by TonyPrep » Mon 06 Apr 2009, 18:31:26
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'O')ilfinder created several diversion and distractions when I pointed out that Green River kerogen has not, and can not, be produced.
False statements here include:
1) Oil shale has, in fact, been produced. This link
here, for example, tells us Petrobras has been producing it in Brazil since 1953. There have been other instances elsewhere, including the well-known Shell Mahogany pilot project. It is true these have not been done on a large scale, but they have, in fact, been done.
What about Green River kerogen, which is what pstarr mentioned, not Brazilian oil shale?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OilFinder2', 'A')HA! We've now been reduced to "can still be" uneconomical. How convenient. Before we were talking about certainty: