Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby copious.abundance » Thu 30 Apr 2009, 21:21:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I')s that the best you can do?

Go ahead, start the campaign. Start a religion for all I care - call it the Never-Shalists. Scream it aloud as hard as you can. Make my day. :twisted:
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby rangerone314 » Fri 01 May 2009, 09:04:13

I read OF2's first article. Here is an extract:

Water is another worry. ICP uses a lot of water, mainly to refine the oil and purify the natural gas. (Shell plans on building a refinery onsite, which is news in itself: It would be the first new refinery built in the U.S. in 30 years.) Shell appears to be on solid legal footing with its water plans, as it owns senior rights for local river water.

And some of the water it intends to utilize will be salinated water pumped from deep aquifers that are not part of the conventional water supply. Nevertheless, the potential for political backlash remains high, given that this is a part of the country where water is scarce and fights over water rights get nasty. "It will certainly be an issue," says former Rifle mayor David Ling. "There's an old expression around here: We talk over whiskey and fight over water."



90% of water usage in Estonia is dedicated to shale.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby rangerone314 » Fri 01 May 2009, 09:06:55

Water is going to end up being a resource as valuable as oil. Using vast quantities of water to get kerogen from shale is a bit like using vast amounts of energy to turn lead into gold.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby copious.abundance » Fri 01 May 2009, 14:49:09

Not all of these oil shale extraction technologies will need to use large amounts of water. For instance there is the microwaving option:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')lobal Resource Corporation, through lab experimentation, has identified that there is great potential in utilizing microwave technology to extract hydrocarbons from oil shale. GRC's technology does not require water as part of the process. Our studies indicate that we have the ability to retrieve 90 gallons of oil per ton of shale.


There are other technologies out there which also would not need water - or at least not much water.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby TheAntiDoomer » Fri 01 May 2009, 15:26:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'N')ot all of these oil shale extraction technologies will need to use large amounts of water. For instance there is the microwaving option:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')lobal Resource Corporation, through lab experimentation, has identified that there is great potential in utilizing microwave technology to extract hydrocarbons from oil shale. GRC's technology does not require water as part of the process. Our studies indicate that we have the ability to retrieve 90 gallons of oil per ton of shale.


There are other technologies out there which also would not need water - or at least not much water.
Do you have a microwave in your kitchen? Sure you do? You could put your brain inside the device and it would turn into guacamole. :twisted: Now just for fun, lick the door on the outside. Tongue hot????? No.

How will the microwaves penetrate rock and tar?


PStarr, here's an idea, do us a favor and find your local weather radar or high powered radar. Climb up and place a steak in the middle of that badboy, the only question next will be well done or really well done?

http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/01 ... er-ac.html

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he technology, developed by Raytheon and partner CF Technologies for oil shale processing, combines radio frequency (RF) technology from Raytheon with critical fluid (CF) technology from CF Technologies. (Earlier post.) Raytheon has projected that the same process could also be used to retrieve oil from Canadian oil sands and to reprocess spent wells.

Field experience indicates that the Raytheon RF heating technique obtains recovery rates of 75% of the oil shale’s Fisher Assay value. (A method used to approximate the energy potential of an oil-shale deposit.) Coupling RF heating with the CF technology has resulted in recovery rates as high as 90 to 95%.
"The human ability to innovate out of a jam is profound.That’s why Darwin will always be right, and Malthus will always be wrong.” -K.R. Sridhar


Do I make you Corny? :)

"expect 8$ gas on 08/08/08" - Prognosticator
User avatar
TheAntiDoomer
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Wed 18 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby copious.abundance » Fri 01 May 2009, 17:52:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'D')o you have a microwave in your kitchen? Sure you do? You could put your brain inside the device and it would turn into guacamole. :twisted: Now just for fun, lick the door on the outside. Tongue hot????? No.

How will the microwaves penetrate rock and tar?

God you are an idiot.

The microwaves aren't needed to "penetrate" anything, they "heat" things.

Go home, put a rock in your microwave oven for a half-hour or so, and tell me it wasn't hot as hell when you took it out.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby copious.abundance » Fri 01 May 2009, 18:05:27

Here's a couple other people who are microwaving rocks:
http://www.newscientist.com/blog/invent ... drill.html
http://www.economist.com/science/displa ... E1_TGPNDRQ

But if you go home and put a rock in your microwave, make sure it's the right kind, otherwise you might ruin your microwave oven! :lol:
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby copious.abundance » Fri 01 May 2009, 19:18:10

Another utterly idiotic response. :roll:

Dimwit, when you put a microwave-safe dish in your microwave oven, nothing happens to it. Do you think they would put something down the hole that would melt?

By your lame-brained logic, the interior of a microwave oven would always melt when you turned it on.

:lol:

I guess you've never used a microwave oven! :lol:
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby bencole » Fri 01 May 2009, 19:46:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'N')ot all of these oil shale extraction technologies will need to use large amounts of water. For instance there is the microwaving option:




All this means is yet another energy input is required for this process. This does nothing for the problem of low EROEI is just merely substitutes one energy intensive extraction process for another.
bencole
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Thu 26 Feb 2009, 03:29:52
Top

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby copious.abundance » Fri 01 May 2009, 21:21:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bencole', 'A')ll this means is yet another energy input is required for this process. This does nothing for the problem of low EROEI is just merely substitutes one energy intensive extraction process for another.

But if, as seems likely, this microwaving process is more energy efficient than the other ones being bandied about, its EROEI will be better than the others.

Since Shell's process has an EROEI of about 6:1, maybe this is, like, 10:1. :twisted:
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby copious.abundance » Fri 01 May 2009, 21:26:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'D')o you actually expect to become a rangy oil-hunter [smilie=5bullwhip.gif] writing this kind of shite?

And yet another lame, cop-out response.

Don't you ever get tired of these? Do you ever have any actual content to offer, other than ridiculous garbage like, "The microwave system will fry itself!" mixed in with snarky, smartass, content-less quips?

No, it appears you don't.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests