Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby TonyPrep » Mon 06 Apr 2009, 18:31:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'O')ilfinder created several diversion and distractions when I pointed out that Green River kerogen has not, and can not, be produced.
False statements here include:

1) Oil shale has, in fact, been produced. This link here, for example, tells us Petrobras has been producing it in Brazil since 1953. There have been other instances elsewhere, including the well-known Shell Mahogany pilot project. It is true these have not been done on a large scale, but they have, in fact, been done.
What about Green River kerogen, which is what pstarr mentioned, not Brazilian oil shale?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'A')HA! We've now been reduced to "can still be" uneconomical. How convenient. Before we were talking about certainty:
That is pathetic. pstarr referred to "an energy project", not all energy projects. The fact that you label this realisation as an "AHA" moment for you is also pathetic.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '-')-He intentially confused Green River Kerogen with other shale fossil fuels that may be produced profitably

This is so blatantly a lie it isn't funny.
Yet you did the same thing right in the post I'm replying to.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'A')h yes, and after decades of trying people still hadn't figured out how to build a flying machine. So I guess that means it'll never happen.
The difference is that you assume it will happen. Your posts are often littered with "if"s, "might"s and "possibly"s. Your whole oil belief system is based on wishful thinking.

How's that 2009 catalog coming along, OF2?
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby Maddog78 » Mon 06 Apr 2009, 20:45:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')t this point I don't even really care all that much about this particular oil shale deposit. Why? Because there are a lot of other shales - like the Bakken, the Woodford, and the Tuscaloosa - which have tons of high-quality, thermally-mature oil which doesn't need all the processing this thermally-immature kerogen does. If you're gonna drill holes into a shale, might as well go after the good stuff.


I work in the Woodford and we produce oil at the same time and from the same shale as the gas producing zone.

Admittedly it is not a large amount but it is there.
User avatar
Maddog78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby Serial_Worrier » Mon 06 Apr 2009, 20:59:53

Wow - good work OF2! I have faith in American technology to increase the world's oil supply. Remember whatever increased domestic production goes on the world market, it's not about decreasing foreign oil dependence!
User avatar
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby ian807 » Mon 06 Apr 2009, 21:10:53

At the end of the day, we'll leave a lot of oil in the ground because:

1) It costs too much to get it out.

2) It takes more energy to get it out than you get from the oil.

We have some flexibility here, but not much. At a certain point, it doesn't make economic sense and without some *really* revolutionary technology, we can't increase flow rates of US oil fields (e.g Colorado shale or Bakkan) enough to make a well energy positive.

Wish it were otherwise. Not betting on it.

Remember, this will be an economic crisis long before we literally run out of gas. In the near term, I'd worry about the never ending recession, not freezing in the dark.
User avatar
ian807
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 03 Nov 2008, 04:00:00

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby TheAntiDoomer » Mon 06 Apr 2009, 21:17:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheAntiDoomer', 'T')he fact is that sooner or later the technology will be there to produce the oil from this formation at some rate. Even without this tech this oil shale could be mined and burned directly for power to run electric vehicles :o Estonia has been doing it for years:

http://www.kirj.ee/public/oilshale/Est-OS.htm
Sooner or later Pigs with Grow Wings and Fly. But right now, potatoes contain more embodied energy than Estonia shale. So yes, you could burn the stuff in your old pot-bellied stove and take the chill off your vodka, but that does not imply that a modern technological civilization is going to run on the stuff. Learn about embodied energy, net-energy analysis, the Law of Receding Horizons. Learn something or stfu.


Wrong again YOU lying sack of pitulie waste:

http://www.pohivork.ee/index.php?id=311&L=1

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')roduction of electricity in Estonia is predominantly based on a domestic fuel – oil shale. Electricity produced from this mineral approached 95% of the total electrical energy supplied to our electrical network last year. The largest oil shale mining company in Estonia is AS Eesti Põlevkivi.


That's right baby, the gloves are off, bring it on, and leave the hippy stink at home! [smilie=5badair.gif]
"The human ability to innovate out of a jam is profound.That’s why Darwin will always be right, and Malthus will always be wrong.” -K.R. Sridhar


Do I make you Corny? :)

"expect 8$ gas on 08/08/08" - Prognosticator
User avatar
TheAntiDoomer
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Wed 18 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby copious.abundance » Mon 06 Apr 2009, 21:41:22

Don't forget this:

>>> Bloomberg <<<
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')etrobras, which has been producing oil from shale commercially for 30 years in Brazil's Parana state, is seeking to expand oil output in the U.S. and other markets and to use its patented Petrosix processing technology to diversify the sources of oil, according to the statement.

The company only produces about 3,800 barrels of oil a day using its process in Brazil. If it's proven viable, the Utah project, which will receive $12 million for studies over the next 12 months, can produce much more, Epifanio said.

It's not much, but they've been doing it for 30 years.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby copious.abundance » Mon 06 Apr 2009, 21:57:29

Here's the Wiki page on that Petrosix process:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrosix

Maybe they'll scale this up big-time in Utah, and we can have Petrobras give us mass quantities of oil from their deepwater Brazil fields and mass quantities of oil from their Utah oil shale joint venture. :razz:
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby TheDude » Tue 07 Apr 2009, 01:13:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheAntiDoomer', '
')Wrong again YOU lying sack of pitulie waste:

http://www.pohivork.ee/index.php?id=311&L=1

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')roduction of electricity in Estonia is predominantly based on a domestic fuel – oil shale. Electricity produced from this mineral approached 95% of the total electrical energy supplied to our electrical network last year. The largest oil shale mining company in Estonia is AS Eesti Põlevkivi.


And what a lovely source of energy, too: Effects of pollution from oil shale mining in Estonia

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')bstract
The largest commercially exploited oil shale deposit in the world is in northeast Estonia. the accumulation of solid residues by oil shale mines and processing plants has resulted in numerous dumps and ash hills, which are polluting the environment. the groundwater and streams are highly polluted by sulphates, phenols and oil products. a dump hill of radioactive wastes poses a serious threat to the Baltic Sea. Local people suffer from diseases more often than in other regions of Estonia.


Oil Shale: Contents and Abstracts

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ur detailed studies of the landscapes in northeastern Estonia demonstrate vividly the results of human consumption: the increase in the content of some heavy metals in the upper part of peat layers is as much as 20 times higher than their background values, and the lacustrine sediments formed during the last 50 years contain much higher concentrations of almost all chemical elements. We can trace disturbances in the ecosystems to the sharply increased atmospheric fluxes – alkalinization, disturbances of the plant cover on the peatbogs, essential changes in the fauna in the lakes, and degradation of the forest.
Burning of oil shale in the power plants also results in the emission of huge amounts of CO2. CO2 is one of the greenhouse gases that may cause the warming of the Earth's surface.
And that is not all. Chemical industry based on oil shale is a very active source of pollution. Though the purification systems nowadays have decreased the direct discharge of pollutants into the environment, a huge amount of wastes on terricones are the sources of harmful products. Since Estonia is situated in the Baltic Sea catchment basin, the pollutants will sooner or later reach the sea. Even the closing of mines and openpits leads to problems. These are real chemical time bombs, left in Estonia by the intensive oil-shale-based power and chemical industry.


To get the feel of this, try burning a tire in your living room.

Image
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby AirlinePilot » Tue 07 Apr 2009, 01:20:29

Have to hand this round to pstarr Oilly.

I will also add that as a moderator lets keep the insult and attack off the thread. You guys/gals are big enough and smart enough to debate this without getting pissy. ;)

There is one constant here for the new readers to grasp. OF2 has been unable to separate wishing and hoping from reality. Its typically the first stages we all go through when confronted with the idea that we are very near or past the peak of world oil production. What matters most is actual production. Extraction rates and proven reserves are what matter to the bottom line.

If your not sure about Oil Shale and Tar Sands you really need to do your homework. OF2 is misrepresenting reality here and most of us who have been around this topic long enough know that as time marches on these particular sources do little to affect the overall outcome. I'd even suggest that with the present investing environment due to crude prices they may have a very tough time growing at all. There is plenty of material here and over at The Oil Drum to do your own research with. I'd suggest finding out ON YOUR OWN what is what with regard to this portion of the debate.

pstarr,

Good job mate, lets just keep it civil. I'd like to see this thread not get split of into the HOF, it's valuable to folks here if you can stay on track with the rebuttals without sinking into the crap heap.
User avatar
AirlinePilot
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4378
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of Atlanta

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby TonyPrep » Tue 07 Apr 2009, 03:34:00

I think it's also worth repeating, from time to time, that OF2 does not want any mitigation actions to occur, even if he does realise that peak is close. He doesn't think human societies should ever prepare for scenarios that they may deduce, from time to time. He thinks adaptation at the time the problem arises, is the best course. OF2 wants us to treat natural limits in the same way we would some unanticipated natural disasters (like asteroid strikes, supervolcanoes, etc). This almost certainly goes for climate change mitigation also.

So readers of his posts should understand that his goal is that we should never mitigate against future problems.
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby TheAntiDoomer » Tue 07 Apr 2009, 08:43:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheAntiDoomer', '
')Wrong again YOU lying sack of pitulie waste:

http://www.pohivork.ee/index.php?id=311&L=1

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')roduction of electricity in Estonia is predominantly based on a domestic fuel – oil shale. Electricity produced from this mineral approached 95% of the total electrical energy supplied to our electrical network last year. The largest oil shale mining company in Estonia is AS Eesti Põlevkivi.


And what a lovely source of energy, too: Effects of pollution from oil shale mining in Estonia

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')bstract
The largest commercially exploited oil shale deposit in the world is in northeast Estonia. the accumulation of solid residues by oil shale mines and processing plants has resulted in numerous dumps and ash hills, which are polluting the environment. the groundwater and streams are highly polluted by sulphates, phenols and oil products. a dump hill of radioactive wastes poses a serious threat to the Baltic Sea. Local people suffer from diseases more often than in other regions of Estonia.


Oil Shale: Contents and Abstracts

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ur detailed studies of the landscapes in northeastern Estonia demonstrate vividly the results of human consumption: the increase in the content of some heavy metals in the upper part of peat layers is as much as 20 times higher than their background values, and the lacustrine sediments formed during the last 50 years contain much higher concentrations of almost all chemical elements. We can trace disturbances in the ecosystems to the sharply increased atmospheric fluxes – alkalinization, disturbances of the plant cover on the peatbogs, essential changes in the fauna in the lakes, and degradation of the forest.
Burning of oil shale in the power plants also results in the emission of huge amounts of CO2. CO2 is one of the greenhouse gases that may cause the warming of the Earth's surface.
And that is not all. Chemical industry based on oil shale is a very active source of pollution. Though the purification systems nowadays have decreased the direct discharge of pollutants into the environment, a huge amount of wastes on terricones are the sources of harmful products. Since Estonia is situated in the Baltic Sea catchment basin, the pollutants will sooner or later reach the sea. Even the closing of mines and openpits leads to problems. These are real chemical time bombs, left in Estonia by the intensive oil-shale-based power and chemical industry.


To get the feel of this, try burning a tire in your living room.

Image

Huh? Dude, respond to the info I posted please. Does or does not Estonia generate a vast majority of its electricity from Oil Shale? We can have a healthy debate on whether or not Oil Shale will be a viable fuel (I say it will at some point with a techno breakthrough) but what is perfectly clear is Oil Shale IS a viable energy source.

You dissapoint me dude, you use to be a nearly reasonable poster, but lately you seemed to have gone off to the Lunatic Fringe. :cry: [smilie=dontknow.gif] [smilie=eusa_doh.gif] [smilie=eusa_pray.gif] [smilie=new_silly.gif] [smilie=new_rainfro.gif]
"The human ability to innovate out of a jam is profound.That’s why Darwin will always be right, and Malthus will always be wrong.” -K.R. Sridhar


Do I make you Corny? :)

"expect 8$ gas on 08/08/08" - Prognosticator
User avatar
TheAntiDoomer
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Wed 18 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby Vogelzang » Tue 07 Apr 2009, 10:12:23

Its one tool in the fight against the neo-Stalinists.

http://www.geocities.com/sciliterature/ ... eLinks.htm
User avatar
Vogelzang
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby timmatoil » Tue 07 Apr 2009, 10:52:28

Oilwatch Monthly reports that despite significant cuts “supply is still significantly higher than demand.” On March 15, “OPEC agreed that no further oil cuts in oil production will be made and that it will focus in the coming months on complying with previously announced cuts of 4.2 million bpd – 80% of which has been achieved to date in circumstances where OPEC’s price target of US$70 has not been achieved, and where OPEC now thinks it ‘has to live with’ a US$42 price.”

Via Stock Research Portal (http://www.stockresearchportal.com)

It seems like OPEC is having less and less influence over oil. Any thoughts?
User avatar
timmatoil
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu 29 Jan 2009, 04:00:00

Re: 1.53 Trillion Barrels of Oil

Unread postby copious.abundance » Tue 07 Apr 2009, 12:11:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'T')hanks AP. I was civil (though admittedly sarcastic) until he called me a liar.

There was a damn good reason why I called you a liar. Among other reasons, after I had spent multiple times trying to tell bencole there's a big difference between the oil in shales like the Bakken, and the kerogen in the Green River shale, you had the audacity to come along and tell me I was trying to say they were the same:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '-')He intentially confused Green River Kerogen with other shale fossil fuels that may be produced profitably.

^ That, my friend, is a lie. Not only was I not trying to confuse the two, I spent considerable effort trying to explain the difference between the two. You made the same accusation again here:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'O')nce again Oily you are a lying sack of sh*t. You started this thread to pump Green River Asphalt and you know it has nothing to do with Bakken shale.

In spite of the fact that at least three times I had explained to bencole the difference:
#1: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', '[')b]The Bakken is not "oil shale," it is regular oil (as opposed to kerogen) from a shale formation. There is a big difference between the two, and the fact that you treated both as the same tells me you really have no idea what you're talking about.

#2: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'I') said "this thing" was the kerogen from the Green River Shale. The stuff from the Bakken is not kerogen, and my statement about the half-million bpd referred only to the kerogen from the Green River Shale. The Bakken and similar oil-from-shale plays are an entirely different animal. Please do not lump them together any longer. Thank you.
#3: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'I')ncidentally, for the record . . .

At this point I don't even really care all that much about this particular oil shale deposit. Why? Because there are a lot of other shales - like the Bakken, the Woodford, and the Tuscaloosa - which have tons of high-quality, thermally-mature oil which doesn't need all the processing this thermally-immature kerogen does. If you're gonna drill holes into a shale, might as well go after the good stuff.
Stuff for doomers to contemplate:
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1190117.html#p1190117
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1193930.html#p1193930
http://peakoil.com/forums/post1206767.html#p1206767
User avatar
copious.abundance
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9589
Joined: Wed 26 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Cornucopia
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests