mitigation.
mos6507
 

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby shortonsense » Fri 18 Sep 2009, 16:42:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rangerone314', 'P')eak oil is misinterpreted as a tipping point.


MISinterpreted? Man, you just dissed more peak oil experts than I ever have in a single sentence. Nearly ALL of them interpret peak oil as a tipping point...triggering their favorite end of the world fantasy is usually the entire POINT.
User avatar
shortonsense
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3124
Joined: Sat 30 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Matthew Simmons Thread pt 3 (merged)

Unread postby yesplease » Fri 18 Sep 2009, 23:12:37

I wonder if we'll ever see $150/bbl sustained... There seems to be plenty of evidence that we may and that we may not.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests