by TheAntiDoomer » Fri 01 May 2009, 15:26:50
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'N')ot all of these oil shale extraction technologies will need to use large amounts of water. For instance there is the
microwaving option:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')lobal Resource Corporation, through lab experimentation, has identified that there is great potential in utilizing microwave technology to extract hydrocarbons from oil shale.
GRC's technology does not require water as part of the process. Our studies indicate that we have the ability to retrieve 90 gallons of oil per ton of shale.
There are other technologies out there which also would not need water - or at least not much water.
Do you have a microwave in your kitchen? Sure you do? You could put your brain inside the device and it would turn into guacamole.

Now just for fun, lick the door on the outside. Tongue hot????? No.
How will the microwaves penetrate rock and tar?
PStarr, here's an idea, do us a favor and find your local weather radar or high powered radar. Climb up and place a steak in the middle of that badboy, the only question next will be well done or really well done?
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/01 ... er-ac.html$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he technology, developed by Raytheon and partner CF Technologies for oil shale processing, combines radio frequency (RF) technology from Raytheon with critical fluid (CF) technology from CF Technologies. (Earlier post.) Raytheon has projected that the same process could also be used to retrieve oil from Canadian oil sands and to reprocess spent wells.
Field experience indicates that the Raytheon RF heating technique obtains recovery rates of 75% of the oil shale’s Fisher Assay value. (A method used to approximate the energy potential of an oil-shale deposit.) Coupling RF heating with the CF technology has resulted in recovery rates as high as 90 to 95%.