by MrBill » Wed 01 Oct 2008, 03:30:44
Hey Rockman, I would agree, sexually exploiting a mentally retarded person is not ethical, and it is not that person's fault with diminished intellectual intelligence. Fair enough. But (and there is always a but), where does the buck stop?
The People fought for No Taxation Without Representation. You live in a representative democracy. Ultimately the voters in a democracy get what they deserve. We are not talking about one bad President. We are talking about several generations living beyond their means, while empowering their politicians to do so as well on their behalf. It is a real cop-out to say after the fact that, gee, I benefited - directly or indirectly - from faster economic growth and free government services and handouts - directly or indirectly - but I didn't vote for them. That is a democracy. Fifty percent plus one. Whether it becomes a tyranny by the majority or the majority ruled by an elite is up to the electorate to collectively decide.
Social democracies in other parts of the world have in general some problems of their own, but can you really say that Skandinavia, in general, is grossly misgoverned by a small elite for their own benefit just because like the USA they also have party politics or elected officials that might also have their own human foibles or conflicts of interest? They may have their own social and economic problems, but in general they address them and fix them before they reach the size and scale of those faced currently by the USA. Granted the USA is much larger. But then I would say it had and has the resources to live within its means, but living on borrowed time and borrowed money was simply easier.
That may well have been beyond the comprehension of the electorate, but ignorance of the law is not a defence. I would ask how it is that America manages to send so many students to primary school and then on to state colleges and universities, but cannot manage to impart on those students any sort of civic responsibility that would help them choose a democratically elected government in an informed manner? Another sad cop-out by the apologists. They were certainly smart enough to take out home equity loans and how to deduct interest expenses from their income taxes.
If they are not intelligent enough then by default, of course, the country is going to be run by some sort of intellectual elite. How could it be otherwise? If I join a club I might someday be president of that club. If I join an organization I might someday be the head of that organization. Mr. Gorbachev one day became the First Secretary of the Communist Party and head of the USSR because as a youth he joined the communist party. He changed the direction of the USSR as an insider not as an outsider.
Joiners become leaders. It always makes me laugh when, for example, journalists or others link individuals to their schools, their families, their employers, and then if they happen to work in the government, or for a government organization, they imply an automatic conflict of interest that outweighs any public good. So if I have the experience to some day become Governor of the Bank of Canada (after I brush up on my French naturally) then the journalists can imply that I have no judgment because I used to work for an investment bank? Brilliant. So someone either has no private sector experience because they have never worked in the private sector. Career politicians come to mind. Or they are automatically tainted by their private sector experience when they either run for public office or are appointed to a government position based on their experience. Then the public has a right to know everything about them or their families that they have ever done under our right to know. Great. No wonder most businessmen have zero interest to get involved in politics.
So here's the deal. If the US electorate are really, really upset about this crisis and how it was handled then the first step is to vote against every incumbant running for office at a local, municipal, state and federal level. Throw them all out regardless of their political affiliation. Then start from scratch. Every four years vote the incumbants out until you finally get the elected government that you think serves you the best. Either that or disinfranschise the majority of the voters that are not intellectually capable of choosing a government. Good luck with that. Everything else is a cop-out.
For my part I blame poor supervision by an overlapping patchwork of regulators that left gaps in coverage of financial institutions - as elsewhere in the world naturally as this is a global problem - as well as the bureaucracy, incompetence and corruption of all governments. Only a zero tolerance policy for corruption, an informed electorate and a vigilent, unbiased media can root out that corruption and bring public attention to bureaucracy and incompetence. Its a tall order, but my standards are high.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.