Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE House Resolution (HR) Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby Dawn » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 04:11:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', '&')quot;Young Men and Women of the Armed Forces are under orders to starve the citizens of their own country; Forthwith!" Will that work?

Those are your words. Not reality. Not yet anyway. And being christian or not has nothing to do with it. I believe the OP was about legislation that's being introduced. We can fight that with letters, phone calls, and emails. The problem, IMO, is that the people in power don't listen anymore.
User avatar
Dawn
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed 06 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Michigan

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 04:16:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hose are your words. Not reality. Not yet anyway. And being christian or not has nothing to do with it. I believe the OP was about legislation that's being introduced. We can fight that with letters, phone calls, and emails. The problem, IMO, is that the people in power don't listen anymore

There are other methods, common where I live; but to suggest them would break the CoC.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby alokin » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 04:27:37

I really can't believe it. This is too dark and seems to be tinfoil. Can anyone proof this story?
On the other hand: centralize food is centralize power over the people and means making heaps of money especially in a situation of scarcity. And the food industry could mix every BS in your food if there are no other sources.
But still, it could be that they want to have every tiny bit of produce recorded and you must then give it away,like it was during WWII (as far as I remember).
User avatar
alokin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri 24 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby AgentR » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 09:17:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('alokin', 'I') really can't believe it. This is too dark and seems to be tinfoil. Can anyone proof this story?


It isn't a PRESS story; its a bill currently under consideration and printed in the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD.

It is not law yet.

Hopefully, before it becomes law it will have protections to prevent its malicious use against small growers and family gardens.

Considering that it has 100% Democrat sponsorship, and they hate anything that makes people independent.. I wouldn't put money on it though.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 10:05:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('alokin', 'I') really can't believe it. This is too dark and seems to be tinfoil. Can anyone proof this story?.



http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-875

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:H.R.875:

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h875/show
Ludi
 

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 10:29:19

I just had a poke around in there; 'someone' answers the question 'How will this affect home gardeners?' saying that the legislation only affects commercial production. Does this mean Ludi& Pops can plant a few string beans? (Might just be a boon for the black market?)
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby Jotapay » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 10:34:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'I') just had a poke around in there; 'someone' answers the question 'How will this affect home gardeners?' saying that the legislation only affects commercial production. Does this mean Ludi& Pops can plant a few string beans? (Might just be a boon for the black market?)


I hope this is true, but I don't see any evidence to support this assertion in the bill's language. Where does it say that? If it doesn't explicitly say it, it obviously doesn't exist. Just trying to be logical here.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby topcat » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 10:44:52

I breifly scanned through parts of the bill, here is what I came away with.

If you grow (manufacture according to the bill) food AND sell it, you will be regulated.

Same for animals, fish, eggs, etc.

Who knows what will be added/deleted from the bill, much less if/when it is passed.

As far as the regulating aspect, your guess is as good as mine (more govt jobs).
"No workey, no beef jerkey." TC

"Home is where the hot dogs are." TC
User avatar
topcat
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed 01 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Northern US

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 11:02:31

Jacket image of the Compact Oxford English Dictionary

sell
• verb (past and past part. sold) 1 hand over in exchange for money. 2 deal in (goods or property). 3 (of goods) attain sales. 4 (sell out) sell all of one’s stock of something. 5 (sell up) sell all of one’s property or assets. 6 persuade someone of the merits of. 7 (sell out) betray (someone) for one’s own financial or material benefit. 8 (sell out) abandon one’s principles for reasons of expedience.
— PHRASES sell short fail to recognize or state the true value of. sell one’s soul (to the devil) be willing to do anything, no matter how wrong it is, in order to achieve one’s objective.
— DERIVATIVES sellable adjective.
— ORIGIN Old English.

swap (also swop)
• verb (swapped, swapping) exchange or substitute.
• noun an act of exchanging one thing for another.
— ORIGIN originally in the sense "throw forcibly", later "strike hands as a token of agreement": probably imitative.

While we are into the four letter words. :badgrin:
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby Jotapay » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 11:26:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('topcat', 'I') breifly scanned through parts of the bill, here is what I came away with. If you grow (manufacture according to the bill) food AND sell it, you will be regulated.

Respectfully, you need to go read the bill again. You didn't cite any passages either. The definition in the bill of a "Food Establishment" and "Category 4 Food Establishment" is one that produces or stores food. It does not say that it must be sold.

Also, here is what is excluded from regulation. I don't see personal-use gardens and personal canning/preserving mentioned here.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '(')B) EXCLUSIONS- For the purposes of registration, the term ‘food establishment’ does not include a food production facility as defined in paragraph (14), restaurant, other retail food establishment, nonprofit food establishment in which food is prepared for or served directly to the consumer, or fishing vessel (other than a fishing vessel engaged in processing, as that term is defined in section 123.3 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations).

And even if your backyard garden is interpreted to be a farm, you still fall under regulation under the definitions in item 14:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '(')14) FOOD PRODUCTION FACILITY- The term ‘food production facility’ means any farm, ranch, orchard, vineyard, aquaculture facility, or confined animal-feeding operation.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 11:51:32

I think the point is very well taken that this is a bill that has been introduced in the house only. All sorts of crazy legislation is introduced all the time. It then gets referred to committee where it dies a peaceful death. If the Agriculture Committee reports the bill out, that would be the time to get excited. In all likelihood this bill will die quietly in the Agriculture Committee.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby Jotapay » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 11:53:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'I') think the point is very well taken that this is a bill that has been introduced in the house only. All sorts of crazy legislation is introduced all the time. It then gets referred to committee where it dies a peaceful death. If the Agriculture Committee reports the bill out, that would be the time to get excited. In all likelihood this bill will die quietly in the Agriculture Committee.


I sure as f**k hope so. Seeing as 2/3 of Americans cannot name the three branches of government (article in today's news), there is a slim minority of us who are holding the line against these tyrannical monsters.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby HeckuvaJob » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 12:03:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', 'w')hat did yall expect Democrats to go after once they got real power. Every last one of the listed sponsors of the indicated legislation are members of the Democratic party.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', 'I') wouldn't want to be one of them; this legislation is essentially carte blanch to terminate the existence of any such "trouble maker" who might ever dare voice an opinion contrary to that of The Great Leader.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', 'W')e all know how much Democrats just LOVE hearing passionate voices of opposition. Simply put, its the Democrats way of saying, "Sit down, shut up, or we'll have to come hurt you and everyone you ever cared for."

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', 'C')onsidering that it has 100% Democrat sponsorship, and they hate anything that makes people independent..

Amen brother! This is weird b/c Rush was saying the exact same thing on his show last week! Oh, how I long for the time when America was a shining beacon of freedom and civil liberties:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')n Tuesday, March 3, 2009 the Justice Department released a batch of memos drafted in 2001 and 2002 by lawyers in the Bush administration's Office of Legal Counsel. Written mainly by John Yoo, then a deputy director in the office, they laid out the purported legal justifications for a theory of presidential power amounting to virtual dictatorship.

Collectively, they declare that if the U.S. military were deployed against suspected terrorists inside the United States, even U.S. citizens wouldn't be protected by the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure. They also conclude that citizens and noncitizens could be designated "unlawful enemy combatants" by the president on the basis of secret evidence. And once that happens, they could be locked up indefinitely and tortured, without charge, access to counsel or any procedure through which to challenge the detention or treatment.

http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/documents/memo ... 152009.pdf

Keep fighting the good fight, AgentR.
User avatar
HeckuvaJob
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat 09 Aug 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Pittsburgh
Top

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby Jotapay » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 12:20:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('HeckuvaJob', 'h')ttp://www.usdoj.gov/opa/documents/memostatusolcopinions01152009.pdf

Keep fighting the good fight, AgentR.


When are you going to learn that the corporations and bankers control both sides? Partisanship is for people who don't understand that both sides are funded and controlled by the same people. It's hard to accept the fact that the way you think things work is all a lie.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby papalegba » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 12:25:09

IF this ever went through, it will probably work about as well as their efforts to regulate that other common garden herb, the kind that you smoke.

Ha!
papalegba
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed 22 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby gnm » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 12:31:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jotapay', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('HeckuvaJob', 'h')ttp://www.usdoj.gov/opa/documents/memostatusolcopinions01152009.pdf

Keep fighting the good fight, AgentR.


When are you going to learn that the corporations and bankers control both sides? Partisanship is for people who don't understand that both sides are funded and controlled by the same people. It's hard to accept the fact that the way you think things work is all a lie.


Jotapay, I think your sarcasm detector must be broken.... 8)

As far as both sides being controlled I am in complete agreement.

-G
gnm
 
Top

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby rangerone314 » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 12:45:28

Probably a good that my screening border that I'm engineering around my property will block it from gov view as well as from wandering zombies. It is best to be out of sight and out of mind.

The outer edge is thorny rose hedge; the middle layer is cypress tree or bamboo depending where on property. The inner layer will be a wooden fence.

Since I will be growing things as inter-cropped/companion-planted, there won't be neat orderly rows (like rows of corn) viewable from satellite or plane.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby rangerone314 » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 12:54:00

I hope it dies in committee.

It is too bad there is not some Constitutional restriction on the # of bills that Congress can pass in a year.

It seems they are just a bunch of greedy, cowardly, corporation-beholden fatcat lawyers who sit around all day coming up with more bad ideas on how to f**k over the American people.

I do find people with the revolutionary mindset to be amusing though. Most revolutions just end up replacing one corrupt system with another.

My revolutionary idea is to lie as low as possible, mind my own business, and dig in like Switzerland. Have little worth taking, and have massive defensive capabilities to defend what I DO have.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby topcat » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 13:05:18

Jotapay ( and others);

The bill first defines the different "Food Establishments." You then come to the definition of the term "Food Establishment." (Since I have not had or made the time to learn quotes in the new format, I have to wing it.)

Next, the bill mentions the "Exceptions" and directly mentions "Food Production Facility ... paragraph 14" as an exemption (as you quoted). The definition of a "Food Production Facility" is where ranches, farms, etc. are mentioned.

The link is not functioning right now (so from memory), the term "Selling" was mentioned just above the Exclusion (B).

My impression (expanded version) is still that if you raise/grow/process/transport/hold just about anything edible that is to be sold, that action will be regulated and inspected via this bill.

Anyway, this is how I read it.
"No workey, no beef jerkey." TC

"Home is where the hot dogs are." TC
User avatar
topcat
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed 01 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Northern US

Re: HR 875: Fed to massively regulate gardens, farms

Unread postby Jotapay » Mon 09 Mar 2009, 13:14:22

Topcat, a Food Establishment is anything not already defined as a Food Production Facility. So they get you either way, as a Food Establishment produces or stores food.
Jotapay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Sat 21 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests