by SeaGypsy » Fri 20 Mar 2009, 03:11:31
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bencole', 'N')o doubt this will place more strain on the US relationship with the UN. I don't quite understand what the UN seeks to gain by angering the US, all it seems to achieve is to make the US government more likely to ignore it, and hence reduce its relevance.
If you look at senior appointments by the UN over the years since S11 they have pretty consistently been antagonistic to US interests.
I would guess they are hedging their bets that the USA will go down 1st leaving Islamised Europe in it's position as natural successor.
That's how it looks from here anyhow.